Up Like Trump

[GreenBits]

I lose my respect to Trump. He was bought by war industries.

Perhaps it is too early to reach any conclusion in this regard. Trump is perhaps using this opportunity to improve his approval ratings. He may not be interested in an all out war against the North Korea. I still believe he is a much better choice than Hillary Clinton.

He's no better than Hillary. But stupid. His actions are aimed solely at improving their rankings. I am sure that he will not hesitate to strike on North Korea. Americans remember their inglorious part in the first war and waiting for revenge. Now America can do it easily. I think Trump will do it.

If your logic is correct, then I would say that Trump is much better than Hillary. You are claiming that Trump is talking about the war, just to improve his approval ratings. That is still better than Hillary, who would have dropped nukes by now, if she was the POTUS.

I dunno. Hillary is more beholden to the political machine; that is, she is an actual politician. You would have seen more of the same that happened under Obama. Plus, the onus of her starting a conflict (she is a hawk I guess?) would have been a huge deterrent for NK in the first place.

[1715635812]

1715635812

[craked5]

I lose my respect to Trump. He was bought by war industries.

Perhaps it is too early to reach any conclusion in this regard. Trump is perhaps using this opportunity to improve his approval ratings. He may not be interested in an all out war against the North Korea. I still believe he is a much better choice than Hillary Clinton.

He's no better than Hillary. But stupid. His actions are aimed solely at improving their rankings. I am sure that he will not hesitate to strike on North Korea. Americans remember their inglorious part in the first war and waiting for revenge. Now America can do it easily. I think Trump will do it.

If your logic is correct, then I would say that Trump is much better than Hillary. You are claiming that Trump is talking about the war, just to improve his approval ratings. That is still better than Hillary, who would have dropped nukes by now, if she was the POTUS.

And we're all very happy that Sithara007 is here to explain us what would have happened.
It's really great for us that he's able to distinguish speechs for opinion polls (Trump) and real actions of wars (Hillary).
If only we all had the allknowledge of Sithara007...

[Alexzap]

I lose my respect to Trump. He was bought by war industries.

Perhaps it is too early to reach any conclusion in this regard. Trump is perhaps using this opportunity to improve his approval ratings. He may not be interested in an all out war against the North Korea. I still believe he is a much better choice than Hillary Clinton.

He's no better than Hillary. But stupid. His actions are aimed solely at improving their rankings. I am sure that he will not hesitate to strike on North Korea. Americans remember their inglorious part in the first war and waiting for revenge. Now America can do it easily. I think Trump will do it.

If your logic is correct, then I would say that Trump is much better than Hillary. You are claiming that Trump is talking about the war, just to improve his approval ratings. That is still better than Hillary, who would have dropped nukes by now, if she was the POTUS.

What war led Hillary? She was part of team Obama. He became famous for his indecision and attempts a peaceful solution to the problem. That is why America has lost its image as a world superpower. Trump promises to kick ass. So who leads America to war?

[GreenBits]

I am grateful for the effort.  To be clear, news outlets are supposed to do their own fact checking traditionally.  And their accuracy was how folks determined who to trust with their precious attention.  These days we give our attention to any scoundrel it seems who does little to deserve it.  Hence my request for verified fact.  

It is unfortunate that the MSM has willfully abandoned their very necessary job.  Open societies needed an informed public to make good decisions.  And for example with the news outlets you cite one will now need to look through the reporting for facts or alleged facts and then independently attempt to verify those alleged facts.  It is very difficult to do and sometimes cannot be done I realize.  

In court you can offer a thing called self authenticating evidence.  That is simply a certified copy of a document from a publically searchable database.  This is a good thing to do for the court because it allows the judge to instantly consider the document as authentic because it has the control on it that tells him it is not fake.  Otherwise the court must verify the document is real before the contents can be considered.  So you see the news outlets can do the same thing if they wanted. They could cite where they got the info so the readers can check or they could provide the certified info if possible to save the reader the time of checking.  These days neither options are done and we live in a see of bad info passing as fact!

     It is not that I have any distrust as you indicate I may have on the MSM it is just that they have been busted so many times not doing the process I mention above so now they do not deserve any trust.  If you still trust them it is curious why.  Maybe you are not aware of the many times they have been busted individually and together as part of a wholesale misinfo front for the prevailing government.  

