Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 11:25:08 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 ... 385 »
1941  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Question about Privacy. on: November 29, 2022, 02:34:19 PM
The default answer is going to be no it cannot be traced.
The real answer that people do not want to hear is 'it depends'. Just some random person on the internet probably could not find you.
But a government trying to figure it out well within possibility. Remember, they have shown that they can with a little effort track down any person hosting an .onion site.
You having a node online all the time that occasionally broadcasts transactions. Yes, they can find you.

The amnesic Tor sessions would be better, so long as you do keep a note of what electrum nodes you connect to and verify that you don't keep using the same ones by some random chance.


-Dave
1942  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: New York Prohibition of Mining Law on: November 29, 2022, 02:15:44 PM
Except for the ones that were obvious scams all the new mining setups coming into NY were 100% renewable.

Cough, cough...Greenidge
DigiHost gas powerplant in Buffalo?
TW's Lake Mariner hydro powerplant facility that somehow is just 91% renewable...  Cheesy

Which was why I said that all the NEW ones were committed to buying / using 100% renewable.
There have been no new applications that I have seen for months, probably due to the BTC price drop, but the last few that were proposed were either supposed to be 100% renewable or buying renewable.

Or to put it another way, it's good PR for the government 'we are making NY green' while actually not doing much of anything.

Kind of like after all the insurance companies were forcing all the safety improvements on cars, and the the government stepped in and made anti-lock brakes mandatory. After most car insurance companies were jacking up the rates of cars that did not have them into the stratosphere.

-Dave
1943  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: New York Prohibition of Mining Law on: November 29, 2022, 12:22:17 PM
I still think miner builder companies should improve hardware to consume less power. Something they are not doing yet, in my opinion.

It's been discussed before in other places on the forum but miners are building more efficient BUT more powerful miners.

Every new generation of miners use less power to generate more hashes. BUT, they then cram in more chips to make each miner more powerful. Made up numbers but: If in the last generation you needed 100 chips at 10 watts each to generate X amount of hashes but in the newer generation you need 80 chips at 8 watts each to generate the same X amount of hashes you could in theory make a miner just as fast as the old one but that uses a lot less power because you would be using less chips that are more efficient.

But what they do is make a miner that is much faster then the old generation by putting more of the more efficient using even more power but then now generate X+50% hashes. 

Great for big miners in big data centers where power and noise does not matter. And well, the small home / hobby miners are out of luck.

To put it bluntly, for now, WE ARE NOT THEIR TARGET CUSTOMERS. There are obvious exceptions, there are people here who are running larger farms and such, but are the exception.

Gone are the days of the R4 and things like it, for now anyway.

-Dave
1944  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: New York Prohibition of Mining Law on: November 29, 2022, 11:55:14 AM
None. Zero. Zip. Nada.

Except for the ones that were obvious scams all the new mining setups coming into NY were 100% renewable. Also, in NY since power is more or less fungible, all you have to do is BUY from a green supplier not have green power coming in.

It's also a ploy to get some money to redevelop a lot of old power plants that the miners wanted to take over and run. Putting aside everything else. You have a bunch of locations that could host mining now as-is BUT they are at the edge of being useful. A few more years and they will not be. But, if you leave them empty you can then gut and rebuild into something newer and better.

It's get a little revenue today vs more revenue tomorrow.
The other side of that is the 'bird in hand' argument. Will you find someone to redevelop? How long will that take? And so on.

But since there were no pending permits anyway, BTC is hovering at $16k, and so on it's not a big deal.

Also, and this is a personal big one, it's tough to fight the states like Texas where miners get paid more then they would make mining to shut down during hot days to conserve power. https://fortune.com/2022/07/12/texas-bitcoin-miners-paid-shut-down-power-grid-electricity-blackout-heat/ You can't fight it when the state government takes money out of its citizens pockets to give it to businesses. *This is not just a Texas thing, other states do it for other industries, but for here and now we are talking about mining.

