|
^a bit gay...in fact very gay,lol....sorry m8, not into that.
and what do your mean your done..lol did you....lol , are you feeling better , relaxed, sleepy lol ...wierdo
|
|
|
|
Why so many guys like charlee sheen from litecoin hate BCH? They seems dont want BCH to succeed!
charlie sheen lol aka cobbles..is in bed with ....segshit Says who is licking Roger the Ver aka " selling illegal explosives" convicted criminal's balls. lol roger who? sorry i dont keep track of every humans personal life lol only the trolls that come accross my path, talking shit...like you infact lol |
|
|
|
The whole forum laughs at you and i don't know i bother to respond to a retarded piece of shit like you who is in my ignore list for decades. edit: jonald fyookball, lol. Another fucktard shill. You listen to him? Your brain is probably dead. so many laugh look at them all lol its you thats the fool around here. if im in your ignore list then how do you see my comments ? lol your full of shit as usual m8 |
|
|
|
Why so many guys like charlee sheen from litecoin hate BCH? They seems dont want BCH to succeed!
charlie sheen lol aka cobbles..is in bed with ....segshit ok heres a few names that pop up together and somehow always agree on things and talk shit to everyone else cobbles, toad and vays all 3 hated eth, but loved etc lol they love emootabilty but support 3rd party 2nd layers,lol they claim to be btc maximilists but want to screw the miners that give btc value.... these are a few of the guys that have caused problems for many imo |
|
|
|
Where do the Blockstream/Core/segwitters expect the miners to go once LN is activated taking a majority of transactions off chain, basically skimping them of transaction fees?
I think they may very well have just answered that question preemptively.
Stick to your script, #NOFOMO
They can go to hell, That's the pure purpose of the LN. To reduce miner dependency. i hope your talking about segwit ,blockstream if your mean the miners..the people that have poured so much money into keeping the system secure since its creation...mining at a loss many times (me inc)..then you have lost the plot completely. You have no understanding of how bitcoin got and will get value. if you want a coin without miners..theres many to choose from, go there Keeping the system secure should have given them any rights to change the network whatever they liked. LN is going to fix this. (probably) your so fkn dumb.  gtfo please |
|
|
|
Where do the Blockstream/Core/segwitters expect the miners to go once LN is activated taking a majority of transactions off chain, basically skimping them of transaction fees?
I think they may very well have just answered that question preemptively.
Stick to your script, #NOFOMO
They can go to hell, That's the pure purpose of the LN. To reduce miner dependency. i hope your talking about segwit ,blockstream if your mean the miners..the people that have poured so much money into keeping the system secure since its creation...mining at a loss many times (me inc)..then you have lost the plot completely. You have no understanding of how bitcoin got and will get value. if you want a coin without miners..theres many to choose from, go there |
|
|
|
No reason to be confused, just watch the youtube video, John refers to BTC. Then remember that BTC comes from years ago, so if there is a fork BTC remains the main chain and BCH can not be perceived by the BCH noobs as the real bitcoin but only real Bitcoin (notice the uppercase B for the confused) Remember BCH split from the chain, BTC did not split from the chain. So BTC will remain for ever bitcoin.
eth split from its original chain...it took its ticker with it..just saying. for those mcafee fans lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0Ujt0R6qkohe is a funny guy, he also says he is a poor trader and has lost alot, so dont listen to him to much on trading lol |
|
|
|
yea i do, ive been sayin things like this will happen for past 3weeks...
if is its true , how would you feel?
heres a comment from a reader.
the idea that you pay a monthly bill to blockstream instead of paying per transaction is *really* bad. do you need me to explain why? it's not the "same thing."
another...Requires locking funds into a payment channel, like a bank account
Funds stay locked up until you pay to close the channel, like a bank account
Fees go to channel provider, who is most likely a bank, banking 2.0
Provider can force channels closed, require registration, AML/KYC, fully vulnerable to government confiscation
[–]luke-jrLuke Dashjr - Bitcoin Core Developer 29 points 10 hours ago
In the short term, Lightning should reduce on-chain fees significantly.
