842
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [SSD] Sonic - 1st TOR with functional anon send - Steganography based Anon App
|
on: September 30, 2014, 04:55:31 AM
|
392.000 SSD in C-CEX and to day reveice 1.18BTC. 1 SSD = 300sat only SSD in Bittrex 1ssd = 3000 sat.
OMG! Bye bye C-Cex
Could have not given you anything at all, also I read when this happened it was fellow traders who spent the extra coins that weren't theirs to begin with but never alerted ccex admins. So in essence ccex didn't steal your coins the community took advantage of an issue they had with the ssd wallet and sold your coins for free. I don't see any of these traders coming forward and admitting it though. Quit shilling for C-CEX the scam exchange, you scammer.Big purple letters scare me I'll never trade their again!! Stop shilling for the dev weirdo. You are the weirdo. You go out of your way to scam for C-CEX on a thread you only visit to scam at, scammer. If you actually did your homework I posted on this thread before you positively. It's only only when I see devs acting like they are God's gift to humanity my tone changes. All i see from you is a dev sock puppet and a weird obsession with ccex. Will I defend exchanges that take all these shitty coded coins soon after released? Yes because without them your coins have no value. So kindly go fuck yourself.
|
|
|
843
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [SSD] Sonic - 1st TOR with functional anon send - Steganography based Anon App
|
on: September 30, 2014, 04:25:39 AM
|
392.000 SSD in C-CEX and to day reveice 1.18BTC. 1 SSD = 300sat only SSD in Bittrex 1ssd = 3000 sat.
OMG! Bye bye C-Cex
Could have not given you anything at all, also I read when this happened it was fellow traders who spent the extra coins that weren't theirs to begin with but never alerted ccex admins. So in essence ccex didn't steal your coins the community took advantage of an issue they had with the ssd wallet and sold your coins for free. I don't see any of these traders coming forward and admitting it though. Quit shilling for C-CEX the scam exchange, you scammer.Big purple letters scare me I'll never trade their again!! Stop shilling for the dev weirdo.
|
|
|
844
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [SSD] Sonic - 1st TOR with functional anon send - Steganography based Anon App
|
on: September 30, 2014, 03:42:08 AM
|
392.000 SSD in C-CEX and to day reveice 1.18BTC. 1 SSD = 300sat only SSD in Bittrex 1ssd = 3000 sat.
OMG! Bye bye C-Cex
Could have not given you anything at all, also I read when this happened it was fellow traders who spent the extra coins that weren't theirs to begin with but never alerted ccex admins. So in essence ccex didn't steal your coins the community took advantage of an issue they had with the ssd wallet and sold your coins for free. I don't see any of these traders coming forward and admitting it though. Fucking sheep
|
|
|
846
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] ARCHcoin [ARCH] – The Profit Network
|
on: September 30, 2014, 02:37:49 AM
|
I just hope u don't fuck us all over by releasing everything right now and not keeping anything behind for after the ico. Look at craigcoin, when most shit is already out before it got released it just dumps and dumps and the only person who thanks us all is the person selling the ico... That just sucks Yeah I have to agree, another ICO that can't even sustain a mild increase would really put the nail in the coffin for Presales/ICO's or whatever anyone feels like calling them. I think if ARCH doesn't perform ICO's will die and I would put a lot of money on this. Let's hope ARCH pulls a Viacoin....BTCarchitect please break the shitstorm of horrible altcoin ICO's lately. (BTW i think craigscoin should be valued 10x higher or more but this guy is right)
|
|
|
854
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [SSD] Sonic - First coin over TOR with functional anon send - 0% prem
|
on: September 24, 2014, 09:31:41 PM
|
After migration and salvaging wallet, it returned the same addresses, presumably in the same order, my bet that's bug is related to key pool queue, it's developer job to determinate exact cause, I'm not going to look through every step to find exact line of code which cause this. My time isn't free and I'm not going to waste it on this, thanks. If someone has better explanation why it was happened and why addresses were reused, you can post your version of events.
Address generation is deterministic on purpose. That is a feature added to BTC wallets long ago. If you generate address #X from a new private key, it will always be the same address. Holy smokes, dude. If you are going to review something, know your business. [edit] This is how you can take an old backup of a wallet and recover new transactions that produce their own change addresses. I'm not talking about address generation, I said that the same address has been reused despite it had been used in transaction and shouldn't exist in the queue. Read carefully next time. Addresses are taken from the keypool. The keypool caches addresses from a deterministic generator. They re-generated the same keypool twice, probably by using their trading database to construct new transactions before the chain was fully synced. Case closed. +1 very logical and same simple explanation . I think that should accept now. This assumes a lot, sorry but it does. Do you know this without a shadow of a doubt "They re-generated the same keypool twice, probably by using their trading database to construct new transactions before the chain was fully synced." Because you really don't know thats how it worked. For ExD is this the piece of code you were looking for? bool CWallet::GetKeyFromPool(CPubKey& result) { int64_t nIndex = 0; CKeyPool keypool; { LOCK(cs_wallet); ReserveKeyFromKeyPool(nIndex, keypool); if (nIndex == -1) { if (IsLocked()) return false; result = GenerateNewKey(); return true; } KeepKey(nIndex); result = keypool.vchPubKey; } return true; } в ssd вставлено: bool CWallet::GetKeyFromPool(CPubKey& result, bool fAllowReuse) { int64 nIndex = 0; CKeyPool keypool; { LOCK(cs_wallet); ReserveKeyFromKeyPool(nIndex, keypool); if (nIndex == -1) { if (fAllowReuse && vchDefaultKey.IsValid()) { result = vchDefaultKey; return true; } if (IsLocked()) return false; result = GenerateNewKey(); return true; } KeepKey(nIndex); result = keypool.vchPubKey; } return true;
|
|
|
856
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CRAIG] CraigsCoin | CLASSIFIED ADS ON BLOCKCHAIN | 5+ POD | ICO IS OVER!
|
on: September 24, 2014, 03:32:59 AM
|
Ask BITTREX and tell us , please! Craig, this would be very welcome by investors since the time frames were a little odd. +1 Yeah come on Craig , ask bittrex when Tomorrow at midnight, california usa time. I have a feeling only Craig and Bittrex will know the answer to this, given the time the three days are up it's unlikely the market will open. Although that crew is mostly night owls so who knows.... Craig, one last thing, did you find a marketing group for Craigscoin? This coin will do well without, but may become amazing with a real good marketing team.
|
|
|
|