I provided a bonus because you went the extra mile with color coding and additional instructions. The extra effort is appreciated. Okay, then I know about it. You not have to do this! I was happy to do it... Of course I'm happy about the extra payment... Thank you very much for this, again. |
|
|
|
~
Sorry, for bump up your thread again. I hope that's okay. I like what you're saying. Of course, Satoshi is no god, i agree! But he is the one and the first one who had made usable a lot of considerations around of cryptographic money for the layman. As you say yourself, it is of course no witchcraft, what Satoshi has accomplished. But he was the first to make this idea really useful! It is the result of the dedication passion and time he has put into this topic. For me, he ist a genius guy already for this. I think Satoshi was more of an academic than a professional developer. Definitely someone who had a lot of knowledge about cryptography because of the choice of the elliptic curve, and he was able to create things like Base 58 and the like. Clearly, this is a person who had an education in computer science. The academic-looking C++ code was a good sign of someone who was trained to know how to programming, but was not a professional. A professional would have done a more structured job, i think! With healthy ambition and a certain amount of technical understanding, anyone can do these kind of projects! Especially in times of the Internet and many good books, where the way to self-learning of topics that really interests you, is made extremely easy for virtually EVERYONE! You just need to kick in your own ass!  This is also demonstrated by the one or other innovative blockchain project outside of BTCitcoin... not many, but a few! Whether he was involved in any of these projects...? This was also the subject of an interesting newspaper article I read in the back days. Unfortunately, I can't find him anymore... |
|
|
|
I've see you sent me another $10/ BTCTC. So, I've already received a total of $25/ BTCTC from you instead $15/ BTCTC! Is that correct? Otherwise I will gladly return the eventually false routed amount. |
|
|
|
Interesting, slowly a puzzle of your words begins to fit together. Of course it's a complex subject. I admire your technical skill and thinking. An effective application would be great, also to make it easier for me to understand and participate in everything without mistakes. |
|
|
|
~
Is this another scam? Any insight would greatly be appreciated.
Don't fall for it! Even a quick search for the email address suggests that it is not from slushpool. And as already mentioned here, there are also enough inconsistencies when checking the address...
 |
|
|
|
~
Everything is done for now but when we get the next task set your at the front of the line. What are your general thoughts on Zenoribbon? There is a booklet describing Zenoribbon at zenoribbon.freeforums.net. The next task set might not be for a few months because a security app will have to be written designed for more easy manual verifications than what we were able to do with the tasks on this thread. Zenoribbon is part of Zeronet, which as an oversimplified explanation is a layer over Tor that makes it easy to provide anonymous web hosting service which would include transaction ledger service for Zenoribbon. And both Zenoribbon and Zeronet are part of Rainbow Road, which is a plan for decentralization of all power structures. I am also very interested to learn more about Zenoribbon and to support you in your research as best as I can! |
|
|
|
Task 2 Correction:
The text as copied and pasted from the first link provided is actually:
CONTAINERIZATION
CONTAINER
ZR 0 to 1
CONTENT IDENTIFIER: Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road
CONTAINER IDENTIFIER: d9533c95c6a0d03e634b124f90c08c58800d3fb368b7f392ac698c66f140a6f7adf84ab27fa4f36 064f9817f17a1e578ee0d25e5c3fdb2c593a1e3f035c02b60
Hash of Containerization Text Above: SHA-512 Base64: a2041a22eec1a991d91fb71c40f6e88549ca64008f6df59834ad7b32e486221fb3f6db7f53738d6 9bd5d340a12b93cb96debcb819b6034d735acfd2d40d06a7c
Hash Signature and Transaction Identifier: Ed25519 TweetNaCl:
0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==
I copied and pasted from the wrong source! So, in any case, the signature would match in your evaluations. This is part of the reason why I'm doing this... to see just how hard it is to do the claims and evaluate manually. Not that easy to do correctly at least when your new at evaluating apparently. But we'll design tools to make it easier for a manual verification before we design the automated tool.
Should I verify this again with the new data? It'll only take ~3 hours, I'm just at my work now! |
|
|
|
Task 2 of 4 Detailed Instructions:
~
Nothing works with the public key you have transmitted! But this signature you have posted belongs to MY public key from my contribution in the last night!
I did exactly what you described, I think!
