I hope this is a joke.

---

I mean, it is funny to listen to conspiracy theories. But some people are just delusional 
Weak minds are getting caught by that.

---

Tails is a linux distro just as others are.
It might be pre-configured for more privacy etc.. but if you keep it offline anyway, it doesn't matter.

Just make sure to verify the signature of the downloaded .iso and you are good to go.

It is a startup parameter.

Either 1) start the software (in this case: core) via the command line and add -choosedatadir at the end
or 2) right-click the shortcut -> details and edit the exeuction path by adding -choosedatadir at the end. Remember to remove this after starting it using that parameter. Otherwise you will be asked each time.

Sollte eigentlich so nicht passieren.

Könntest du kurz zusammenfassen wie genau du dein Wallet (insbesondere das Passwort) erstellt/hinzugefügt hast?




Also sicherheitstechnisch ist das kein Problem. Höchstens ein Problem was die Privatsphäre angeht.
Würde aber eh zu einem anderen Wallet (z.B. Electrum) raten. Ledger Live ist schrecklich.

No, it is not safe.
Stop making such retarded statements.

It is never safe to enter private information into a website, regardless of whether you "turn off the internet" or not..

This means the transaction is invalid because the outputs do not exist (or are already spent).
Basically, you can not create that transaction with these UTXOs.

What wallet are you using? Is it fully synced?




I doubt the same transaction has been successfully broadcasted, since it is invalid 
What is the transaction id?

Oh, stimmt.
Ich habe garnicht darauf geachtet, dass es 255 sat sind anstatt 255 sat/vB 

In dem Fall könnte es tatsächlich noch ein wenig dauern. Mindestens 5-10 sat/vB sind für eine relativ baldige Bestätigung momentan notwendig.




Hab mir die Adresse mal angeschaut.
OP, es scheint als hättest du nie einen Doublespend durchgeführt. Du hast einfach eine zweite Transaktion erstellt, die einen anderen Input (Input ist nicht gleich Adresse) verwendet hat.

Muss romanengel hier zustimmen.

Die @gmx Adresse ist schon mal höchst unprofessionell. Keine eigene Webseite mit Mailserver ??
Zudem finde ich ebenfalls nichts zu deiner sogenannten DriveMining GmbH.

Scheint mir mal wieder irgendeine Betrugsmasche zu sein..
Kannst das aber auch gern widerlegen und mal eure Umsatzsteuer Identifikationsnummer nennen.

Bis es soweit ist, die Warnung an alle:
OP stellt eine unprofessionelle @gmx Mail zur Verfügung und die genannte GmbH scheint nicht zu existieren.
Hierbei handelt es sich eventuell eine Betrugsmasche.

Was meinst du mit "irgendwo sehen".

Kleines Beispiel:
Du hast 1 BTC und sendest 0.2 BTC. Die Transaktion sieht so aus (ignorieren wir mal die Gebühr):

1 BTC -> 0.2 BTC + 0.8 BTC (change)

In deiner Transaktionshistorie siehst du: -0.2 BTC.
Eigentlich, wurde aber der ganze BTC verwendet und ein neuer Change Output erstellt. Trozdem siehst du diesen change output nicht als "Erhalten".
Du siehst einfach nur, dass 0.2 BTC gesendet wurden. Und das ist so ja auch korrekt. Mir ist nicht ganz klar was du sehen möchtest.

Es wurde doch die richtige Menge an BTC von deinem Guthaben abgezogen, oder?

Ich glaube ich verstehe das Problem nicht 

Is it possible to import (watch only) addresses into the wallet?
Or does coinbase allow to import private keys to be used in the same "account", basically creasting a HW wallet + single keys/addresses?

If so, he might have imported an address from the standard "i send you bitcoin, here import that addresss" type of scam.

I mean.. i wouldn't be surprised if the coinbase wallet would allow to add addresses/keys to the HD wallet..

No, you were not right.
It seems you misunderstand something.

Read my response again:


So, to summarize and to reference your statement:

1) You don't necessarily need the private key. Observing the unlocking script being published (a.k.a. the output is being spend) is enough.

2) Even if you made the transaction creating the UTXO, you don't know anything about the unlocking script.
As a sender, you just use the address provided by the recipient to to create that new UTXO. You, as a sender, don't know wheter this is multisig or P2WPKH nested into P2SH. It is irrelevant whether you or someone else created the transaction/UTXO.

Then exporting that one private key indeed is the easiest way for you.


To export your private key:

• Open armory and go to Wallet Properties
• -> Backup this Wallet
• -> Select "Export Key Lists"
• -> Click "Export Key Lists"
• -> Select "Address String" and "Private Key (Plain Base58)

You'll see the address and the private key.

