optioncmdPR
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 16, 2025, 07:26:22 AM |
|
That was actually pretty cool. The quote from the saatoshi_rising @ 2:26 was bit mangled, however. Nonetheless, bravo!
|
|
|
|
|
wifdev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 16, 2025, 10:28:29 AM |
|
That was actually pretty cool. The quote from the saatoshi_rising @ 2:26 was bit mangled, however. Nonetheless, bravo! Thank you ! yeah wanted to talk about the creator of the puzzle but was the only message about it.
|
|
|
|
|
smartpermutations
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 16, 2025, 07:53:24 PM |
|
Does the hash narrow the range?
Hashing in Bitcoin doesn’t shrink the real search space of the private key. It just compresses data, which naturally causes collisions. You start with 256 bits → hash → 256 bits → hash → 160 bits. Collisions at the 160-bit stage are normal and expected.
|
|
|
|
|
zahid888
Member

Offline
Activity: 344
Merit: 24
the right steps towards the goal
|
 |
November 16, 2025, 08:50:15 PM |
|
LIVE ON SCREEN DRAMA: - Every Prefix address in the range flashes LIVE - Viewers can SPOT THE KEY in real-time! - Your Lucky hex + GPU POWER = PURE THRILL & SUSPENSE! https://t.me/funwithpuzzle71/129
|
1BGvwggxfCaHGykKrVXX7fk8GYaLQpeixA
|
|
|
analyticnomad
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 17, 2025, 02:36:10 AM |
|
LIVE ON SCREEN DRAMA: - Every Prefix address in the range flashes LIVE - Viewers can SPOT THE KEY in real-time! - Your Lucky hex + GPU POWER = PURE THRILL & SUSPENSE! https://t.me/funwithpuzzle71/129You spelled "Towards" wrong in your bio and have it as "the right steps Towerds the goal". also not clicking on that link.
|
|
|
|
|
fecell
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 177
Merit: 2
|
 |
November 17, 2025, 08:20:08 AM |
|
[+] [18,067] 0.00% S: 331895.0 p/s, E: 18:19:32, TE: 16d 11:59:41, ETA: 1623936135880879259797946368y 5m 23d 17:21:04 255215748667055164621267256750573 --- [+] [18,068] 0.00% S: 331860.1 p/s, E: 18:20:48, TE: 16d 12:00:57, ETA: 1623933104747034416043261952y 3m 24d 20:39:28 143991517358151100293789707953175 --- [+] [18,069] 0.00% S: 331802.2 p/s, E: 18:22:09, TE: 16d 12:02:18, ETA: 1623935310097885652527874048y 8m 28d 09:18:56 32767286049247035966312159155777 --- [+] [18,070] 0.00% S: 331762.4 p/s, E: 18:23:27, TE: 16d 12:03:35, ETA: 1623933431784606125021724672y 5m 8d 16:40:32 246061608398769734450787649898602 --- [+] [18,071] 0.00% S: 331735.1 p/s, E: 18:24:41, TE: 16d 12:04:50, ETA: 1623928731610614548238696448y 9m 18d 04:11:44 134837377089865652108911591619220 --- [+] [18,072] 0.00% S: 331691.1 p/s, E: 18:25:59, TE: 16d 12:06:08, ETA: 1623927852853047085750026240y 6d 07:38:40 23613145780961605795832552303806 --- [+] [18,073] 0.00% S: 331644.7 p/s, E: 18:27:18, TE: 16d 12:07:27, ETA: 1623927559057088759526850560y 4m 20d 16:21:20 236907468130484250237112514600679 --- [+] [18,074] 0.00% S: 331586.9 p/s, E: 18:28:39, TE: 16d 12:08:48, ETA: 1623929873722913526030270464y 6m 12d 00:23:28 125683236821580203924033475285265 --- [+] [18,075] 0.00% S: 331558.6 p/s, E: 18:29:54, TE: 16d 12:10:03, ETA: 1623925481386162456780341248y 4m 20d 07:36:32 14459005512676139596555926487867 is a statistic well?
|
|
|
|
|
zahid888
Member

Offline
Activity: 344
Merit: 24
the right steps towards the goal
|
 |
November 17, 2025, 10:34:32 AM |
|
LIVE ON SCREEN DRAMA: - Every Prefix address in the range flashes LIVE - Viewers can SPOT THE KEY in real-time! - Your Lucky hex + GPU POWER = PURE THRILL & SUSPENSE! https://t.me/funwithpuzzle71/129You spelled "Towards" wrong in your bio and have it as "the right steps Towerds the goal". also not clicking on that link. Thanks for catching that typo, fixed "Towerds" to "Towards" in my bio  No worries about the link at all, totally get the caution. I’ve already scanned millions of PVK suffix, using completely random Python/C++ generation. Now I’ve opened the exact same tool to the public so anyone can drop in their own hand-picked 8 hex characters. Just a simple experiment: let’s see how much difference there really is between pure machine randomness and a human going “yeah this one feels lucky”,  And whether people end up clustering in the same spots. Basically turning the unsolved Puzzle 71 into a behavioral crypto experiment and Fun. Anyway tool is live now...
