Bitcoin Forum
September 15, 2024, 12:12:48 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 [295]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it  (Read 206661 times)
pbies
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 290
Merit: 133



View Profile
September 14, 2024, 01:48:55 PM
 #5881


I need all possible PVK in decimal...from 161 to 256


There are no puzzles over 160. We can guess now most of 67-159.

Look here:

https://privatekeys.pw/puzzles/bitcoin-puzzle-tx

and convert with Python adding "0x" in front of hex number - just print the value:

puzzle 67

>>> 0x40000000000000000
73786976294838206464
>>> 0x7ffffffffffffffff
147573952589676412927

or you may use "bc" in WSL console (Linux).

BTC: bc1qmrexlspd24kevspp42uvjg7sjwm8xcf9w86h5k
nomachine
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 410
Merit: 23


View Profile
September 14, 2024, 02:05:27 PM
 #5882

The more private keys we have, the smaller the error would be....5% deviation on puzzle 130 is too big.
mcdouglasx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 267
Merit: 68

New ideas will be criticized and then admired.


View Profile WWW
September 14, 2024, 02:10:47 PM
 #5883


I think you need take official registered a USA or EU patent to you DB. This will be protect your Idea from stealing and maybe give some money. Then you have a patent, can try sell your method to google, microsft etc.
Agreed this DB will be especially useful for space and medicine with how far AI has come we could use mcdouglasx's db to store a detailed brain scan or a 3d map of a galaxy and train AI on the db so it could piece together the data and we could ask it questions about the data like does this scan have a blood clot or a misfiring neuron or map the most efficient trajectory to this planet and it could answer but instead of taking up petabytes or even exabytes of storage it would take a fraction of that. Of course right now your db is specifically for public keys but its the idea that matters if you could apply it to different areas that would be game changing.

I don't believe a brain blood cloth is willing to wait some exponential time for a "binary" DB to be "scanned". The current state of practical technology uses bytes, words, 64-bit addressing and registers, because these are the actual smallest units of data that are being read or operated within a single clock cycle, by a CPU, controller, or whatever. Especially memory, the higher the bus width, the more data can be transferred per cycle.

Using 0 and 1s is already the basis of everything we use every day, and lots of things in CS make heavy use of them for memory-trips efficiency already, flags, algorithms, etc. but they DO NOT do this because it uses less data, they do it because IT IS FASTER. As a few already said before, "scanning" speed of said DB is sub-optimal to say the least, but hey, I'm no one to judge people's ideas. However, I must say it does not sound like something that any non-graduate CS student hasn't already "seen this, done that" as there are dozens of algorithms that do a much better job. This is why I asked about complexities or insert/update/query operations on said DB, otherwise it's not a DB but mangled packed bits, e.g. some compression output.

Advances in society, especially in technology, are often evolutionary. An initial idea may be innovative, but over time, others improve it and adapt it to new needs and contexts. This collaborative and continuous process is what drives progress.
Don't give vague opinions. Maybe something is difficult today, but tomorrow we don't know.


BTC bc1qxs47ttydl8tmdv8vtygp7dy76lvayz3r6rdahu
pbies
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 290
Merit: 133



View Profile
September 14, 2024, 02:18:20 PM
 #5884

The more private keys we have, the smaller the error would be....5% deviation on puzzle 130 is too big.

It depends how you want to search for them.

With keyhunt and option for addresses is useless as it will take ages,
but with keyhunt and option for bsgs (random or not) may be successful.

BTC: bc1qmrexlspd24kevspp42uvjg7sjwm8xcf9w86h5k
Kelvin555
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 14, 2024, 08:21:44 PM
 #5885

Seems there are 12 satoshi left to grab on the #66 address. Hurry up guys.

TX input:
Code:
1FuckUmT5yBAvozf6gT8GRQVbJ7iBDUnrH

TX outputs:
Code:
1Jvv4yWkE9MhbuwGU66666666669sugEF 0.00000001
1YouAreSoDumbLoL666666666667K5aR4 0.00000002
1WhatWereUThinking6666666662wkqq1 0.00000003
1YouDeserveNothing6666666665sbbBC 0.00000004
1YouEpicFaiLure66666666666688GSDA 0.00000005
1BitchAssLoser66666666666669dBUVg 0.00000006
1AndEveryoneELse666666666669Vnc8C 0.00000007
1ThisisALosingGame6666666667HAZdf 0.00000008
1JustGetAReaLJob666666666665vGKVD 0.00000009
1YoureWastingTimeAndMoney664CVExC 0.00000010
1AndCausingCLimateChange6666HK8Qc 0.00000011
13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so 0.00000012
1Jvv4yWkE9MhbuwGUoqFYzDjRVQHaLWuJd 0.00000013
1FK5PjPNARQmg94n2cNHTo9417kWfXUDBQ 0.00002125

I think whoever sent these sats stole the price from the real solver of puzzle 66.
COBRAS
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 923
Merit: 22


View Profile
September 14, 2024, 08:41:48 PM
 #5886

Seems there are 12 satoshi left to grab on the #66 address. Hurry up guys.

TX input:
Code:
1FuckUmT5yBAvozf6gT8GRQVbJ7iBDUnrH

TX outputs:
Code:
1Jvv4yWkE9MhbuwGU66666666669sugEF 0.00000001
1YouAreSoDumbLoL666666666667K5aR4 0.00000002
1WhatWereUThinking6666666662wkqq1 0.00000003
1YouDeserveNothing6666666665sbbBC 0.00000004
1YouEpicFaiLure66666666666688GSDA 0.00000005
1BitchAssLoser66666666666669dBUVg 0.00000006
1AndEveryoneELse666666666669Vnc8C 0.00000007
1ThisisALosingGame6666666667HAZdf 0.00000008
1JustGetAReaLJob666666666665vGKVD 0.00000009
1YoureWastingTimeAndMoney664CVExC 0.00000010
1AndCausingCLimateChange6666HK8Qc 0.00000011
13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so 0.00000012
1Jvv4yWkE9MhbuwGUoqFYzDjRVQHaLWuJd 0.00000013
1FK5PjPNARQmg94n2cNHTo9417kWfXUDBQ 0.00002125

I think whoever sent these sats stole the price from the real solver of puzzle 66.


Can sender of microsat know of balace move faster then others because  this microsathoshi ?


Probably we will seen transaction replace again.

[
AndrewWeb
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47
Merit: 1


View Profile
September 14, 2024, 10:53:11 PM
 #5887

I don't think anything wrong happened here.

5.94 BTC went to

bc1ql5lrt3y97djyu5k8ewmz87nnemxheycp6wdree
bc1qdplvug87leypur2a27xh64u8cu78e0td8edwv7
bc1qpa20zkg6kr55yl7gxnwh37aj8q00rt70k6q8ru

whereas 0.66 BTC (exactly 10% of the prize 6.60 BTC) went straight to Binance (for cash out ?)

Someone helped the finder with the transaction and got 10% of the prize ?
Pages: « 1 ... 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 [295]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!