GOT paid . I'm thinking of buying some shares and increase them ....
Last time I checked there were no more shares in the shop. They are visible, but you can't order them since they're out of stock! |
|
|
|
Add fotos with Miners.
And while we're at it, maybe put a set on an eligius address and post the link here. I have had the gridseeds "back in the days" and those were jumping up and down like crazy and had no real baseline. |
|
|
|
Wow, this just gets crazier and crazier. I have not checked the threads for a few months and now there is a 17BTC maintenance fee on my account. I have less than 3k shares left on this account and 460 2nd gen shares. Is the maintenance fee on 2nd gen shares as well? Are 2nd gen shares even online?
I got a 55BTC fee applied on my 3200 qAsic shares so yea looks like you got the fee applied to your 2nd Gen's too making this a definite scam. Most of my qAsics werent purchased until late last year and Ive probably only recouped $5k of my $10k investment and now he wants 55BTC in fees which is a joke, as the fee is supposed to be for 12 months (with the next fee becoming due this December) & I havent even been paid me for the last 7 months of the current 12 mth period. Course, I wont be giving him another cent of my money. Are you required to pay 55 BTC for 3200? or do you have 32.00 0 shares? Besides the fee being ridiculous high anyway, this looks way out of line with others  Ah yea, sorry, I meant 32,000 shares. that looks pretty normal... due to the high number of gen2 it could be interesting to do the math how many week's you need to ROI. If the Gen2 still pay 1,5 LTC a week I don't think there is a chance you'll ROI on that within the year you're paying for  |
|
|
|
Wow, this just gets crazier and crazier. I have not checked the threads for a few months and now there is a 17BTC maintenance fee on my account. I have less than 3k shares left on this account and 460 2nd gen shares. Is the maintenance fee on 2nd gen shares as well? Are 2nd gen shares even online?
I got a 55BTC fee applied on my 3200 qAsic shares so yea looks like you got the fee applied to your 2nd Gen's too making this a definite scam. Most of my qAsics werent purchased until late last year and Ive probably only recouped $5k of my $10k investment and now he wants 55BTC in fees which is a joke, as the fee is supposed to be for 12 months (with the next fee becoming due this December) & I havent even been paid me for the last 7 months of the current 12 mth period. Course, I wont be giving him another cent of my money. Are you required to pay 55 BTC for 3200? or do you have 32.00 0 shares? Besides the fee being ridiculous high anyway, this looks way out of line with others |
|
|
|
Sometimes its possible to draw up to 1.8Mh.
1.65Mh current is up to 1.3A@12V (usually little lower).
And Wattwise? Electricity is quite expensive in Europe so that's the biggest part of making a decision  |
|
|
|
weekly payments are credited to accounts who payed the fee, payments are on the low edge of the weekly BTC/LTC rate.
Hi ! Pl. can u confirm if those who paid the fees did get payments frm begining of jan 2015 which were due to them? Can everybody confirm if this is true please? Thanx I think you've got some wrong info here... The people who have been ridiculous enough to pay the fees, started getting weekly payouts (lagged most of the time, but still weekly) from that point on, nothing from the past has been paid, nor will it... IMO. That is what I gathered as well. So technically your shares were "offline" for January-June (or more accurately January ==> until you pay for them) and if/when you pay then you will start getting payouts from that point onwards. The first half of the year is lost. (So you are pretty much buying them again, instead of paying a maintenance fee, since this latter would mean that you'd get the payouts that were missing during the first half of the year.)
Waiting for the ultimatum on Friday....Today we'll know something from either side. Problem is that the amount "fee" hasn't changed over the weeks. If it's only regarding "from now on" instead of from start of the year you should at least have a lowering amount every week since you've "lost" out on one more weekly payment. The most honest way would be to pay me in full for the period for which I had my miners. That is, everything missing, because I have not asked him to shut down my miners.The fee was supposedly for last year, so OK Id be happy to pay it and then receive the payments I am owed ever since this fun started. I would be well in profit. Now the fee is sort of a "reactivation" fee, which doesn't make much sense as it should relate to last year, not this year. The fee won't go lower as (again supposedly) this will be your yearly fee which will restart whenever you paid (?). Unless he plans to do it at the end of the year regardless when you pay, at which point it doesn't make any sense to pay now as technically you'd be paying for only 6 months. That's the main reason I assume he's going to "add" the missed months to the accounts because the logic would make no sense at all otherwise. Only problem is that it would be the logical thing to "not pay us the owed for the first six months" and keeping the fee already. But that's what's the puzzling part. |
|
|
|
if you buy more than 10.000 pcs our price 10$/mh.
That's probably based on the "overclock" speed? Because I can't imagine doing that for 0,5 mh/s per stick 15 roughly per Mh/s at the moment. Would you consider sending a set of samples out to certain known forum testers? 1.65Mh its a regular speed using powered hub. 0.5 its a downclock speed to meet usb 3.0 standard 1A@5V current. It can be overclocked even higher than 1.65 but it depends on asic and require good cooling. What's the max you've gotten a stick to? And what does that do to the powerusage? |
|
|
|
weekly payments are credited to accounts who payed the fee, payments are on the low edge of the weekly BTC/LTC rate.
