Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
|
September 23, 2016, 02:07:14 PM |
|
In many of the opinion polls, Gary Johnson is polling double digits. However, I have a feeling that what happened during the 1996 elections will repeat this time as well. In 1996, Ross Perot was polling as much as 20% in the opinion polls. But when the election results came out, he received just 8% of the vote (but that was enough to ensure the defeat of the Republican candidate).
So shouldn't Johnson insure the defeat of Hillary?
|
|
|
|
Bitbobb
|
|
September 23, 2016, 02:39:44 PM |
|
In many of the opinion polls, Gary Johnson is polling double digits. However, I have a feeling that what happened during the 1996 elections will repeat this time as well. In 1996, Ross Perot was polling as much as 20% in the opinion polls. But when the election results came out, he received just 8% of the vote (but that was enough to ensure the defeat of the Republican candidate).
So shouldn't Johnson insure the defeat of Hillary? What it does is ensure that their hackathon as advertised on the Hillarclinton.com website (check her source code for the bold advertisement) will have plausible denial-ability. They will tell you that it was close call but Hillary won. And without paper ballots uploaded locally to a blockchain you will NOT know if they are correct. The voter fraud and irregularities are already alarming this cycle. She is the diebold candidate. I will be killed later today is the only way for her to win because I mentioned this now. So That is her strategy to win. Kill her critics. True Bolsheviks style. Why else did the media stop doing exits polls like they used too? Why else do we now see legislation to forbid any exit polling? Answer: Because with even rudimentary exit polling the average man and woman quickly sees if the numbers are wrong and can even make a margin of error with some simple math. This started happening and so they stopped it. With a strong 3rd party candidtae it helps hide the voter rigging and make it easier to explain away later so you will not riot. Usually 35% is the most vote rigging you can do before people notice. That is a lot but not enough for Hillary. She is really not popular. Look at Brexit. They could not get any higher without triggering people on the street busting them and social media. This is the last chance perhaps however since the ICANN is getting your DNS server jurisdiction and maybe even your IP. SO I really hope common sense wins at the end of this properly litigated day known as election day. I am afraid the people may need to prosecute this election personally, locally and with threat of force if not allowed to exit poll and verify this election for President of the U.S.A.
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
|
|
September 23, 2016, 05:31:53 PM |
|
In many of the opinion polls, Gary Johnson is polling double digits. However, I have a feeling that what happened during the 1996 elections will repeat this time as well. In 1996, Ross Perot was polling as much as 20% in the opinion polls. But when the election results came out, he received just 8% of the vote (but that was enough to ensure the defeat of the Republican candidate).
So shouldn't Johnson insure the defeat of Hillary? There are mainly two categories of Gary Johnson supporters. The first one consists of disaffected republican voters (especially supporters of Ted Cruz). The second category consists of independent voters, who dislike Trump and Clinton equally. There are a few disaffected Democrat voters as well, but their numbers are small and most of them are supporting Jill Stein. I have a feeling that if a part of the Gary Johnson supporters dump him and decide to back any of the two mainstream candidates, then Trump will be gaining more votes than Clinton.
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1130
|
|
September 23, 2016, 06:38:09 PM |
|
ReBloodlicans are afraid that 3rd parties will will take votes away from them & DemoCrips are afraid that 3rd parties will take votes away from them.
BTW The Media still does "exit Polls," as of the very last primary.
My new intrigue is the growing number of obvious HILLARY DOUBLES. 9/11/2016 was the HUGE giveaway!
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
|
September 23, 2016, 10:18:48 PM |
|
ReBloodlicans are afraid that 3rd parties will will take votes away from them & DemoCrips are afraid that 3rd parties will take votes away from them.
BTW The Media still does "exit Polls," as of the very last primary.
My new intrigue is the growing number of obvious HILLARY DOUBLES. 9/11/2016 was the HUGE giveaway!
Interesting. Five years ago I went to a Cher performance, and did not know there was an entire cult like following of women who dress up like Cher. Sure was. Hillary? They got to be paid off.
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1130
|
|
September 23, 2016, 10:40:59 PM |
|
Wow, you missed an entire chapter of POP OCCULTURE. In one satire movie a Cher-alike claims, "I invented Gay Men!" There are WAY MORE MEN dressing like Cher! TMI? I may die for this, but I believe there is a ROBOTIC CLONE HILLARY (see vid) as well as a few WELL PAID actor DOUBLES: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxE3YQqLaBoOh, and BTW the real Hillary Clinton's eyes are bright BLUE.
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
|
September 24, 2016, 12:37:17 AM |
|
Wow, you missed an entire chapter of POP OCCULTURE. In one satire movie a Cher-alike claims, "I invented Gay Men!" There are WAY MORE MEN dressing like Cher! TMI? I may die for this, but I believe there is a ROBOTIC CLONE HILLARY (see vid) as well as a few WELL PAID actor DOUBLES: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxE3YQqLaBoOh, and BTW the real Hillary Clinton's eyes are bright BLUE. Some how that's all pretty disgusting. But please let me know when the Ivanka actress doubles are available on call and the ROBOTIC CLONE Ivankas.