-Dave
1945  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Is this true? Coinbase has a Custody reserves of 2M bitcoin? on: November 29, 2022, 11:39:52 AM
Didn't CZ mention Coinbase in this context recently?
Looks like he finished with FTX and he is moving to next exchange target now...
I don't think all that Bitcoin is owned by them, and they are keeping good amounts of coins from other people.
Coinbase exist since early days of Bitcoin, so it's normal to expect they also have a lot of Bitcoin in their portfolio, and I don't think they can go bankrupt that easy, unless they do it on purpose.
I will never understand people who keep all their Bitcoin on centralized exchanges, but there are many who are still doing this.


It's easy to understand people that do. We have been trained for years to leave our money in banks, use brokerages to hold our stocks and so on.
Centralized exchanges are just the progression of that. What I don't get is that after so many have imploded that NEW people still do it.

Drawing an arbitrary line, say a week after FTX imploded, there were still people posting about not just using them for trading and pulling their coins off ASAP for no reason I fully admit someone paid me back a bunch of money in ETH that I thought I was never going to see. So I have it sitting there with a trade open for a fair amount more then it came in at. But there are people leaving funds on 3 tier no name exchanges because they don't know how and don't want to know how to do self custody.

Why? Well IMO as I said, because they have been taught that you leave your cash in the bank and your stocks in the brokerage so why not leave your coins on an exchange.

-Dave
1946  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin worth $1.5B withdrawn from Coinbase in 48 hours on: November 28, 2022, 11:43:19 AM
So more then likely some big institution pulled their coins out, probably to calm their investors. Proving that they have it and it is safe. Not a big deal, and between the article and what we have discussed here spent more time discussing a non event then it's worth.

If, picking on a random brokerage, E*Trade pulled a bunch of cash out of one bank to bring it in house it would not even make the press.
If a investment fund switched some back end stuff around as to who held their investments if they did not do it in house it might make a line or 2 of text in places like Bloomberg.

-Dave
1947  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: FTX drama stressing people for no reason | How to stay neutral on: November 27, 2022, 03:15:31 PM
I don't think it's drama, but since it's out there and people are hearing about it, there will be reactions.
Much like people did not understand years ago that AOL was not the internet instead of just being a small part of it, or that the banks do loan money they don't have, or....
Pick your example. People will learn over time, but it takes time.

At the moment, I think the only people stressed are those who had it all in FTX. And people who bought at the ATH a year ago and thought BTC would keep going up instead of it being another cycle.

-Dave
1948  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin hits 500 GB size hard disk data on: November 27, 2022, 01:09:36 PM
there is not much difference between a 1tb vs 4tb in price its not like the price is 4x. so better off on the long run to have a 4TB hard drive

It depends if you are looking for new or used and where you are located.
If you know people in tech and such they are (including myself) giving away used 1TB drives a lot of the time. They have just about 0 residual value on the secondary market here in the US. 2 TB are not far behind if they have high hours, low hour drives are usually 'pizza' money.

If there will be some sort of revolution in this field and average people would own drives with hundreds of terrabytes,
there's a revolution going on right now actually. 22 TB hard drives. problem is, it is out of reach of "average people" unless they're willing to pay $600.
https://www.westerndigital.com/products/internal-drives/wd-gold-sata-hdd#WD221KRYZ

it will probably stay like that too. they'll stop making them at some point but they won't just start lowering the prices too much.

You really don't need a WD gold for this, as I posed above I have ironwolfs running 2 bitcoin nodes and a ETH node and they are not even noticing the load once the IBDs are done.

A Seagate Ironwolf 12TB 7200RPM, which although being sold as a NAS drive does work very well for blockchain storage, is under $249
Use anything you want for your boot / OS drive and stick the blockchain on there and you are good till just about the end of time.
All of my Hard Disks have failed after about two to three years.  As in, they became extremely slow up to a point where they were practically unusable.  HDD's are cheap but they also have a short life span.  Is this not a problem you encounter?  For me this is why I rather choose an SSD instead.  Although more expensive, that one I can truly say could last you possibly forever.  I at least never had an issue with any of mine.

