Oh I meant bets, but timezone is irrelevant, whatever the time stamp says on block 420,000
The time stamp is a number. A timezone is needed to convert a number to a date. |
|
|
|
|
Yep, there's a lot. I will go through the new ones and add them once I have the time (which will be this weekend I hope). Keep the reports coming!
|
|
|
|
|
On closer inspection it seems that the best way to resolve the CSRF (which is a CSRF, not just a modified one) is to display a confirmation. "Are you really really sure you want to log in to this secret link?" and have a CSRF token on the confirmation page.
|
|
|
|
What timezone?
Half a year later and still no response. |
|
|
|
Nothing new in daily weighted averages. Weekly weighted average has reached a new high though: 1. 2013-10-18 through 2013-10-24 W. Avg: 177.82
2. 2013-04-05 through 2013-04-11 W. Avg: 175.81
3. 2013-04-04 through 2013-04-10 W. Avg: 172.88
4. 2013-10-17 through 2013-10-23 W. Avg: 172.05
5. 2013-10-16 through 2013-10-22 W. Avg: 164.67 |
|
|
|
Oh so close... 1. 2013-04-09 W. Avg: 214.67
2. 2013-10-23 W. Avg: 196.25
3. 2013-10-22 W. Avg: 189.14
4. 2013-04-10 W. Avg: 184.65
5. 2013-04-08 W. Avg: 181.49
6. 2013-10-21 W. Avg: 175.72
7. 2013-10-20 W. Avg: 165.18
8. 2013-10-19 W. Avg: 163.26
9. 2013-04-11 W. Avg: 158.93
10. 2013-04-07 W. Avg: 154.26
11. 2013-04-24 W. Avg: 152.07
12. 2013-10-18 W. Avg: 148.31
13. 2013-04-25 W. Avg: 143.07
14. 2013-10-16 W. Avg: 142.61
15. 2013-04-29 W. Avg: 142.25
16. 2013-04-06 W. Avg: 142.16
17. 2013-10-17 W. Avg: 141.81
18. 2013-04-30 W. Avg: 139.87
19. 2013-04-05 W. Avg: 139.22
20. 2013-10-15 W. Avg: 138.90 10-day rolling average has been smashed. 1. 2013-10-14 through 2013-10-23 W. Avg: 162.97
2. 2013-04-02 through 2013-04-11 W. Avg: 159.03
3. 2013-10-13 through 2013-10-22 W. Avg: 157.88
4. 2013-04-01 through 2013-04-10 W. Avg: 153.54
5. 2013-10-12 through 2013-10-21 W. Avg: 150.43 |
|
|
|
|
Indeed, I think this is a modified CSRF attack. Someone can put the login link into an invisible iframe on any website, which can not only destroy someone's access to his or her account but also prompt unsuspecting newbies to deposit to a public account.
|
|
|
|
Based on weekly weighted averages we must be at or close to ATH already. IMO period-weighted averages are better yardsticks than the occasional brief bubbletop spew.
Not yet. 1. 2013-04-05 through 2013-04-11 W. Avg: 175.81 2. 2013-04-04 through 2013-04-10 W. Avg: 172.88 3. 2013-10-16 through 2013-10-22 W. Avg: 164.67 4. 2013-04-03 through 2013-04-09 W. Avg: 157.91 5. 2013-10-15 through 2013-10-21 W. Avg: 154.99 |
|
|
|
China all-time high is 1944 CNY/BTC. I dislike the concept of "closing high" so I intentionally omit that from this post.
I disagree. I think technically, closing highs are more important than all-time high. This ^. Price sustaining over time (until the end of the day) is important just like closing the weekly price is more important than the weekly high. You are contradicting yourself. The closing price is just one point, which fails to measure sustained price. If you wish to measure sustained price, the Weighted Average would best suit you (as theonewhowaskazu had already pointed out). |
|
|
|
|
China all-time high is 1944 CNY/BTC. I dislike the concept of "closing high" so I intentionally omit that from this post.
