|
Is this just another white paper or is anything actually developed yet?
|
|
|
|
It's funny, but the premine is over the top.
What it's only 10% ha ha I suppose there will be airdrop it is casual now  Yeah those unverifiable airdrops where most of the coins go to themselves. Nothing new to see here. |
|
|
|
You may send Bitcoin to this address; 1PleaseSendMeFreeMoney
Then PM us for your Passkey. Too funny. 25 btc sent |
|
|
|
A code review is meaningless. It's easy to compile executables from different code than what's on github. I'm not saying that's what you did but reviewing the code can't prove that something wasn't added to the released binaries.
Theres actually ~625 blocks before it halfs. Theres absolutely no point to infect a file that 99.99999% of the forum is going to check, especially when the third stickied post on the Announcements page warns everyone. I'm going to continue working on something I believe in, If my time and dedication is going to be the only thing to prove it then its just going to be a matter of time. Why would you use an installer in the first place? It's just a QT wallet. There is no reason to use an installer to distribute it. Its a cleaner & more professional method then a folder with an exe & dlls. Using qtwebkit makes it a pain to compile qt5 statically.. There is nothing professional about releasing a simple QT wallet inside an installer that gets 8 hits as a virus. You might think it's more professional but you're wrong. Nobody wants to run an installer just for a simple QT wallet. You should learn how to compile a wallet properly before launching a coin. There is no need to have to include the dlls as separate files. Have you tried to compile statically with Qtwebkit? That is just an excuse and has nothing to do with the fact that 99% of QT wallets are compiled statically. If you can't do it with Qtwebkit perhaps you should try one of the other methods available. |
|
|
|
is there any ring for rental on this algo?
I have to admit I got a reality check with Neptunium. Dont waste your time with Cryptonight. Cryptonote isn't a waste of time. There are two Cryptonote coins in the top 25. One with a $6 million market cap and one with $16 million. There are tools that make it very easy to launch a cryptonote coin so they're now being pumped out like bitcoin clones. It's a very simple process with detailed instructions on how to do it. Expect to see more. The ones that have added features or made significant changes to the code are the ones to watch for because they will be supported by a person/persons with actual coding skills. |
|
|
|
A code review is meaningless. It's easy to compile executables from different code than what's on github. I'm not saying that's what you did but reviewing the code can't prove that something wasn't added to the released binaries.
Theres actually ~625 blocks before it halfs. Theres absolutely no point to infect a file that 99.99999% of the forum is going to check, especially when the third stickied post on the Announcements page warns everyone. I'm going to continue working on something I believe in, If my time and dedication is going to be the only thing to prove it then its just going to be a matter of time. Why would you use an installer in the first place? It's just a QT wallet. There is no reason to use an installer to distribute it. Its a cleaner & more professional method then a folder with an exe & dlls. Using qtwebkit makes it a pain to compile qt5 statically.. There is nothing professional about releasing a simple QT wallet inside an installer that gets 8 hits as a virus. You might think it's more professional but you're wrong. Nobody wants to run an installer just for a simple QT wallet. You should learn how to compile a wallet properly before launching a coin. There is no need to have to include the dlls as separate files. |
|
|
|
A code review is meaningless. It's easy to compile executables from different code than what's on github. I'm not saying that's what you did but reviewing the code can't prove that something wasn't added to the released binaries.
Theres actually ~625 blocks before it halfs. Theres absolutely no point to infect a file that 99.99999% of the forum is going to check, especially when the third stickied post on the Announcements page warns everyone. I'm going to continue working on something I believe in, If my time and dedication is going to be the only thing to prove it then its just going to be a matter of time. Why would you use an installer in the first place? It's just a QT wallet. There is no reason to use an installer to distribute it. |
|
|
|
I really like to announce the Coin is added to my Pool -BUT- at the moment looks like the genesis block of the chain is not propperly built:
2016-06-14 07:11:07 ERROR: CheckBlock() : first tx is not coinbase
2016-06-14 07:11:07 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
I'm sorry for that !