SSDs have a finite lifespan, the bits can only flip a certain number of times before they stop working.
I have had both SSDs and spinning drives die. A lot also depends on the environment, a spinning drive in a sever in a data center with proper cooling and power with very few on - off cycles is probably going to last far longer then an SSD in your kids laptop.

Either way important data should be mirrored anyway.

-Dave
1949  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How does an encrypted wallet.dat file compare to Ledger/Trezor? on: November 26, 2022, 06:46:31 PM
The problem with a wallet.dat and a password is that it's a single point of failure.

If whatever you wind up putting that file on when you want to send funds whenever in the future has any sort of malware / keylogger it's all over since they now have the file and your password.

But, with an external hardware wallet you avoid that risk.

-Dave
1950  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin hits 500 GB size hard disk data on: November 26, 2022, 01:26:49 PM
A Seagate Ironwolf 12TB 7200RPM, which although being sold as a NAS drive does work very well for blockchain storage, is under $249
Use anything you want for your boot / OS drive and stick the blockchain on there and you are good till just about the end of time.

I use a pair of slightly smaller wolfs mirrored together and they hold the data for 2 BTC nodes, and an ETH node and I/O utilization even under the IBD I am doing now for a MyNodeBTC I am setting up for someone is under 15%.

Drive storage is cheap. Used 1TB drives are just about free.

-Dave
1951  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Inflation and its possible impact on signature campaign payments. on: November 26, 2022, 01:14:35 PM
Was thinking that yes inflation will allow for lower paying but 'easier' campaigns.

$20 for 15 posts kind of thing. People who might be feeling a bit of financial pressure where $1000 a year will help out, and they are posting about that much here anyway so why not.

If things are 'good' for you making sure you meet that post count and everything else may not be worth the effort. But keep the effort low enough and you can keep the payment lower and people who just want / need an extra few dollars a week who are good posters and normally would not want to be bothered with a sig campaign might join.

-Dave
1952  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: To those who do not care about their privacy. Why? on: November 26, 2022, 12:26:52 PM
Unfortunately, most of us are forced to use banks, and therefore give up a certain amount of data, since they're usually required to get paid by most jobs.
This is something I accept. As much as I hate banks, I couldn't get paid for my job without one. I know I have zero privacy with my bank, I know I can be censored, and I know my funds can be frozen against my will. These are all significant drawbacks, but drawbacks I must accept to be able to by paid for my job. However, the whole point I got involved in bitcoin was that it does not possess these drawbacks. The whole point I got involved in bitcoin was to regain some financial privacy, to hold my own coins, to be censorship resistant, to be free of third parties, to be free of arbitrary seizures, and so on. Why would I get involved in bitcoin for all these reasons, and then immediately give them all up and go back to a fiat model by using a centralized exchange?

That does bring up an interesting point. At least here in the US there are a lot of 'unbanked' people, usually not by choice. It just costs them more to exist so to speak. There are check cashing places that do exist that will give you cash for your paycheck, but they charge a hefty fee. Local banks will cash checks written by their customers, but if you work for a large company your payroll check might be written from a corporate bank on the other side of the country.

Some places give you a payroll debit card, but that brings in another set of issues.

Would you take 10% off the top of your pay to not have to use a bank?

-Dave
1953  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Full RBF on: November 26, 2022, 12:09:45 PM
Anyway, what the hay. I downloaded and ran 24.0 and set mempoolfullrbf=1 in my bitcoin.conf. This will solve woes with wallets which refuse to support the RBF feature.
I haven't upgraded yet, bet when I do I'll likely enable it as well. I don't really want my node to holding on to transactions which other nodes have already replaced. Although it could also go the other way, in which my node accepts a replacement transaction, but the original ends up getting mined. Could be a bit of a mess for a while.