This was why I posted the stuff I did the last few days because you did not believe these things are real.  I posted quotes and have the full cite and  You choose not to comment.  And then I posted a video I think ( I will post it again just for you) about media being busted in outright lies using actual footage of the fakery and I will wait for any comment.

in the mean time thank you for the links and I will look through them over the next week

I haven't forgot about you, I took the time to watch the video you suggested a few times. To concede your point, because I agree, there is a different YouTube clip I want to show you to demonstrate the corporate nature of mainstream.news dissemination. But the clip in question immediately raises an additional question. I can't find the quote attributed in the clip, made by anyone. If you search that qoute, it only yields in the context of the video.

Also, do people doubt that Aleppo occurred? Our government actually admitted to bombing the fuck out of them, I think.

[tukangkopi]

Donald Trump always seem egocentric and arrogant, in all his public appearances shown. The eagle was hilarious 

[stompix]

I lose my respect to Trump. He was bought by war industries.

Perhaps it is too early to reach any conclusion in this regard. Trump is perhaps using this opportunity to improve his approval ratings. He may not be interested in an all out war against the North Korea. I still believe he is a much better choice than Hillary Clinton.

He's no better than Hillary. But stupid. His actions are aimed solely at improving their rankings. I am sure that he will not hesitate to strike on North Korea. Americans remember their inglorious part in the first war and waiting for revenge. Now America can do it easily. I think Trump will do it.

If your logic is correct, then I would say that Trump is much better than Hillary. You are claiming that Trump is talking about the war, just to improve his approval ratings. That is still better than Hillary, who would have dropped nukes by now, if she was the POTUS.

Assumptions , assumptions and more assumptions..

While the FACTS are:

Donald Trump said he will never get involved in Syria
Donald Trump said that if the US will get involved in Syria we risk a ww3

Fact:
We all know how the us got deeply involved in Syria based on some Ivanka trademark teardrops

[Alexzap]

I lose my respect to Trump. He was bought by war industries.

Perhaps it is too early to reach any conclusion in this regard. Trump is perhaps using this opportunity to improve his approval ratings. He may not be interested in an all out war against the North Korea. I still believe he is a much better choice than Hillary Clinton.

He's no better than Hillary. But stupid. His actions are aimed solely at improving their rankings. I am sure that he will not hesitate to strike on North Korea. Americans remember their inglorious part in the first war and waiting for revenge. Now America can do it easily. I think Trump will do it.

If your logic is correct, then I would say that Trump is much better than Hillary. You are claiming that Trump is talking about the war, just to improve his approval ratings. That is still better than Hillary, who would have dropped nukes by now, if she was the POTUS.

Assumptions , assumptions and more assumptions..

While the FACTS are:

Donald Trump said he will never get involved in Syria
Donald Trump said that if the US will get involved in Syria we risk a ww3

Fact:
We all know how the us got deeply involved in Syria based on some Ivanka trademark teardrops

And that Trump is out? If he won't do anything in Syria, he will say that he is a wimp and lost the confrontation with the Russian, if he starts to fight he will say that he started the third world. In chess it's called zugzwang.

[youdamushi]

Fact:
We all know how the us got deeply involved in Syria based on some Ivanka trademark teardrops

What are you talking about?
I'm interested but it seems I'm not one of the "all" that are supposed to know that.

[stompix]

Fact:
We all know how the us got deeply involved in Syria based on some Ivanka trademark teardrops

What are you talking about?
I'm interested but it seems I'm not one of the "all" that are supposed to know that.

59 tomahawks hitting a Syrian airfield ?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ivanka-trump-donald-bomb-air-strikes-sir-kim-darroch-syria-chemical-attack-sarin-idlib-province-a7674951.html

Trump's 33-year-old son, Eric, told The Daily Telegraph on Monday that the strike was influenced in part by Ivanka, who he said was "heartbroken and outraged" by the chemical attack.

[youdamushi]

Fact:
We all know how the us got deeply involved in Syria based on some Ivanka trademark teardrops

What are you talking about?
I'm interested but it seems I'm not one of the "all" that are supposed to know that.

