I think, the next steps in case of exchanges would be Mintpal, Cryptsy, Poloniex. But I think, most of them will add NEOS besides Voting-Lists, if the Volume keeps up this way.

Great is: Time is working often against Crypto-Projects. But I think, this is one of only a few Coins where Time is a friend. Because it just needs Time, that more and more People will recognize that there are not just great promises, but also a great and trustworthy and transparent acting Dev-Team.

The whole market is in a search for reliable and skilled Devs. So... it could be possible. Maybe the next BTCD. But for now: Too few know about it.

Well I can say this much, the bugs from v1 are stomped on.  Sending Neos to "Jimmy" instead of "NjAn3nDjjphytDTyWijjNZAA" is also complete.  Address book with labels is done.  3 of a list of 45 things. =)  Once 2 more deals are finalized I'll be letting everyone in on them also =)  Pretty big stuff and we're really excited.

     Regards,

The Neos Team

Looks like ill start mining here always seem to be missing the start of SHA coins lmfao oh well better late then never and grab what  I can with me crappy 800GH

The value of the holdings will grow as long as the coins that are purchased gain in value. This will be reflected in the market price. It would probably be good to have some sort of realtime indicator of what the value of all the holdings are, then this can be used for people to be trading around the value.

Owners of SuperNET will be getting dividends from its click revenues.

Each asset represents a proportional share of SuperNET. SuperNET has BTC + NXT + BTCD + coins, then the services which will be at least InstantDEX, Teleport, Tradebots and Privatebet.

Also I will only own the percentage of SuperNET proprotional to my contribution of the InstantDEX, NXTprivacy, NXTcoinsco and Privatebet and the ownership of these assets will generate the base revenue for SuperNET. When more services are added then the click auction will generate more revenues. The details for the monetization are things that can be fine tuned to maximize the usage and this is only achieved with experimentation.

Now the revenues from SuperNET (clicks and dividends) will be distributed, half to owners of the asset and the other half to various parties, eg. BTCD stakers, coin communities, people running nodes, etc.

I only talk about direct money flow here, there could of course be a rising tide to lift all boats if SuperNET succeeds enough to start helping BTC prices by pulling in significant amounts of fiat, but this is cake in the sky, so we will ignore it for such a skeptical person such as you.

James

Hence the Supernetwork IPO. It will use the funds raised to privately purchase coins prior to public announcement of their acceptance into the Supernetwork, also for some after market support and maybe even market making to provide liquidity. I will capitalize it with my personal holdings of the assets that are benefiting from the Supernetwork, sharkfund0, InstantDEX, NXTprivacy, Privatebet, Tradebots (aka NXTcoinsco).

So folks the question now is:

What would you like to see on the dashboard in v2?  What would be most useful to you?  I'd rather ask than assume.  v1 was somewhat of a proof of concept to display the possibilities.  Now it's a matter of tailoring your coin, for you.  If you tell me what you'd like to see, you'll get it.

     Best regards,

syntaks

If you have minimum brain you know the mess is caused by the greedy scammer who tries to get all the ICO for himself. And with such a scammer, he is "verified" by C-Cex, and C-Cex does not anything for the scam? C-cex needs to restore people's confidence, by stop the scams there, and let everyone know who is this scammer, so he will not cheat more people in the future.

so we have a hard working dev.

Hey buddy syntaks ..
sometimes you sleep? when I look in here, you always here....Or you are a bot? XD

Is there a problem if I were to run the normal looking wallet?

Each transaction uses a unique address also, every time.

if that makes you happy

Please do not misinterpret what I say and then turn it into a definitive statement.
Maybe I was not clear as it has been very hectic few days, but I said that I could not find out the server topology, probably because I didnt look in the right place for the info. I guessed that maybe it is distributed, which is nothing at all like centralized. This is like saying multiply redundant is the same as single point of failure. So big change. I also said that a decentralized system would have vulnerabilities, but remember I said I was not sure about the topology, so this is a conditional.

So, I hope this is clear. I am not knowing of the actual server topology.
I made a guess that it is distributed
Then a general statement that distributed servers have a possible vulnerability. It is actually possible to create a distributed server topology that is not vulnerable to seizure and also possible to do it wrong.

So, conjecture + possibility + my lack of knowlege -> misquoting -> I apologize for any confusion this caused. I know the last thing that any coin needs is some seemingly credible statement that has the "c" word in it.

James