Evaluation:Honor to: 0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ== Hash of Evaluation Statement: 8e549d1b367600979314c83a788bf1215223bf6ac8b1d81fe19862e141151928c5e0a20e1a01dfc dc57e7723672825648cd22a8c9adddb7283d80ff951eb3e46 Signature: o8aYBduwhDPPss3IdVLeGqPreJQq7Vyoxwx+8zgMxi9WtgBMEkjp8oZmTAWYcBhjWc7tLYNu9djZlQSfHvEbBw==Public Key: f74kSSFLWcz8qahPw2c6wEaaGBhacFgaP8zaADyk8BU= |
|
|
|
Good, that verified nicely, though you swapped signature lines such that the last signature actually corresponds with the second to last hash. The reason why that doesn't need to be corrected is that a digital signature itself is considered bound to whatever statement is verified by it. It is the duty of the signor on the Public Settlement Network (PSN) to check all hash codes to make sure they match the text lest they accidentally sign away their soul. So the moral of the story is to sign a hash carefully on the Public Settlement Network! Oh man, it was in the middle of the night in Germany, I'm sorry. I hope it did you some help anyway. What was my mistake again? Let me know what else I can do for you, please, i look forward to further cooperation! |
|
|
|
I greet you most sincerely.
Task 2 of 4:
Public Key: f74kSSFLWcz8qahPw2c6wEaaGBhacFgaP8zaADyk8BU=CONTAINERIZATION
CONTAINER
ZR 0 to 1
CONTENT IDENTIFIER: Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road
CONTAINER IDENTIFIER: d9533c95c6a0d03e634b124f90c08c58800d3fb368b7f392ac698c66f140a6f7adf84ab27fa4f36 064f9817f17a1e578ee0d25e5c3fdb2c593a1e3f035c02b60Hash of Containerization SHA-512: a2041a22eec1a991d91fb71c40f6e88549ca64008f6df59834ad7b32e486221fb3f6db7f53738d6 9bd5d340a12b93cb96debcb819b6034d735acfd2d40d06a7cHash Signature: JO+1T3LpvwQRAJ3F0wgx2+5774fO0MewdreycjDLFGAPbJlLI5+9uW4LRFwUKTtQ0YEnP2v/iBC/tqtxK6iVAg==
Evaluation Statement:Public Key: f74kSSFLWcz8qahPw2c6wEaaGBhacFgaP8zaADyk8BU=Evaluation:
Honor to: 0nP5UpmI3+m9Uk1qf8fMQK3drWwS7p4+sLSZu7iepnFv1rHUJElJqDjQtYJLfWM/jW1e/LwdLn69g1bdLvuyCQ==Hash of Evaluation Statement: jlSdGzZ2AJeTFMg6eIvxIVIjv2rIsdgf4Zhi4UEVGSjF4KIOGgHfzcV+dyNnKCVkjNIqjJrd23KD2A/5Ues+Rg==Signature: ReECezZZVGIxvIZeCMNFWY42czX/RLeOANNrGNKENcPKEWsTtuljYmbVryh38AaW5/QWzFK72LU9YHuXyDMfAw== And with SHA512 Hash of Evaluation Statement:Hash of Evaluation Statement: 8e549d1b367600979314c83a788bf1215223bf6ac8b1d81fe19862e141151928c5e0a20e1a01dfc dc57e7723672825648cd22a8c9adddb7283d80ff951eb3e46Signature: o8aYBduwhDPPss3IdVLeGqPreJQq7Vyoxwx+8zgMxi9WtgBMEkjp8oZmTAWYcBhjWc7tLYNu9djZlQSfHvEbBw== |
|
|
|
Spreadsheet for round 79 has been turned in to lightlord for payment.
Available spots. Tier E, All rank
Note: My DM is always open to any inquiries, complains, observations etc.
Remember,
BrainbossCares❣️
Good work as usual! Thank you. So far I am very pleased! I mean, of course the payment could be a little bit better, but maybe soon, i will meet the requirements to move up... I look forward to further good cooperation... Kind regards SiNeReiNZzz |
|
|
|
You have probably already signed messages with your BTCTC address. This is almost the same here! You just have to imagine:Public key = your BTCTC address Secret key = Private key of your BTCTC address
Instruction:Go to the site: https://tweetnacl.js.org/#/sign1. > Click on 'Random' and write down the Secret key and the public key (remember the Secret key is like your private key at BTCTC, and your future key for further tasks, so that you do not have to create a new one each time) 2. > Write in the 'Message' field (without spaces in front or back): OgKBFR13cfSEMKG4dhU2p0q4MIOW1Oi6NAKbV3LtnrB5HR2MCoUSjsDy9xDMzw6YyR71cTfRzKlRVcq ia1vSUQ== 3. > Click 'Sign' ( after this point, you don't need the Secret key anymore for this task), then a Signature should appear (just like BTCTC) 4. > Write this Signature in the Evaluation Statement below at Signature (of hash) (marked purple) and then just insert your Public key (from step 1) (marked green):
Public key: Evaluation Statement:
Claim Identifier: 26HCsa7MldWXjplJMd6Js++bitjDw+ILhkQ1rn9/2R+6DVmh/EX43vEYIrYzppabv8DKy5OSglHwPYq4GbPIwg==
Full Property Name: Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road
Abbreviations: ZR, Zenoribbon
I searched the internet for a few minutes and was unable to find any earlier homestead claim to any similar works as named or abbreviated "Zenoribbon", though ZR is too generic of a term to search and so ignored.