59 tomahawks hitting a Syrian airfield ?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ivanka-trump-donald-bomb-air-strikes-sir-kim-darroch-syria-chemical-attack-sarin-idlib-province-a7674951.html

Trump's 33-year-old son, Eric, told The Daily Telegraph on Monday that the strike was influenced in part by Ivanka, who he said was "heartbroken and outraged" by the chemical attack.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH xD

omg
If that's true that's completely ridiculous
I knew about the attack of USA but not that the spoiled child had anything to do with it.
I can't believe that without some valid source, that's too stupid even for the Trumps ^^

[Marcus_2017]

Fact:
We all know how the us got deeply involved in Syria based on some Ivanka trademark teardrops

What are you talking about?
I'm interested but it seems I'm not one of the "all" that are supposed to know that.

59 tomahawks hitting a Syrian airfield ?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ivanka-trump-donald-bomb-air-strikes-sir-kim-darroch-syria-chemical-attack-sarin-idlib-province-a7674951.html

Trump's 33-year-old son, Eric, told The Daily Telegraph on Monday that the strike was influenced in part by Ivanka, who he said was "heartbroken and outraged" by the chemical attack.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH xD

omg
If that's true that's completely ridiculous
I knew about the attack of USA but not that the spoiled child had anything to do with it.
I can't believe that without some valid source, that's too stupid even for the Trumps ^^

I doubt that this is possible. We see that Trump any step does with great difficulty. All his actions are literally under the microscope considered in Congress, the Senate, in the press etc. Trump will not be able to act at the request of Ivanka. This is absurd.

[stompix]

I doubt that this is possible. We see that Trump any step does with great difficulty. All his actions are literally under the microscope considered in Congress, the Senate, in the press etc. Trump will not be able to act at the request of Ivanka. This is absurd.

Just as absurd as this , right?



Remind me how and why she has a seat in the white house... because her daddy is president:).
Well the little blonde cried so her daddy bombed a country.

Totally legit.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH xD

omg
If that's true that's completely ridiculous
I knew about the attack of USA but not that the spoiled child had anything to do with it.
I can't believe that without some valid source, that's too stupid even for the Trumps ^^

Eh , the telegraph which hosted the interview is fake news so... I can't provide a "legit source" it:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/10/donald-trumps-action-syria-proves-not-league-putin-says-son/

Oh shit,

https://www.infowars.com/donald-trump-carried-out-syria-missile-strike-after-being-convinced-by-daughter-ivanka/
 Even infowars is saying so

[youdamushi]

I doubt that this is possible. We see that Trump any step does with great difficulty. All his actions are literally under the microscope considered in Congress, the Senate, in the press etc. Trump will not be able to act at the request of Ivanka. This is absurd.

Just as absurd as this , right?



Remind me how and why she has a seat in the white house... because her daddy is president:).
Well the little blonde cried so her daddy bombed a country.

Totally legit.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH xD

omg
If that's true that's completely ridiculous
I knew about the attack of USA but not that the spoiled child had anything to do with it.
I can't believe that without some valid source, that's too stupid even for the Trumps ^^

Eh , the telegraph which hosted the interview is fake news so... I can't provide a "legit source" it:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/10/donald-trumps-action-syria-proves-not-league-putin-says-son/

Oh shit,

https://www.infowars.com/donald-trump-carried-out-syria-missile-strike-after-being-convinced-by-daughter-ivanka/
 Even infowars is saying so

Man that's repulsive.
Here you go USA, here is your King Trump in action.
I can't even imagine what will be the next step. Maybe the invasion of Europe cause her wife wants to own the Tour Effel?

[Marcus_2017]

If Trump used the weapon without consent of the senators and congressmen, it would be at the morning mixed with shit. Trump is not very happy a lot of people and at the first opportunity they would have raised the noise in the media. You heard anything?

[GreenBits]

Just thought I'd leave this little tidbit here

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/10/politics/james-comey-russia-investigation-money/index.html

CNN is totally 'fake news', but let's tune in for a sec:

(CNN)FBI Director James Comey asked the Justice Department for more resources for the agency's investigation into Russian meddling of the US election and ties to Donald Trump's presidential campaign, just the week before the President fired him.

