From what I'm aware of he's a trader and as long as he didn't go leverage
Then there's nothing he should be scared about.
The last time I saw his post was some weeks ago when he stated Bitcoin going to $27K
But I think something made him change his mind.
We still have a possibility in creating another ATH this year.

Fingers crossed.

Is like saying does every country that intend to have Gold as a strategic reserve buy?
Yes they do not just rely on confiscated asset
It shows they trust whatever asset they making their Reserve.

It's kinda free. That doesn't mean they would hold it indefinitely.

I still don't understand the difference between what they are doing now
and what they did some years ago
The difference they just gave it a name.
If they really plan on making Bitcoin a strategic reserve they should have atleast started buying
But I'm sure to them it's too expensive and would prefer to shake weak hands
So they can get cheaper. 

Bitcoin major challenge is awareness and people understanding what money really is
They are so used to the fact of trusting the government and relying on a degrading fiat
That others starts looking risky.

Confusing technology how? government rules how? It would be nice if you elaborated on these.
On its price swing, I believe you speaking about it's volatility.
Volatility is usually found on young assets even fiat experienced high volatility during the 70's
And the recent was the finanacial crisis of 2008
Which opened many eyes to the need of a decentralized currency.

Really hope and want to believe you talking about your account and not the user behind just like Lauda did.
The fact it's posted on off-topic and not on reputation is scary.

Edit

The signature space is been updated and it's done wrongly which means the one in control isn't familiar with the forum.

Terrorism financing has been ongoing even way before Bitcoin inception.
Cash is more anonymous than Bitcoin.

It's inevitable that we will face stricter regulations as Bitcoin gets bigger
So they can properly control citizens funds as it has always been.

The funding of terrorist organization and criminal activity isn't the reason but a means to justify their action.

Bullets are better. What they have to do is make people forget.
Let them stay comfortable with the status quo and if not let them misuse the idea.

As long as there's control and centralization, the seed and desire for freedom would always persist.
We just have to be willing to fight.

This has nothing to do with Bitcoin performance. October set the pace that we entering a bearish momentum.
To be sincere I doubt even if Trump declares war on Nigeria it would have any effect on Bitcoin.
Sometimes I feel we too accommodating and not prone to violence when it comes international
Which is good in a way.

Dormancy doesn't mean the adresss can't receive Bitcoin but that it hasn't spent any UTXO
For a certain period of time in this case 9 years.

External sources and they are mostly dust attack to track the address.

The address above is the one that was linked to Mt Gox stolen Bitcoin and hadn't moved since it was deposited.
But from what I could recall the Mt Gox hack too place in June 2011.
So could be wrong.


The last deposit was a dust. Malicious actors can send dust to track ownership or for scam attempt in claiming ownership.

The wallet address that you saw did it.
Bitcoin is pseudonymous so you can't track who's behind an address easily.

Bitcoin is money. I don't understand why he would consider it such
But Bitcoin is first money and other attributes are just secondary effect of it been a decentralized money.


If it was Ethereum then I would understand his view especially with respect to DEFI and creating tokens.

I don't know I see it from the angle that he's having issue with our regulation
How it's lapsed and KYC are not projected.
Cryptocurrency is relatively new and laws on dispute are still fresh
I guess their focus is extorting from citizens rather than finding a way to protect them.

In the end, It seems we advocating for some level of centralization.

Most merchant haven't even thought passed volatility not to mention thinking of a refund policy.
If they want a refund, they can request for it to be sent
I see no reason how Bitcoin confirmation affects it's adoption.


Adoption is usually plagued by volatility not refund policy.

The live support section is disabled don't know how or why or if I should message them via email.
Believe that would grant a slower response
I tried inputting an amount and it seems I can place bet
But the total amount I have isn't reflecting on the dashboard .

In a nutshell you saying Bitcoin needs ETFs to succeed and it not growing lies in the hands of ETFs.
Yes some funds that would have gone to bitcoin are channeled to altcoins
But how can Bitcoin show it's difference and superiority if there isn't anything to compete with.

currently what Bitcoin is facing that's affecting it is the supposed institutional adoption and government unwarranted interest.

The live chat is disabled which is weird in my opinion and No the bet hasn't been settled.

First time I'm experiencing such from a casino. And it would have been easier if the live chat was active.

I used my freebet that was awarded to me and won but the amount isn't reflecting on my balance.
Any idea why?
The last game that I placed on ended by 11.

Sorry for your loss. It's usually annoying when low odds are the reason your bets are lost.

From my research is possible to buy Bitcoin in satoshi and isn't compulsory to own a full Bitcoin
And it's possible to buy at interval.

It still represent financial freedom for every one and it's price doesn't change that
Since one can get it at any reasonable amount.


this is so unrealistic. There would always be disparity. Everybody can be equally wealthy
They might be given same opportunities doesn't mean they would all be equal

Just checked out the thread and I saw it's self moderated.
And if you read the top you would see this.

It's quite a normal situation
Once you post in such thread, you already agreed that the creator can moderate your post

And the thread moderators actions doesn't represent Bitcointalk.

I can create a self moderated post and when I feel someone is going off Imo or something I can choose to delete.

So Bitcointalk doesn't censor posts.

How you feeling is how some feel about the strict filter of knot and definition of spam.


There's a likelihood this thread would be moved because it has nothing to do with Bitcoin.

We already have a Bitcoin core fork
Now a Bitcointalk alt
I guess next would be a Bitcoin fork.

I haven't really experienced such and would help if you throw more like on why you believe the forum censors post.



P. S quite related to the knot and core debate. Now the case are reverse and we acknowledging censorship
And I believe the other side would say you spamming.


Sometimes we just have to switch shoes to understand anothers POV.
If it helps I enjoy seeing your perspective. It helps limits bias.

I Saw Microsoft . I only noticed it was rn when I saw you added text.
The only saving grace for me would be the fact I don't click links in mails.
But it's a really smart strategy and would work well if they individual isn't well focused.
Phishing still remains one of the most known scam and still very much effective.