Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
June 28, 2015, 05:45:33 PM |
|
thanks bud I REST MY CASE MISSILE just what i always thought never seen that video in such slow motion i tried slowing it down on me ps3 in the past but not quite like that TOTAL PROOF a MISSILE plus why on earth would the FBI try and confiscate all the video evidence around the pentagon even the petrol stations video if plane hit the pentagon then you would just show it to the american people not try cover it up you would say here is the video from the petrol station and here is the plane hitting the pentagon the towers i knew blew up 97% sure just a little thought thinking hmmm fire 3% fire but i was 99% sure a plane never hit the pentagon but after seeing that video i am 100% sure now no plane hit the pentagon thanks bud You guys need to just use your brain a bit. now where is the "missile?" please do a screen clip and show us, because I did not see a "missile." I saw a long metallic thing that was blurred, but pretty darn long. Cruise missiles are quite small, you know. About 10-15 feet long. I am not aware of 100 foot long "missiles" that fly horizontal. Oh, except airplanes used as missiles. Oh yeah... Exactly, but with an opposite sign. That "long metallic thing" is long because of the motion blur and trailing smoke. The object's height above grass is too low. Even if a plane was skidding on its belly towards the building, it would have occupied a significant part of the frame. In the video, it would hardly reach the top of the ground floor windows. The videos above are just one piece in a large jigsaw of evidence that debunks the official theory. Regarding Pentagon: They want us to believe that a trainee pilot, who according to his instructor, could barely handle a Cessna in straight and level flight, somehow performed an ideal descending spiral, which ended at Pentagon, skimmed above the ground, leaving the lamp posts on the approach unharmed, and slammed into the wall, leaving only a tiny hole, and some of the furniture inside intact (while two similar impacts allegedly brought down WTC, where nothing was left remaining from the buildings or furniture, save for the high-jackers' passports and a turbine from a wrong plane model). Does not compute. Here is some more (watch all 10 short parts): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czB_CWkqix4&list=PLWwb73xj88Z3bPFmJlse7T_JiW7wfWSOk&index=21Complete film with Spanish subs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQFQHKjH4t0&list=PLWwb73xj88Z3bPFmJlse7T_JiW7wfWSOk&index=29And also this, doing extensive audio and video analysis from an armature video recording of what I can only call a demolition. Watch especially 43 minutes in and onwards: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k&list=PLWwb73xj88Z3bPFmJlse7T_JiW7wfWSOk&index=5Earlier I asked for 911 conspiracy theories that "made sense." I did this because the ones presented didn't really seem to. Now why all these Youtube video links? How about an actual engineering analysis? How about something better than your saying "what I can only call a demolition?" But since you said that, let me ask- Why would any bad guy cook up a scheme to plant truly massive amounts of explosives of some totally mysterious type into buildings, then fly airplanes into buildings, AND THEN DETONATE THE EXPLOSIVES? that just seems to me like it would have to involve hundreds of people and thousands would have known about it - it seems just impractical, impossible, improbable, and insane. Not sure you will see my point of view here - but really, think about the matter of choosing an extremely complicated "solution" when much simpler "solutions" exist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
popcorn1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 28, 2015, 07:40:35 PM |
|
thanks bud I REST MY CASE MISSILE just what i always thought never seen that video in such slow motion i tried slowing it down on me ps3 in the past but not quite like that TOTAL PROOF a MISSILE plus why on earth would the FBI try and confiscate all the video evidence around the pentagon even the petrol stations video if plane hit the pentagon then you would just show it to the american people not try cover it up you would say here is the video from the petrol station and here is the plane hitting the pentagon the towers i knew blew up 97% sure just a little thought thinking hmmm fire 3% fire but i was 99% sure a plane never hit the pentagon but after seeing that video i am 100% sure now no plane hit the pentagon thanks bud You guys need