Complete set from all 4 States Utah, Wyoming, Nevada and New Hampshire
You get the $1, $5, $10, $25 and $50 from each state.
BTC 0.036 delivered anywhere in the US
Payment address (for now) bc1q75e3m9sy20xnkefqd3m8p2ukqk3lvqth0sp8lx can also send you a LN invoice or you can pay with SOME other cryptos if you want to.









I will not ship internationally, but will ship to anyone who you want to re-ship to you.
Both minerjones and MoparMiningLLC offer to do this.

If you have any questions ask.

Cleaning out a lot of stuff. So there will be a lot of things listed over the coming weeks. If you have something specific you might want ask and I'll take a look, but no I am not going to go and make a complete list I just don't have the time at the moment.

And as to why this is being sold: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5455887

-Dave

If you do it properly, multi sig is very secure.
If you do it improperly, it's no more secure than anything else.
A secure method two devices one of which is preferably not Internet connected holding your keys an. A non secure method just having them both on one PC.

The more you have separated the better it is.
The other question then becomes what works for you, 2 of 3 or 3 of 5 or 4 of 7 and so on.
For that choice a lot of people could give you advice. But you have to figure out what is going to work for you.

That, or get a hardware wallet. Which also works quite well. Once again, there are dozens of them you have to figure out what works for your particular situation and how you want to do things.

Starting now, where you have a smaller amount of coin makes it a lot easier to get into and stay with good security practices. After you've accumulated more and you've had no issues, it's easy to say meh I don't have to worry about it all these people are too paranoid. But if you've been doing it since the beginning you don't have to get into a more secure habit you've already been doing it so you're already there.

-Dave

I see that some people are vehemently against this, I see it as more the merrier.

Even if they are not good investment products for people, at a surface glance it shows others that Bitcoin can be a good investment.

Some people don't agree with BTC being investment but rather it should always be used for trade or something else that is more of an individual view.

I am a firm believer in not your keys not your coins, but and this is a big important *but* there are many people that don't have a clue about technology don't have a clue about investing and a host of other things. They could be brilliant pilot or and amazing auto mechanic or any of hundreds of other occupations, yet they could barely get to Chase to do their online banking. For them, having to explain how to them do it properly is probably more daunting than figuring out how to remove your own appendix.

With products like this, all they have to do it put in some money and click buy.

-Dave

I made one (it's dead simple) and used it a couple of times it does work, but unless you NEED it, there are better solutions to do it.
But, for offline generation or demo or things like that it does work.

-Dave

About 2 minutes after somebody noticed that you can make money trading BTC and selling BTC hardware and so on.
We (here) discussing privacy are in the minority, we are the people who spend hours thinking about and talking about BTC.

Most other people really don't give a shit. They want to make money or they don't care about privacy and want to do other things with crypto.

While leaving the wallet that shall not be mentioned out of it. People are worried about a lot of things, and those that care about privacy / anonymity will try to preserve theirs. Those that don't will not.
Same way those people who trade in an attempt to make a profit would not even think about doing anything like running their coins through a mixer / anonymization service since there are fees involved with that (however small) and that cuts into profits..... Same way you will NEVER see a real professional gambler drink while gambling. It makes you less sharp, where as those of us that go to casinos for fun....keep bringing me the free drinks till I can't drink no more....

-Dave

Most places that do cash & crypto do BTC
However, if you are using LN it is usually displayed in sats

There are obviously some exceptions, but for the most part that is at least why I have been seeing.
Personally I don't care that much, either way works for me.
But this IMO is important, make sure you are using a fair and public conversion rate that people can verify.

Seeing $10 = 0.0003766 is fine. But if I can't verify you conversion rate or it's far from the large well known sites you are going to have issues.
bitmovers is a perfect example of how to do it.

-Dave

There was an update to Atomic the end of May. So the question now becomes what that the version that introduced the vulnerability or was it perhaps the version that fixed it?
If it fixed it, then a lot of people can spend a lot of time looking at the code and find nothing.

Also, on that note does anyone know if you would see it in what was released if it was a 'supply chain' issue and a library that it was using that was the vulnerability?

-Dave

Shhhh, you were supposed to keep those parties secret.

Oh, 3rd parties.

---

Anyway, what I find interesting too is that the 1st post in this thread is over 2 years ago, and they are just starting the open beta.
And to get in it asks a bunch of questions about what wallets you use and what you do with BTC / crypto.
What have they been doing for 2 years other then designing something that looks like a rock. Yeah, it's cool looking I'll give them that. But 2 YEARS?

-Dave

What I don't get, and it could fully be because I am an idiot, but beyond everything else The Netherlands is part of the EU I was always under the impression that they all more or less followed the same banking / KYC / AML laws with only some very minor variations. So am I wrong on that or it there another thing going on here. I'm in the US so I don't know all the ins and outs of EU banking.

However, as I have said, if so many other places can do it and you can't, it's probably you....

-Dave

o_e_l_e_o  trigger warning below (didn't I tell you in another post to go outside and enjoy the weekend)....

This seems to have been put out there with very little discussion anyplace:

https://www.coinbase.com/blog/announcing-a-global-partnership-with-blocks-bitkey-wallet

So you will be able to link your fully KYCd Coinbase coins with your fully linked self custody wallet that links back to Block to have them keep a way of recovering your keys.

It's just like banking with Chase. But with crypto.

-Dave

o_e_l_e_o , BlackHatCoiner you do know you are arguing with someone who claims to a contributor to Wasabi. That means they have to keep the narrative of Wasabi good others bad or they loose their special place in the world. Or something like that.

