Well damn I like having a million dollar insurance policy that my trade wont drop below what I paid... lol You don't see that everyday. Ive watched that wall get hit too and its been there all night. If it cant go down, which way do you think it will go?

Whoever is dumping on bittrex. Do you not see the million dollar buy wall on kraken holding it up at $300? Pretty much this is the worst possible price to sell at lol. Best price to buy at. I'm in! 

It's not a matter of opinion that ETC is the original Ethereum chain and ETH is the original modified with an opt-in controversial bailout for the DAO.

That's a matter of fact, indelibly written in the blockchain for all to see and verify.  You don't get to wave that historical fact away by characterizing it as mere BTC maximalist POV.

ETC is opt-out and Bcash is opt-in.  Please accept that aspect of objective/consensus reality and the rest of my conclusions, being logically entailed, follow naturally.

ETC and BTC are the default chains.  ETH and Bcash participation is opt-in, requiring affirmative commitment to the attacking chain.  So please stop using the stupid Redditard talking point about how exchanges must support Bcash because they supported ETC.  That idea reeks of false equivalence and Eternal September greedy noob ignorance.

You need to stop and reconsider that opinion because it is wrong, despite its popularity in low-to-mid-brow pleb venues like Reddit.

ETC is the original and thus *DEFENDING* chain under attack from the controversial Bailout Fork.

BTC is the original and thus *DEFENDING* chain under attack from the controversial Jihan/Ver/Garzik vanity fork.

You cannot validly compare Polo's continued (and legally obligatory) listing of the *DEFENDING* status quo ETC chain with other greedy exchanges listing the *ATTACKING* fork of Bcash.

ETC is opt-out; Bcash is opt-in.  Do you see the difference?

Coinbase had no business picking the winner in the ETC/ETH fight and Armstrong made a complete fool of himself by declaring the defending chain would simply Go Away Quickly because its persistence is inconvenient for Bailout Edition.

Polo was required to list ETC because it is not their place to decide on behalf of customers that the controversial and mutable Bailout Edition should supersede it.

And what makes you think Bcash will be worth anything when we start using Disruption Nodes to flood active addresses with malleated tx, effectively paralyzing the network at the economic and protocol layers?

Since Bcash wants 8mb blocks so bad, I'm willing to spend all my airdropped JihanCoins making sure they get as many huge, difficult or impossible to validate blocks as possible.

You see the obvious strategic value in my "Leverage Hostile Forks' Own Airdrops Against Them" technique, but won't follow that approach to its logical conclusion.  Why not?  My guess is you're still building a Bcash short position and will change your mind when it's ready to cash out. 

Hi Pumpertits, thats what she said lol

I've been enjoying (IE been helplessly addicted to) all the usual crypto-drama, especially Roger's "Bcash" vanity project.

This elective rage-fork is harmless by itself but set a terrible precedent w/r/t exchanges being forced with invalid 'pregnant cow' analogies to support every shitty airdrop for all time (because muh Fiduciary).

All the pressure on Coinbase, etc. does it make it impossible for US-based exchanges subject to lawfare (legal blackmail) to compete with those in less litigious jurisdictions, because they will now forever continue to be pressed into service supporting the latest trendy new contentious hard fork.

Thus I propose Bitcoin Core supporters create a Bcash Disruptor Node with the following functionality/UX.

1. Bcash Disruptor Node (indistinguishable from normal node) is installed, synced, and loaded with user's Bcash
2. Easily malleated tx are construed and broadcast with no out-of-pocked expense to user, targeting (exchange?) address with the largest/most active balances
3. Malleated tx construction is accelerated with users GPU
4. Attack Client uses airdropped Bcash to flood network with malleated low/med fee spam tx, forcing exchanges to halt deposits and withdrawals
5. User may select from Slow, Fast, and Random attack speed options for constant, instant, or unpredictable crapflooding fun

The more BTC you own, the more damage you get to inflict on Bcash using your free airdropped JihanCoins.  The force of the attack is multiplied by the stupidity of eschewing a malleability fix and the power of OpenCL to quickly malleate transactions.   


My other idea is to fork Bcash into Bcash2x, which honors Satoshi's Vision (everybody take a shot) by implementing Segwit2x on the Bcash chain, where the egregious heresies of GregStream Corp cannot harm it. 

2 blocks/day for BTC would be exactly the kind of failure mode which would rally support for an uncontroversial hard fork to either new difficulty adjustment algo or new PoW.

But that's not going to happen because the alternative is to use the shoddy Bcash chain, which is so appallingly defective in design that it can be attacked by merely mining it at 'sensitive' times.

Let the scope of Garzik's architectural failure sink in for a moment; savor the boundless incompetence of a hastily implemented rage-forked shitcoin design that by application of additional mining power is actually *endangered* rather than additively secured.  

Game of Thrones must work very hard to provide us with appropriately epic graphics/memes for the upcoming Bcash Officially #REKT thread...

I sold all my BCH on HitBTC as soon as possible then bought back in at the lows and sold it all again around $330 I now have 0 BCH and do not wish to get anymore it can burn in a fiery death the only reason I am here now is to help newbies think a bit more rationally and look at the possible outcomes and how things will most likely play out and hopefully decide not to support this scam.

I sold all my BCH on HitBTC as soon as possible then bought back in at the lows and sold it all again around $330 I now have 0 BCH and do not wish to get anymore it can burn in a fiery death the only reason I am here now is to help newbies think a bit more rationally and look at the possible outcomes and how things will most likely play out and hopefully decide not to support this scam.

I started in crypto late 2012 and have seen the rise and fall of many companies and scams and things to watch out for
I have spent a lot of time studying the various graphs and numbers and taking note of patterns that are emerging.

Only because its cheaper to implement and payout rather than deal with a lawsuit

With big emphasis on this bit


customers will be able to withdraw bitcoin cash

We’ll make a determination at a later date about adding trading support
meaning you can get you bch but you cannot use it with us (i added this for you, im a nice guy..ill even make it red lol  )

Thats when there was no competition now bitcoin is fully established and BCH is fighting a loosing battle and loosing ground daily