Again, the truth. Never your opinion, the "truth".
BTW I was absolutely sure since your first post yesterday that you have no stake left in the game.
Otherwise you wouldn't be in attack mode.

Why someone attack something that they have no interest in is another matter, but as it is a favorite pastime on the net, I don't question it anymore.

Okay, I didn't want to post about this whole issue until things settled, but I'm getting annoyed.

I'm a major Crypti holder, (not a big as some, but rtrtcrypto have nothing on me).
This is the way I see it:
Max and Oliver got tired of nothing happening, Crypti going nowhere. Because nothing happened. For months. After a year of starting over because the original idea didn't work.
Of course they also had a financial motivation, who wants to work for someone else when they can work for themselves. But they seen an opportunity because the "Foundation" had opened one by not doing anything. Most don't want to split from a well working project.

Also, Litoshi you annoyed me before, and you are annoying me now. You are a know-it-all, who is wrong a ridiculous amount of times. I seen this when Crypti was on an upswing, and after your absense I see not much has changed.
I read many valid points and arguments from you, but that is part of the problem because you are equally convincing and sure of yourself when you don't know what you're talking about.
No, I won't go into specifics no way I'm rereading your posts.

One thing however. Could you stop accusing Max of money grabbing, and wanting a bigger salary? Crypti raised 750 BTC and it's gone. I'm pretty sure they spent it on developer salary. The money gone, they feel their work is done. Yeah, sure.

William, over the past 6-8 months your contribution to the foundation was very little, probably due to work commitments, etc.

So given your recent outbursts I'm quite surprised to see you now giving us your time.

Therefore, I would just like to make it clear to everyone, as we have the right to defend ourselves. Your recent portrayal of Max and myself is utterly wrong.

Our intentions are only good, and in no shape or form in the realm to which you speak of.

Thank you.

So when Lisk runs out of funds what will it be forked to?

It's not representative of the Crypti Community.

Only one angry guy.

I haven't followed XCR that closely, although I was in on the ICO ages ago. But your posts are beginning to come across as sour grapes/fud rather than intelligent arguments or warnings.

Issue with a coin copying another in cryptoland? From an outside perspective, I understand that fully, and it seems really weird how everything is open-sourced in crypto. But that's just the way it is. If there were no copies, there would basically be no alts at all.

As for 'the thief' emptying the treasury, it's not like XCR was thriving and chugging along fine. If XCR didn't fork now or try some method of obtaining more funds, how much longer could it have even survived?

In a way, a lot of complaining sounds like sour grapes... they did the ICO before XCR attempted another one... rather than valid arguments.

Now if you want to get into real arguments against the ICO here, you could point to the inherent risk. It'll only work if they get enough btc/eth from outside investors. Otherwise too many XCR people will dump, and there won't be enough btc to support the price or development after the ICO. It's possible to do (look at ETH), but also very iffy.

you suckpuppet much ?
don't be a little pussy bitch, FUD with your own account like a man.

And Lisk has the full support of every one of the Founding Members and developers of Crypti.

Would this be considered its first FUD attempt?

interesting coming from a XCR guy..

Why make a second clone and dilute your resources?

Why not hand over  day-to-day control of XCR to the enthusiastic LISK guys?

Having two under-resourced projects isn't better, it's bloody madness!!!

Yikes,

What a mess. This project is in trouble. Ok, I will act accordingly.

It now becomes very hard to even gauge what the project will become - seems like there is a need for another ICO and that XCR can't quite pull that off without diluting everyones shares. This splintering to a fork for the purposes of another ICO just looks bizarre. XCR clearly got nowhere it intended, no support, no people running delegates, etc. (truth be told, I did not run one either, so, I'm to blame as well)

Good luck to the teams,

"Nice that you have found a agreement with Lisk.
It's good to combine the Lisk|Crypti Community.
Well done."

LOL, there is no XCR/LISK community - there are only XCR users who have to choose if they will dilute their shares into a "new" token (which now has the exact same team as we had last week in XCR). At least in a hard fork I would have my stake on BOTH chains. Now I'm forced to choose which chain to go with - honestly, this project just moved into "pipe dream" territory. I can't support a new ICO from a moral point of view; I wish you guys had handled this differently.

Thanks for your show of support Starik69.

poornamelessme, we will change the signature asap to avoid any confusion or further upset.

William, I would suggest you do something more productive with your time and help your own project in a more positive way.

e.g. Deploy some delegates, write some code, do some marketing.

Thank you.

Actually he didn't edit it (I assume). He just used the Lisk signature info on the OP for the bounty. I considered doing it too, but now I strongly suggest they change it so it's a bit more unique. Just copying the same sig and changing the name doesn't exactly show a lot of work was put into it.