To be honest, I am now convinced to purchase a .22 handgun, Should i ever buy a handgun (i live in canada its kinda hard to legaly carry a handgun) I just NEVER even Thought about it! I always had the "i dont want to fucking kill a guy who stole my wallet, I want to Stop him, So im gonna aim for the leg" Well, Thats kinda hard... Swap to a less lethal bullet, And i should beable to hit the guy in the stomach or back without lethal consequences.
A 22lr can be lethal if you hit the right spot. There is a thread around here somehwere about a 92 year old man who killed an intruder in his house. He used a 22lr rifle. The guy apparently got a couple blocks away before dying, 22lr definately won't knock somebody down and keep them down like a bigger round, but you can still kill people with it. Put five of them in a man in under 3 seconds, and he is as likely to drop as with a 45 to the gut. Might even still cost less. In the past, I've thought about the idea of a PDW that uses three 22lr barrels arranged in an equalateral triangle, wherein each of the three fires one round simulaniously. I imagine, though I can't know because I've never actually tried it, the perfect shot group pattern of impact would create a prettly large trauma zone. I can't know if the ATF would consider it a machine gun or not.
|
|
|
This is why Travon Martin is facing felony charges in Florida, because that ongoing threat is under question. If you shoot the guy in the back, it all but implies that he was running away, thus no further threat exists.
I tought Travon Martin was dead? You must mean Zimmerman is being charged. Yeah, that's it. I'm old, just accept it.
|
|
|
Best military rifle?
Whichever one is in my hands when the shit hits the fan.
When the shit hits the fan, which rifle would you most like to be holding? Which would you be most likely to be holding? I'm most likely to be holding a Marlin 22lr, and considering that I have in my possesion thousands of rounds for the thing (as compared to merely hundreds for my Mosin-Nagant), I think that it's a fine choice for two legged game in an urban combat zone. I'm not the only one, either.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdr14xVetXMTo be honest, I am now convinced to purchase a .22 handgun, Should i ever buy a handgun (i live in canada its kinda hard to legaly carry a handgun) I just NEVER even Thought about it! I always had the "i dont want to fucking kill a guy who stole my wallet, I want to Stop him, So im gonna aim for the leg" Well, Thats kinda hard... Swap to a less lethal bullet, And i should beable to hit the guy in the stomach or back without lethal consequences. Even in a pro-gun US state, with "stand your ground" laws in effect, there are always legal consequences with any shooting, and if you shot your pickpocket in the back you're going to prison. That's one of the classic examples that the state instructors teach is almost never a justifiable use of lethal force, and even a 22lr is lethal force. The reason is that you can only respond to threat of force with force, and only for so long as that credible threat exists (or a jury of your peers can be convinced that a reasonable person would fear the threat under the same circumstances). This is why Travon Martin is facing felony charges in Florida, because that ongoing threat is under question. If you shoot the guy in the back, it all but implies that he was running away, thus no further threat exists.
You just cannot justify "i only Shot at the burgler because i was defending my home!" "You mean you killed a man who entered your house with the intent to steal" "dude! He was robbing me! I didnt mean to kill him!" "riighhttt... And im sure that john doe didnt mean to rob you"
And that is why "castle doctrine" laws exist in the US. If someone breaks into your home, or otherwise forces their way in, the law assumes that they were there with criminal intent. Particularly after dark and if you don't know the guy. If they were just drunk and mistook your house for theirs, that's a shame but breaking & entering is, itself, a crime; alcohol kills addicts eventually.
|
|
|
On a loosely related note....
1) The Swiss were the first soverign nation to recognize the independent United States, ...
