The SPR community used to run 85 full nodes between them.
They stopped being happy to pay for VPS hosting for full nodes and shut them down when it became clear that Georgem no longer wanted to be part of a community and started throwing insults around at the people who supported him most. This is why the the Spreadcoin network has been a bit sparse for the last year or so.
|
|
|
Serious questions.
Is there anybody out there who believes in georgem's ability to deliver anything?
Is there anybody out there who thinks that georgem is doing the right thing?
Can somebody explain to me how delisting from Trex will distribute coins better? Looks like a handful of people still own a huge amount of SPR.
|
|
|
Its notable that every project that George calls a scam, has a thriving community, a team of developers and is actually making progress
Time to look in the mirror, Georgem.
|
|
|
Why doesn't CROWN's website have Chinese language options? Don't you think China is also a big market?
All of our translations are provided by the community. Nobody has offered to do a chinese translation yet. Perhaps you could help?
|
|
|
This ICO, which is registered as a company in the UK, is sending spam to a distribution list that it bought from a third party. They aren't even including an unsubscribe link. If you receive spam like this and you are UK based, please report to the Information Commissioner's Office so action can be taken. This is NOT the way that a reputable company does business. https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint/nuisance-calls-and-messages/spam-emails/
|
|
|
I think we are in the top three if you ignore projects that use botnets for retweets.
|
|
|
I have recently discovered that if I have CRW running on my sha port, it blocks UNO and MYR from generating blocks. As soon as I disabled CRW, they began creating blocks again...
That's bad news Maybe that's the cause of no one mining Crown other than one/two pools. Can the dev team confirm that merge mining Crown infact stops the mining of other merge mined coins? For the sake of accuracy, while there are only one or two large miners, there are 14 people currently mining CRW and solving blocks.
|
|
|
Of course! The Helium project paid for its listing so they could do the snapshot.
|
|
|
A bittrex delisting is not the end of the world, BTW.
agreed....trex delisting Spreadcoin most assuredly wouldn't be the end of the world...end of Spreadcoin most likely, but not the end of the world... just move to cryptopia Cryptopia charge about $100k for a listing. Perhaps Georgem could ask for donations from the SPR community to pay for a listing?
|
|
|
A bittrex delisting is not the end of the world, BTW.Well, it kinda is for the Pump'n'dumpers / Mining-farms. But the moment they have to fold and leave, it will open up more possibilities for the little guys to enter. Anyway, we now have so many Exit-Scams (that all fail the howey test BTW) and weird behavior tied to this coin which makes it highly likely that bittrex will drop us like a hot potato. I don't blame them, they have to cover their own asses. But whatever way this goes, I will not give Spreadcoin up and continue the clean-up-process. (with the hopes that once the "stank" leaves the room I can actually drop some updates) More info soon! Do you think that Bittrex delisting SPR will solve the distribution problem? If so, how? Currently, there are about three million SPR on Bittrex...surely they would just be withdrawn elsewhere when delisted? Wouldn't the best way to solve the distribution problem be to add value to the project and encourage trading?
|
|
|
You send us abusive messages but expect us to bend over backwards to come and chat to you in your trollbox?
For the record, C-Cex fell out of favour with us when they took four months to fix a wallet crash...ignoring 10+ support tickets in the process. It has nothing to do with our Bittrex listing. We have good relationships with all of our exchanges apart from C-Cex and Yobit. C-Cex also seemed to delete our accounts for some reason, I have no interest in signing up with a new account and depositing 0.1 BTC on an exchange which won't even run our wallet properly.
If you don't like us or what we are doing, sell your coins. Sending the dev team abuse and threats and then having a tantrum that we won't talk to you in your internet chat room is really rather childish.
Yes, you gave us a lot of support in the early days and we were grateful for it at the time. Continue that support or walk away. Simple. In the meantime, given the content of your messages to us, perhaps you should both change your names to Echo & Narcissus.
|
|
|
Your last Patreon update was over one year ago. What have you been working on recently?
|
|
|
I think this ICO has big promise and will make investor very happy.
|
|
|
Jesus Christ.
What is the point of all this shitty account farming if you are killing the very platform you are using in the process of doing it?
|
|
|
Mattermost is now available.
Turns out that my disaster recovery scripts work a lot better than I expected them to.
I'm 90% certain that the original fault has been fixed but need to let it run for a while to make sure.
|
|
|
Is there a reason why i cant create a new systemnode? this is my 6th one iv created and am doing everything the same, following guides, but it keeps giving me an error after trying to install crown on vps?
No reason that I know of. Best thing to do is sign up at mm.crownlab.eu or contact our helpdesk.
|
|
|
Mattermost Outage
Our Mattermost database has been corrupted, possibly due to a known problem with Gitlab integration and our older version of Mattermost. I need to do some more diagnosis before knowing for sure.
In any event, Mattermost will be unavailable for several hours. I expect that it will be available from 1600 GMT at the earliest.
I am going to take advantage of this opportunity to upgrade the distro and prepare for video conferencing integration while I wait for backups to restore.
I shall post updates here as and when I have them.
I'm very sorry for the inconvenience.
|
|
|
Was pretty cool to see this at the Emirates Stadium last night. 60,000 people there and televised to a quarter of a billion global viewers.
|
|
|
A telegram group posted it.. maybe just pumping the coin.. Probably the same thing about the fork then..
Jesus, is that fork still happening? I'd much rather see a developer take over and do some work on this chain rather than fork... I suspect that the “SPR overlay node” ship sailed long ago. The SPR masternode code was on test, or the test period had just ended when Mr Spread performed his disappearing trick. The third anniversary of that event is coming up soon. The overlay node approach has subsequently been taken much, much further than the historical remnant that represents Mr Spread's initial foray into the area. The Spreadcoin clone is now so antiquated that pretty much all of Mr Spread's innovations are now a supported part of the codebase for other, more successful altcoins and independently maintaining his idiosyncratic approach/code will add to the maintenance load without bringing any real benefit as opposed to migrating to a clone of a more recent version of Bitcoin (at least 0.10, according to the sighs of relief of the Core devs at waving goodbye to a raft of potential legacy vulns). Cheers Graham I hate to say it, because it involves agreeing with georgem, but it is really suspicious that forks are being proposed with the distribution in such a mess. People out for a quick buck and nothing more. SPR, in all its forms, is dead or at least should be.
|
|
|
|