innout
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 29, 2016, 11:59:13 AM |
|
Hi guys As a test I just sent 100LSK from one of my adresses to another. The sender account balance went down 100LSK, but the receiver account still has the same balance, althought it shows the transaction. Is that normal ? Am I being paranoid ?  |
|
|
|
|
|
Masha Sha
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:00:40 PM |
|
After the fix lisk will explode again
Yeah people trying to fud, but they will not succeed... If we only polo had allowed shorting... Do you know when it will be possible? |
/sarc /snowflakeshield /iammorevirtuousthanyou /2692 /pixelsonscreeen /fuckthemusep2p /p2p=love
|
|
|
Splatters
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 1400+ Coins Exchange
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:01:52 PM |
|
After the fix lisk will explode again
What are you doing on a decent coin thread? most of the time i found you at the shitty coins You owe me 0.5. Contact me when you have it |
I know why your pray will never be answered!
|
|
|
|
tobsnn
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:02:53 PM |
|
People still buying this with a broken chain? LOL! Crash incoming. The blockchain stopped working at block 35143. The team is already fixing it. Stay tuned!
Is this just the block explorer or is it more serious? It is the chain! And yes it is serious Exchanges are protected. Bittrex etc all have tools in place in case that they would be something wrong... so nothing to worry about... We already fixed the issues in Lisk v0.3.1. We need a bit more time to build the latest versino, deploy it to the network, test it, and then we will release it. On the Trollbox in Poloniex they are already Fudding like crazy  PS: Did you already release those distribution coins? More sell-off coins for the real investors going in long term, seems this is working out |
|
|
|
andyatcrux
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:05:07 PM |
|
After the fix lisk will explode again
Yeah people trying to fud, but they will not succeed... If we only polo had allowed shorting... Do you know when it will be possible? If you mean "short selling" from the margin trading, probably a few weeks. You can always short and long a trade-able coin. |
|
|
|
|
|
tobsnn
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:12:17 PM |
|
Hi guys As a test I just sent 100LSK from one of my adresses to another. The sender account balance went down 100LSK, but the receiver account still has the same balance, althought it shows the transaction. Is that normal ? Am I being paranoid ? Wait for 0.3.1 to give the chain a fresh Lift so blocks will be generated more flexible than in 0.3.0 |
|
|
|
Transpotime21Bus
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Roberto TM
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:12:55 PM |
|
Will Lisk ever do its own DAO?
|
|
|
|
|
innout
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:14:27 PM |
|
Hi guys As a test I just sent 100LSK from one of my adresses to another. The sender account balance went down 100LSK, but the receiver account still has the same balance, althought it shows the transaction. Is that normal ? Am I being paranoid ? Wait for 0.3.1 to give the chain a fresh Lift so blocks will be generated more flexible than in 0.3.0 Ok patience it is then.  |
|
|
|
|
|
ibrahim11
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:25:33 PM |
|
Why polo price not rising?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
innout
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:41:49 PM |
|
"Error: Failed to send transaction" on Faucet Maybe has to do with the current chain problem ? |
|
|
|
|
b457
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
BURSTcoin - Burst-team.us
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:43:27 PM |
|
"Error: Failed to send transaction" on Faucet
Maybe has to do with the current chain problem ?
Chain is running smooth again, so it's more likely that this is a faucet problem. |
|
|
|
|
Grumlin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2891
Merit: 1149
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:43:56 PM |
|
"Error: Failed to send transaction" on Faucet
Maybe has to do with the current chain problem ?
no, just now faucet is empty, just will more fast |
|
|
|
|
peterepeat
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:44:54 PM |
|
I just noticed some small transfers have not confirmed and it is been quite a long time.
I am using the web wallet.
Can someone tell me what the "blockchain problem" is.
Is it broken? Is it a serious problem?
|
|
|
|
|
|
ludbega
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:46:10 PM |
|
you must be fast on Grumlin
|
Un tiens vaut mieux que 2 tu l'auras
|
|
|
innout
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:49:20 PM |
|
Hi guys As a test I just sent 100LSK from one of my adresses to another. The sender account balance went down 100LSK, but the receiver account still has the same balance, althought it shows the transaction. Is that normal ? Am I being paranoid ? Small update here. Transaction has now disappeared from both accounts, and the balances are back on where they were before. Dafuq ?  (Web Wallet) |
|
|
|
|
Galacto
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:50:27 PM |
|
So I've got some Lisk and I'm in the process of deciding who to vote for. I don't like the fact (at all) that certain delegates vote for each other (exchange votes) as that makes it feel a bit like a cartel and might exclude some more viable delegates. However, that's the way the system is so c'est la vie. For me it's about voting for a) those who have something to contribute to Lisk now or in the future or those who have already made a significant contribution and b) those who will give back some of the significant rewards they are going to receive by being voted as a delegate.
I like the idea behind Lisk, I think it has promise. Let's see where the journey takes us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lovely89
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:52:19 PM |
|
Does anyone know how long are manual transfers going to take? I sent an email with the address over 12 hours ago.
|
Bitrated user: vanlovely.
|
|
|
placebo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:53:48 PM |
|
We see a increase in buy support, we see higher lows and getting higher highs. We are getting some positive signs on the LSK market. If we can get above 80,000 sats then it can go fast.... we have now a marketcap of $38,000,000 another positive sign.
|
|
|
|
|
|
docker
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:54:18 PM |
|
So I've got some Lisk and I'm in the process of deciding who to vote for. I don't like the fact (at all) that certain delegates vote for each other (exchange votes) as that makes it feel a bit like a cartel and might exclude some more viable delegates. However, that's the way the system is so c'est la vie. For me it's about voting for a) those who have something to contribute to Lisk now or in the future or those who have already made a significant contribution and b) those who will give back some of the significant rewards they are going to receive by being voted as a delegate.
I like the idea behind Lisk, I think it has promise. Let's see where the journey takes us.
It'll be a cartel obviously, that's why many are looking for big fat wallets mate |
|
|
|
|
|