Is that right? For what it's worth I was in Morocco recently and half the people I met made a point of saying that Morocco was the first to recognize the U.S. But maybe they did not fit the definition of a sovereign nation at the time? I have no idea. Well, a quick google search reveals that not only is my memory a bit off on this topic, there is a bit of disagreement as to that point anyway. According to Wikipedia ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morocco%E2%80%93United_States_relations) Moroocco officially recognised the US on Dec 20th 1777. However the Wikipedia page on the Netherlands ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands-US_relations) states this little tidbit... "The Netherlands was the first foreign country to salute the American Flag on November 16 1776[1] and therefore the first foreign nation to (unofficially) recognise the United States as an independent nation. On 19 April 1782 John Adams was received by the States General in The Hague and recognized as Minister Plenipotentiary of the United States of America. The house that Adams purchased in The Hague became the first American embassy in the world." So I was wrong. There, I said it.
|
|
|
How can it still be waiting for confirmation on that much Bitcoin when the 20 and 10 BTC transactions in last night have 90+ confirmations?
Because Bitcoin Wallet for Android keeps the blockchain local to the phone, and needs to catch up to the rest of the network on it's own. This is the primary reason that I've switched to BitcoinSpinner, which uses a divided wallet method & keeps the blockchain on the BitconSpinner server instead.
|
|
|
The difference between Bitcoin and gold is (technically) you can't plunder and steal Bitcoin by force.
That's not technically true. If a thug knows who has access to the wallet.dat, all that is required is a little uninterrupted time with an Alabama lie detector. The trick is that, since they are not a physical object, they need not exist in any particular place (i.e. a safe) that can be compromised. Yip u agrees, but it does look easier to protect. I know In Bitcoin's short history a fare bit has been stolen, but it looks like it is easier to prevent theft by brute force than gold. With a brain wallet technically you can mug me but you can't steel my money, - well you can but being a 7' Viking with an axe does not make it any easier to steel. It does if I'm willing to cut off your fingers one at a time until you give me your brainwallet seed.
|
|
|
Just a question.
Why would you want a 12 year old to learn shooting?
I want her to learn firearms safety, learning to shoot well is just fun. I took my son there last year, and he was only 8. I find those facts shocking as a normal person here where I live never gets to touch a gun in his life. Where do you live? EDIT: Ah, nevermind. I can see from your profile that you live in the Peoples' Republic of Spain. Ironicly, some of the best shotguns available are manufactured in Spain. http://www.chuckhawks.com/spanish_shotguns.htmEDIT2: The US federal government has long had a program for encouraging marksmenship skills in the civilian population (yes, that includes all of the "liberal" administrations, despite some recent anti-gun propoganda to end the program) called the Civilian Marksmanship Program. http://www.odcmp.com/The Appleseed program is one that primarily uses 22lr rifles, while most of the others use airsoft rifles. The point of the CMP is to instil high levels of skill into young adults, should the draft ever be reinstated due to another world war level event. The CMP is also the only federal program authorised by law to sell military surplus rifles to the public, so I can now go buy a M1 Garand, a WWII surplus rifle worth at least $1200 if you can buy it at all. One of the instructors had one there to show off, and it's beautiful. I've literally never seen one before in person, that wasn't behind glass at the Frazier Military History Museum ( http://www.fraziermuseum.org/) On the other hand, I'm swiss. And all the male swiss citizen have to make the obligatory military service. So, yeah there's a lot of contrast in each country. On a loosely related note.... 1) The Swiss were the first soverign nation to recognize the independent United States, 2) the first nation to loan us money and... 3) the inspiration for the US constitution's 2nd amendment & general 'militia' defense mindset prior to 1880. Also the foundation story of the Swiss (Will Penn?) is one of the first lessons my children have learned about in their homeschool curriculum ( www.sonlight.com). In fact, that story is taught to kindergarten ages and before the story of the US itself. What made a Swiss born move to Spain? Work?
|
|
|
And any economic advantage that inflation may hold for a particular nation's trade policy is 1) always a temporary effect that lasts only as long as it takes for the international community to adjust to the changes in relative value and 2) only applies if no one else is also debasing their currency at the same time, which is clearly not the case in our modern world.