I honor this homestead claim as an original creation.Hash of the above evaluation statement: OgKBFR13cfSEMKG4dhU2p0q4MIOW1Oi6NAKbV3LtnrB5HR2MCoUSjsDy9xDMzw6YyR71cTfRzKlRVcq ia1vSUQ== Signature (of hash):
|
|
|
|
|
Nice to read that it all worked out.
Yes, if there are any bugs on the own website, it can cause you sleepless nights!
But I doubt it was because of TweetNaCl.js.
I don't know what I did wrong the first time, but I admit it took me a few minutes to understand what to do. With your second instruction, I knew immediately what i have to do.
Maybe your writing style was a little confusing, or I just had a bad day.
I'm would be very happy, to be allowed at your disposal for further tasks.
|
|
|
|
The hash came out correctly for me, but the signature failed verification. So, for the message you'd want to put in the hash line (the line with OgK....Q==), then you'd want to put in your private key and click sign. Hopefully you can get a new signature on the hash? Hmm... Interesting that I was not alone on the wrong track... I hope I have now completed the task (I have added some screenshots for you to review):
Public Key: f74kSSFLWcz8qahPw2c6wEaaGBhacFgaP8zaADyk8BU=Claim Identifier: 26HCsa7MldWXjplJMd6Js++bitjDw+ILhkQ1rn9/2R+6DVmh/EX43vEYIrYzppabv8DKy5OSglHwPYq4GbPIwg== Full Property Name: Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road Abbreviations: ZR, Zenoribbon I searched the internet for a few minutes and was unable to find any earlier homestead claim to any similar works as named or abbreviated "Zenoribbon", though ZR is too generic of a term to search and so ignored. I honor this homestead claim as an original creation. Hash of the above evaluation statement: OgKBFR13cfSEMKG4dhU2p0q4MIOW1Oi6NAKbV3LtnrB5HR2MCoUSjsDy9xDMzw6YyR71cTfRzKlRVcq ia1vSUQ==Signature (of hash): veIMN7zTpkx3TJDh56NIiYeH+tDLscaTdmIVJ95khAHHW6z/aHkdbfGY1Z7C9cHO2tcbuED7s5nVLn87ge1FDQ== |
|
|
|
The hash came out correctly for me, but the signature failed verification. So, for the message you'd want to put in the hash line (the line with OgK....Q==), then you'd want to put in your private key and click sign. Hopefully you can get a new signature on the hash? Okay, I'll be home in about two hours. It's a little awkward on my cell phone to do this... As soon as I'm home, I'll make the right verification for you. Sorry |
|
|
|
EVALUATION TASK 1 OF 4
~
I hope I've understood what I was supposed to do: Public Key: f74kSSFLWcz8qahPw2c6wEaaGBhacFgaP8zaADyk8BU= Claim Identifier: 26HCsa7MldWXjplJMd6Js++bitjDw+ILhkQ1rn9/2R+6DVmh/EX43vEYIrYzppabv8DKy5OSglHwPYq4GbPIwg== Full Property Name: Zenoribbon of Rainbow Road Abbreviations: ZR, Zenoribbon I searched the internet for a few minutes and was unable to find any earlier homestead claim to any similar works as named or abbreviated "Zenoribbon", though ZR is too generic of a term to search and so ignored. I honor this homestead claim as an original creation. Hash of the above evaluation statement: OgKBFR13cfSEMKG4dhU2p0q4MIOW1Oi6NAKbV3LtnrB5HR2MCoUSjsDy9xDMzw6YyR71cTfRzKlRVcq ia1vSUQ== Signature (of hash): mbrx8jOUmIMI/3FOluGriX+qYaH1Y8IHMOVDwB32s1GunJSYvUyiFOyZ9DX2sLD8ZTMc+X0EqdFqGXd0zEWrCA== |
|
|
|
@SiNeReiNZzz: Mellowads still alive? why does it not load properly and can't login from my side? is there a new url? I am sure I had tons of credit there!
Yes I have just used MellowAds again. As recommended here, just turn off the adblocker or whitelist the page. I can also highly recommend the "Brave Browser" (based on Chromium)...
~
One of my referrals of Mellowads itself is still active for more than 2years now and gives me referral commission off the faucet claim. I have 0.00016 in stock there already for free and running some campaigns on them. Pretty nice cycling of invested money isnt it?
Sounds nice, I would start a campaign on FreeBitco.in: 16 days with 0.00001BTC/day! This should bring between 5-10 signups for you... The question is of course, whether you has luck and get a signup which will be always active in the future too! Is it a rich one guy, who also still like gambling, this can be a Jackpot for you over the time... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
