Actually.. it is completely transparent.
You don't have to "estimate" anything. You can just calculate it.




It is not.
I told you how to calculate the total fee. And others have shown where the coinbase fee can be found.
You literally just have to add those two numbers together.




Complicated? 

Subtracting the coinbase fee and trading fee from your total value is too complicated?
If so, i suppose the whole "magic internet money" is too complicated for you. You'd better just sell your remaining BTC and don't get involved in such complicated things again.

Stimmt, wie konnte ich das vergessen 




Naja.. in Announcements gehört der Thread hier ja wohl nicht 

Wenn dieser (Shit-)Token für dich keinen wirklichen Sinn macht.. wozu dann investieren?
Die Zeit der (Shit-)Tokens ist abgelaufen. Und da zählt ein "freebitco.in Token" auch dazu.

Meiner Meinung nach ist das verschwendetes Geld. Pack es in BTC und du bist über die nächsten Jahre gut aufgestellt.



Du glaubst, dass der sinnlose Shittoken um mehr als das 300-fache auf 1$ steigt? Damit würde ich definitiv nicht rechnen... Rechne eher damit, dass er auf das 1/300 fällt.

Visit coinbase and check their fees section maybe?
Then further, check their withdrawal fees (transfer to bank account or whatever you are using).

Sum up those fees and deduct them from your total value. Pretty straight forward.

Hello old friend..




Whether the computer is locked, doesn't matter.
Windows is shitty enough that the "lock" simply means you can't move your mouse etc. without entering the password.

Inserting an USB device which executes malicious code is still doable.




If it is not turned on, how is it supposed to execute code?
If the CPU is turned off, it can't do anything.




Full disk encryption? And turned off?
Same as above.. if the PC is not turned on, it can not execute code.

Das funktioniert ohne Probleme.

Deine Coins (BTC und auch andere) sind quasi an deinen Public Key gebunden (vereinfacht ausgedrückt; technisch nicht ganz korrekt). In der Blockchain steht "X BTC gehörten Public Key Y".
Jeder der den dazugehörigen Private Key hat, kann die BTC versenden. Und da die Private Keys vom Seed und dieser vom Mnemonic Code (12/24 Wörter) abgeleitet wird, ist das quasi dass Secret welches es dir erlaubt deine BTC zu versenden.

Ein Wallet ist nur ein Interface was für dich Transaktionen erstellt, signiert und broadcasted. Du kannst problemlos mehrere Wallets mit dem selben Seed / Private Keys verwenden.
Es gibt also keine "Berechtigungen" oder ähnliches. Jeder, der die geheime Information (Private Key) hat, kann Transaktionen erstellen.




Dass "geschützt durch HW Wallet" dran steht ist genau so gewollt, denn dank deines Ledgers kann keine Applikation auf die Private Keys (oder Seed oder Mnemonic Code) zugreifen. Dieses Secret ist sicher im Secure Element des Hardware Wallets gespeichert.
Tatsächlich ist der von Ledger erstellte Mnemonic Code, der den du eingeben müsstest wenn du deine Coins (Alle Kryptos die du auf dem Ledger hast) in einem anderen Wallet wiederherstellen möchtest.




Richtig.
1 Mnemonic Code -> 1 Seed -> Unzählige Private Keys für die unzähligen verschiedenen Coins.

Out of curiosity.. what vendor are we talking about?

I honestly can't imagine how someone would generate a non-valid address in the first place.
A mistake when copy/pasting it might happen.. but telling you that this address indeed is correct after you have contacted him... seems to be quite weird. And untrustworthy.

Do you trust in his competence to recognize an incoming transaction if he can't verify whether the address he mentioned to you is correct or not?

Samourai definitely is a good choice.




But that's weird. If it promotes having RBF, then there might be an option somewhere? But nonetheless.. only offering to choose between 3 options for a fee is incredibly bad.
Samourai is definitely the better choice here.




Yes, this setting is exactly that, enabling Replace-By-Fee (RBF).

Well, it actually is a double spend. But by using the "bump fee" feature, you are double-spending the same UTXO in a new transaction to the same recipient. Just with a higher fee.
It could be exploited to make a double-spend sending the funds to yourself. And that's the reason no one should accept 0-conf transactions. Especially if the RBF flag is set.

There is rarely any use case where RBF does harm you. Close to no one accepts 0-conf transactions. And after the 1st confirmation, the RBF flag gets "useless". The TX can only be replaced while it is unconfirmed.

You don't need to worry enabling that feature

Well, using a proper wallet with RBF enabled, you'd be able to increase the fee afterwards by replacing the transaction with a new one paying a higher fee.
Unfortunately your mobile wallet doesn't allow to do that.

While switching to a better wallet won't help you now, it might save your some headache in the future.

You could try starting it from the command line.
This should show you whats going wrong.




No, you didn't.

Just because you can't get armory online, doesn't mean you can't access your BTC.

