indahkfi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2015, 03:25:09 PM |
|
Congratulations indah kusumaningsih, you are the winner in the twitter giveaway! chain.altcoinsteps.com/tx/463407f9a65c3c9ac40b433c9cfc495a7473081d688137e643c26c380ed8d833 … @AltcoinSteps @henryzzzit @Poloniex #fintech #bitcoin #stepscoins #crypto thanks
|
|
|
|
hashmaster1
|
|
December 12, 2015, 06:07:54 PM |
|
Congratulation to the winner now proud honor of 5000 steps .....
|
|
|
|
LordPiccolo
|
|
December 12, 2015, 06:26:53 PM |
|
I have put up my copy of Fifa 16 for the PS4 on the market place guys.
I may also be putting up a PS3 console with some games in the near future
LP
|
|
|
|
AltcoinSteps (OP)
|
|
December 12, 2015, 07:39:06 PM |
|
We need community input:
In the light of the Global Climate Deal today the Steps Team want to do our part and is considering adding another staking pool of 1 million coins. This mean more stakes for shareholders and with the use of less power.
We had numerous request for another staking pool and want to hear from the community before we will consider it.
There are 3 options:
1. Merge another 1 million coins with our current pool.
2. Make another pool of 1 million coins.
3. Do not do it at all. WE WOULD ALSO CONSIDER TO REDUCE THE FEE FOR THIS POOL.
|
Steps - Let's make a new altcoin environment. | Join Us Now!
|
|
|
Godson_Mansa
|
|
December 12, 2015, 08:04:41 PM |
|
i say 1. some of us just didn't get to buy shares early enough.
|
|
|
|
raetsch
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 957
Merit: 1006
|
|
December 12, 2015, 08:26:37 PM |
|
also 1
at the end, one pool has more luck than the other... consider the discussions...
|
|
|
|
LordPiccolo
|
|
December 12, 2015, 08:29:48 PM |
|
I'm with option one also.
|
|
|
|
nikkers
|
|
December 12, 2015, 09:29:57 PM |
|
I would vote for one also
|
|
|
|
LordPiccolo
|
|
December 12, 2015, 09:51:19 PM |
|
Would it be worth considering a wallet that will lock the coins in until the 300 blocks are over?
Just thinking out loud
LP
|
|
|
|
ReturnOfTheMAC
|
|
December 12, 2015, 09:59:59 PM |
|
After giving it some thought a new pool with a reduced fee would shortchange those who bought into the first one - unless it was only started up after the first one ceased operating - then it would be fair to all. I would go for a new pool beginning after the old one has run its course, with a 5 Million Steps limit and a 10 STEPS admin fee per share.
We know there are some here holding in excess of 2 Million coins so it wouldn't be so hard as it might seem to get 5 Million STEPS staking in the pool.
|
|
|
|
bhokor
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 12, 2015, 10:01:43 PM |
|
option 1 seems to be the most reasonable, why dont make a poll dev for know the opinion of entire community?
|
|
|
|
AltcoinSteps (OP)
|
|
December 12, 2015, 10:46:01 PM |
|
We hereby invite you to vote for the way forward, the options are as follow:
1. Merge another 1 million coins with our current pool.
2. Make another pool of 1 million coins.
3. Do not do it at all.
Kindly take note if we do decide to sell more shares and it is cheaper we will refund the first stake holders accordingly.
|
Steps - Let's make a new altcoin environment. | Join Us Now!
|
|
|
Roke
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
December 13, 2015, 12:07:56 AM |
|
if the fee should be cheaper, because the rhythm going earnings per share are 1 steps a day for now. for now not recover the 50 steps of administration fee per share.
|
|
|
|
henryzzit
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
December 13, 2015, 12:39:06 AM |
|
I vote for 1
|
|
|
|
indahkfi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
December 13, 2015, 02:33:43 AM |
|
no 1 Merge another 1 million coins with our current pool
|
|
|
|
Tortoise75
|
|
December 13, 2015, 04:18:01 AM |
|
I prefer option 1 as well. But it might be time to consider how the pool should go on. For now it looks like the plan is staking for 30 days and then a reselling period followed by a further month of staking. It doesn't looks like that good an idea to me to sell all at once and then its nothing goes for a month. People interested often loose their interest if they have to wait, especially more than a week, and people loosing interest might be people lost for this coin. It might be better having 5 times 1000 shares, that number probably needs some adjustment according to demand, going through a 5 days (re)sell and the 30 days staking periods alternating so that there's an entry option every week. That rises the question if the system could do that with one pool or would it need several pools to minimize the manual work involved to set it up every week.
|
|
|
|
m3rt1x
|
|
December 13, 2015, 10:41:08 PM |
|
OK.Someone dumped(really dumped @816-768sat) 30000 the last 3 hours.I know:It's BTC price going up(again) + crowdfunding investors can still dump with x4 profit.