|
1BGvwggxfCaHGykKrVXX7fk8GYaLQpeixA
|
|
|
HoMLoL
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 19, 2025, 12:49:27 PM |
|
Hello everyone! For those looking for puzzles 71, 72, 73, etc., I have finally completed the development of a project that can unite us all in an honest search. An honest pool with an open API. The puzzle range is divided into 67,108,864 parts, each part being 2^44. It uses open-source software: https://github.com/FixedPaul/VanitySearch-Bitcrack. Its source code is unmodified; you can download it directly from its repository and use it. All automation and server interaction are handled by a Python script. In general, I have described everything in more detail on Git: https://github.com/homlol/honestpool. Website: https://honestpool.ru GIT: https://github.com/homlol/honestpool API: https://github.com/homlol/honestpool?tab=readme-ov-file#api TG Group: @homlol_pool Good luck to everyone
|
|
|
|
|
fecell
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 177
Merit: 2
|
 |
November 20, 2025, 05:38:38 AM |
|
[+] [18,067] 0.00% S: 331895.0 p/s, E: 18:19:32, TE: 16d 11:59:41, ETA: 1623936135880879259797946368y 5m 23d 17:21:04 255215748667055164621267256750573 --- [+] [18,068] 0.00% S: 331860.1 p/s, E: 18:20:48, TE: 16d 12:00:57, ETA: 1623933104747034416043261952y 3m 24d 20:39:28 143991517358151100293789707953175 --- [+] [18,069] 0.00% S: 331802.2 p/s, E: 18:22:09, TE: 16d 12:02:18, ETA: 1623935310097885652527874048y 8m 28d 09:18:56 32767286049247035966312159155777 --- [+] [18,070] 0.00% S: 331762.4 p/s, E: 18:23:27, TE: 16d 12:03:35, ETA: 1623933431784606125021724672y 5m 8d 16:40:32 246061608398769734450787649898602 --- [+] [18,071] 0.00% S: 331735.1 p/s, E: 18:24:41, TE: 16d 12:04:50, ETA: 1623928731610614548238696448y 9m 18d 04:11:44 134837377089865652108911591619220 --- [+] [18,072] 0.00% S: 331691.1 p/s, E: 18:25:59, TE: 16d 12:06:08, ETA: 1623927852853047085750026240y 6d 07:38:40 23613145780961605795832552303806 --- [+] [18,073] 0.00% S: 331644.7 p/s, E: 18:27:18, TE: 16d 12:07:27, ETA: 1623927559057088759526850560y 4m 20d 16:21:20 236907468130484250237112514600679 --- [+] [18,074] 0.00% S: 331586.9 p/s, E: 18:28:39, TE: 16d 12:08:48, ETA: 1623929873722913526030270464y 6m 12d 00:23:28 125683236821580203924033475285265 --- [+] [18,075] 0.00% S: 331558.6 p/s, E: 18:29:54, TE: 16d 12:10:03, ETA: 1623925481386162456780341248y 4m 20d 07:36:32 14459005512676139596555926487867 is a statistic well? current state: [+] [19,979] 0.00% S: 324569.5 p/s, E: 06:26:12, TE: 18d 04:45:24, ETA: 1619688167311456692992999424y 9m 16d 13:30:40 154138132311997239066806131546382 it was 2 days and 4237314074705763787341824 years reduce.
|
|
|
|
|
Poopari
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 20, 2025, 04:03:03 PM |
|
I have been playing around EC math for some time that i don't remember. But may be I am crazy or lost my analytical acuman or whatever you call it you are free to do so. I have reached a juncture that I have two scalar values and two points one of the point being puzzle public key point. Here is explanation.
Scalar_S1 Scalar_S2
Mataphor_Point_P1 Puzzle_Point_P2
S1*P1= P3 S2*P3= P2
It also works either way as well. S2*P1= P4 S1*P4= P2
Now either this is a step towards something or may be I lost my energy to call it something anyhow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kTimesG
|
 |
November 20, 2025, 04:35:46 PM Last edit: November 20, 2025, 05:04:24 PM by kTimesG |
|
I have two scalar values and two points one of the point being puzzle public key point.
S1*P1= P3 S2*P3= P2
Why so many words for "I have the private key"? Sweep the puzzle or end the trolling, these are pretty much your two options. Or, if you don't have P1's scalar, then you can simply generate whatever P1 you want out of P2, G, S1 and S2, to simply transfer the ECDLP(P2) to a different point.
|
Off the grid, training pigeons to broadcast signed messages.
|
|
|
fecell
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 177
Merit: 2
|
 |
November 21, 2025, 02:23:17 PM |
|
I have been playing around EC math for some time that i don't remember. But may be I am crazy or lost my analytical acuman or whatever you call it you are free to do so. I have reached a juncture that I have two scalar values and two points one of the point being puzzle public key point. Here is explanation.
