diks
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1450
|
 |
May 10, 2015, 10:10:11 AM |
|
when bittrex ?
Once you tweet, retweet and send emails  PLEASE RETWEET: PLEASE EMAIL: done  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
placebo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 10, 2015, 10:24:47 AM |
|
If the team keep supporting the coin then it will be listed on Bittrex one day, volume has been nice , so...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheAltTrader (OP)
|
|
May 10, 2015, 10:26:31 AM |
|
when bittrex ?
Once you tweet, retweet and send emails PLEASE RETWEET: PLEASE EMAIL: That's all we need to do  |
|
|
|
|
|
MCDev
|
|
May 10, 2015, 01:01:12 PM |
|
Hey guys ..
want a faucet??
Let me know
|
|
|
|
|
TheAltTrader (OP)
|
|
May 10, 2015, 01:58:09 PM |
|
Hey guys ..
want a faucet??
Let me know
Sure ! |
|
|
|
|
|
minerjoen
|
|
May 10, 2015, 02:11:06 PM |
|
guys, i never ever had any problems with this coin but now,. it stop syncin. Ofc i used my own tutorial to fix it ( clean everything only not wallet.dat ) and i downloaded the latest wallet qt. But.. it just stop syncing at block 6014, i also tested if it was a hard block so i keep wallet open for 10 hours, but now i am back from work and its still not synced. i closed and re-open the wallet-qt and still nothing. hangin at block 6014. This also means i miss my stakes  |
Bitcoin: 1GPjrqoWGQfqyCEYnPhbA3nWN9dmMwFHRE
Elementrem: 0xF4789b95826C4474B3E7C780Fd90f639b51C4B6c
|
|
|
|
TheAltTrader (OP)
|
|
May 10, 2015, 02:14:07 PM |
|
guys, i never ever had any problems with this coin but now,. it stop syncin. Ofc i used my own tutorial to fix it ( clean everything only not wallet.dat ) and i downloaded the latest wallet qt. But.. it just stop syncing at block 6014, i also tested if it was a hard block so i keep wallet open for 10 hours, but now i am back from work and its still not synced. i closed and re-open the wallet-qt and still nothing. hangin at block 6014. This also means i miss my stakes PrometheusX or BTXdev will help you We always take care of our community ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheAltTrader (OP)
|
|
May 10, 2015, 02:34:12 PM |
|
Missing lucky stakes?
According to my analysis, the following blocks should have generated lucky stakes if the input coins were > 50k, 100k, or 300k;
5959
5965
5950
5865
5754
5800
5727
5730
5960
5844
5971
5794
The first group, in red, all had inputs large enough but generated normal stakes. The one in the middle is the only one that lucky staked. The third group all had inputs too small.
There's probably a simple explanation, something obvious I'm just not seeing but is anybody able to explain why, based on the code in github, the blocks in red did not produce lucky stakes?
PM this to dev. |
|
|
|
|
|
SquidsIn
|
|
May 10, 2015, 02:41:34 PM |
|
Missing lucky stakes?
According to my analysis, the following blocks should have generated lucky stakes if the input coins were > 50k, 100k, or 300k;
5959
5965
5950
5865
5754
5800
5727
5730
5960
5844
5971
5794
The first group, in red, all had inputs large enough but generated normal stakes. The one in the middle is the only one that lucky staked. The third group all had inputs too small.
There's probably a simple explanation, something obvious I'm just not seeing but is anybody able to explain why, based on the code in github, the blocks in red did not produce lucky stakes?
PM this to dev. In the spirit of openness can he not respond here? To be honest I dumped my 400k when I discovered this morning that it had staked one of those blocks in red and got 2.xx BTX. I wish you all luck with it but there have just been too many issues with this coin for me to keep the faith. It's not just BTX, that was the final straw though... I dumped every altcoin I had this morning, too many scams and no real world adoption and I've got too much else to concentrate on. |
Since getting into Cryptocurrency I've had many bags, all but two have varied over time. Those are the two I see in the mirror where my eyes once shone.
|
|
|
|
TheAltTrader (OP)
|
|
May 10, 2015, 02:45:11 PM |
|
Missing lucky stakes?
According to my analysis, the following blocks should have generated lucky stakes if the input coins were > 50k, 100k, or 300k;
5959
5965
5950
5865
5754
5800
5727
5730
5960
5844
5971
5794
The first group, in red, all had inputs large enough but generated normal stakes. The one in the middle is the only one that lucky staked. The third group all had inputs too small.
There's probably a simple explanation, something obvious I'm just not seeing but is anybody able to explain why, based on the code in github, the blocks in red did not produce lucky stakes?