to just use your brain a bit. now where is the "missile?" please do a screen clip and show us, because I did not see a "missile." I saw a long metallic thing that was blurred, but pretty darn long. Cruise missiles are quite small, you know. About 10-15 feet long. I am not aware of 100 foot long "missiles" that fly horizontal. Oh, except airplanes used as missiles. Oh yeah... Exactly, but with an opposite sign. That "long metallic thing" is long because of the motion blur and trailing smoke. The object's height above grass is too low. Even if a plane was skidding on its belly towards the building, it would have occupied a significant part of the frame. In the video, it would hardly reach the top of the ground floor windows. The videos above are just one piece in a large jigsaw of evidence that debunks the official theory. Regarding Pentagon: They want us to believe that a trainee pilot, who according to his instructor, could barely handle a Cessna in straight and level flight, somehow performed an ideal descending spiral, which ended at Pentagon, skimmed above the ground, leaving the lamp posts on the approach unharmed, and slammed into the wall, leaving only a tiny hole, and some of the furniture inside intact (while two similar impacts allegedly brought down WTC, where nothing was left remaining from the buildings or furniture, save for the high-jackers' passports and a turbine from a wrong plane model). Does not compute. Here is some more (watch all 10 short parts): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czB_CWkqix4&list=PLWwb73xj88Z3bPFmJlse7T_JiW7wfWSOk&index=21Complete film with Spanish subs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQFQHKjH4t0&list=PLWwb73xj88Z3bPFmJlse7T_JiW7wfWSOk&index=29And also this, doing extensive audio and video analysis from an armature video recording of what I can only call a demolition. Watch especially 43 minutes in and onwards: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k&list=PLWwb73xj88Z3bPFmJlse7T_JiW7wfWSOk&index=5Earlier I asked for 911 conspiracy theories that "made sense." I did this because the ones presented didn't really seem to. Now why all these Youtube video links? How about an actual engineering analysis? How about something better than your saying "what I can only call a demolition?" But since you said that, let me ask- Why would any bad guy cook up a scheme to plant truly massive amounts of explosives of some totally mysterious type into buildings, then fly airplanes into buildings, AND THEN DETONATE THE EXPLOSIVES? that just seems to me like it would have to involve hundreds of people and thousands would have known about it - it seems just impractical, impossible, improbable, and insane. Not sure you will see my point of view here - but really, think about the matter of choosing an extremely complicated "solution" when much simpler "solutions" exist. How about an actual engineering analysis? these are your words wow you have people who are at the top of there profession chief firemen who say malting steel they stood right next to it not 1 mile like you say major general of USA army photo specialist he say plane don,t fit in hole demolition experts say brought down by explosives air pilot who flew those same planes says impossible they hit the pentagon data report says it flew over the pentagon engineering experts 30 years plus in there field all say bullshit think about the matter of choosing an extremely complicated "solution" when much simpler "solutions" exist. these are your words her is a simple solution you can do...... go and take your face for a shit you plant pot sheep your like a bible basher nothing will change your mind not posting on this topic no more even if bush told you him self he done it you still say i want proof give your head a wobble will you stupid sheep
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
June 28, 2015, 09:47:36 PM |
|
.....
her is a simple solution you can do...... go and take your face for a shit you plant pot sheep your like a bible basher nothing will change your mind not posting on this topic no more even if bush told you him self he done it you still say i want proof give your head a wobble will you stupid sheep
Well that's certainly interesting.
|
|
|
|
popcorn1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 28, 2015, 10:21:02 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
June 28, 2015, 10:59:01 PM |
|
Oh come on now popcorn, it's just an Internet discussion forum. Nothing about it is any big deal. Take a break, go outside and enjoy the world. Lots of things I don't like also.