Scalar_S1 Scalar_S2
Mataphor_Point_P1 Puzzle_Point_P2
S1*P1= P3 S2*P3= P2
It also works either way as well. S2*P1= P4 S1*P4= P2
Now either this is a step towards something or may be I lost my energy to call it something anyhow.
of coz. its simple math. >> S2*P1= P4 >> S1*P4= P2 so, S2*S1*P1=P2. >> S1*P1= P3 >> S2*P3= P2 so, S2*S1*P1 = P2 and all other P's well.
|
|
|
|
|
cctv5go
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 21, 2025, 03:40:17 PM |
|
A crash test: Hash160☞Public key☞Private key
|
|
|
|
|
brainless
Member

Online
Activity: 451
Merit: 35
|
 |
November 22, 2025, 09:34:03 AM |
|
A crash test: Hash160☞Public key☞Private key
Try first Public key☞Private key
|
13sXkWqtivcMtNGQpskD78iqsgVy9hcHLF
|
|
|
farou9
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 22, 2025, 09:08:20 PM |
|
i dont remember where but i have seen someone talking about if we have k1 and k1 * g = p1 then we have p1.y=p2.x how can we get k2 in this case ?
|
|
|
|
|
Poopari
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 23, 2025, 02:39:35 AM |
|
Why so many words for "I have the private key"?
Sweep the puzzle or end the trolling, these are pretty much your two options.
Or, if you don't have P1's scalar, then you can simply generate whatever P1 you want out of P2, G, S1 and S2, to simply transfer the ECDLP(P2) to a different point.
First of all thank you for your reply. Secondly, I am not trolling anyone here neither I have the private key of puzzle 134. I don't know whether you've said it due to mathematical juncture that I posted or for the sake of having a laugh on it. But I am serious here. I don't have kP and I don't understood your suggestion either how to manipulate this in our favor.
|
|
|
|
|
Garys27
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 23, 2025, 09:52:04 AM |
|
Why so many words for "I have the private key"?
Sweep the puzzle or end the trolling, these are pretty much your two options.
Or, if you don't have P1's scalar, then you can simply generate whatever P1 you want out of P2, G, S1 and S2, to simply transfer the ECDLP(P2) to a different point.
First of all thank you for your reply. Secondly, I am not trolling anyone here neither I have the private key of puzzle 134. I don't know whether you've said it due to mathematical juncture that I posted or for the sake of having a laugh on it. But I am serious here. I don't have kP and I don't understood your suggestion either how to manipulate this in our favor. I will help you for half of the puzzle loot 
|
|
|
|
|
Tony8989
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 23, 2025, 08:37:21 PM |
|
1PWo3JeB9SyEuPyjoqKm2Ur6xUNJigqkmF
1PWo3JeB9d5CYrv5dzc4P8cr59ibFRMZMf
1PWo3JeB9sYfCE3gqL4LADHDLuhtr3kFH3
1PWo3JeB9Xa4x6UjH5tqGTkb8WE6H9MJuv
1PWo3JeB9UnXe1CR3K7rEt9te92E6SBH5p
1PWo3JeB9HvP415UbBEyMW9VEkUj619KGD
1PWo3JeB9NmXAKPPnPLNnuEo5pLCKASzs9
1PWo3JeB9JykV7ixxyAr8QfTQWFRN7THDJ
1PWo3JeB9tWXkfLAyxnnq6ykiBXAv4g5nc
still nothing guys
|
|
|
|
|
E36cat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 23, 2025, 10:35:47 PM |
|
1PWo3JeB9SyEuPyjoqKm2Ur6xUNJigqkmF
1PWo3JeB9d5CYrv5dzc4P8cr59ibFRMZMf
1PWo3JeB9sYfCE3gqL4LADHDLuhtr3kFH3
1PWo3JeB9Xa4x6UjH5tqGTkb8WE6H9MJuv
1PWo3JeB9UnXe1CR3K7rEt9te92E6SBH5p
1PWo3JeB9HvP415UbBEyMW9VEkUj619KGD
1PWo3JeB9NmXAKPPnPLNnuEo5pLCKASzs9
1PWo3JeB9JykV7ixxyAr8QfTQWFRN7THDJ
1PWo3JeB9tWXkfLAyxnnq6ykiBXAv4g5nc
still nothing guys
1PWo3JeB9jakyr87nZvq34SGhWNMvDbay4
|
|
|
|
|
|
kTimesG
|
 |
November 23, 2025, 10:55:12 PM |
|
I don't know whether you've said it due to mathematical juncture that I posted or for the sake of having a laugh on it. But I am serious here. I don't have kP and I don't understood your suggestion either how to manipulate this in our favor.
There's nothing to manipulate that helps with anything, you can choose whatever scalars S1 and S2 (and S3 and S4 up to whatever), and simply compute inv(S1*S2*...) * P2 to get a P1. This works for all the points on the curve. So, zero useful extra information to help you retrieve the unknown scalar (which needs to be relative to the generator, not to what is basically one and the same point). It's not like you have some sort of solvable system of independent equations there, if they are derivable one from another.
|
Off the grid, training pigeons to broadcast signed messages.
|
|
|
|