Kind of funny I was actually going the other way and thinking that I am not going to enable it for a while on any of my nodes that have funds.

Since, at the moment the only nodes I am running that have funds are all tied to lightning channels I figure it's safer at the moment to wait.
The ones that don't have funds are all up and down and not as reliable for others to connect to so it probably does not matter as much.

-Dave
1954  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Bitkub considers going public by 2024 on: November 26, 2022, 11:59:40 AM
I don't know the way Thailand's regulations work, but does anyone know / have a link to how extensive are the financial / operations checks when you are going public?
Here in the US it's actually pretty lax, once you are public you do have more scrutiny but that also depends on a lot of other factors such as where it's being traded.
Pink sheets / OTC don't require nearly as much as other things: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pinksheets.asp

Getting listed in a highly regulated environment does allow them to say 'we are somewhat legit'. But, considering the number of legit places that have imploded due to fraud over the years it does not mean as much as it used to.

-Dave
1955  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: To those who do not care about their privacy. Why? on: November 26, 2022, 01:58:39 AM
But, the 1st time you mess up and NewDaveF is found out to be DaveF you are back where you started.
Are you though?  Because if you care about your privacy, you will dispose of almost anything you do after your action is complete.  As a result, you will only link the 995'th DaveF to the original DaveF by mistake.  All the other 994 DaveF's are still unknown.

If every time there is a new name, a new address, a new e-mail, a new password et cetera then you can not go back straight to where you started from.  And if your new Bitcoin address got linked to your old address by accident, just as you say there are ways to break again the link right there.

-
Regards,
PrivacyG

I'm not saying that it really can't be done. But, IMO since I am so far down that road already it's going to be a lot more difficult then had it been done from the beginning.

Off the top of my head, I have met F2F at least 6 people on this board and had dealings with a lot more. So if DaveF disappears and someone else from this area starts occasionally buying and selling collectables and hardware sooner or later someone may figure it out.

I drop off all the exchanges and move all my existing coins through enough hops and places tat they could never be traced back to me.
And so on.

It's not that I don't care, just that past a certain point, at least for me, it's going to be a major battle.
Do I give up the 10% cash back on gas with my Gemini card? And a dozen other things.

So I'm not saying it can't be. But, since you asked shy don't I care, it's not that I don't it's just that since I am so far down the road the time and cost and effort for me now is just going to be greater then the benefits. For now. If I retire and wind up with more free time that may change.  

-Dave
1956  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: To those who do not care about their privacy. Why? on: November 25, 2022, 05:33:35 PM
I have brought up a similar question and at times it's not that you don't care about privacy, it's that you can't un-ring a bell.
How many people got into BTC / crypto and then figured out that they have now leaked out a lot of personal info.
Yes you might be able to start new accounts and move funds to them in untraceable ways and so on.

But, the 1st time you mess up and NewDaveF is found out to be DaveF you are back where you started.

You never know what leaked where, and how it can be traced.

-Dave
1957  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Would you build a unique new BTC mining pool if you had the resources? on: November 25, 2022, 05:29:14 PM
That might be because P2Pool (for Bitcoin) haven't been updated since late 2018.

Single developer Jtoomim? Which P2Pool you checked? For reference, i meant https://github.com/p2pool/p2pool where the main contributor is forrestv.

ETFbitcoin,

Yes I read through most of the 800+ pages (admittedly skimming through many of the pages of posts) on the pool and it does appear that Forrestv was adding in Jtoomim to push his code into the master.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=18313.msg18981247#msg18981247

When analyzing the two versions of P2pool that I came across it seemed to me that Jtoomim remained as the last active developer for the code use with BTC however there has been no further development.