Essentially they become subscription fees to use Bitcoin, rather than per-transaction fees.
In case anyone try to enforce anything like that (maybe by spamming the network as usual), this will be the market reaction in a matter of hours:  bch me btc ^lols, that pic...thats whats happening right now imo. bch... me...btc is what i see lol |
|
|
|
What a bunch of bullshit and disinformation there. Do you really believe that? yea i do, ive been sayin things like this will happen for past 3weeks... if is its true , how would you feel? heres a comment from a reader. the idea that you pay a monthly bill to blockstream instead of paying per transaction is *really* bad. do you need me to explain why? it's not the "same thing." another...Requires locking funds into a payment channel, like a bank account Funds stay locked up until you pay to close the channel, like a bank account Fees go to channel provider, who is most likely a bank, banking 2.0 Provider can force channels closed, require registration, AML/KYC, fully vulnerable to government confiscation [–]luke- jrLuke Dashjr - Bitcoin Core Developer 29 points 10 hours agoIn the short term, Lightning should reduce on-chain fees significantly. Essentially they become subscription fees to use Bitcoin, rather than per-transaction fees.Of course it requires locking the funds in the payment channel, what's new about that? Fees go to channel provider, yeah, somewhat... but why a subscription fee? That will depend on each channel/LN hub provider. Obviously they will have to charge you to pay for on-block tx's plus a profit. But, again... noone is forcing you to use LN, it's an enhcement/additional feature, not a replacement. The idea behing LN tx's is that they would be instant and cheaper. What's the problem with that?  nothing, your right...just keep doing what your doing lol |
|
|
|
What a bunch of bullshit and disinformation there. Do you really believe that? ... no he clearly doesn't, he's getting paid to spread it, that's what happening here. yea right...so if you pay me more you think ill say what you want ? i do and say what i want m8. |
|
|
|
What a bunch of bullshit and disinformation there. Do you really believe that? yea i do, ive been sayin things like this will happen for past 3weeks... if is its true , how would you feel? heres a comment from a reader. the idea that you pay a monthly bill to blockstream instead of paying per transaction is *really* bad. do you need me to explain why? it's not the "same thing." another...Requires locking funds into a payment channel, like a bank account Funds stay locked up until you pay to close the channel, like a bank account Fees go to channel provider, who is most likely a bank, banking 2.0 Provider can force channels closed, require registration, AML/KYC, fully vulnerable to government confiscation [–]luke- jrLuke Dashjr - Bitcoin Core Developer 29 points 10 hours agoIn the short term, Lightning should reduce on-chain fees significantly. Essentially they become subscription fees to use Bitcoin, rather than per-transaction fees. |
|
|
|
|
so whos gona pay for lightining subscription?
who wants to pay for a btc wallet?
how much % will the prices go up per yr?
get used to this...this is what you guys wanted.
|
|
|
|
Eric Lombrozo, Bitcoin Core contributor and CEO of Ciphrex Corp, told IBT. Lombrozo "thinks" SegWit will allow for exponential scaling. Plus, even without nifty new features, he said all the bitcoin wallets updated with SegWit will immediately be able to handle twice the number of transactions, so from between 5 to 7 transactions per second now to 10 or 12 transactions tomorrow, depending on the transaction type. More important than the incremental boost is the myriad of new doors this technology opens. In the early days of the internet, there were only a few university computers connected to one network. Similarly, bitcoin developers who were first chained to the mainframe can now add new network layers, new features, new portals, all without needing permission from that godfather network’s consensus.  they can now do what they want...lol 3rd party coin is not trustless, its just another alt-coin bitcoin cash should have the ticker BTC the other segwitcoin should be called something else, that indicates it uses 2nd layers and isnt pure bitcoin. |
|
|
|
me -   |
|
|
|
 segwitcoin....  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
