Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[napros]

PHI Proof: Bitcoin Markets + Puzzles
Market Evidence:

Golden Ratio Multiplier (350DMA × φ) accurately predicted every BTC cycle top
Historical: 21x→13x→5x→3x following Fibonacci descent
Current $100k+ resistance = 1.6x (φ) level

Puzzle Evidence:

P69 solved at 0.72% (not random 50% average)
Shows non-uniform distribution exists
Pattern analysis reveals φ⁻¹ (0.618) positioning correlations

Mathematical Foundation:
Position = Range × (φ⁻¹ + calibration_offset)
Where φ⁻¹ = 0.618033988749895
Cross-Domain Link:
Both markets and puzzles follow logarithmic patterns where φ emerges naturally. Same mathematical principles, different applications.
Statistical Proof:
Testing on known solutions shows >15% improvement over random distribution. P69's early position validates φ-based positioning theory.
Conclusion: φ is mathematically valid for both Bitcoin markets and puzzle solving. Different domains, same underlying harmonic principles.

[mahmood1356]

PHI Proof: Bitcoin Markets + Puzzles
Market Evidence:

Golden Ratio Multiplier (350DMA × φ) accurately predicted every BTC cycle top
Historical: 21x→13x→5x→3x following Fibonacci descent
Current $100k+ resistance = 1.6x (φ) level

Puzzle Evidence:

P69 solved at 0.72% (not random 50% average)
Shows non-uniform distribution exists
Pattern analysis reveals φ⁻¹ (0.618) positioning correlations

Mathematical Foundation:
Position = Range × (φ⁻¹ + calibration_offset)
Where φ⁻¹ = 0.618033988749895
Cross-Domain Link:
Both markets and puzzles follow logarithmic patterns where φ emerges naturally. Same mathematical principles, different applications.
Statistical Proof:
Testing on known solutions shows >15% improvement over random distribution. P69's early position validates φ-based positioning theory.
Conclusion: φ is mathematically valid for both Bitcoin markets and puzzle solving. Different domains, same underlying harmonic principles.

Well now, with the calculations you did, did you finally identify the range closest to the target?

[bit_mind]

PHI Proof: Bitcoin Markets + Puzzles
Market Evidence:

Golden Ratio Multiplier (350DMA × φ) accurately predicted every BTC cycle top
Historical: 21x→13x→5x→3x following Fibonacci descent
Current $100k+ resistance = 1.6x (φ) level

Puzzle Evidence:

P69 solved at 0.72% (not random 50% average)
Shows non-uniform distribution exists
Pattern analysis reveals φ⁻¹ (0.618) positioning correlations

Mathematical Foundation:
Position = Range × (φ⁻¹ + calibration_offset)
Where φ⁻¹ = 0.618033988749895
Cross-Domain Link:
Both markets and puzzles follow logarithmic patterns where φ emerges naturally. Same mathematical principles, different applications.
Statistical Proof:
Testing on known solutions shows >15% improvement over random distribution. P69's early position validates φ-based positioning theory.
Conclusion: φ is mathematically valid for both Bitcoin markets and puzzle solving. Different domains, same underlying harmonic principles.

This is not near the 50% mark you’d expect in a uniformly distributed brute-force search space. Instead, it’s very close to φ⁻¹² ≈ 0.072, which is a compelling correlation.
If you hypothesize that:

Puzzle creators intentionally embedded key locations based on Golden Ratio offsets, or

Real-world entropy biases accidentally favored certain ranges,

[holy_ship]

hey, guys, did you know that keyhunt switch -R is not really working?

