Why exactly should a new closed-source wallet be reliable?
I'd never recommend a closed source wallet over samourai or electrum.

And there are other (cheaper) ways than a hardware wallet to store coins securely.
With an unused device, an air-gapped wallet for example. Or a paper wallet. Both of them are kind of impractical when it comes to frequently transacting, but are definitely secure if managed properly.

It seems like Trezor is bringing out one hotfix after another.
To me, it seems like the device is broken itself, but kept together with patches.

I mean.. it works.. but it's not how it is supposed to be. A new generation device is needed IMO.

For future reference:

To make sure that the software you are installing, gets installed in your users directory (instead of the root directory) and to run pip without sudo, you need to use the --user parameter:


You should use sudo pip only if you want to install something system-wide (which should rarely be the case).

It's the blockchain data.
Armory needs core do be installed and fully synced.


You are starting core with the datadir argument D:\\somedir\\Crypto\\Armory\\Bitcoin Blockchain Data':


The blockchain is being downloaded, processed and saved in this directory.

If you already have the blockchain downloaded, you need to point armory towards the correct directory.

Hopefully only your scamcoins got stolen, and your BTC were already transferred.
This is one of the reasons we always recommend to claim shitcoins in a virtual machine.



Probably not since it would be quite useless for an attacker aiming for cryptocurrencies.
However the possibility (while being low) exists.



Yes, definitely.



Quite a lot is being logged in the event log, but you probably won't find out what exactly has been uploaded without hiring some forensic expert.



While unlikely, it is possible.


Note that i answered your questions, whether a malware could do that.
Personally, i believe it is extremely unlikely since the malware only wanted to get your coins.

Most crypto stealing malware is extremely simple and not as devastating as it could be.
However, reinstalling your OS would be your best bet to be on the safe side.

In electrum, am besten irgendwo bei "Empfangen", "Receive", "Address" oder ähnliches.
Bei blockchain.com weiß ich es nicht genau, müsste aber auch irgendwo dort zu finden sein. Es geht quasi um die Adresse, auf die du BTC empfangen kannst.

Why is that important?
The sender is responsible for the delivery of the product.

If someone steals it, they have to replace it. What are you scared of? Theft? Manipulation?

Sure, by looking at the transaction on an explorer.
But unfortunately you'll only see which address received your coins, not who that person in control over the private key is.
If your coins have been stolen, the chance of getting them back is almost zero.

More important is to find out how your coins got stolen. If your computer is infected, more data could be at risk.

Did you receive a popup as shown by erikoy? Or where did you electrum download from?
What OS are you using and where is your mnemonic code stored (PC, paper, email, ..) ?

Yes, you are.
But unfortunately your sciolism may hurt others. Especially people who are new to crypto and/or InfoSec.




I completely understood you.
You are using an OS which has reached its end of life 2 years ago and therefore is outdated and risky to use:




It is not.
Tails is a distro based on debian. It is not more or less secure than debian.
Tails has tools installed to preserve the users privacy and anonymity. For example by routing everything via TOR by default.

It has no direct effect on the security whatsoever.

Hast du denn in beiden Wallets (also Electrum und blockchain.com) die selbe Art von Adressen? Also: Fangen die Adressen in beiden Wallets gleich an (mit 1.., mit 3.. bzw. mit bc1..) ?
Wenn nicht, dann musst du in electrum den richten Adresstyp einstellen.
Wenn das übereinstimmt, müsstest du (sofern electrum eine Verbindung zum Server hat - benutze die App leider nicht, kann desswegen leider nicht sagen woran man das sieht) eigentlich eine Historie sehen.



Super

You can pretty much ignore the post from keychainX here.

As mentioned in your other thread, if you don't know anything about your password, your chances are pretty much zero.
Rescanning is something completely different.

I am assuming you bought that wallet file. Everyone (absolutely everyone) selling wallet files is a scammer.

Electrum braucht maximal eine Minute um alles aktualisiert zu haben.

Auf die App "laden" kann man sowieso nichts. Die BTC sind mit deinen public keys verknüpft. Und die dazugehörigen Private keys (welche du zum ausgeben brauchst) werden vom Mnemonic code (den 12 Wörtern) abgeleitet.
Ein Wallet ist also nur ein Interface um deine BTC zu managen.


Zu deinem Problem:
So wie es andere erwähnt haben, dass es z.B. an einer anderen IP etc. liegt, kann es eigentlich nicht sein.
Blockchain.com (welches übrigens ein extrem schlechtes und fehlerbehaftetes online wallet ist), hat dein Wallet file verschlüsselt auf deren Servern. Wenn du dich einloggst, wird es auf deinen Rechner heruntergeladen und du kannst lokal im Browser Transaktionen ausführen etc.

