Okay, I try to look in here, from time to time. I have already researched something about Zenoribbon, unfortunately there is not much to find about it. But just the fact that you are already registered here since 2011, lets me guess that you are a person who is more than familiar with the cryptography and all arround it! However, the approach that people access content that was created before a certain point in time is understandable for me. But I still have to work on the whole Use Case in my mind... I will have to read further into the topic, 14 pages PDF are not a little bit to read! Now I have to work first, the money for food and accommodation is not earned by itself, unfortunately... //edit: By the way, I've received the first $5 in BTC from you. Thank you very much!
If I should not fulfill any agreement in your eyes in the future, and you would like a refund, please contact me before you leave bad feedback in my account here. I will, if you are right, pay back everything! |
|
|
|
|
Very gladly, this sounds interesting...
1SiNeRYT3iE7wbJeXULmSHUaDU6nfBjAe
|
|
|
|
~
Wenn du nicht wirklich darauf hinarbeitest ist es nicht machbar. Ich habe die Merits immer kritisiert und werde das weiterhin machen. Bin zwar grundsätzlich vom System nicht abgeneigt aber entweder es müssen mehr Merits in Umlauf kommen, sodass auch mehr verteilt werden kann oder aber für die höheren Ränge muss das Merit Limit gesenkt werden. Ansonsten ist es ja unmöglich als normaler Teilnehmer im Forum auf 1.000 Merits zu kommen 
Ich kann deine Sichtweise auf eine Art verstehen. Vor allem im Bezug auf den eigenen Aufstieg. Allerdings ist dieses System ja eingeführt worden um Mitglieder einzudämmen, welche hier nur verweilen um Profit zu machen. Beispielsweise mit Signatur-Kampagnen... zur Eindämmung von Spam kann ich die Idee schon nachvollziehen! Wenn ich nun von einem einfach dahergezogenen Wert von 10+Merit/Monat ausgehe, würde ich noch ca. 23 Monate bis zum "Uprank" benötigen... |
|
|
|
Das hier habe ich gerade mal in unseren Untiefen des Forums "erstöbert":~ | Rank | Required activity | Required merit | | Brand new | 0 | 0 | | Newbie | 1 | 0 | | Jr Member | 30 | 1 | | Member | 60 | 10 | | Full Member | 120 | 100 | | Sr. Member | 240 | 250 | | Hero Member | 480 | 500 | | Legendary | Random in the range 775-1030 | 1000 |
~
Bezogen auf mich, wäre ich ja, (nach dem alten System) allein bezogen auf meine Aktivity/Posts nun "Hero Member", mit einem "Coin" mehr unter meinem Namen.  Nun spüre ich es sozusagen am eigenen Leib...  Nein, Spass beiseite, ich erkenne den Sinn dahinter und irgendwie in manchen Dingen auch einhergehende Verbesserungen. Nun bin ich entspannt gespannt wielange ich brauche bis zu meinem nächsten "Ziel"... der "Coin" mehr würde ja schon nett ausschauen! 
|
|
|
|
I still use mellow ads. It's still an effective method of getting referrals when you don't have a significant marketing budget. How long you been using mellowads? I had mostly done this back in 2015-16 and got 31 referrals in total. Didnt have time much later on though but your numbers do seem shabby to me.  I've been using them on and off about 4 years only with faucet credits. This month's numbers aren't that great because the most popular faucets in their ad network went offline due to a ransomware attack and traffic dropped off significantly. Still, a nearly 1% conversion rate for pop under ads is very good compared to autosurf/ptc sites I've tried where you're lucky to even get 0.1% conversion rate. Currently I have 137 referrals and have earned 0.00465760 BTC in commisions.
As I said before, I also use MellowAds. I would even say about as long as you @FinneysTrueVision.
The whole last month with only 0.00001BTCTC/day: Why the visits to my link at MellowAds are so different, for example on the 10.06.2020, I have been wondering for a long time. The budget was the same every day.  I think some kind of bug in the programming. It's not the first time either. But it's not my disadvantage, I'm not complaining about this.
|
|
|
|
I keep wondering why he does that, all the time.