Devs should do whatever they decide with the pools,but they should take under consideration that people will dump long before the 300 coins rewards especially if the price will hopefully be higher than 2k.If people are not satisfied with the profit from the pools,or from solo staking,we should expect greater dumps even before 200 coins/stake. So,devs must find a way to lock as many coins as possible in the pools untill the end of the big stake rewards.
Daytrading is far more profitable than staking ATM,and will continue like this.Especially if the coin is added to Poloniex.With the rhythm weak hands are dumping everytime BTC's price goes up (and imho it will keep rising as we get closer to reward halving) another exchange will just be another choice for experienced daytraders to make easy profit just by trading between sites.And why shouldn't they?
No intention of being negative,it's just reality at my POV!
|
|
|
|
andrepierre
|
|
December 13, 2015, 11:13:13 PM |
|
OK.Someone dumped(really dumped @816-768sat) 30000 the last 3 hours.I know:It's BTC price going up(again) + crowdfunding investors can still dump with x4 profit.
Devs should do whatever they decide with the pools,but they should take under consideration that people will dump long before the 300 coins rewards especially if the price will hopefully be higher than 2k.If people are not satisfied with the profit from the pools,or from solo staking,we should expect greater dumps even before 200 coins/stake. So,devs must find a way to lock as many coins as possible in the pools untill the end of the big stake rewards.
Daytrading is far more profitable than staking ATM,and will continue like this.Especially if the coin is added to Poloniex.With the rhythm weak hands are dumping everytime BTC's price goes up (and imho it will keep rising as we get closer to reward halving) another exchange will just be another choice for experienced daytraders to make easy profit just by trading between sites.And why shouldn't they?
No intention of being negative,it's just reality at my POV!
We always welcome positive input and opinions!
|
|
|
|
ReturnOfTheMAC
|
|
December 13, 2015, 11:19:54 PM |
|
OK.Someone dumped(really dumped @816-768sat) 30000 the last 3 hours.I know:It's BTC price going up(again) + crowdfunding investors can still dump with x4 profit.
Devs should do whatever they decide with the pools,but they should take under consideration that people will dump long before the 300 coins rewards especially if the price will hopefully be higher than 2k.If people are not satisfied with the profit from the pools,or from solo staking,we should expect greater dumps even before 200 coins/stake. So,devs must find a way to lock as many coins as possible in the pools untill the end of the big stake rewards.
Daytrading is far more profitable than staking ATM,and will continue like this.Especially if the coin is added to Poloniex.With the rhythm weak hands are dumping everytime BTC's price goes up (and imho it will keep rising as we get closer to reward halving) another exchange will just be another choice for experienced daytraders to make easy profit just by trading between sites.And why shouldn't they?
No intention of being negative,it's just reality at my POV!
The coin keeps getting dumped to hell because far more coins than I first anticipated appear to have been bought and still held from the original ICO pricing. I'm in this for the long haul but boy oh boy its gonna be tough passing 2000 sat again yet alone holding 1000 sat with the number of people keen to dump for seemingly anything they can get.
|
|
|
|
andrepierre
|
|
December 14, 2015, 12:01:22 AM |
|
OK.Someone dumped(really dumped @816-768sat) 30000 the last 3 hours.I know:It's BTC price going up(again) + crowdfunding investors can still dump with x4 profit.
Devs should do whatever they decide with the pools,but they should take under consideration that people will dump long before the 300 coins rewards especially if the price will hopefully be higher than 2k.If people are not satisfied with the profit from the pools,or from solo staking,we should expect greater dumps even before 200 coins/stake. So,devs must find a way to lock as many coins as possible in the pools untill the end of the big stake rewards.
Daytrading is far more profitable than staking ATM,and will continue like this.Especially if the coin is added to Poloniex.With the rhythm weak hands are dumping everytime BTC's price goes up (and imho it will keep rising as we get closer to reward halving) another exchange will just be another choice for experienced daytraders to make easy profit just by trading between sites.And why shouldn't they?
No intention of being negative,it's just reality at my POV!
The coin keeps getting dumped to hell because far more coins than I first anticipated appear to have been bought and still held from the original ICO pricing. I'm in this for the long haul but boy oh boy its gonna be tough passing 2000 sat again yet alone holding 1000 sat with the number of people keen to dump for seemingly anything they can get. I am not sure according to block explorer and what I see these coins moved into a wallet on 1 December.
|
|
|
|
|