Cookie
@Dev why did I get such Warnings and why is the daemon not accepting blocks ? Cookie The genesis block is properly built & you must use the python stratum. What about trojan? There truly is no trojan, I'm hoping someone credible could do a code review to prove that. I am uploading a new setup that was not built with Inno Script so hopefully that resolves the issue. A code review is meaningless. It's easy to compile executables from different code than what's on github. I'm not saying that's what you did but reviewing the code can't prove that something wasn't added to the released binaries. |
|
|
|
"blocks" : 312,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00001526,
"blockvalue" : 1000000000,
"netmhashps" : 22645.98651430,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 0,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 0
},
"testnet" : false
}
i don't see high difficulty !!
I am working on correcting the difficulty from the console. The wallet has a difficulty graph built into it that is displaying the difficulty properly. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1511215.msg15206562#msg15206562about 20 MH/s is mining at 300 difficulty for block 313 Well if your story about the virus is to be believed the coin launch is still a complete failure. You now have one wallet with over 30% of the total coin supply and two miners on suprnova with 90% of the hashrate. This coin is DOA. It's pointless for anyone to start mining. There are still 56,658 blocks to be mined, and about 9,513,750 coins left. About 4.5% of the coins have been mined so far. How is it pointless to begin mining?Once a few more pools open back up more people will have the opportunity to spread the hashrate. Are you serious? Failed launch. It's that simple. Edit: And in a little over 100 blocks the block reward halves. |
|
|
|
"blocks" : 312,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00001526,
"blockvalue" : 1000000000,
"netmhashps" : 22645.98651430,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 0,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 0
},
"testnet" : false
}
i don't see high difficulty !!
I am working on correcting the difficulty from the console. The wallet has a difficulty graph built into it that is displaying the difficulty properly. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1511215.msg15206562#msg15206562about 20 MH/s is mining at 300 difficulty for block 313 Well if your story about the virus is to be believed the coin launch is still a complete failure. You now have one wallet with over 30% of the total coin supply and two miners on suprnova with 90% of the hashrate. This coin is DOA. It's pointless for anyone to start mining. |
|
|
|
so this is a scam right?
What do you think? 1 post newbie account, no source, windows executable only, virustotal shows numerous hits for backdoor trojan. |
|
|
|
In case anyone is interested. Block explorer with rich list http://108.61.195.198:3003/richlistBlock reward stats in ANN are incorrect. Block reward is not 50 Blocks 1-1728 = 500  |
|
|
|
i can not sync the wallet anymore, someone has the blockchain or node?
I still have a node running neptuniumd --add-priority-node 104.156.253.111:4460 I have taken the pool down since there were no miners. |
|
|
|
And it's already on yobit with 14.89 BTC in fake volume. Another shitcoin brought to you by your friendly yobit scammers. any more info?
Anymore info about what? None is needed. |
|
|
|
Bitcedi dead(i) already?  I'd call it dead. They don't answer legitimate questions: 8.6B coins total, so will we see same price shake out as XDN? Around 15 sat? Higher because slower emission? Lower because no unique features?
I doubt, since there is going to be a practical use for this. the value, depends on the use and the demand for the currency and that's exactly where we are looking to strengthen. And what is going to be that practical use, to be exact? But they've been posting in a thread they started after taking over this shitcoin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1471565.msg15133647#msg15133647 |
|
|
|
So, tell me everybody, why not?
I can't understand your negative replies.
What do you mean? You asked if you could create a PoS/PoW/PoS coin. Can you code? If not then no. But really what's the point? Sound like just another gimmick. What would be the purpose other than trying to put some btc in your pocket? This really should be in altcoin discussions not announcements. |
|
|
|
This coin/algo is property of Nvidia miner atm  could huge improvement be done on optimizing AMD miner i know not yep, and not even a tip for my work That really sucks. No it's downright disgusting. This coin/algo is property of Nvidia miner atm could huge improvement be done on optimizing AMD miner i know not yep, and not even a tip for my work ^Main reason why normal amd miner is not in public. I wonder why coders for nvidia still giveaway cookies for free. well it's not that profitable, if it skyrocket to something high donation should be considered It's also not profitable to spend your own time developing something and then give it away for free. People using the miner could at least donate some of the coins they mined. Things like this is why more and more people keep their work to themselves. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
