You shouldn't do trades if you are not educated enough, to learn everything we need to spend time to learn from proper channels and experienced people/teachers.
I'd suggest you spend at least 6 months to learn everything about the basics of different methods of trading or at least watch some youtube videos to learn it.

Not everyone supposed to become a trader and thinking that trading is easy and you were built for it then you are naive.

Did you download anything from coinbase or what? can you try it while offline with a new address and see if the change still happens?
If the change didn't happen then you could defeat the virus/hijacker by always copy paste addresses when not connected to internet.

Having a selfie as avatar does not give you credit nor maturity and wouldn't legitimize your opinion, what are you talking about? you contradict your statement in the title, destroying and fixing? have you ever had $1B or even more if not less and then come here to talk about fixing/destroying.
What I think miners will never interrupt their own money printing process and not even miners can control what will happen to bitcoin.
Bitcoin is already centralized by exchanges, they're the ones steering the market and if they say that they'll not list/accept/trade/recognize BU if they hard fork the chain then BU will not do it, so you should turn your focus on exchanges and stop blaming developers at both sides.

First understand the basics and concept of bitcoin, then learn one thing or two about cryptography or simply google it for the sake of our bellies not to explode from laughter and don't worry soon enough they'll change the system and either force Satoshi to move his coins to a new address version or risks them to be stolen if he was alive at all. and how would you know if he really has 1M and not a few more millions? couldn't he keep mining and even build ASIC farm to continue mining even until now? I'd say he has at least 4M up to 8M bitcoins.

It looks like none of the posters in this thread other than the one above me has ever used blockchain.info to import addresses as "watch only" and still get a SMS whenever they receive funds to their imported addresses.
They do this and it's actually very cheap price for them as they get a contract and buy sms in bulk maybe 10K only for $10 bucks and they earn it back 100 folds by showing banners of different services in their pages.

Oh yeah? well I was just wondering and wanted to give them a hand and help them to complete the street view at least in my city and cities nearby seems like they rather are lazy or have no incentive to complete the global street view.

Does google need someone driving a car with 360 panorama camera on it's roof in the streets and roads for google map completion?

Even with 51% of total hash power of the network BU miners will have to produce blocks larger than 1MB and the majority of nodes will have to validate those blocks for up to 2 weeks I imagine to successfully perform a hard fork but they won't do it why? answer is really simple, exchanges won't trade and list that second coin even if it has the majority of hash power behind it unless they show BU the green light there will be no hard fork.

I'd suggest you to watch season 6 episode 9 of homeland (just google it you'll find it) there you'll see a group of shills each one with several usernames/accounts shilling/FUDing against (supposedly Hillary Clinton) and as a matter of fact you can see their kind here as the full member/senior member all with post count and activity equal to each other (farm accounts/shills) and their presence is felt extremely hot especially in altcoin boards and in ICO/scam threads they have also a couple of hero/legendary members with sometimes green trust as their leader

As a bitcoin supporter and a regular user if you are, you shouldn't really be effected/influenced by any FUD but should only be satisfied or unsatisfied by the performance of the system and be prepared for any funny surprises.

I can swear that 60% of total numbers of transactions low or high fees are fake/spam/enforcers of "we need bigger blocks so lets go unlimited".

@OP, I think you don't know what is potential please do a translate to your own language to see that it's something that is already there but rather hidden/unseen.
If anyone wants to transfer under $10 bucks of value in BTC either pay 25 cents or wait hours if you paying less.
You have failed to see the BIG advantage, you could transfer $500M in less than 30 minutes paying only $1-$5 without anyone saying: wait a second, where did you get that much money? have you paid your tax share on that amount? why do you have that much money without us knowing anything about it and without transferring it through our system no why is that?

Wellp, better for BU not to hard fork away from bitcoin main chain because then Core could change POW but wait a second, the whole bitcoin mining community is running on ASICs now so how could any miner vote against their own interest? it is literally a money printing machine and why on earth anyone intentionally vote on destroying their own money printing machines?
You say Core has mandatory activation remote commands or something like that? do big miners actually review and triple check the codes before they mine with it?

It doesn't make any sense that in order to shut down the TV you'll need to destroy the remote control and the button on the TV itself.

They want a huge exchange service with huge market that could handle (hold) large amounts of bitcoins at all times and be regulated, meaning giving them the authority to freeze funds at any given time, otherwise I'm sure that they're not stupid to think bitcoin network could possibly become regulated.
If investors want to benefit from the market fluctuations of bitcoin then they should first understand that a centralized and regulated currency would've never had such volatile market because an organization in control of such currency is able to induce stability artificially, same old banking system.

