what decision will cablepair take on Fcx35x10?
|
|
|
I am seeing lot of texts like this "< class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-full">" in the above site.
|
|
|
Think I will add this information to what my attorney general has already got..... He did refund my money but it was only cause I got the Gov involved.
You're lucky. Their official policy is pre-orders are "non-refundable". No luck involved. Email office@butterflylabs.com and we will happily refund your order at any time. It's always been that way. We've had, hmm, 6 order cancellations in the past 3 months. Each time, the person emailed and we cancelled the order and refunded the money immediately. BitcoinINV never once asked for a refund. If that is truly your policy, why does your website state otherwise? http://www.butterflylabs.com/faq/Can I get a refund on my pre-order? Butterfly Labs, INC. is accepting pre-orders for ASIC based products, expected to begin shipping in late October or early November 2012. Your pre-order with payment confirms your place in line for delivery once we begin shipping. Payments made for pre-orders of ASIC based products now under development should be considered non-refundable until products begin shipping or 1 January 2013, whichever is earlier.
|
|
|
How do I sign up and pay for shares?
The place where you signup & buy shares has been shutdown. Wait until they open again, or new one comes. https://glbse.com/
|
|
|
I don't think Nefario sent double payment by mistake. He deliberately sent double payment to cause problems.
He got scammer tag for not giving back bitcoins. & now those who gave scammer tag, must give scammer tags to those who don't payback also.
|
|
|
Who is going to pose nude for Jack Dawson?
|
|
|
I never wanted to act as an escrow & never asked anyone to follow me in speaking truth or try to be honest.
Scammer tag was given to nefario when he didn't returned money. Now he starts paying them & sent double payments to some & asked to send back double payed coins.
If the person, who holding others money, even after knowing that, its not his money, will be given sacmmer tag? coz nefario was given scammer tag for holding others money knowingly.
|
|
|
Perfect business trick. Nefario was given scammer tag, coz he didn't payback the bitcoins & assets in GLBSE.
Now he sent double payments & ordered to return the bitcoins, which makes whoever received the bitcoins & not giving it back has to get scammer tag. How many persons will be given scammer tag in this forum for not paying back the double payment?
@Badbear: what you going to do about this?
Edit:I think badbear gave scammer tag, not theymos.
|
|
|
I don't think he has evil plans. But he has/had plans which is evil for governments.
Bitcoin itself is evil plan to governments, but it's good plan to anti governments.
Maybe he had, now he hasn't. I'm convinced that what he's doing is not only a result of him trying to avoid prosecution, but also trying to keep the platform in his control. He is working for his own "positive" gain at the cost of the immense losses we are suffering. Think of it this way. We could have easily managed to continue business without GLBSE, but he has intentionally and actively prevented us from being able to do so. He has planned this sabotage of all businesses on the exchange, and probably will use the information he's holding hostage to coerce the asset issuers to submit to his plan, whatever it is. This is the most extreme betrayal of trust we have witnessed so far, it's almost a statement against the people with anti-government sentiment forcing us to "face the reality", that we cannot do business that depends on mutual trust without the helping hand of the State. Yes, can't deny. I have seen sometimes before also, that Bitcoin goes to centralized from decentralized & vice verse. At least Nefario returning bitcoins & may open exchange again, instead of running away like pirateat40
|
|
|
This is the first time, this thread loaded very fast to me.
|
|
|
Since he so far didn't repay any asset issuers their bitcoin, & his commanding reply, shows he has some plans.
Probably some evil and convoluted one,like everything he's doing. But to me, it shows one of the biggest A-holes I've seen in the last years. I don't think he has evil plans. But he has/had plans which is evil for governments. Bitcoin itself is evil plan to governments, but it's good plan to anti governments.
|
|
|
Its not that hard to find who has returned & who hasn't.
It only takes a couple of people to send odd amounts to make matching impossible. One could always claim they sent my 90% in pieces. He has time & our money. Until, he convinced that they returned, he can hold assets & their dividends. Or just take the bitcoins from dividends.
|
|
|
Its not that hard to find who has returned & who hasn't.
He has receivers or members bitcoin address. Just have to compare it with their GLBSE account, if he sent 90% or 180%. If its 180%, then i assume he will force them to repay by not returning the assets they have in their GLBSE account.
His only reply after ~20+ days, shows some what aggressive & commanding, instead of requesting or asking or begging.
Since he so far didn't repay any asset issuers their bitcoin, & his commanding reply, shows he has some plans. Maybe he will just transfer all shares & bonds to LEGAL exchange (Bitcoinglobal). Coz already, most of the asset issuers identity is known, they cant runaway from government to hide their money, if they do anything illegal in respect to assets they issued.
So for asset issuers, the choice will be transfer all the assets in to new LEGAL exchange & continue business or default assets or get back assets. Asset issuers cant default, coz it will affect their reputation & future. Also, getting back assets, will affect their reputation & future business & they loose bitcoins (thats why, he didn't repay them).
So, no good/other way, but go in Nefario's way.
|
|
|
I was just the opposite, I got my coins back but not one single email ... even after I filled out the return form on GLBSE. naelr
Check spam holder.
|
|
|
|