Also, bear in mind that nations don't actually trade, people do. So any advantage in trade imbalances due to one-sided inflationary policies benefit a corporation on one side of that international trade, not even a government and never a population.
Are You sure this applies to China ? I'm positive.
|
|
|
@Adrian-x
A deflating bitcoin will not solve any of the problems You are talking about. An inflating bitcoin can solve my problem of providing liquidity for start-up companies.
The reason why now You need 2 incomes to support a US family is lack of inflation ... decades of relative overvaluation of $ compared to other currencies and now You have competition from low-cost-labor countries that purposely kept the value of their currency low. Such a competition can eliminate the value collected in BTC very fast.
Wow, I'm continually amazed at the economic ignorance of some forum members. While it's a bit of a distortion to blame all of the economic woes of our modern world on inflationary monetary policies, inflation in general solves only one problem. That one problem is the access to liquidity of those who have the the legal authority to create new funds and the people and industries that are most closely connected to that entity. In the modern case of the US; those entities include the Federal Reserve & member banks, the federal government, & any major corporation or lobbying group with close ties to said government. That does not, ever, include middle class American households. And any economic advantage that inflation may hold for a particular nation's trade policy is 1) always a temporary effect that lasts only as long as it takes for the international community to adjust to the changes in relative value and 2) only applies if no one else is also debasing their currency at the same time, which is clearly not the case in our modern world. Also, bear in mind that nations don't actually trade, people do. So any advantage in trade imbalances due to one-sided inflationary policies benefit a corporation on one side of that international trade, not even a government and never a population.
|
|
|
The difference between Bitcoin and gold is (technically) you can't plunder and steal Bitcoin by force.
That's not technically true. If a thug knows who has access to the wallet.dat, all that is required is a little uninterrupted time with an Alabama lie detector. The trick is that, since they are not a physical object, they need not exist in any particular place (i.e. a safe) that can be compromised.
|
|
|
Best military rifle?
Whichever one is in my hands when the shit hits the fan.
When the shit hits the fan, which rifle would you most like to be holding? Which would you be most likely to be holding? I'm most likely to be holding a Marlin 22lr, and considering that I have in my possesion thousands of rounds for the thing (as compared to merely hundreds for my Mosin-Nagant), I think that it's a fine choice for two legged game in an urban combat zone. I'm not the only one, either.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdr14xVetXM
|
|
|
Just a question.
Why would you want a 12 year old to learn shooting?
I want her to learn firearms safety, learning to shoot well is just fun. I took my son there last year, and he was only 8. I find those facts shocking as a normal person here where I live never gets to touch a gun in his life. Where do you live? EDIT: Ah, nevermind. I can see from your profile that you live in the Peoples' Republic of Spain. Ironicly, some of the best shotguns available are manufactured in Spain. http://www.chuckhawks.com/spanish_shotguns.htmEDIT2: The US federal government has long had a program for encouraging marksmenship skills in the civilian population (yes, that includes all of the "liberal" administrations, despite some recent anti-gun propoganda to end the program) called the Civilian Marksmanship Program. http://www.odcmp.com/The Appleseed program is one that primarily uses 22lr rifles, while most of the others use airsoft rifles. The point of the CMP is to instil high levels of skill into young adults, should the draft ever be reinstated due to another world war level event. The CMP is also the only federal program authorised by law to sell military surplus rifles to the public, so I can now go buy a M1 Garand, a WWII surplus rifle worth at least $1200 if you can buy it at all. One of the instructors had one there to show off, and it's beautiful. I've literally never seen one before in person, that wasn't behind glass at the Frazier Military History Museum ( http://www.fraziermuseum.org/)
|
|
|
Just a question.
Why would you want a 12 year old to learn shooting?