Due to the attitude of Wasabi they have lost users, due to the monitoring they have lost users, ignoring those 2 facts they also seem to be working towards working with larger financial institutions. And that is fine. As a business, that is their decision. As consumers it's our decision on which businesses or services to deal with.

At this point anyone who sees this thread / uses twitter or reddit and probably other social media knows what they are doing.
Anyone with a basic knowledge or caring about privacy knows not to use them.

Anything they say or people that contribute to them say that criticizes other services is just going to be seen as propaganda "us good them bad"
Go outside, enjoy the day. At this point almost nobody I know in the BTC world uses Wasabi anymore. A year ago the statement would have been anyone I know in the BTC world who is concerned with privacy uses Wasabi and so do a few others. And I really think the people still using it is mostly because of inertia. They are not going to change until Coinfirm marks one of their inputs as bad. Then they will shrug and complain and move to another wallet.

Lets face it, people are STILL installing and using atomic wallet 2 weeks after the hack: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5454994.0
What are the odds of people like that moving away from this (or any other wallet) because of the massive privacy damage....

Go outside, enjoy the weekend.

-Dave

But beyond all of that it comes back to the transactions that were actually being shown. The 1st 3 mined? Seriously, that is either an extra special kind of stupid or just an outright troll.

I am going with troll at the moment, but since the OP has gone away and is obviously not coming back does it really matter.

With the amount of fake wallets that people keep buying and then coming here to ask for help, I think more and more we should start asking more questions 1st and then think about helping them. Legit people loosing their passwords seem to be very very rare vs. scammers / trolls.

-Dave

Once it's goes live I'm sure a lot of us will put it thought our own personal testing.

But it's kind of interesting when you think about it, bluewallet gave up on handling peoples funds for LN and handing the back end LN node. But in the past couple of weeks there have been a couple of other wallets (this one and lifpay https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456290) staring to do it.

Makes you wonder who is 'right'

Not your keys not your coins, but for small amounts does it really matter? I guess everyone is going to have their own not over this amount point for doing things in an insecure way.

-Dave

Did you create a backup before you reset it? Are you using CLN or LND?
If you have a backup there may be some utilities you can try depending on a few things.
Take a look here for LND: https://github.com/lightninglabs/chantools and https://docs.lightning.engineering/lightning-network-tools/lnd/disaster-recovery

-Dave

Oh look another place they couldn't or wouldn't get a license.

Here's a hint for the people still using Binance.

Run as fast as you can.

They're slowly but surely leaving parts of the world that require some sort of proof that you're not running a scam outfit. As more people want proof that they're doing shady things, they seem to be bailing from those jurisdictions. If it was just one or two countries or regions that they were leaving or being forced out of or being sued in you could say it was just that one particular country or region or whatever. With them having to stop operations in so many places you really can't at this point still think that there's not something funky going on behind the scenes there.

-Dave

And people wonder why the government wants to come in and regulate.
How many people are going to loose everything because they were stupid and gave their money away to places like this.

It's not a new thing, businesses like this have been around scamming forever. And then as they get bigger and bigger and grandma and grandpa wind up loosing all their money the government comes in and tries to control them. So they move on to the next scam.

<shrug>

People are greedy and stupid, and we can't fix that. Kind of like the people who invested in gold back in 2012 and can't figure out why a decade later it's worth less then they paid for it....

-Dave

And the OP has not come back. Not wanting to be 'that guy' but going to be him anyway. Should we start adopting the same policy of the scam accusations section where we encourage people to post TX and other errors in a standard(ish) format?

Otherwise like here we have have a dozen posts with nothing but speculation and no real help for anyone.

There have been a lot of posts like this over time and they all seem to end up the same way.

-Dave

What is the difference between yours and the GekkoScience Compac F?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5355470.0

Things like this are and will always be a hobby project for people to play with but there is nothing wrong with making it and trying to sell it.

Just keep in mind, you will have to support it, and deal with issues with them and so on.

But, it still looks like a cool project.
Post image links, since you are a new users they will not show up in the post but people can quote / click on them.

-Dave

Isn't that with any method of payment. Like I said above.

Eliminating everything else, if you don't see a need for something or doing think it's going to improve your business, you are not going to do it. That really is where all these places like Square that process payments for credit cards come into play. If all a merchant has to do it click 'I Agree' a few times on the portal they already go to daily to check credit card processing things and be able to take BTC / LN / Crypto whatever then they are more likely to do it then jump though a bunch of hoops.
Bring it back to credit cards. Most legitimate places CAN get better rates then these terminal in a box services. But it's a lot of time and effort and paperwork and so on. Or you can pay the extra percentage and just get a terminal shipped to you. It dies, they ship another one, no jumping though hoops. Have a different issue, no having to deal with the CC processor, the bank, whoever else. It's 1 point of contact and done. So yes LN is going to benefit as these services start to put it in their terminals and let more merchants accept it with no other work needed.

-Dave

The pay by address is just a regular lightning address telling someone to send to davef@wherever.com is a lot easier then telling them to send to a long lnurl
Looking at it, it's very similar to wallet of satoshi.

Yes it's custodial, but as I like to point out ANY funds on your phone are not secure so you should not have that much in it anyway. So yes it's bad, and not your keys not your coins. But it's another LN wallet out there and that is a good thing.

As for people running their own LN node, yeah I do it and so do a lot of other people here, but we are edge cases. Most people just want things to work magically in the background and don't want to know how or why.

-Dave