To import it into another wallet, download any lightweight client (e.g. electrum) (please verify the signature, take these 3 minutes to learn how to do it) and import the private key by creating a new wallet:

• -> "Import Bitcoin address or private keys"
• -> Enter your private key with the prefix matching the address you want to recover:
  
  • p2pkh: for addresses starting with 1..
  • p2wpkh: for addresses starting with bc1..
  • p2wpkh-p2sh: for addresses starting with 3..
• -> Click "Next"

You'll need to wait a few seconds until electrum is synchronized and afterwards you can spend your BTC.

If you want to keep electrum: Create a new wallet and backup the mnemonic code.

Da mein Post in originalen thread vermutlich vom OP gelöscht wird, hier mal eine Info an alle:

Solche "Transaction accelerator", wie in dem Thread unten, sind reine Zeitverschwendung und reiner Betrug.
Diese Nutzer locken mit "kostenlosen und bezahlten" Angeboten. Sie bieten einen Service an, den sie nicht liefern können.

War zwar nett gemeint von dir, mole0815, aber leider bringt das nichts außer promo für den Scammer.





Es gibt aktuell nur einen kostenfreien Accelerator und das ist der von ViaBTC.
Alle anderen sind reiner Betrug oder bringen im besten Fall einfach nichts.

As i have mentioned.. since none of these 4 UTXO's has been spend, no script has been revealed.
And therefore only the person who created that unlocking script knows whether it is a multisig P2SH or P2WPKH nested into P2SH or any other P2SH.

The 4 UTXO contain:

Therefore, all we know is that the unlock script's hash will be 4714deea7bae98a2ae990bd1ff059911529eddff.
But we don't know what kind of script this is.

What do you want to achieve?

Do you want to get core running such that you can use core/armory in the future?
Or do you just want to quickly access your BTC?

If it is the latter, the easier option would be to export that single private key (you received just one transaction, right?) and import it into a lightweight client (e.g. electrum).
I'd recommend this option if you don't want to use core/armory at all, but just want to quickly access your coins and have it as easy as possible.

Weird, i never saw that error message before.

Please answer these questions:

• What operating system are  you using ?
• What version of armory did you install ?
• Where did you download armory from ?
• What exactly did you do, that you got that message ?

Further, if possible, provide a screenshot and upload the armory log files (you can use pastebin or any other similar service and provide us the link).

In theory this is completely irrelevant.
If your device is compromised, it is compromised. Regardless of whether you enter the mnemonic code into an application or open your wallet file.




Do you mean that you use the same password across multiple sites? If that's the case, you might want to overthink what you are doing... That's definitely not the proper way.

It is "more dangerous" to enter the mnemonic code multiple times if you enter them into different devices or if there is a risk that your device got compromised in the meantime.


I think a hardware wallet would be a better alternative for you. It is easier to use than an offline setup and less error-prone.

I cant emphasize this enough: Make a backup of your wallet.dat file before doing anything else.

Afterwards, you have 2 options to access your coins.
The first is to keep bitcoin core and let it sync. This might take some time and needs ~330+ GB of hard drive space.
This option takes more time, but requires less work from your side. After the syncing process is finished, you can access and send your coins.

The second option is to use core to export the private keys and use another wallet (e.g. electrum) to import them (make sure to verify the signature of the downloaded file!). Afterwards you can access and send your coins.
This option takes less than 20 minutes but is more sophisticated and requires more work from you.

You don't need to know the private key.
When the output is being spend, the unlocking script has to be revealed. And once you observe this, you can tell whether it is P2WPKH nested into P2SH or a multisig P2SH. Or even something completely different.

However, if the UTXO is not spent yet, there is no way of knowing this other than having the unlocking script created by yourself (i.e. you are the recipient).

First, you should educate yourself about bitcoin.

The fact that you chose a completely unknown website as "your wallet" paired with that you now think to use coinbase or blockchain with your ID shows that you are not well informed enough.

Browse this forum and check bitcoin.org.
Answer for yourself what kind of wallet you want or need. And stay away from web wallets or custodial ones. Choose a desktop- or mobile wallet.

Generally, electrum is a good desktop wallet for newcomers. You might want to look into it.

Wieso kam nix an?
Die Gebühr wahr hoch genug.

Wurde die Transaktion denn gebroadcastet, also hast du die in einem Blockexplorer (z.B. blockchair) sehen können?




Könntest du uns die Transaktions ID geben? Dann können wir selber nachsehen.




Die Gebühr ist hoch genug, ja.
War Core denn komplett gesynct? Hast du die Transaktion in deiner Historie geshen? Hast du die ID?




Soweit ich das sehe, ist hier kein Fehler festzustellen.
Die Wechselgeldadresse wird dir nicht automatisch angezeigt, wofür auch. Das verwirrt nur.