Comey told the heads of the Senate intelligence committee that he went to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein last week and pushed for more resources to be devoted to the Russia investigation, according to two sources familiar with the discussion.
RELATED: Behind the scenes of James Comey's epic firing
Justice Department spokesperson Sarah Flores denies Comey asked Rosenstein for more resources. She called reporting to the contrary "100% false," and told reporters she spoke directly with Rosenstein about the reports.
Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr, R-North Carolina, and Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia met Monday with Comey and urged him to speed up the Russia investigation. Comey acknowledged in this discussion that things were moving slowly.
Before Rosenstein, Comey had been working with the acting deputy attorney general Dana Boente. Comey's requests for resources was first reported by The New York Times.

Unsubstantiated, and denied by the White House, so we will see what truth comes of it. But before you dismiss it out of sorts, nibble on this other morsel:

http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/10/the-fbi-is-investigating-trumps-call-for-russia-to-hack-hillary-clintons-emails/

A Daily Caller article? Tasty indeed!

The FBI is investigating President Donald Trump’s 2016 call for Russian hackers to “find the 30,000 emails” Hillary Clinton deleted from her private server.

The Justice Department disclosed the existence of an investigation in a recent court filing in response to a lawsuit by Ryan Shapiro, a researcher at Harvard University, and Jason Leopold, a BuzzFeed News reporter. Shapiro and Leopold sued the FBI after they did not fulfill a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for any “and all records, including investigative records, mentioning or referring to Donald J. Trump’s statement on 27 July, 2016” on former Secretary Hillary Clinton’s deleting of 30,000 emails from her private server.

The FBI initially said it could neither confirm nor deny the existence of any documents to fulfill the FOIA request, but eventually admitted there’s an “active, ongoing investigation” into Trump’s comments and “records that are responsive to the Russia Request” could interfere with “enforcement proceedings.”

But it's probably nothing, right? We all know the liberal media is blowing this whole Russia thing way out of proportion just to smear old No. 45.

We should focus on those emails. There are kids locked up in a Clinton sex dungeon somewhere, being forced to eat healthy school lunches while watching inclusivity/diversity videos with a homosexual narrator.

The humanity.

[PancherBitCoin]

I was very much surprised by the action that happened the other day, namely Donald Trump removed from the post of FBI head a man who said that there were interference in presidential elections by Russian hackers. If indeed this was the place, then apparently not everything is so clean in the choice of American citizens. I really do not want to think that the president of America is a protege of the Kremlin.

[Lancusters]

I was very much surprised by the action that happened the other day, namely Donald Trump removed from the post of FBI head a man who said that there were interference in presidential elections by Russian hackers. If indeed this was the place, then apparently not everything is so clean in the choice of American citizens. I really do not want to think that the president of America is a protege of the Kremlin.

The more open facts the more I realize that Trump recruited by the Kremlin. All of his pathetic attempts to distract attention from himself look ridiculous. Who would believe that it is possible to produce 59 "tomogavk" and it does not destroy the airbase. I'm really looking forward to impeachment.

[RoomBot]

I was very much surprised by the action that happened the other day, namely Donald Trump removed from the post of FBI head a man who said that there were interference in presidential elections by Russian hackers. If indeed this was the place, then apparently not everything is so clean in the choice of American citizens. I really do not want to think that the president of America is a protege of the Kremlin.

The more open facts the more I realize that Trump recruited by the Kremlin. All of his pathetic attempts to distract attention from himself look ridiculous. Who would believe that it is possible to produce 59 "tomogavk" and it does not destroy the airbase. I'm really looking forward to impeachment.

[Bitbobb]

[Bitbobb]

President Trump is asking everyone to pass this around:
5/08/2017

Let's see if congress understands what people pressure is all about.

Of the 27 amendments to the Constitution, seven (7) took one (1) year or less to become the law of the land - all because of public pressure. Congressional Reform Act of 2017

1. No Tenure / No Pension. A Congressman / woman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they're out of office.

2. Congress (past, present, & future) participates in Social Security. - All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. It may not be used for any other purpose.

3. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.

4. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.

5. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.

6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.

7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen/women are void effective ______. The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen/women. Congress made all these contracts for themselves. Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, so ours should serve their term(s), then go home and go back to work.

THIS IS HOW WE FIX CONGRESS!