There is no significant difference. Both sites are operated by the same company, 1xCorp N.V., or something like that.
The only differences are in the frontend design and the fact that 1xbit does not have a license, so it operates illegally.
Quoted message: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5412793.msg60900509#msg60900509

So they are really that having on the same company but having on that different management but still
it isn't just that wise that you do make yourself getting involved with these shady sites and better to avoid it at all cost
or if you don't really like to experience some headache.

It is unfortunate but an uncontrollable urge that some gamblers fall into. One of the major reason for taking loan in gambling is where the gambler has lost out but he is trying to come back into the game. This is the real factor that causes it. Ordinarily, gamblers don't begin their game with loan but they are forced to do that because of the losses that they begin to chase in the middle of the game. I have seen seen many like that in offline gambling places that ended up dropping their iPhones and android phones to come back at a later day to retrieve their phones when they pay up their debts. So loses can make a gambler without control to take loan and at the end they end up not having back the loses they were chasing. Gamblers need to learn to let go when it doesn't go their way.

[

It may be that the price of bitcoin is rising because demand has increased , there are more people who want to buy bitcoin because they know that it is a great investment, and with everything that can be achieved when buying right now and hoping to sell much more late, for example, buy now and wait until the end of 2024, you would be making a lot of money, this is a lifelong investment, where the more time passes, the more strength the investment takes because the better price it takes, this is what is expected all the time to be done, based on how much they think about why ? It could be because the investors have planned it that way, if the big investors who are the ones with the most money see it that way, we who buy little by little because we must follow the big ones.

Those who follow the big ones do well buying , and selling when they sell, that is the only way I have seen that they can Achieve the things they want, you only have to Follow those who know and those who know know that there is still a long way to go to go up.

No matter how much you lost on gambling, I ain't got that time for petty sentiments, all in the name of regrets or pity for you... I believe that nobody needs to tell you at that point to forsake so many unnecessary spendings, including gambling....(cus I believe a gambler would always carryon and spend on other irrelevancies extravagantly)

---

The one thing that gives them hope is that -- others are winning, and it'll definitely get to their turn... maybe today, maybe not. How sick that sounds to me...

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

Basically this has become a cycle that will continue to run if the gambler cannot be firm with himself to stop or at least just reduce his gambling activities. There will be no end to gambling involvement because someone who is already addicted will always have a way or even explore many ways just to realize their desires and curiosity about gambling, as you discussed here they are willing to pledge their professional assets or homes just to realize their gambling desires.

So when your hopes and expectations are getting higher and higher in terms of the end result that can make you smile then don't be surprised if people are even willing to do stupid things like that, so it might be very difficult if we just tell them not to be too much because they won't listen to some advice from others and they only focus on their own beliefs. So it's probably too late if you're already in that position, not least because you started with the wrong approach and understanding, simply put "when you lose you get curious and when you win you get addicted" that's gambling.

I believe that they're trying their best to regain the trust of the community and are offering such good things to regain the players attention that they have lost. Bitvest isn't a new name in the industry but still they haven't got a good amount of players due to their weak practices. I believe that they might need some good feedback and some reviews in order to get better. I think the best they can do is to run a review campaign and accept some participants who may share their honest opinion about the site. That way it will be smoother for them to gain some trust from the community and I also believe that they should offer some unique features to get some more attention.

I pray they don't change too, but I trust my Naija people once they notice a change in their services in the future everybody go japa leave them na. Opay has to understand that they have competitors out there who are working tirelessly to take them out of the market. I think with this in mind they will keep doing everything possible to keep delivering their best to their customers. I know that periodically they are always doing customer survey to know what their customers thinks about them and how to improve to keep delivering the best.

I so much agree with you on this very statement you just made above, because the fact that some people lose huge sums while gambling, at times that could be how much they are willing & could afford to lose, unlike if you are a newbie, and then you try to compare yourself with legend gamblers who has got enough funds and willing to risk any amount. Hence, trying to compare yourself or your budget with anybody else is the worst thing any newbie gambler can ever afford to do. Because just as our fingers are not the same, so is our financial strength not the same.

Maybe that only applies to big gamblers so far, as a small gambler, I don't need to send any identification, just do level 1 verification, filling in the information data is more than enough, I can still withdraw money without having to be asked to send documentation for level 2, every KYC there is always a level. That's why gamblers who have a lot of money should read the rules first before making a large deposit.

