Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 02:58:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [SDC] ShadowCash Uncensored: Zeuner, Zero Knowledge, Zero Trust. What Happened?  (Read 23457 times)
Bank_sy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 08, 2016, 05:13:00 AM
 #341

It looks like SDC went live with our solution for hashToEC.




They switched from creating a new generator, discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14079014#msg14079014

What's this mean?

We are the leaders kids.


This is the heart of our algo, pushed publicly 9 days ago:

Code:
    for (j = 0; j < k; ++j)
    {
        if (j == 0)
            x = u;
        else
        {
            secp256k1_fe_set_int(&i, j);
            secp256k1_fe_add(&x, &i);
        }
        if (secp256k1_ge_set_xquad_var(&Q, &x))
        {
            success = 1;
            break;
        }
    }



This is shadowcash's pushed to their repo 3 days ago:

Code:
        while(!EC_POINT_set_compressed_coordinates_GFp(ecGrp, ptRet, bnTmp, 0, bnCtx) && count < 100)
        {
            count += 1;

            if (count == 100)
                return errorN(1, "%s: Failed to find a valid point for public key.", __func__);

            BN_add(bnTmp, bnTmp, bnOne);
        }


This is their commit after they read our critique of their method:

https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/commit/106afc6975cf41090ca2a0c47877de0cc8a16f1a




SDC used fix that EC came up with first
bangomatic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000

ARK Team likes to ban and delete posts in reddit.


View Profile
March 09, 2016, 01:22:20 AM
 #342

yeah but eclipse cloned shadows complete code base...so...its a shitcoin clone.

LISK!!! on that we can agree. Looking forward to launch.
BrosephGordonLevitt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 09, 2016, 04:19:58 AM
 #343

I can't believe I read all 18 pages of this ridiculous thread. 

Some people...haha.

Anyways glad to see everything's running smoothly, was keeping up with this project a while ago, nice new release and looking forward to the others. 

I don't think threads like these deserve a quarter of the response they pulled, diverts the attention from more important things for a developing coin Smiley
child_harold (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 10, 2016, 02:45:55 PM
Last edit: March 10, 2016, 02:56:21 PM by child_harold
 #344

I can't believe I read all 18 pages of this ridiculous thread.  

Some people...haha.

Anyways glad to see everything's running smoothly, was keeping up with this project a while ago, nice new release and looking forward to the others.  

I don't think threads like these deserve a quarter of the response they pulled, diverts the attention from more important things for a developing coin Smiley


Pff†… Smiley

But you did read it, right? What in particular do you disagree with btw? What is "ridiculous" about it?

Im intrigued by the SDC "Phoenix" resurrection attempt, but the question is will people trust the anon is working after Shen deanon'd the whole chain? Sure you have a fix, but will you need another? Has Shen performed a full review of the anon now? I think people would be interested to know that. And what of Shadowchat's security?

child_harold (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 10, 2016, 02:50:56 PM
 #345

Great to see some more recognition from a respected publication. This is big.

Yeah about that…

How exactly did ryno end up getting quoted in that article?
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/03/why-criminals-cant-hide-behind-bitcoin
The journalist was aware of the recent deanonymization, right?

rustynailer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 725
Merit: 501


Boycott Qatar 2022


View Profile
March 10, 2016, 03:15:50 PM
 #346

Great to see some more recognition from a respected publication. This is big.

Yeah about that…

How exactly did ryno end up getting quoted in that article?
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/03/why-criminals-cant-hide-behind-bitcoin
The journalist was aware of the recent deanonymization, right?

Why don't you just ask him?
child_harold (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 10, 2016, 03:23:18 PM
 #347

Why don't you just ask him?

Hi rusty,

Geez - I think that boat sailed… Sad
Why dont you?

PS Im happy for you the price spiked up a little as a result. At least you can recoup some BTC, whatever the outcome.

rustynailer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 725
Merit: 501


Boycott Qatar 2022


View Profile
March 10, 2016, 03:42:12 PM
 #348

Why don't you just ask him?

Hi rusty,

Geez - I think that boat sailed… Sad
Why dont you?

PS Im happy for you the price spiked up a little as a result. At least you can recoup some BTC, whatever the outcome.

Hey mate,

Well you tried to sink the ship but she appears to be well afloat. 

Hop back on board anytime and I will help make you feel back at home.
rustynailer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 725
Merit: 501


Boycott Qatar 2022


View Profile
March 10, 2016, 03:58:12 PM
 #349

Why don't you just ask him?

Hi rusty,

Geez - I think that boat sailed… Sad
Why dont you?

PS Im happy for you the price spiked up a little as a result. At least you can recoup some BTC, whatever the outcome.

Serious answer, cryptonote level anonymity on bitcoin codebase.

child_harold (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 10, 2016, 04:08:29 PM
Last edit: March 17, 2016, 11:44:03 AM by child_harold
 #350

Well you tried to sink the ship but she appears to be well afloat.  

To be fair I got a lot of help Smiley
Its not s though I wrote those whitepapers, didnt deliver the peer review or de-anon'd the entire chain
(or wrote a blogpost entitled ShadowCash Deanonymized? Nope, roughly 24 hours before it totally was)

All I did was write about it, and in this thread cause yours is heavily modded.

Serious answer:

Quote
Im intrigued by the SDC "Phoenix" resurrection attempt, but the question is will people trust the anon is working after Shen deanon'd the whole chain? Sure you have a fix, but will you need another? Has Shen performed a full review of the anon now? I think people would be interested to know that. And what of Shadowchat's security?