Seriously, how can a person denounce himself like that?
I can only put it down to a mixture of an schizotypal and an narcissistic personality disorder.
It's a serious mental illness... Why isn't anyone helping this man?
Nevertheless, in this connection also again a reference to a new burn-address in our Blockchain:
|
|
|
|
~
Ye, seems like a lot of effort for nothing. You consider it as "nothing", that's okay, because it's your opinion! I think it's funny, though. And i mean, some others too! It's a good way to enjoy fun round about the main topic here... One person likes it, the other doesn't... |
|
|
|
Und nochmal sorry für das OT hier qwk. Aber hast du Regel Nr. 3 gelesen SiNeReiNZzz? Schnell nachbessern und dann klappt es auch mit den +Merits  Ich bitte um Entschuldigung für das OT hier! | @mole0815 Danke für den Hinweis! 
@qwk hier noch ergänzende 5 Links! Beim nächsten Mal dann ALLES wie gewünscht, sorry nochmal. *ich hätte nach Möglichkeit gern insgesamt (abzüglich der schon vergebenen 5) 13 +Merits für meine Posts
//edit: Vielen Dank @mole815 für's +Merit!
|
|
|
|
Na dann müssten auch alle Nutzer ausgelassen werden, die bereits über 1.000 Merit haben und nur wegen der Activity noch teilnehmen dürften, weil sie noch kein Legendary sind. Wenn ich ganz dreist wäre, würde ich jetzt an deinem Airdrop teilnehmen. Zu aller erst, ich habe den Eingangsbeitrag gelesen und auch das wir nichts weiter schreiben sollten, ausser die betreffenden Links! Meine Mama hat immer gesagt: Die Anderen sind nicht Du! Also nimm dir kein Beispiel an den Anderen, nur weil sie z.B. etwas dürfen was du nicht darfst! Nun ja... Sorry Mama! Und @qwk natürlich auch...
Nun zu diesem Thema hier: Wie dem einem oder anderem vielleicht bekannt sein sollte, hänge ich ja durch die etwas langwierige Rückerlangung meines Accounts, mit den (für mich neuen ) +Merits etwas zurück. Nun bin ich hier auf diesen Beitrag gestoßen und schließe mich dem Ganzen hier natürlich sehr gerne an!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1989247.msg54647841#msg54647841https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251587.msg54639130#msg54639130https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251587.msg54524753#msg54524753https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2360806.msg54516117#msg54516117https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5237640.msg54513545#msg54513545Ergänzend:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1989247.msg54649628#msg54649628https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251587.msg54612770#msg54612770https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=920631.msg54530165#msg54530165https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251587.msg54514398#msg54514398https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1989247.msg54512780#msg54512780//edit: englischsprachige Posts habe ich entfernt, danke @mole0815, SORRY @qwk |
|
|
|
Yes, that's right so far! However, note that EVERY address WITHOUT credit is not really immortalized in the Blockchain! That means, with your method you can create any addresses, but you have no "private key"! (Also called "burn-adresses") Consequently, you can also send nothing from this address! Because with today's technology it is extremely difficult up to impossible to calculate the right private key for these addresses... With Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] you can calculate an address... but definitly with less digits and letters!