Start the old version of armory which works on your computer and export the private keys.
Armory does not need to be online to do so.
Then import these wallets into another wallet (e.g. electrum; but please verify its signature before installing). You'll gain access to your BTC again.

To export your private keys from armory: Click on Wallet properties -> Backup Wallet -> Export Key List -> Check "Address String", "Private Key" and "Include unused addresses".
Feel free to check the balance of these address in a block explorer before continuing to import them into another wallet like electrum.
If you decide to use electrum -> Create a new wallet -> "Import Bitcoin addresses or private keys". Then enter your private key(s) (without the address string).

P.s. Don't react to scam message trying to "help" you.

Yes, it will.

But honestly.. you just waste money doing this.

Withdrawing from binance already costs you very much.
Then, creating a new transaction with spends a fee paying for both, also is not that cheap if you want it to get confirmed within an hour or so.

You can just wait for the transaction to go through. Your funds won't get lost.
Spending ~30$ just to boost a transaction sending 175$ funds seems a bit too much for me.
However, if you want to do it, then make sure to use a different wallet where you can exactly choose the UTXO and the appropriate fee yourself (e.g. electrum) by exporting/importing the private key or mnemonic code.

Yes. The address is derived from the public key. Both can be shared without compromising security.

Regarding your issue.. it seems like the address simply is invalid.
Maybe there is a character missing at the end? Or one too much?

Feel free to post the address here and we can take a look at it.

Dieser Satz schien von meinen Vorpostern wohl ignoriert worden... Tu das bloß nicht!

Der gesamte Sinn eines Hardware Wallets ist, dass die Private Keys ausschließlich auf dem Secure Element gespeichert sind.
Wenn du deinen Mnemonic Code nun in ein anderes Wallet eingibst, vernichtest du damit die gesamte Sicherheit des Hardware Wallets.

Zu deinem Tracking-Anliegen..
Möchtest du 1) nur sehen wie viel deine Kryptos wert sind? Oder 2) möchtest du auch automatisch sehen wenn du eine Transaktion erhältst?
Bei 1) kannst du einen Portfolio Tracker (Delta oder Blockfolio) verwenden. Für 2) müsstest du ein Wallet für die jeweilige Kryptowährung installieren und dort die Adresse als Watch-Only Wallet importieren. Bei welchem Wallet das konkret für XMR funktioniert weiß ich jetzt nicht.

Also, bitte niemals den Mnemonic Code irgenwo (außer direkt am Hardware Wallet) eingeben.
Alles andere lässt sich schon hinkriegen, hängt aber auch davon ab was du mit "Stand abfragen" genau meinst. Eine Erläuterung diesbezüglich wäre hilfreich.

I am not sure whether it is supposed to run on your OS, but what kind of error do you get?
Do you have all the python dependencies installed properly? If so, i'm not sure what prevents armory from starting up.

It is not only about de-anonymizing you.

If you connect to the same server (or to multiple server which are owned by the same entity) through different IP's, he will still know it is you. Simply by looking at the addresses you are interested in.
And in this case, you might get wrong data transmitted (transactions confirmed / not confirmed / not received / wrong block height / etc..) to your client.
A targeted attack is still possible, regardless of the IP you use to connect to that server.

Further, what if the adversary is the person in control of the VPN server you use?


There are SPV wallets with good privacy available (Wasabi, Samourai).
Trying to improve electrum to be more privacy-focused is not as easy as using a VPN or Tor. If you are serious about your privacy, don't use electrum.

Yes.
Download the latest version of Armory (0.96.5).

Where did you get version 0.93.3 from?

It depends on your password.

Did you choose a 4 char password? Then yes.
Did you choose a 12 char password with numbers only? Then yes.
Did you choose a 40 char password which is a common phrase (e.g. from a book)? Then yes.
Did you choose a somewhat random password with either at least 12-15 chars (letters only) or 10+ chars using letters, numbers and special characters? Then no, it can't be efficiently bruteforced.

The first thing to do (which is at the same time the most important) is to make a (or several) backup(s).

You never want to work on the original drive. Only on 1:1 images.

So, if you didn't do this yet: Please stop using your drive. Clone it sector-wise and only work on those images.

They should always be usable.
Of course no one can guarantee what will happen in the future. But you will always be able to simply download an older version of electrum which works with your current wallet file to export the private keys or sign transactions.




This sounds a little bit like sci-fi to me.
I personally never heard of a practical attack vector where someone can "load" data from a flash memory without accessing it physically.

I mean, you wouldn't need to connect it to a computer.. but you definitely would need to connect it to a device.




You can simply use encryption. Electrum offers you to encrypt your wallet file.
That's sufficient in your case.

If you however don't need your wallet on your computer, you are free to delete it.
Physically storing the mnemonic code is sufficient in this case.

By miscalculating by the factor 10 in my head.

It indeed seems to be somewhat the same order of magnitude as 24 words in an unknown order.
Nonetheless, this is quite irrelevant in the case when a secret has to be entered on a (potentially) compromised computer. Especially when the input is being processed by a software wallet instead of a hardware wallet.