|
|
|
|
Squeaking into second place. Unfortunately, first is still a while away... 1. 2013-04-09 W. Avg: 214.67
2. 2013-10-22 W. Avg: 189.14
3. 2013-04-10 W. Avg: 184.65
4. 2013-04-08 W. Avg: 181.49
5. 2013-10-21 W. Avg: 175.72
6. 2013-10-20 W. Avg: 165.18
7. 2013-10-19 W. Avg: 163.26
8. 2013-04-11 W. Avg: 158.93
9. 2013-04-07 W. Avg: 154.26
10. 2013-04-24 W. Avg: 152.07
11. 2013-10-18 W. Avg: 148.31
12. 2013-04-25 W. Avg: 143.07
13. 2013-10-16 W. Avg: 142.61
14. 2013-04-29 W. Avg: 142.25
15. 2013-04-06 W. Avg: 142.16
16. 2013-10-17 W. Avg: 141.81
17. 2013-04-30 W. Avg: 139.87
18. 2013-04-05 W. Avg: 139.22
19. 2013-10-15 W. Avg: 138.90
20. 2013-10-14 W. Avg: 135.27 Biweekly weighted average has been broken though: 1. 2013-10-09 through 2013-10-22 W. Avg: 152.80
2. 2013-03-29 through 2013-04-11 W. Avg: 146.77
3. 2013-10-08 through 2013-10-21 W. Avg: 145.42
4. 2013-10-07 through 2013-10-20 W. Avg: 140.05
5. 2013-10-06 through 2013-10-19 W. Avg: 139.14
6. 2013-03-28 through 2013-04-10 W. Avg: 138.97
7. 2013-10-05 through 2013-10-18 W. Avg: 134.30
8. 2013-10-04 through 2013-10-17 W. Avg: 131.65
9. 2013-03-30 through 2013-04-12 W. Avg: 129.61
10. 2013-04-19 through 2013-05-02 W. Avg: 129.11 |
|
|
|
Above posts have explained the letter of the law, but TradeFortress has in general paid old rates anyways. I have question regarding future payments. In the event of a rate adjustment between the day of program enrollment and the 30 days following enrollment, do I get paid the updated amount? For instance, there was a change in payout from 0.25 to 0.13. However, you paid me 0.26 BTC. Was this done to compensate for the rate adjustment, or was it done out of kindness? Kindness. I am allowed to pay you using the latest rates after 30 days. |
|
|
|
whats the sum?
3,189,354.44 thx for doing some mental arithmetic  but holy cow, thats 27% of all coins. And how many persons holds those 250 adresses? I would guess very few. At least one is an Mt. Gox cold storage address, of which at least 1 million BTC are estimated to be in. Many, many people hold a share of those cold storage addresses. |
|
|
|
No BTC left to sell in China  . 1216 now with record-setting volume. Arbitrage is needed, and quickly. |
|
|
|
Bubbles always pop as soon as everyone stops thinking it's a bubble. As long as people still yell "bubble", the bubble will keep inflating . |
|
|
|
|
You know, China seems like one of the markets best-suited to using mBTC instead of BTC as their base unit. The currency values for mBTC and CNY are virtually equal if you discount fluctuations in the BTC price. I don't think people made that much noise when mBTC reached parity with the CNY, though. Maybe we'll have to wait for mBTC=2 CNY for the big celebration.
|
|
|
|
|
Volume's as high as it ever was, but price has gone flat. This is the perfect opportunity for Bitstamp to catch up.
|
|
|
|
|
Wish I had USD on Bitstamp... it is so far behind BTCChina that arbitrage will happen at any moment. The price could spike to $190 in a second.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitstamp is catching up now. Still a while (~$10) to go.
In other news, the tiny 1170 wall has gone poof. Keep this up and we'll be challenging the BTCChina high @1944!
|
|
|
|
Still doing just fine. The last week has consistently featured price increases (with a few exceptions), and we're now approaching the price two days before the April peak. 1. 2013-04-09 W. Avg: 214.67
2. 2013-04-10 W. Avg: 184.65
3. 2013-04-08 W. Avg: 181.49
4. 2013-10-21 W. Avg: 175.72
5. 2013-10-20 W. Avg: 165.18
6. 2013-10-19 W. Avg: 163.26
7. 2013-04-11 W. Avg: 158.93
8. 2013-04-07 W. Avg: 154.26
9. 2013-04-24 W. Avg: 152.07
10. 2013-10-18 W. Avg: 148.31
11. 2013-04-25 W. Avg: 143.07
12. 2013-10-16 W. Avg: 142.61
13. 2013-04-29 W. Avg: 142.25
14. 2013-04-06 W. Avg: 142.16
15. 2013-10-17 W. Avg: 141.81
16. 2013-04-30 W. Avg: 139.87
17. 2013-04-05 W. Avg: 139.22
18. 2013-10-15 W. Avg: 138.90
19. 2013-10-14 W. Avg: 135.27
20. 2013-04-23 W. Avg: 134.63 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