-b 135 -R

you think that it will start 135bit range from random place? fsck, no, it always starts from beginning of range.

sooo much wasted resources.... alberto is rediska

[teguh54321]

PHI Proof: Bitcoin Markets + Puzzles
Market Evidence:

Golden Ratio Multiplier (350DMA × φ) accurately predicted every BTC cycle top
Historical: 21x→13x→5x→3x following Fibonacci descent
Current $100k+ resistance = 1.6x (φ) level

Puzzle Evidence:

P69 solved at 0.72% (not random 50% average)
Shows non-uniform distribution exists
Pattern analysis reveals φ⁻¹ (0.618) positioning correlations

Mathematical Foundation:
Position = Range × (φ⁻¹ + calibration_offset)
Where φ⁻¹ = 0.618033988749895
Cross-Domain Link:
Both markets and puzzles follow logarithmic patterns where φ emerges naturally. Same mathematical principles, different applications.
Statistical Proof:
Testing on known solutions shows >15% improvement over random distribution. P69's early position validates φ-based positioning theory.
Conclusion: φ is mathematically valid for both Bitcoin markets and puzzle solving. Different domains, same underlying harmonic principles.

This is not near the 50% mark you’d expect in a uniformly distributed brute-force search space. Instead, it’s very close to φ⁻¹² ≈ 0.072, which is a compelling correlation.
If you hypothesize that:

Puzzle creators intentionally embedded key locations based on Golden Ratio offsets, or

Real-world entropy biases accidentally favored certain ranges,

Okay lets talk bout this golden ratio "if" somehow work misteriously..

This is the full phi

n   φⁿ   %

1   0.6180339887   61.8034%
2   0.3819660113   38.1966%
3   0.2360679775   23.6068%
4   0.1458980338   14.5898%
5   0.0901699437   9.0170%
6   0.0557280900   5.5728%
7   0.0344418537   3.4442%
8   0.0212862365   2.1286%
9   0.0131556172   1.3156%
10   0.0081306193   0.8131%
11   0.0050249980   0.5025%
12   0.0031056213   0.3106%
13   0.0019193767   0.1919%
14   0.0011860504   0.1186%
15   0.0007333263   0.0733%
16   0.0004527241   0.0453%
17   0.0002806022   0.0281%
18   0.0001721218   0.0172%
19   0.0001084804   0.0108%
20   0.0000636414   0.0064%



n   1 - φⁿ   %

1   0.3819660113   38.1966%
2   0.6180339887   61.8034%
3   0.7639320225   76.3932%
4   0.8541019662   85.4102%
5   0.9098300563   90.9830%
6   0.9442719100   94.4272%
7   0.9655581463   96.5558%
8   0.9787137635   97.8714%
9   0.9868443828   98.6844%
10   0.9918693807   99.1869%
11   0.9949750020   99.4975%
12   0.9968943787   99.6894%
13   0.9980806233   99.8081%
14   0.9988139496   99.8814%
15   0.9992666737   99.9267%
16   0.9995472759   99.9547%
17   0.9997193978   99.9719%
18   0.9998278782   99.9828%
19   0.9998915196   99.9892%
20   0.9999363586   99.9936%


P70 64.4%
P69 0.72%
P68 49.01%
P67 79.78%
P66 25.62%
P65 65.71%
P64 92.98%
P63 95.01%
P62 69.5%
P61 23.67%
P60 96.9%
P59 82.17%
P58 38.76%
P57 91.85%
P56 22.73%
P55 66.79%
P54 10.74%
P53 50.18%
P52 87.25%
P51 82.86%
P50 8.56%
P49 45.35%
P48 35.86%
P47 70.06%


This is the picture of phi lines vs solution.
Mybe anyone can figure it out ? Or not ?
https://yourimageshare.com/ib/Bpv5YbxK04



Then offset?🤔
How bout incase of p68 p49 p47 etc wich is not around the ratio..??

If it work ,  can you use phi formula for each hex digit ? Or just relative to the given keyspace ? 🤔

[E36cat]

hey, guys, did you know that keyhunt switch -R is not really working?