Usually people like that never know how the online casino system works where there are rules and requirements that must be read regarding KYC so most of them make large deposits and bets until they end up confused when the casino asks the user to provide their identity and complete their KYC. My suggestion is that rich users should complete their KYC at the beginning

Well, as much as we don't know the sites out there that are connected to 1xbet, as well as 1xbit, I personally believe that this is the more reason why we all should steer clear from unknown casinos, most especially, unknown casinos outside this forum.

For me personally, ever since I got into this forum and started playing on online casinos, I done well  to avoid casinos that do not have a presence on this forum, except for 1xbet which is a casino I've personally known and played on several occasions before I started playing on online casinos on this forum.

So, in order not to fall victim to puppet casinos belonging to the same family or 1xbit and 1xbet, avoid playing on casinos that are not known out there, and also do not have a presence on this forum.

Its not even deserving to be called an investment, its just collectibles, ronaldo might iniitially thought it was legit business because the ones that released the NFT was an exchange with billions of dollars of trading volume that is binance so I guess his management thought that its gonna be fine but we all know some people are so detached from reality they think every investment guaranteed them profit and if they instead losing money it must be the fault of someone.
its simply ridiculous how just a mere $77 could become billion dollars lawsuit, well regardless people should know that NFT, arts more specifically, is just collectibles not investment, anyone should be conscious that these NFT are more likely gonna be ending up having low value if no one bids, after all its art.

To be frank when there is any disagreements between founders then you need to be very mindful with your holdings especially when the price is starting to dump on holders, that is one thing about altcoin i don't always like them due to disagreement between founders/team members and to whatever news that may possibly surface one of them may decides to back off from the project by dumping his holding and for the projects to be revived back it would take only the grace of Bull run otherwise those projects that face similar difficulties never rise again that was their ends. Main while altcoin you to be vigilant since falling is inevitable. 

Also, its never been that ethical or something that would really be that good to take advantage of those gamblers on the verge of that huge losses because you are really that taking
advantage of them on which they would be likely be getting those amounts or loans and trying out to make collateral on everything that they could possible have.
Do you really have that kind of emotion on having no sympathy for their situation or condition? Yes, business is business but we can't really be able to deny that
it isn't really something to be that ethical.

The last thing I will ever do is lend money to a gambler as a way to assist them to gamble more, a gambler who have gambled until he or she lost all their money also have the potentials also lossing the money they borrowed, or was lended to them, and we all know that, if a gambler loses the money he or she borrowed to gamble, there won't be any way for him or her to pay back the money except he or she looks for an external source.

So for me, I completely disagree with the Ops idea or method of quiting gambling to invest in it rather, I will rather play the gambling myself than lend someone money to do it.

We came to the conclusion that many people play without knowing why. Probably many people want to be lucky and in the end the player wins enough money to afford to buy a new house for his family or afford expensive medical care to his relatives. These are all very good dreams and of course there is a chance for this thanks to gambling, it’s just extremely small compared to losing, which is sometimes better to stand on the sidelines. Some believe that they won't achieve this dream in their entire life, and are ready to justify themselves with bets, which is irresponsible. Since we want to try to realize our dreams through gambling, we need a tough approach and informed decisions.

OK, I think I understand what you mean better now, it is indeed true that having a big bankroll in gambling does give a gambler a good winning edge over those playing with small bankroll, but like you said, the gambler must learn how to manage their bankroll, if not, he or she may like loss it all in a twinkle of an eye.

It's like what you said before in your previous comment that, the more money a gambler have in their bankroll, the more they engage in gambling activities, a gambler who is out of control may even find him or herself betting on games which ordinarily, he or she shouldn't be betting on because he or she lack proper knowledge on such game or sports.
Big bankroll could be a temptation to the gambler if the gambler lack self control, so before a gambler get to that realm of managing a big bankroll, he or she should or first of all master self-control, else, he or she may just end up wasting the money.

Money laundering from mixers to crypto casinos is a major concern. The mixer crackdown may reroute illegal flows to casinos, but the business won't die. Why? Because AML policies already monitor crypto casinos. Criminals adapt, but so do regulations. But are present AML policies strong enough to handle this possible surge? The government's mixer seizure shows the dangers of lax regulation. Crypto casinos must adapt and impose strict AML to survive. Government involvement is likely if they fail. How can these platforms evolve to beat launderers and meet regulations? The industry has a huge challenge, but it can also demonstrate its integrity and compliance.