IMHO regulation will bring the necessary maturity for the market, and it takes time
I think everything takes time even though it's a few days or weeks because no one can finish it in just one day and make it all so easy. Yes, this is a really long process. But I'm not sure if we really need regulations. If the future of cryptocurrencies are in the hands of states, there is really no point in using cryptocurrencies. Because Bitcoin is basically a legal revolution. And it does not need permission from any country or regulatory authority to carry out this revolution. |
|
|
|
A lot of these bounty projects take time to enter the market because they have a process they have to follow through, I guess. Most of these exchanges, especially the top rated ones would not like to list just any coin on their site. And again, I totally agree with the fact that they might be trying to avoid the massive dumps that usually come after the airdrops.
Bounty is free marketing. Because almost all of the projects pay with their own tokens. Since the Tokens are in their own hands, they advertise their products for free. Most projects say they will distribute token worth $ 500,000. But the actual average is the distribution of token worth $ 50,000. If we're optimistic. Therefore, almost no project wants to miss this opportunity. |
|
|
|
In general, before any investment in any project, first of all, you need to check the reviews. Need to know first hand about the project. Who, how, why, why, how they communicate with the community, how quickly they solve complex issues, what plans, whether these plans are confirmed by partners, and so on.
Before investing in any project, it is critically important to familiarize yourself with the roadmap and how the project is going on this roadmap.
If there is no such information due to the fact that the project is young, then you need to wait, take your time, the risks are always high.
Sometimes it is immediately evident that the project hardly overcomes the stated goals. The more promises a project makes, the more carefully you need to be when investing in it.
Nowadays, other review sites like icobench are making good comments in exchange for money. I witnessed a lot of projects which had 5 star on icobench got scam. So I have some serious questions about the accuracy of the ico reviews. So comments are not an important criterion, especially in the world of cryptocurrency. Therefore, users should be able to comment on their own and invest accordingly. |
|
|
|
|
There are a few ways to understand that.
First of all, the project needs to be a working product. That product can provide a wallet, casino, privacy, stock market service. If the product actually has a functioning mechanism, it means that the product can be invested. Just creating a cool whitepaper and creating a visually good website doesn't mean that altcoin will be successful.
|
|
|
|
Everything that you can find on Binance, Huobi, Okex or Kucoin is legit. Those four exchanges have already done a lot of IEOs, and every single one gave profit. Pay your attention to those exchanges and stay away from garbage like Livecoin or Latoken.
I think the IEOs made in Latoken are rubbish too. But there is a project called TecraCoin. I reviewed the project and found it quite well. There have very talented and strong ppl in their team. I don't understand why they choose Latoken to do IEO. I wish they could start an IEO on a smoother platform. However, I think that the project will be successful in the future. But this is not investment advice. |
|
|
|
|
Of course, Staking (PoS). Because the Proof of Work mechanism is much more laborious. To do this, you need have powerful CPUs and GPUs. In addition, POW consumes a lot of electricity and pollutes the environment.
So I can clearly say that I never used PoW, but I do use PoS. Because I don't think POW is sustainable in the long run but PoS is.
This is means Bitcoin mining does not seem sustainable in the long-term.
|
|
|
|
Staking is a good way to earn while you hold. The complexity and large amount required to hold for staking specific coins are keeping people away or not staking their stakable coins. Binance's staking pool would enable many users to get passive income for their holdings. This is a very attracting offer and as far as I know they are offering very good interest rates. But my question is why would they just give out money for free, especially something insane like 15 percent in BTC for a month.
They are not providing 15% BTC for a month. Their lending platform currently provides 3% a year on BTC holdings. Staking is a different thing from lending. Exactly. I think all we have to do is buy the coins and keep it in our wallet. The QTUM project that interests me the most. I have been following the project for a long time. It's listed on including Binance, Huobi and Kraken. I think CZ has chosen a few coins for the start and I think that the number of coins that can be staking in the future will increase. |
|
|
|
I will only conclude from a few users who say that there are projects that are successful in 2018 and can generate huge profits and are fortunate to have become a part of them such as the Izichain, MB8coin, Gowithmi, Harmony, SESSIA, and Colletrix projects that have recently been able to traded on Bitsdaq.
Yes, the Harmony bounty was really successful. There are also several successful projects such as Bethash, TecraCoin, Vanta, Atomic Wallet and Menapay. I can say that the success rate of bounty campaigns in Bitcointalk has always been higher. These examples can be duplicated, these are just the first ones that come to mind. Before you go into a bounty, I suggest you take a look at who ran it and his old experiences. |
|
|
|
Many cryptocurrency project build with betting platform and almost 70% many ICO or IEO always have betting form, its why many people dislike for investing or joining at the cryptocurrency investment because many people still dislike about cryptocurrency build using betting way for getting investor.