Die 12 Wörter stellen all deine private keys her. Wenn du die in Electrum eingegeben hast, und es quasi "aktualisiert" ist und mit einem Server verbunden ist (Das merkst du z.B. daran wenn alle Transaktionen in der Historie zu sehen sind), dann siehst du auch deinen gesamten "Bestand" an BTC.
Wenn da 0 steht, dann ist 0 auch die endgültige Zahl.

Da blockchain.com aber wirklich extrem schrecklich ist, gibt es da auch noch ein Wallet auf das du garkeinen Zugriff hast. Quasi dein "Account" bei blockchain.com. Das sollte wenn ich mich recht erinnere das "Trading Wallet" sein.
Da hast du keine private keys dafür, und viele Leute haben Probleme damit.

Daher meine Fragen:
Hast du die BTC direkt bei blockchain.com gekauft?
Hast du die jemals vom "Trading Wallet" auf dein "eigenes" Wallet verschoben/transferiert?
Ist dir das jemals aufgefallen, dass es ein "Trading Wallet" gibt?
Oder hast du die BTC nie auf blockhain.com gekauft, sondern nur dorthin transferiert?


P.s. Nach deinem Urlaub, wäre es das beste wenn du alle BTC weg von blockhain.com transferierst. Am besten gar kein Online Wallet mehr verwenden. Sicherheitstechnisch sind diese ein Alptraum.

Da läuft es jedem, der ein wenig auf Sicherheit achtet, kalt den Rücken herunter.
Eine zentrale Instanz, welche kompromittiert werden kann, zusammen mit einer Pseudo-sicherheit in Form von weniger als einer Sekunde Rechenzeit.

Da es dich im Endeffekt ja nur 200€ gekostet hat, sollte es ja auch kein Problem sein. Aber riskant ist es dennoch. Zumindest riskanter und zentralisierter als eine dezentrale Währung sein sollte.

No. Exodus is one of the worst wallets available.

• Missing features (e.g. Multi signature)
• Bad security (Seed exposed in memory after unlocking the wallet)
• Closed source

Since you are explicitly asking for a bitcoin wallet, do not use exodus.
If you don't want to download the whole blockchain, use a lightweight wallet. If you don't care much about your privacy, electrum. If you want to stay more private, use wasabi.

Nevertheless, the security of a desktop wallet can only be as good as your PC is protected.
For higher amounts, better use offline storage or get a hardware wallet.

A rescan?

You are not "looking for a rescan".
As previously mentioned, if you don't recall what your password might be (e.g. you know the length, charset, anything..) and the password is longer than a few chars (like 5-7), then your chances are pretty much zero.

If you don't have an old backup (prior to changing the password) or your password written down anywhere, you are unfortunately out of luck.


Oh, and btw.. if you bought the wallet file, you got scammed. There is nothing to get out of it.

And exactly that is the reason you should not give any security advises at all.
El Capitan has reached its end of life in august 2018.

No one should be using an OS which didn't receive any security updates within the last 2 years. And especially not when storing crypto (or any other sensitive data).

You might not care about your security and privacy at all, and that is fine. That's what you are showing us.
But don't participate in discussions about security with such statements:

"Pending" heißt in diesem Fall unbestätigt ?
Falls das so ist, kannst du eine neue ETH Transaktion (Menge: 0 ETH) versenden und dabei die gleiche Nonce wie die zu ersetzende Transaktion verwenden.
Falls du die Transaktion ersetzten möchtest (quasi Gebühr erhöhen), einfach gleiche Adresse und gleiche Menge und wieder mit der gleichen Nonce versenden.

Um an die Nonce zu kommen, kannst du einfach auf https://etherscan.io/ (oder einem anderen explorer), die letzte bestätigte ausgehende Transaktion von der Adresse suchen und schauen welche Nonce diese hat.
Die nächste Transaktion hat dann automatisch eine Nonce um 1 größer.

Also wenn die letzte bestätigte TX hat eine Nonce von X hat, dann hat deine unbestätigte TX eine Nonce von X+1. Und diese musst du auch wiederverwenden.


Dann einfach die Transaktion mit einem Wallet, dass ledger unterstützt (z.B. MEW) versenden.

Actually it doesn't have to be only after the first transaction got confirmed, but can be at the same time (i.e. same block) too.
That's how CPFP works, the second transaction pays a fee high enough for both transactions to be included in a timely manner in the same block.




That's a double spend using RBF (Replace-by-Fee), not CPFP.

This sounds really weird.
Did you receive any email regarding your ticket? Maybe in your spam folder?

I'd definitely try to open another ticket. How exactly did you describe the problem?
Maybe they didn't understand you?

A new nano? No, there is no reason to do so.
Make sure to use a new seed (created by the nano) tho, not any potentially pregenerated one.



Yes.



 
Your coins are associated to your public keys.
And the corresponding private keys are derived from the seed.

It doesn't matter which wallet you use to access them. If you create a transaction, your balance obviously will go to 0 (when sending everything).
I don't get what you are asking 




You can use a BIP39 mnemonic code in electrum, but can't use an native electrum mnemonic in any other wallet (almost).