|
|
|
|
popcorn1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 28, 2015, 11:43:17 PM |
|
Oh come on now popcorn, it's just an Internet discussion forum. Nothing about it is any big deal. Take a break, go outside and enjoy the world. Lots of things I don't like also. i did what you told me... sorry bud .. and i never said i don,t like you..show me video evidence where i said i don,t like you av a nice day live long and prosper i chat to you on a other topic
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
June 29, 2015, 03:03:13 AM |
|
Oh come on now popcorn, it's just an Internet discussion forum. Nothing about it is any big deal. Take a break, go outside and enjoy the world. Lots of things I don't like also. i did what you told me... sorry bud .. and i never said i don,t like you..show me video evidence where i said i don,t like you av a nice day live long and prosper i chat to you on a other topic that's cool with me, and by the way, I don't like the big government either.... the way this thread got going, it was a couple of posters claiming those Evil Jews did 911, and I'm thinking, like this bullshit never ends... Actually I have no interest in the events of 911, but I do have interests in formal logic and debate and such.
|
|
|
|
PenguinFire
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
That Darn Cat
|
|
June 29, 2015, 03:28:33 AM |
|
I don't think the world will ever know for sure. Extreme terrorist for sure carried it out but they were probably allowed to with the intelligence there but it was part of the greater plan.
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
June 29, 2015, 03:36:53 AM |
|
I don't think the world will ever know for sure. Extreme terrorist for sure carried it out but they were probably allowed to with the intelligence there but it was part of the greater plan. Yeah, you know that just does not sound like George Bush. Now if you said maybe the Saudi princes knew about it and stayed quiet, could be.
|
|
|
|
Nemo1024
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
|
|
July 01, 2015, 03:54:49 PM |
|
About Pentagon. A lot of comparative imagery of disproportionally little damage there. 9/11 In Plane Site - Directors Cut https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igX7Z8VstN4http://www.911inplanesite.com/
|
“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.” “We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.” “It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
July 01, 2015, 07:18:24 PM |
|
Did you know the Pentagon wasn't exactly built lightweight? It's like, the PENTAGON, you know?
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
July 02, 2015, 01:29:42 AM |
|
Did you know the Pentagon wasn't exactly built lightweight? It's like, the PENTAGON, you know? That's why the cruise missile only punched a little hole in it.
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
July 02, 2015, 02:27:15 AM |
|
Did you know the Pentagon wasn't exactly built lightweight? It's like, the PENTAGON, you know? That's why the cruise missile only punched a little hole in it. That's totally ridiculous. A cruise missile will go into a window. The explosion is not even the same COLOR as what occurred at the Pentagon. AGAIN - if you want to have a conspiracy theory, just make it a good one. Okay?
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
July 02, 2015, 12:41:03 PM |
|
Did you know the Pentagon wasn't exactly built lightweight? It's like, the PENTAGON, you know? That's why the cruise missile only punched a little hole in it. That's totally ridiculous. A cruise missile will go into a window. The explosion is not even the same COLOR as what occurred at the Pentagon. AGAIN - if you want to have a conspiracy theory, just make it a good one. Okay? Now it seems that you are trying to say that explosives did the 9/11 Pentagon.
|
|
|
|
Tusk
|
|
July 02, 2015, 05:24:05 PM Last edit: July 03, 2015, 10:57:23 PM by Tusk |
|
Something that is hardly mentioned but struck me as being odd were the anthrax attacks that happened. THE 9/11 ANTHRAX FRAME-UPAfter the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the Bush Administration tried to ram the USA PATRIOT Act through Congress," [Francis A.] Boyle said in a radio interview with Austin-based talk-show host Alex Jones. "That would have set up a police state. Senators Tom Daschle (D-South Dakota) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) were holding it up because they realized what this would lead to. The first draft of the PATRIOT Act would have suspended the writ of habeas corpus [which protects citizens from unlawful imprisonment and guarantees due process of law]. Then all of a sudden, out of nowhere, come these anthrax attacks."