You can use cryptocurrencies to play gamble, invest, education, decentralized storage etc. There are now thousands of blockchain projects on the market. Because you can do whatever fiat do with cryptocurrency. I think it would be wrong to establish a direct relationship between cryptocurrencies and gambling. Cryptocurrencies can be used in any field, which field you use and which you use is your choice. |
|
|
|
Yes, 40% for the early investors is a lot and I think that the maximum bonus for the early investors will be at 20% only. Giving too much bonus for the early investors or the investors in an ICO is a dangerous move because that means that you are giving the pioneer investors a chance to really mess up the price of your coin because they got more supplies and they can easily manipulate the market.
I vouch for every sentence you say. In fact, this rate should not exceed 10%. Giving a bonus of 40% means creating a whale with your own hands. These whales can influence the price as they wish, ie they can dump or pump the price of the coin at any time and make a continuous profit from it. Therefore, if the project really trusts its product, it should distribute its supply to as many people as possible and avoid whale risk. |
|
|
|
Of course high value. although the total coins are small but have a high value. we can sell again and buy assets that are cheaper and at the prospect of a price that will be far more high than it should, due to the fact that someone uses altcoin rarely for the long term and only for short trading and taking advantage of that price.
If the project is reliable, you're right. For this, it is necessary to examine the project closely. You should look at the previous jobs of your team and the Linkedin page. In addition, how much holders they have, which exchanges they are listed etc. I think these are important details that need to be examined before investing in a project. If all the incubators are green for you, you can easily choose the profitable product even if the product's price is low. |
|
|
|
|
Right now, I know Energi, the most profitable masternode service. A very high rate of 40%. But to set up a masternode, you have to have 10,000 NRG. That's an investment of about $ 30,000. I don't know if I'd have that much money.
In addition, altcoins like Qtum and Zcoin also offer masternodes. Although they do not offer as high profit rates as energy but I think they are worth exploring.
|
|
|
|
|
If I had $ 1000, I would have invested it in a project that gave a good dividend share. Because $ 1,000 is not a huge amount of money and in the short term the most effective way to use it is to store dividend shares. For example, if you use this money in Bethash now, you can get 1 EOS profit per day. A very profitable investment.
Of course it's just my idea, please do your own research before you invest.
|
|
|
|
|
Ethereum, EOS, Zcoin and many more now have a working product. We have a lot of dApps working on smart contracts and blockchain infrastructure. People use these dApps to gamble, make financial transactions, play games and more. In addition, XRP works with many banks and XRP serves many banks in the world.
These are the first ones that come to mind and these examples can be reproduced.
|
|
|
|
Wolf bet username: plast555 Lucky number:  (26) |
|
|
|
I had the opportunity to examine the project and played DICE with free registration bonus of 5 DOGE. I can say that the website interface is very useful and the winning rate is very high. This casino is a niche for now. In addition, they give bonuses to newly registered users. I will continue to play at this casino, but I have never encountered anything bad. I hope this goes on  p.s: do you have any active signature campaign? thanks. |
|
|
|
I think that the rules are set by the development team itself. Bounty Manager cannot influence KYC requirements.
Absolutely I agree. It's not the Bounty Manager, it's the team. After all, the bounty manager is just doing his job. And I've never heard a bounty manager collect all the funds and run away. If the team is trustworthy and has AML registration, I think there is no need for KYC for the bounty manager. |
|
|
|
In 2017 i decided to give cloud mining a try and i did get to follow the best ones back then and the following are the ones that were very good until they stopped working excluding minergate and nicehash.
1 Genesing mining
2. Hashflare
3. Minergate
4. Nicehash
back then many fake and scam cloud mining websites did scam lots of people since not everyone can afford to build a mining rig but i was so lucky then until cloud mining stop been profitable, what about you guys? anyone on here that make better profits from cloud mining?
I have a very unsatisfactory experience on cloud mining from both Genesis mining and Minergate. I bought a USD fixed 2 years mining contract for Monero with bitcoin. Bitcoin quadrupled the price in the meantime while the total output of 2 years was less than the threshold minimum amount for withdrawal for monero. Minergate changed my plans and terminated the lifetime mining scheme without any notice. Thank you for sharing your valuable experience with us. I've never had clouding before. As a matter of fact, I have never taken such an initiative. But looking at what was written here, I thought cloudmining would definitely be a bad experience. So Dividend and PoS seem much more logical and reliable. I'm gonna keep trying. |
|
|
|
In the world of cryptocurrency, all possibilities can happen. Now very many new altcoins are circulating on the market, almost all new altcoins are difficult to develop, because of declining market conditions. When making an exchange, the majority of traders rely more on old altcoin to avoid the risk of loss.
You're absolutely right, man. The introduction of new altcoins has become very difficult. It might even think of it as good news. In this way, shitcoins disappear before they even enter the market. But the new altcoins that come with a new technology have the chance to be permanent if they can add new things to the ecosystem. The first thing that comes to mind is Grin. It uses Mimblewimble and it's really promising feature and new protocol. |
|
|
|
|
Money laundering and terrorism is nothing that comes with blockchain technology. This point is important. If you have enough money and you are strong enough you can do it very easily with fiat money.
There are still drugs, terrorism, prostitution and gambling in the world. It is not nice to mention the names of the cryptocurrencies together. Because they really have nothing to do with it. As long as people are bad, it doesn't make sense to put all the blame on blockchain technology.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