PM this to dev. In the spirit of openness can he not respond here? To be honest I dumped my 400k when I discovered this morning that it had staked one of those blocks in red and got 2.xx BTX. I wish you all luck with it but there have just been too many issues with this coin for me to keep the faith. It's not just BTX, that was the final straw though... I dumped every altcoin I had this morning, too many scams and no real world adoption and I've got too much else to concentrate on. Cannot tell if you are FUDing or are asking a legit question... Anyway, dev will answer although I do not like the way you just insulted us publicly. But I guess that's crypto. Till now, there have been 0 issued with BTX. You must be talking of BT which has nothing to do with us. We are building a real coin here. |
|
|
|
|
kpierce77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 10, 2015, 02:49:21 PM |
|
Missing lucky stakes?
According to my analysis, the following blocks should have generated lucky stakes if the input coins were > 50k, 100k, or 300k;
5959
5965
5950
5865
5754
5800
5727
5730
5960
5844
5971
5794
The first group, in red, all had inputs large enough but generated normal stakes. The one in the middle is the only one that lucky staked. The third group all had inputs too small.
There's probably a simple explanation, something obvious I'm just not seeing but is anybody able to explain why, based on the code in github, the blocks in red did not produce lucky stakes?
PM this to dev. In the spirit of openness can he not respond here? To be honest I dumped my 400k when I discovered this morning that it had staked one of those blocks in red and got 2.xx BTX. I wish you all luck with it but there have just been too many issues with this coin for me to keep the faith. It's not just BTX, that was the final straw though... I dumped every altcoin I had this morning, too many scams and no real world adoption and I've got too much else to concentrate on. Boy IDK. In still staking my 236,000, but wallet keeps going out of sync, and I've tried everything, including CryptoClub's suggestion. Never had so many problems with keeping a wallet in sync, and now lucky staking might not be working? Will keep holding but not sure for how much longer. |
|
|
|
|
|
TheAltTrader (OP)
|
|
May 10, 2015, 02:51:48 PM |
|
Missing lucky stakes?
According to my analysis, the following blocks should have generated lucky stakes if the input coins were > 50k, 100k, or 300k;
5959
5965
5950
5865
5754
5800
5727
5730
5960
5844
5971
5794
The first group, in red, all had inputs large enough but generated normal stakes. The one in the middle is the only one that lucky staked. The third group all had inputs too small.
There's probably a simple explanation, something obvious I'm just not seeing but is anybody able to explain why, based on the code in github, the blocks in red did not produce lucky stakes?
PM this to dev. In the spirit of openness can he not respond here? To be honest I dumped my 400k when I discovered this morning that it had staked one of those blocks in red and got 2.xx BTX. I wish you all luck with it but there have just been too many issues with this coin for me to keep the faith. It's not just BTX, that was the final straw though... I dumped every altcoin I had this morning, too many scams and no real world adoption and I've got too much else to concentrate on. Boy IDK. In still staking my 236,000, but wallet keeps going out of sync, and I've tried everything, including CryptoClub's suggestion. Never had so many problems with keeping a wallet in sync, and now lucky staking might not be working? Will keep holding but not sure for how much longer. To my knowledge, there is 0 issue with the coin. It's just the way PoS works. Next wallet may improve that. If you doubt, please dump. We will gladly buy your cheap coins. What we are creating here is greatly larger in scope than Lucky Blocks or Masternodes. If you cannot wait a few weeks to see how far we are planning to go, then too bad for you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCDev
|
|
May 10, 2015, 03:29:08 PM |
|
Missing lucky stakes?
According to my analysis, the following blocks should have generated lucky stakes if the input coins were > 50k, 100k, or 300k;
5959
5965
5950
5865
5754
5800
5727
5730
5960
5844
5971
5794
The first group, in red, all had inputs large enough but generated normal stakes. The one in the middle is the only one that lucky staked. The third group all had inputs too small.
There's probably a simple explanation, something obvious I'm just not seeing but is anybody able to explain why, based on the code in github, the blocks in red did not produce lucky stakes?
PM this to dev. In the spirit of openness can he not respond here? To be honest I dumped my 400k when I discovered this morning that it had staked one of those blocks in red and got 2.xx BTX. I wish you all luck with it but there have just been too many issues with this coin for me to keep the faith. It's not just BTX, that was the final straw though... I dumped every altcoin I had this morning, too many scams and no real world adoption and I've got too much else to concentrate on. Boy IDK. In still staking my 236,000, but wallet keeps going out of sync, and I've tried everything, including CryptoClub's suggestion. Never had so many problems with keeping a wallet in sync, and now lucky staking might not be working? Will keep holding but not sure for how much longer. To my knowledge, there is 0 issue with the coin. It's just the way PoS works. Next wallet may improve that. If you doubt, please dump. We will gladly buy your cheap coins. What we are creating here is greatly larger in scope than Lucky Blocks or Masternodes. If you cannot wait a few weeks to see how far we are planning to go, then too bad for you. Yeah, it was nice when there were a bunch avail at 85 |
|
|
|
|
MCDev
|
|
May 10, 2015, 03:49:59 PM
Last edit: May 10, 2015, 04:02:03 PM by MCDev |
|
Hey guys ..
want a faucet??