"At the time I myself did not know precisely what was going on, either with respect to September 11 or the anthrax attacks, but then the New York Times revealed the technology behind the letter to Senator Daschle. [The anthrax used was] a trillion spores per gram, [refined with] special electro-static treatment. This is superweapons-grade anthrax that even the United States government, in its openly proclaimed programs, had never developed before. So it was obvious to me that this was from a U.S. government lab. There is nowhere else you could have gotten that. In October [2001], press reports revealed that White House staff had been on a regimen of the powerful antibiotic Cipro since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Judicial Watch wants to know why White House workers, including President Bush, began taking the drug nearly a month before anthrax was detected on Capitol Hill. Create the problem ----> Reaction -----> Provide the solution = USA PATRIOT Act http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/frameup.html
|
From the ashes rises the Phoenix. Viva the block chain, Viva BitCoin!
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
July 02, 2015, 09:07:16 PM |
|
Did you know the Pentagon wasn't exactly built lightweight? It's like, the PENTAGON, you know? That's why the cruise missile only punched a little hole in it. That's totally ridiculous. A cruise missile will go into a window. The explosion is not even the same COLOR as what occurred at the Pentagon. AGAIN - if you want to have a conspiracy theory, just make it a good one. Okay? Now it seems that you are trying to say that explosives did the 9/11 Pentagon. It sure is more probable than a plane crash. What you should ask yourself is why the government tried to make people believe it was a plane and even planted fake witnesses that supported their theory, like that black cab driver. Okay, please tell us where the plane went, and what happened to the people in it. Also, what constitutes "more probable?" Obviously kerosene catching on fire looks completely different than the brilliant white flash of a high explosive. And a cruise missile is about 20" around and maybe 15' long, so basically it would go in a window and make no hole. Plus, if a plane did it there's no need to "plant fake witnesses that say they saw a plane." If you did that, they you probably have to kill them all off or they'd start blackmailing, and some might have remorse and talk. That implies "less probable" (for the cruise missile), right? Frankly, the only thing I can see about the "cruise missile" theory is that it creates a link to the US Government, since they were the main player around with cruise missiles.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
July 02, 2015, 09:34:56 PM |
|
Did you know the Pentagon wasn't exactly built lightweight? It's like, the PENTAGON, you know? That's why the cruise missile only punched a little hole in it. That's totally ridiculous. A cruise missile will go into a window. The explosion is not even the same COLOR as what occurred at the Pentagon. AGAIN - if you want to have a conspiracy theory, just make it a good one. Okay? Now it seems that you are trying to say that explosives did the 9/11 Pentagon. It sure is more probable than a plane crash. What you should ask yourself is why the government tried to make people believe it was a plane and even planted fake witnesses that supported their theory, like that black cab driver. Okay, please tell us where the plane went, and what happened to the people in it. That's always been part of the question. No plane in the videos. No debris that would have been left by a plane and passengers. Also, what constitutes "more probable?"
Obviously kerosene catching on fire looks completely different than the brilliant white flash of a high explosive. And a cruise missile is about 20" around and maybe 15' long, so basically it would go in a window and make no hole.
If an armed cruise missile hits the wall on the other side of the room after it flies in through the window, does it explode on contact? Plus, if a plane did it there's no need to "plant fake witnesses that say they saw a plane." If you did that, they you probably have to kill them all off or they'd start blackmailing, and some might have remorse and talk. If you can bribe a witness, the media (who is in on the cover-up) isn't going to broadcast that he talked if he remorsefully changes his mind and blabs. So, how is anyone going to find out? Once he realizes that he can't get the truth out there, he simply will pine away in his sorrow.
That implies "less probable" (for the cruise missile), right?
Frankly, the only thing I can see about the "cruise missile" theory is that it creates a link to the US Government, since they were the main player around with cruise missiles.
What would be more convenient than a cruise missile? A rocket fired from a military jet?
|
|
|
|
lucaspm98
|
|
July 02, 2015, 11:27:20 PM |
|
Welp that's a great way to combine all the theories into one.
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386
|
|
July 03, 2015, 03:41:49 AM |
|
Welp that's a great way to combine all the theories into one. It lacks pickup trucks, beer, trains, and momma. Could use some trailer parks too.
|
|
|
|
|