-b 135 -R

you think that it will start 135bit range from random place? fsck, no, it always starts from beginning of range.

sooo much wasted resources.... alberto is rediska

you are wrong

• Version 0.2.230519 Satoshi Quest, developed by AlbertoBSD
• Turn off stats output
• Threads : 4
• Random mode
• Mode BSGS random
• Opening file 135
• Added 1 points from file
• Bit Range 135
• -- from : 0x4000000000000000000000000000000000
• -- to   : 0x8000000000000000000000000000000000
• N = 0x100000000000
• Bloom filter for 4194304 elements : 14.38 MB
• Bloom filter for 131072 elements : 0.88 MB
• Bloom filter for 4096 elements : 0.88 MB
• Allocating 0.00 MB for 4096 bP Points
• processing 4194304/4194304 bP points : 100%
• Making checkums .. ... done
• Sorting 4096 elements... Done!
• Thread 0x5e4a17dfb41d9f62e3ec74c2fbcb3509d9
• Thread 0x509fcb93a7449b84783a67f0a4fd54274f
• Thread 0x72910d1cd3496ab69ec73f7b0f147fdd09
• Thread 0x6b61467b7fa7df642ebf5a20e11e4a9e22

[Mr-M]

Bitcoin is a virtual currency, it has a high level of security, in addition, it also has a freedom, so we can not find out who sent the funds. That is a good thing, but it is also a disadvantage to bitcoin. And I think the author of those deals does not matter, the main thing is that you can get rewards from it.

Like in 23 days "or so" we will have #52 
https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/stats

And that's just because we're covering our 4-day "search debt". @BurtW - you hear this?


Rico

I solve the block on the preimage. So when i get paid? Or we just gonna let it rewind. Tbh I’m confused. How do i get paid actually.. I thought it just by getting the preimage.. and R*vok…. ? I still have 1 utxo

A genius correct a 9.4b$  am i going to jail?..

[brainless]

If you have 5090 gpu
Can someone explain, for search complete range of 48 bit, how much time by bitcrack or keyhunt etc sequence search ?

[teguh54321]

If you have 5090 gpu
Can someone explain, for search complete range of 48 bit, how much time by bitcrack or keyhunt etc sequence search ?

44 bit bitcrack  brichard19
3080ti +-2.5hours

44 bit  vanitysearch-bitcrack fixedpaul
3080ti +- 1.5 hours
4090 +- 40 minutes
5090 +-30 minutes

If 48 bit then x16

[ericb148]

I have been experimenting for months with popular algorithms like Kangaroo, Baybestep,.. but all have no results, need more efficient algorithms. As the last comment of author Satoshi_Rising he said all addresses belong to the same wallet, this means they have the same master key. Hope some genius will have more ideas.
 

[sxiclub]

I have been experimenting for months with popular algorithms like Kangaroo, Baybestep,.. but all have no results, need more efficient algorithms. As the last comment of author Satoshi_Rising he said all addresses belong to the same wallet, this means they have the same master key. Hope some genius will have more ideas.
 

These algorithms are useless in those puzzles in which the public key has not been revealed, the first on the list with that condition is 135 and yes, without another type of approximation it is practically impossible to solve.

[husone]

I have been experimenting for months with popular algorithms like Kangaroo, Baybestep,.. but all have no results, need more efficient algorithms. As the last comment of author Satoshi_Rising he said all addresses belong to the same wallet, this means they have the same master key. Hope some genius will have more ideas.
 

where is the comment?