Let me know
Sure ! Minimum Payout Amount: 1BTX Maximum Payout Amount: 10 BTX Minimum time between payouts to a BTX address / IP is 7 hours I plan on funding it at a minimum of 250 BTX a day for the next week while testing it out. After testing I will increase the funding, It’s very basic right now (now I need to learn php)… just got it setup and working over the weekend and now I have to start working on work for work tomorrow. Hopefully having the faucet running will help the chain move. Post issues here or email me directly faucetop@btx.rocks |
|
|
|
|
Diggio
|
|
May 10, 2015, 04:16:55 PM |
|
Missing lucky stakes?
According to my analysis, the following blocks should have generated lucky stakes if the input coins were > 50k, 100k, or 300k;
5959
5965
5950
5865
5754
5800
5727
5730
5960
5844
5971
5794
The first group, in red, all had inputs large enough but generated normal stakes. The one in the middle is the only one that lucky staked. The third group all had inputs too small.
There's probably a simple explanation, something obvious I'm just not seeing but is anybody able to explain why, based on the code in github, the blocks in red did not produce lucky stakes?
PM this to dev. In the spirit of openness can he not respond here? To be honest I dumped my 400k when I discovered this morning that it had staked one of those blocks in red and got 2.xx BTX. I wish you all luck with it but there have just been too many issues with this coin for me to keep the faith. It's not just BTX, that was the final straw though... I dumped every altcoin I had this morning, too many scams and no real world adoption and I've got too much else to concentrate on. If you are going to use your "analysis," you need to tell everyone what your analysis is. The lucky staking is simply selection of a random number within 100 numbers and if you select one below 3, you win the block based on the size of your stack (assuming it meets minimum threshold). I preferred the previous lucky staking model because I earned more with less blocks previously. To state you can accurately predict what blocks should have hit is not believable without something to substantiate it. Any analysis you've done will help the developer confirm one way or the other. |
|
|
|
|
diks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1450
|
|
May 10, 2015, 04:31:33 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCDev
|
|
May 10, 2015, 04:41:33 PM |
|
Strange, I just opened it from the link you quoted... let me check it further Can someone else check it also |
|
|
|
kpierce77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 10, 2015, 04:42:03 PM |
|
Missing lucky stakes?
According to my analysis, the following blocks should have generated lucky stakes if the input coins were > 50k, 100k, or 300k;
5959
5965
5950
5865
5754
5800
5727
5730
5960
5844
5971
5794
The first group, in red, all had inputs large enough but generated normal stakes. The one in the middle is the only one that lucky staked. The third group all had inputs too small.
There's probably a simple explanation, something obvious I'm just not seeing but is anybody able to explain why, based on the code in github, the blocks in red did not produce lucky stakes?
PM this to dev. In the spirit of openness can he not respond here? To be honest I dumped my 400k when I discovered this morning that it had staked one of those blocks in red and got 2.xx BTX. I wish you all luck with it but there have just been too many issues with this coin for me to keep the faith. It's not just BTX, that was the final straw though... I dumped every altcoin I had this morning, too many scams and no real world adoption and I've got too much else to concentrate on. Boy IDK. In still staking my 236,000, but wallet keeps going out of sync, and I've tried everything, including CryptoClub's suggestion. Never had so many problems with keeping a wallet in sync, and now lucky staking might not be working? Will keep holding but not sure for how much longer. To my knowledge, there is 0 issue with the coin. It's just the way PoS works. Next wallet may improve that. If you doubt, please dump. We will gladly buy your cheap coins. What we are creating here is greatly larger in scope than Lucky Blocks or Masternodes. If you cannot wait a few weeks to see how far we are planning to go, then too bad for you. Seriously give me a break. I won't be dumping because why at this point? Unless I want to get 10% back on my "investment". Simply stating that I've never seen a wallet with so many syncing issues, and let me tell you that in the past year that I've been buying coins, I've put BTC into some seriously fucked up coins, but hey... at least their wallet's stayed in sync lol Can't understand why my wallet won't stay in sync, even though I've tried everything. Who knows. Maybe it's my internet connection, not sure. Although every other coin up to this point worked fine. Now wallet says "not staking because wallet is offline." Great. Oh well. |
|
|
|
|
|