Hi ! Pl. can u confirm if those who paid the fees did get payments frm begining of jan 2015 which were due to them? Can everybody confirm if this is true please? Thanx I think you've got some wrong info here... The people who have been ridiculous enough to pay the fees, started getting weekly payouts (lagged most of the time, but still weekly) from that point on, nothing from the past has been paid, nor will it... IMO. That is what I gathered as well. So technically your shares were "offline" for January-June (or more accurately January ==> until you pay for them) and if/when you pay then you will start getting payouts from that point onwards. The first half of the year is lost. (So you are pretty much buying them again, instead of paying a maintenance fee, since this latter would mean that you'd get the payouts that were missing during the first half of the year.)
Waiting for the ultimatum on Friday....Today we'll know something from either side. Problem is that the amount "fee" hasn't changed over the weeks. If it's only regarding "from now on" instead of from start of the year you should at least have a lowering amount every week since you've "lost" out on one more weekly payment. |
|
|
|
I don't think it's a bad thing to have it updated at least weekly latest. I usually make well over 50 posts but I do not know whether all of them will count until it's updated. I do not see a problem in any of the posts but one is stricter than the other |
|
|
|
if you buy more than 10.000 pcs our price 10$/mh.
That's probably based on the "overclock" speed? Because I can't imagine doing that for 0,5 mh/s per stick 15 roughly per Mh/s at the moment. Would you consider sending a set of samples out to certain known forum testers? |
|
|
|
I assume this 60% deal is now gone? Since it says "end 13th of July" Yes, it s gone. Lots of people took that advantage. Well, at least my wallet is staking now for a day every other week, let's see if theres new campaigns coming up |
|
|
|
Nothing really to gain yet either from converting. Waiting for some specs was the way to go even if it's taking longer than you would like. He did at least extend the deadline most likely for that very reason.
Also, he emailed TheMage back, and will not do a live Q&A. He has the questions though so providing answers should still be no issue.
Four days after the deadline and there's not a sign of the Q&A yet. Plus some chatter on LCT on locked accounts after double payments and accounts that are forced to do hardware conversion. |
|
|
|
UPDATE: Deadline is extended to July 21.
Hopefully Q&A this time before
TheMage sent him the questions, answering them should not be such a big task. Then again, it's chris |
|
|
|
Conversation ending ! ASIC shipping date little bit unfortunate for me as i´m out of country  Conversion? I've checked litecointalk but couldn't find any Q&A there. Not even remotely something. Only TheMage saying he's planning on visiting chris doing the Q&A 1on1. FTFY There is no Q&A on ltctalk as of now. The only thing that happened so far is that Chris logged in and asked TheMage for questions and TheMage gave them to him. Whether or not the Q&A will actually happen and when is completely unknown. TheMage is proposing to do it alone since the last one was a big clusterfuck where Chris avoided the important questions and because several members there asked him too. I personally think it is a good idea for only one or two people to do the q&a so they can press on issues that Chris is avoiding. Whether TheMage is the right person or not I don't know but he seems to be a good choice. Would be nice if this could be organised as e.g. users submit 100 questions in total, the 10-20 most important ones are agreed upon by voting and those will be finally asked Chris. Again, to avoid not asking the right questions by some mistake. That has already kindof happend on litecointalk in the previously linked topic. People have been adding and discussing questions and TheMage took the questions from that list. |
|
|
|
Conversation ending ! ASIC shipping date little bit unfortunate for me as i´m out of country Conversion? I've checked litecointalk but couldn't find any Q&A there. Not even remotely something. Only TheMage saying he's planning on visiting chris 1on1. |
|
|
|
Guess we will see. All I know is questions were sent to him at his request. Don't know when he will answer, or how it will take place whether it's on the forum or he just sends back answers for TheMage to post on Litecointalk.
Is this list public? Do we know what kind of questions were asked? I am already angered, as there going to be bunch of irrelevant questions and the answers going to be buslhit like last time! I'm quite certain it will be something like this list: https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=25452.0 |
|
|
|
Buy 48 miners (2 hubs) and we provide worldwide shipping absolutely for free.
Shipping depends on the parcel size and weight. and calculated by dhl agent. One hub shipping to eu is approximately 60$.
With one hub I assume you mean 1 hub and 24 sticks? |
|
|
|
if you want escrow then you pay escrow fee. deal?
Seems like a fair deal What would be an average shipping cost for Europe? Or does that differ per country? |
|
|
|
you really believe that?!  That beekeeper emailed TheMage for a list of questions? Yes. That we will get some answers to some of the questions? Yes. Will he cherry pick which questions he wants to answer, idk, but yes its possible. At least it's not going to be a complete mess like it was last time with constant moderating in a thread |
|
|
|
Thanks, but that doesn't answer my question |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