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1130
|
|
September 24, 2016, 12:48:14 AM Last edit: September 24, 2016, 12:58:39 AM by RoomBot |
|
Dial 1-800-CloneMe or 1-800-D-R-E-A-M-O-N
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
September 24, 2016, 07:46:26 AM |
|
WIKILEAKS BOMBSHELL: HILLARY'S BRAIN INJURY CAUSED BY 'NEAR FATAL PLANE CRASH'If an unclassified email leaked by WikiLeaks is any indication, it appears that there may be much more to the story of what happened to Hillary Clinton back in 2012. We've been told that she suffered a concussion… but was that just diplomatic cover for something else? Wikileaks released this chain of emails forwarded between various ranking military officials, and eventually to State Dept. and top Hillary confidant Jake J. Sullivan who laughed it off when he forwarded it to "H" herself, citing a conspiracy story written by Sorcha Faal – whose reports are widely dismissed as disinfo – claiming that Hillary sustained serious injuries in a crash during a secret diplomatic meeting with the then-president of Iran. If such a secret meeting did happen, it remains top secret and there is no publicly available information to confirm or deny that such a meeting even took place – let alone that there was a plane crash. According to the original story: A new Foreign Military Intelligence (GRU) report circulating in the Kremlin today is saying that United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was injured, and a top US Navy Seal Commander killed when their C-12 Huron military passenger and transport aircraft crash landed nearly 3 weeks ago in the Iranian city of Ahvaz near the Iraqi border. […] Upon the C-12 Huron landing at Ahwaz, however, this report says it encountered "extreme turbulence" causing it to leave the runway where its main landing gear then collapsed causing it to crash. Within seconds of the C-12 Huron crashing, this report continues, Iranian emergency and security personal responded freeing the victims, including Secretary Clinton who was reportedly unconscious and "bleeding profusely." The death of SEAL Team 4 Commanding Officer Job W. Price adds additional reason to think that a cover story may be at work. Price was reportedly escorting Hillary on the plane, and may have died as a result of injuries in the alleged crash. The US Navy Seal member reported killed in this bizarre incident, this report says, was indentified as Commander Job W. Price who as a leader of this highly specialized American Special Forces unit protects high-ranking diplomats traveling in Middle Eastern and Asian combat zones. […] This GRU report, however, states that US military flight logs recorded by Russian air and space forces confirm that Commander Price, and other members of US Navy Seal Team 4, left their base in Urozgan Province, Afghanistan on a flight to US Naval Support Activity Bahrain where they met up with Secretary Clinton and all of them transferred to the C-12 Huron that began a flight path to Baghdad, Iraq. However, officially Commander Price died by suicide a.k.a. a "non-combat-related injury" on December 22, 2012 while stationed in Uruzgan Province in Afghanistan. Was this official explanation just cover for the real cause of his death? What else don't we know? Here's the full story as released by Wikileaks. The PDF can be downloadedfrom Wikileaks here. Read more at http://www.thedailysheeple.com/wikileaks-bombshell-hillarys-brain-injury-caused-by-near-fatal-plane-crash_092016.
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
September 24, 2016, 02:03:09 PM |
|
Yeah! It's sorta like flipping pancakes. Or in the case of States, hamburgers.
|
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
|
September 24, 2016, 03:04:09 PM |
|
My opinion is that Colorado will go Trump. Look at it's history of voting. It has never been a "blue state."
|
|
|
|
vokain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
|
|
September 24, 2016, 04:16:21 PM |
|
My opinion is that Colorado will go Trump. Look at it's history of voting. It has never been a "blue state." I wonder what states won't vote Trump
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
September 24, 2016, 05:27:01 PM |
|
My opinion is that Colorado will go Trump. Look at it's history of voting. It has never been a "blue state." I wonder what states won't vote Trump For sure, the state of freedom.
|
|
|
|
vokain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
|
|
September 24, 2016, 05:30:03 PM |
|
My opinion is that Colorado will go Trump. Look at it's history of voting. It has never been a "blue state." I wonder what states won't vote Trump For sure, the state of freedom. I'm choosing to party
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
September 24, 2016, 05:35:34 PM |
|
My opinion is that Colorado will go Trump. Look at it's history of voting. It has never been a "blue state." I wonder what states won't vote Trump For sure, the state of freedom. I'm choosing to party If Trump wins, the last party will be his inauguration party.
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1130
|
|
September 25, 2016, 01:06:48 AM |
|
TRUMP is Bringing Gennifer Flowers to the FIRST DEBATE!! When Hillary Clinton takes the podium at Monday night’s first presidential debate, she could be staring down an old romantic rival sitting in the front row. Gennifer Flowers, who carried on a 12-year affair with Bill Clinton when he was governor of Arkansas, said she’ll attend the debate at Hofstra University as Donald Trump’s guest, according to Buzzfeed. “Ms. Flowers has agreed to join Donald at the debate,” her personal assistant Judy Stell wrote in an email to Buzzfeed, the website reported Saturday. The development grew from a Twitter broadside Trump launched earlier that day. “If dopey Mark Cuban of failed Benefactor fame wants to sit in the front row, perhaps I will put Gennifer Flowers right alongside of him!” he tweeted. It was a shot at Clinton’s decision to seat Cuban — a frequent Trump critic — in the front row as her guest at the debate at Hofstra University, and a signal that the Republican candidate could use past Clinton scandals as ammunition. Trump misspelled Flowers’ first name in his original tweet, then sent a corrected version minutes later. The Trump campaign and Flowers did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The spectacle of the buxom blonde lounge singer staring down Hillary Clinton would only draw more people to a debate already expected to attract 100 million viewers. The clash could generate Super Bowl-level ratings, experts had already predicted. Source: http://nypost.com/2016/09/24/gennifer-flowers-will-be-sitting-front-row-at-first-debate/
|
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
|
|
September 25, 2016, 11:34:36 AM |
|
My opinion is that Colorado will go Trump.
Look at it's history of voting. It has never been a "blue state."
It is possible. And if that happens, then Trump will beat Hitlery 275-263. The latest poll from Colorado was the one by Quinnipiac University, which put Hitley Ahead by 2 points - Clinton 44, Trump 42. Johnson was getting 10% support in that poll. If a part of his supporters decide to vote for any of the two mainstream candidates, then Trump can win.
|
|
|
|
|