You can look at the 'house edge' different sites are offering. Competition seems to be pushing these down.
Yeah.. Where can I find that house edge man? That is like, the lower the house edge the better right? Short answer: Yes. Long answer: Instead of just comparing the house edge of different sites, you should also consider the deposit/no deposit bonus, rakeback and most importantly the trustworthiness.
|
|
|
Judging from the replies here, it seems the site is doing selective payments now, which indicates it is likely very close to the end.
|
|
|
is this site legit?
AFAIK, Direct Dice is provably fair and offers onchain games. Nevermind this doesnt even look like that kind of dice i'm lookin for :/
If you are looking for offchain dice sites, the best IMHO is PD.
|
|
|
Can I still play with dice?
Of course you can, as long as you are not on scamming sites like dicebitco.in or dice.ninja believe me, scammers will always be around...no mather what True, but if you deposit your bitcoin only in trusted sites (at least at the point of depositing), play as much as you like, and withdraw all your bitcoin once you are done, the chance of getting scammed should be much much lower.
|
|
|
Can I still play with dice?
Of course you can, as long as you are not on scamming sites like dicebitco.in or dice.ninja
|
|
|
We have made plans on how to implement this, and will develop the scheme in public. Once we have done so, we will switch the site to my control where every outcome is guaranteed fair. I will outline the technical details of the scheme further, but it is based on the early work of Dooglus in this very thread.
You mean the following PF suggestion by dooglus? It looks great to me. The site isn't really provably fair. Each "game" you pick how far the multiplier is going to go before the game crashes. You provide a hash of that number, so we can be sure you picked it in advance.
Yeah, that's correct -- I definitely should acknowledge it. Due to the nature of the game, I'm not sure it's even possible to be fully provably fair. I had an idea about that. Publish the algorithm by which you come up with each game's multiplier. Presumably it will be seeded somehow. Pick a random seed that you will use for game 1 billion. sha256 hash it to get the seed you will use for the game before that, and so on. Each games seed is the sha256 hash of the game that comes after it. So you have a billion-long chain of sha256 hashes. Before each game you publish the hash of the current game's seed, which allows everyone to verify all the previous games but none of the future games. Now you can't be accused of rigging the outcomes.
|
|
|
Why not? I'm not stealing any of their code. This has been done hundreds of times (every dice site is pretty much a clone of PrimeDice in some way, if you look at them). I wouldn't steal the design either, I'd just build something structurally similar, and website design ideas are stolen every day anyway. No one makes a website expecting no one to copy it. While it is true that many people are stealing ideas from some other people or some other sites, it is still morally not right. no offense but what you are saying is that because there is a casino in vegas there shouldnt be other casinos with the same games offered. thats a dream for the first one on the market I am not saying there shouldn't be any dice games, roulette or blackjack because someone else has developed it already. What I want to say is that new site owners shouldn't look for cloning 99% of a site and changing just 1% of it. For example, PD and JD offer pretty much the same game, but do you consider one a clone of another? I don't.
|
|
|
Why not? I'm not stealing any of their code. This has been done hundreds of times (every dice site is pretty much a clone of PrimeDice in some way, if you look at them). I wouldn't steal the design either, I'd just build something structurally similar, and website design ideas are stolen every day anyway. No one makes a website expecting no one to copy it. While it is true that many people are stealing ideas from some other people or some other sites, it is still morally not right IMHO. I don't think you deserve a negative trust for offering the service though.
|
|
|
@EvilPanda
Just a quick question, I am assuming I know the answer I just wanted to verify. I just hit Sr. Member, am I still going to receive a payment as a full member for this month?
Thanks!
You will get paid with the Sr member rate as long as 1) You updated your sig, which you have already done, and 2) EvilPanda learnt about your updated rank before sending you the payment
|
|
|
Please count me in for another month. Posts: 810 Bitcoin address: 1Gmz1Wek681s2xmmguWKuqELFyuTuuoiaZ
|
|
|
|