That is so she can catch up with her American peers who learn at 10. Hell, I owned a gun by 10. Well, my wife & I bought her a 22LR rifle for her 9th birthday, and both my wife and my daughter have repeatedly pointed out how she has never actually fired her own rifle. (Turns out, her rifle may have been defective from the factory, she had to borrow one at Appleseed. I used her brother's, which can fire a sub MOA with CCI ammo; just not by me) The problem is that we live in a city, and the only choices we have are to go out to Grammy's farm or to a pay for membership gun range. Grammy's farm is a bit of a trek, (and not particularly welcome, see below) while Appleseed is held at that very gun range and the range fees are lower for the Appleseed event than if I just took her out myself. And as they proved this weekend, they are much better at teaching children than I am. Undoutedly, she had more fun in a group of other children than she would have training with me alone. She's a social butterfly anyway. Ironicly, I grew up in a liberal (read anti-gun & anti-military) household. I joined the USMC at 18, which pissed off my parents. I took great joy in buying my kids their own firearms, which again royally pissed off their grandparents. The look of shock on my mother's face when my daughter opened that present was precious. I have long had a policy against toy guns in my home. My parents, incorrectly, took that to mean that I shared their value systems; whereas I just didn't want to associate a realisticly looking toy with playing. I wanted them to treat anything that looked like a weapon as if it really was one, even if they knew better. I required this of them even while they were at my sister's house, where their cousins had toy guns but there were no firearms in the household. My parents were unaware that I had long had firearms of my own. I gave the present to my daughter, then stepped back with the camera to take a photo of my mother's face, not my daughter's. Once opening it, my mom said something like, "What happened to the no toy guns rule? Wait, IS THAT A REAL GUN!?" *click* "Why, yes, Mom; it is! I felt that she might have been getting a little old for toys." Both my wife & I were laughing out loud at this point, and my parents understood that we set it up (partially) to mock them. My own mother wouldn't even talk to me for several weeks. It's still funny, though.
|
|
|
Just a question.
Why would you want a 12 year old to learn shooting?
I want her to learn firearms safety, learning to shoot well is just fun. I took my son there last year, and he was only 8.
|
|
|
Among those choices, the M1-Garand is certainly the best singular military rifle, but for the price nothing beats the Mosin-Nagant.
|
|
|
I took my daughter to an Appleseed this past weekend. Between the two of us, we fired off over 1100 rounds. She's a better shot than I am; probably because it's hard to break bad habits from years of trying to teach myself. She's 12, and this is her first formal training in marksmanship. In the beginning, she wasn't putting anything on a poster sized target; but by the end she was scoring in the 170's on the "Quick & Dirty" 25 meter Army Qualification Test. The best score I've ever got was 15 or so years ago in the USMC somewhere between 180 and 190.
I'm exausted and she's ready to do it again.
Good times, though.
|
|
|
After reading this thread, I started looking up the phosphate issue and ordered a batch of "bubble bandit" with phosphates. I believe soaps with phosphates would be a perfect product for the libertarian minded bitcoin community. If you make up a batch of dishwasher / laundry / detergent with phosphates, put me down for a large order. I already had phosphates in my clothes detergent. Did you want the remainder of the batch?
|
|
|
Thanks, keep updating. Very interesting:) Time for me to finally learn another language, and check that one off my bucket list. And no, I don't consider high school French 'learning'.
|
|
|
Posting, maybe restrictions should be lifted on donators?
They generally are, but you still have to request a whitelisting. It's not automatic. The 5 post & 4hours rules exist so that we might have a chance to catch bots. You can start any thread you like in the newbie section, though. Ask anything you like, and we will still answer it. If it becomes a major thread, we can move it to it's proper topic section at a later point.
|
|
|
I did not mention apocalyptic evens.
My point is: If bitcoin were to become a threat to governmental power structure and the economy is crumbling already why should they hesitate to take it down with em if all it takes is the push of a button?
Because an EMP would be an apocalyptic event. The entire country is too dependent on our electronic network to just bring it down like that. When have you known a government to willfully commit suicide like that? Even the Third Reich didn't intend to destroy themselves.
|
|
|
|