P2pools network concept was unique and I do like the idea however I am just not sure that this is the right foundation / pool code to start with.

jtoomim is at times pushing out some updates / fixes / tweaks but not a lot. Some as recently as a few months ago https://github.com/jtoomim/p2pool/tree/master/p2pool

With the way pools are going it would be a tough call. Having all the money and resources and so on to develop and run a pool from scratch is one thing. But, in that respect would there be a better use of all that money and time? Better wallet? Better BTC processing for merchants? Better education for regulators?

Now, as a thought experiment as to if there is a better way to build & run a pool that is a different thing. And yes, if you really think you have something better it is probably worth it. Just don't go too far down that path before as you noted you wind up in the list of failed pools.

-Dave
1958  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Is this true? Coinbase has a Custody reserves of 2M bitcoin? on: November 25, 2022, 04:55:31 PM
Adding to what @stompix said Coinbase also runs the crypto back end for a few brokerages and other businesses. So yes it's a lot of money, but not 'theirs' they are just holding it for other people.
So you have

1) Direct customers like you and me
2) Custody customers
3) People who have BTC through their broker and don't even know it's Coinbase holding the funds
4) Businesses that are using their services like Coinbase commerce so it's just 'passing through' but still held by Coinbase.

Either way, it's a ton of coins. And that is just the BTC, makes you wonder how much ETH and everything else thy are sitting on.

-Dave
1959  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Running a full node(s) anonymously at home on: November 25, 2022, 04:27:04 PM
The internet traffic is quite big for one full node already
Over the past 106 days, my node (on clearnet) downloaded less than 1 GB per day, and uploaded 23 GB per day on average. I've set it to allow much more, so it's solely limited by the demand for data. For a server, it's not that much. At home, I don't expect my ISP to complain about uploading 23 GB per day continuously, but I also wouldn't want to find out.

I didn't know the numbers, thank you for this, very good information.
I think that with this kind of traffic (especially upload) the ISP may start keeping an eye on you the user, since I don't know of too many apps that generate such traffic apart of Bitcoin and the P2P file sharing services (like torrent).

In the post covid work from home world 23GB per day is not that much. Add in the number of people who are streaming things out of their homes to the internet these days it adds even more people to the heave bandwidth users. A few years ago that amount of bandwidth would have been noticed, today not so much.

Now, the flip side of that is that the above statement depend on where you are. If you are in an area where the providers are a bit more limited, then they might care and notice. But them they tend to target the to 1% or 2% of users does not matter what you are doing it's just looking at a chart and saying these people use the most.

-Dave
1960  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Craig Wright's lawsuit against Kraken on: November 25, 2022, 04:05:28 PM
The end of the CSW - Calvin Ayre partnership is near?

https://twitter.com/itswillmack/status/1594667376020267010

He's demanding they stop using the word Bitcoin to refer to Bitcoin and that they pay him billions of dollars in damages. (The particulars of claim is the interesting document)

Seems like he’s seeing some of his funding start to dry up and is now throwing Hail Mary lawsuits at people hoping to be able to get something. His claim is utterly ridiculous and I think it won’t go anywhere but you never know when it comes to the legal system. I’ve seen dumber things be allowed to progress as lawsuits. Hopefully this one is over quickly.

Yes but it's up to the Kraken team to make sure the "legal system" are educated. Look at
the Hodlonaut trial, his team did a great job of discrediting CSW's arguments.

Kraken has enough competence to ensure that its lawyers educate the court about crypto. I mean they are a crypto exchange after all, so they should absolutely know the fundamentals of crypto.

Calvin Ayre doesn't seem to be involved in this one, not even in the backstage, does he? Without him, CSW is just a scarecrow or paper tiger.

As I posted, I also don't think they are going to be doing this alone, I can see other exchanges, even ones that would benefit from Kraken going away helping out in terms of expert witnesses, lawyer costs and so on.

Not quite 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend' but close enough that it make it worth their time and effort and money to help Kraken. This way they don't have to be the one dealing with him and his BS.

You can help in the background and still be in competition with someone.

-Dave
Pages: « 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 ... 385 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!