You can't have light and shade both at the same time in same place you know? bitcoin and regulation though are like that, you might regulate part of the market but users will abandon that part and move to an unregulated parts and you could continue chasing the exchanges to shove them regulation pills but online world is extremely hard to keep track of everyone and every thing.

Have any of you seen this site with their zoom-able images? I know they are not the same as the thing I had in mind but I wanted to have a way to bypass data compression and find a way to store data on a single file/image even though that could mean if the image is damaged or corrupted you would lose all the data you had saved (captured) in that image.

I primarily intended to store copy or copies of blockchain in this way. imagine what if we could somehow store 100GB of data captured in an image(s) with 60GB size.

For instance, I can hold Ctrl and scroll down to zoom out 25% or scroll up to zoom in up to 500% in my browser while I have this thread opened and when I zoom out I can barely see the characters but their still there only very small but imagine if I could zoom out -2000% or -10,000% then I could fit 500 threads and pages of the forum in my current screen and access any page if I wanted to read simply by zooming in.

@BuySomeBitcoins, what if you could fit 10 times more data in a picture with 2.3KB size than the data in sample 1 that would mean compressing 4.5KB into a single file/image with the size of 2.3KB? I was thinking of a way to do that.

Why do you need one, trying to run a scam and crappy exchange? because being lazy and having no coding/programming skills is mostly the reason for people to look for open source projects for services where the only advantage is being unique and complex and closed source.
Some exchange service provider if open source should be avoided, it's not like you could access private keys for having control over the coins anyways right?
Or maybe you'd like to play around with virtual (imaginary) coins eh?

Reason why apple has no viruses/trojans in their operating system is because no one other than their main developers have access to the source code.

It's really funny that few companies plus dozens of people investing millions on something like tracking transactions and you could go on and on about all the various ways to determine which address belongs to which wallet and so on, while there is a really simple and easy and cheap way to remove all the worrying and all the hassle from the equation is to use mixer, as you might already know mixers such as BitMixer.io are operating very effectively rendering all the efforts of said companies practically useless/void/futile.

@OP, you could use BitMixer if you want to stay hidden/private, then you could sleep knowing no one will be tracking you that is the reason for mixer(s) to exist.

You should stop calling out scammers with their scam projects and why do you still have the sig on?

The world is moving forward growing every day we can't just shrink and get smaller blocks and there is no way to determine which transactions are unneeded or inefficient other than the obvious spam attacks that now been revealed that they are to push the BU and other bigger blocks agendas.

With faster than 10 min block speed miners will mine more bitcoins and as a natural result the price will decrease.
I'd say lets make the fees to increase to a point where only the real supporters and users remain and spammers (aka BU dry out of money)
But that would mean nothing since they can keep mining their own spam transactions and earn back the fees that they've paid.

If bitcoin manages to stay stable in performance and security it could become the diamond in cryptocurrencies while now is more like gold.
If the hard headed miner(s) stop messing around with hard forking and block size increases half a megabyte I'd say $1500-$1700 in this year
And if there will be no funny surprises in near future it is safe to expect $2000+ in the next year but throwing some numbers like 10K or 100K
Is childish dreams, it's best if we remain not in fantasy world and in the real one.

Right now you can transfer from $10 bucks up to $1,000,000,000 bucks with just spending $1 buck as a miner fee and receive the funds in another side after approximately 30 minutes. now could you show me a similar system with such safety and popularity as bitcoin any where in the world?
I think many people are very ungrateful and always trying to blame and smash bitcoin. I agree that something must be done to reduce the fees required to transfer small amounts but that should be temporary and we shouldn't try to transact small amounts all the time instead go and use other so called cheap alternatives for penny deposits and withdrawals and let bitcoin be for larger amounts $10+ and stop bi**hing around until the danger of hard fork has past.

Every time I gamble I try a new and trusted casino first and then deposit a small amount to test then after a few days I go back to deposit $10 up to $20 to test my luck this time and both times if I lose in a suspicious way I'll drop that casino for good and will forget their name and move on but if I get lucky and win I'll deposit more and more each time until I lose and when I lose again I move on if you follow my style you'll never really lose because you are only playing if you win, that way I can as well manage my losses and defeat my greed.

How does that work? I mean every wallets in blockchain.info is not like a real wallet(Core wallet/full node) so how can they transfer without any fees deducted? I once tried the transfer function and sent a small amount from an imported address to another imported address with a very small fee.

I imagine there is a function in Core wallet that lets you transfer funds between your own addresses with zero fee (I haven't tried it) so I guess blockchain.info has a full node(wallet) and all their clients actually using one wallet is that correct?