How much has Shen helped you guys out to fix the problem?

rustynailer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 725
Merit: 501


Boycott Qatar 2022


View Profile
March 10, 2016, 04:28:09 PM
 #351

Shen did a fantastic job helping out this open source project.   Smiley
child_harold (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 10, 2016, 04:51:14 PM
 #352

Shen did a fantastic job helping out this open source project.   Smiley

That goes without saying. It was broken.

But what of the future?
You have no cryptographer since Tecnovert left.
And the bitmessage implementation (shadowchat) has not been vetted…

Is ShadowSend now fully peer-reviewed and secure post-Shen? Or could there be other exploits?

How will you regain trust?

If Monero had been deanonymized the way ShadowCash has been it never would have recovered.

child_harold (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 17, 2016, 12:42:14 PM
 #353

It looks like SDC went live with our solution for hashToEC.




They switched from creating a new generator, discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14079014#msg14079014

What's this mean?

We are the leaders kids.


This is the heart of our algo, pushed publicly 9 days ago:

Code:
    for (j = 0; j < k; ++j)
    {
        if (j == 0)
            x = u;
        else
        {
            secp256k1_fe_set_int(&i, j);
            secp256k1_fe_add(&x, &i);
        }
        if (secp256k1_ge_set_xquad_var(&Q, &x))
        {
            success = 1;
            break;
        }
    }



This is shadowcash's pushed to their repo 3 days ago:

Code:
        while(!EC_POINT_set_compressed_coordinates_GFp(ecGrp, ptRet, bnTmp, 0, bnCtx) && count < 100)
        {
            count += 1;

            if (count == 100)
                return errorN(1, "%s: Failed to find a valid point for public key.", __func__);

            BN_add(bnTmp, bnTmp, bnOne);
        }


This is their commit after they read our critique of their method:

https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/commit/106afc6975cf41090ca2a0c47877de0cc8a16f1a




SDC used fix that EC came up with first

Is this true?


Shen did a fantastic job helping out this open source project.   Smiley

Did Shen fix the bug? Did he go on to do a full review?

sickandtired
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 17, 2016, 07:40:22 PM
 #354

Delete and shut down any comment or info that they dont like about SDC from the official FORUM thread and claim that it is just an info thread and not a forum (bit insane, authoritarian and against everything that Opensource represents, but still claim to be opensource) --- Checked.
Worst distribution (coins in few hands) --- Checked
Pump n Dump --- Checked
Broken Anon (after being used to hype the first pump) --- Checked
New Hype for new Pump and Dump phase --- Checked

Pump and dump much vaporware?

https://i.imgur.com/eNj1tsX.png


Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
Quote from: X1235 link=topic=745352.msg13353263#msg13353263
Quote from: LongAndShort link=topic=745352.msg13344731#msg13344731
Quote from: Gillette link=topic=745352.msg13344519#msg13344519
ETA of the marketplace?
2016

Merry Christmas everyone or however you wish to celebrate it Smiley
Personally i will be celebrating the birth of Jesus.

or 2027? why 2016? Is your Jesus late?


2 Real Decentralized marketplaces are now out and available for the public (one of them with a proper Alpha testing (not inside only testing like sdc) Now what is your motive to hold aside of the fact of being the big holders of the 50-60% of the coin, with that Group power, and non transparency, and now the real marketplaces coming out, this is aiming to become a huge failure, always delays and keep moving the date out every time just playing the market to make it dump so you can continue to hoard an 70-80% of the coin instead to play your pump and dump.
child_harold (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 21, 2016, 06:19:09 PM
Last edit: March 21, 2016, 06:36:42 PM by child_harold
 #355

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote

 Huh

erok
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000


Avatars are overrated.


View Profile
April 15, 2016, 12:01:59 AM
Last edit: April 15, 2016, 03:28:58 AM by erok
 #356

Shen did a fantastic job helping out this open source project.   Smiley

That goes without saying. It was broken.

But what of the future?
You have no cryptographer since Tecnovert left.
And the bitmessage implementation (shadowchat) has not been vetted…

Is ShadowSend now fully peer-reviewed and secure post-Shen? Or could there be other exploits?

How will you regain trust?

If Monero had been deanonymized the way ShadowCash has been it never would have recovered.
It was de-ringed, not "broken". It's an open source project so anyone can work on it (including smooth, since he pays so much attention to the project). WTF kind of vetting should SDC get, the fucking Elders of the Internet to stamp it with their dicks?

Of course there could be other exploits you fucking troglodyte. IT'S FUCKING 1's and 0's! It's goddamn code. Not like you understand anything about any of it though.

Regaining trust will most likely be done by demonstrating the coin's technological advantages over other coins (some coins don't even have a wallet let alone the Elders of the Internet dick stamp).

Why would a coin not recover as long as it is still being developed with a beneficial end game for all of humanity in it's crosshairs? YOU FUCKING TROGLODYTE

*Edit* My favorite part about this whole read is that you complain about the fairlaunch distribution yet are currently invested in an ICO!! rofl

"the destruction of privacy widens the existing power imbalance between the ruling factions and everyone else" -- Julian Assange
Gillette
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 744
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 15, 2016, 12:26:23 PM
 #357

SDC is a good coin backed with constant development.
child_harold (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 03, 2016, 10:16:14 PM
Last edit: May 04, 2016, 09:40:43 AM by child_harold
 #358

So this is the graveyard for deleted posts now? Fair:

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
… and am happy to see you have chosen bitmessage channels…

bitmessage=shadowchat
channels=clone

This message will (most probably) be deleted
but hopefully not before you read it.

Welcome

CH


To be clear:

An unapologetically wholesale rip-off of other men's work (as shadowchat is to bitmessage)


Some friendly advice:

1. Rewrite the whitepapers for ShadowSend and ShadowChat
2. Get peer reviews.
3. Start testing publicly.


Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!