[Cricktor]

~~~

Now that we have a glimpse that you're likely not the brightest candle on the cake, it's pretty much clear that there's no feasible way to find the HD wallet's master extended private key or even the mnemonic recovery words which encode the wallet's main secret very likely random entropy.

Bitcoin's cryptography has been safe for 16y and will be safe for longer. HD wallets are a few years younger and are safe too, unless the wallet owner is plain stupid and can't secure the mnemonic recovery words properly.

You may want to hop to https://learnmeabitcoin.com and learn a bit about Bitcoin before you talk about stuff you have no or little clue about. As many others with their questionable contributions here, it's just noise to this thread.

..., the first on the list with that condition is 135 and yes, without another type of approximation it is practically impossible to solve.

Puzzle #135 is the next available with a public key exposed. It's not impossible to solve, it only depends how much resources you're willing to throw at it. But you wrote "practically impossible", and well that might be the case when the resources to solve it cost you more than you could gain from finding a solution and successfully withdrawing it.

To withdraw puzzle #135 you don't need to use slipstream.mara.com because bots can't find a solution any fast. This is the case for all remaining pending puzzles with exposed public keys unless some new magic is invented which frankly I don't see. And please, don't start some blabbering about quantum computers when your knowledge about those comes basically from public clickbait news.

Of course, for puzzles #71+ you need slipstream.mara.com or similar non-public, non-fraudulent miner's mempool to withdraw without fear to loose your puzzle prize to bots.

What value has your post for this thread exactly?

[analyticnomad]

I have been experimenting for months with popular algorithms like Kangaroo, Baybestep,.. but all have no results, need more efficient algorithms. As the last comment of author Satoshi_Rising he said all addresses belong to the same wallet, this means they have the same master key. Hope some genius will have more ideas.
 

These algorithms are useless in those puzzles in which the public key has not been revealed, the first on the list with that condition is 135 and yes, without another type of approximation it is practically impossible to solve.

Then explain why 1-70 were solved without the pub key.

[Tony8989]

lol i start searching today,using 4 Nvidia L4 each scanning at 335 m/k x to 312 m/k x sec is all about lucky?
But i believe the key is around 7............  why because Puzzle 70 was done in 2019-06-09 and since then nobody have find the key for 71 how many people have being scanning for key 71 since 2019-06-09 so must be around 6....... or 7............  what do you guys think?

[E36cat]

lol i start searching today,using 4 Nvidia L4 each scanning at 335 m/k x to 312 m/k x sec is all about lucky?
But i believe the key is around 7............  why because Puzzle 70 was done in 2019-06-09 and since then nobody have find the key for 71 how many people have being scanning for key 71 since 2019-06-09 so must be around 6....... or 7............  what do you guys think?

because nobody has scanned for 71 until 69 was found
70 was found because the pubkey was intentional leaked..
but the latest found was 69

[Tony8989]

awwwww shit!!! this change everything but still 69 was found 2025-04-30 nearly 3 months

[Virtuose]

lol i start searching today,using 4 Nvidia L4 each scanning at 335 m/k x to 312 m/k x sec is all about lucky?
But i believe the key is around 7............  why because Puzzle 70 was done in 2019-06-09 and since then nobody have find the key for 71 how many people have being scanning for key 71 since 2019-06-09 so must be around 6....... or 7............  what do you guys think?

because nobody has scanned for 71 until 69 was found
70 was found because the pubkey was intentional leaked..
but the latest found was 69

That’s not true. I’ve been working on Puzzle 73 for months and have scanned everything up to prefix 14 from 1000000000000000000 to 14fffffffffffffffff. Higher puzzles like 71+ are absolutely being searched, even if they haven’t been solved yet.

[Tony8989]

yes thank you, i was thinking the same someone is scanning different puzzle but wont tell you

[E36cat]

lol i start searching today,using 4 Nvidia L4 each scanning at 335 m/k x to 312 m/k x sec is all about lucky?
But i believe the key is around 7............  why because Puzzle 70 was done in 2019-06-09 and since then nobody have find the key for 71 how many people have being scanning for key 71 since 2019-06-09 so must be around 6....... or 7............  what do you guys think?

because nobody has scanned for 71 until 69 was found
70 was found because the pubkey was intentional leaked..
but the latest found was 69

That’s not true. I’ve been working on Puzzle 73 for months and have scanned everything up to prefix 14 from 1000000000000000000 to 14fffffffffffffffff. Higher puzzles like 71+ are absolutely being searched, even if they haven’t been solved yet.

comme on )  how long and what power did you scan from 10 to 14.. for puzzle 73 )