From current cause still another Burn address, which I'm sure you haven't seen yet:
1FuckYouGraigWrightxSatoshiXc6ppN
|
|
|
|
Well, since the address is never funded it is *not* in the blockchain! It's done! Now the adress is definitely in our blockchain forever... /edit: Thank you @nutildah, @TheArchaeologist and all others who also send some to me, for the +Merits!!! <3 |
|
|
|
I will do this as soon as I get home from work! Nevertheless I think it's funny... If it denounces Craig S. Wright, it's always good! |
|
|
|
Kurzes OT aber da es sonst auch gerne hier besprochen wird... Koal-84 ist seit heute Hero  ~  und wieder einer! Jetzt geht es hier Schlag auf Schlag. Herzliche Glückwünsche natürlich auch von mir für dich @Koal-84. Ich bin ebenfalls gespannt wer der nächste sein wird... |
|
|
|
|
The best adresses I have found so far are these addresses, because every letter has a meaning, no numbers except the 1 at the beginning and everything is in the order:
1LuCKYbiTcoinADDreSsBrinGiNgBUdDha
1MangoDismayedBroadswordChopRanBat
1NarcissistSnowshedHarmerAteGoTerm
Really, there are already so many special addresses. I keep coming across new addresses...
I also find the topic very interesting and entertaining, especially, in many cases, you think about the possible story behind the words.
Nobody writes something without a meaning behind it!
Some other of my biggest favourites:
1ManagedToSteaLSecretPLansToxvKf4K
1ofTheStoLenPLansThatCan111zCJt3F
1PursuedByTheEmpiresSinisterypjWrk
1SaveHerPeopLeAndRestore111yULD1y
1Sea1sWithC1ubsRu1esYAAAAAAAskfyL
1TheEmpiresULtimateWeapon11zoRcyn
11AFatLadyAndAnUsherXXXXXXXZLBJLb
11BecauseTheSenseofWhatAnXXadytiG
11ByTheAudienceSomeVersionsYvdBMD
11DecadenceofTheAristocracyWCVpT9
11ofThePhraseWhatTheHeckDoXWgy2bc
11SetupLineWhatTheHeckDoYouX9gXeg
11WhoMeetTheAgentCan1nc1udeX5TTvE
11RatherThanDescribedThereXXhdW9E
1AboardHerStarshipCustodian1yhX6zg
1AgentsPrincessLeiaRacesHomewxuNTT
1Char1ieHebdooooooooooooooooumv3kJ
1DoNotSubmitDoNotBe1ieveLies9MUahF
1iLoveYouForeverYukiXXXXXXXV8wpyQ
1itisAPeriodofCiviLWarRebeLyzK2rV
11BLahBLahBLahXXXXXXXXXXXXXZTGiC2
1FuckMtGoxFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUQXW5ik
1A11That1sSo1id22222222222222hakjF
|
|
|
|
~
Well the last one won't work because * isn't valid. ~ I'm assuming you were just being ironic about this. I didn't want to attract the attention of any more 'rule keepers'. As you know, I have my experiences with that... So I decided to change the address a bit less offensive with a * to hide, because some of here may find that kind of 'fun' disturbing, objectionable or whatever! Like this: 1DicKz2ZVYUiF9ynHC3KfxKboPXH6rYk85 <<< (Blockchain.com)And if you click on the adresses' link, you will see the addresses in its true glory! |
|
|
|
~
Junger Mann, ich denke nicht dass das jugendfrei und Forumsregelkonform ist, wenn du hier untenrum nackig durchs Forum schlawenzelst! Ich würde vorschlagen, das du dir lieber mal schnell was drüber ziehst, bevor du dir noch nen Zug weg holst... |
|
|
|
|
By now, in the most cases, I can usually detect a scam!
But this brings the experience and the time...
For the inexperienced here I have the following BASIC TIPS (the order is not important here):
Where?
> Internet presence:
-how is the website structured?
-cheap or high-quality impression of the site?
> Legitimate business and location of the business:
-where is the headquarter located? (many scams come from e.g. Russia and neighbouring countries or Great Britain and its Oversea Territories!)
-the legal situation there?
-is everything duly registered and reported to the competent authorities?
Who?
-Who is behind the project? Just use Google Search! (in many cases will realize yourself immediately that it is a fraud!)
What?
-search (with google) the name of the project and also look under news
-what do the founder(s) of the project want to achieve?
-what is the use case?
-is the idea really new or just another copy?
Why?
-why could this project, of all projects, be successful as 1 in 10,000? (if you dont have an answer, Keep your hands off!)
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
