Proof that God exists

[BADecker]

Poor baby. It's so fun watching you squirm.  

Seriously, though. Almost nobody likes pain. Come and turn to God so that He will heal you in the afterlife, if not sooner.

Yeah, ok. I got it now. You're completely deluded. Thank you for playing. You're the weakest link.

And you're the missing link, I suppose?










 

[mrflibblehat]

Indeed. +1 for evolution.

[BADecker]

Indeed. +1 for evolution.

Whatever evolution is, it has been programmed to exist the way it does, by cause and effect.

[mrflibblehat]

Indeed. +1 for evolution.

Whatever evolution is, it has been programmed to exist the way it does, by cause and effect.

Prove it!

[BADecker]

Indeed. +1 for evolution.

Whatever evolution is, it has been programmed to exist the way it does, by cause and effect.

Prove it!

Don't have to. Newton showed the proof of it a long time ago.   

[mrflibblehat]

Indeed. +1 for evolution.

Whatever evolution is, it has been programmed to exist the way it does, by cause and effect.

Prove it!

Don't have to. Newton showed the proof of it a long time ago.   

I thought you'd try to weasel your way out of it.

[poptok1]

Water

What’s so amazing about water is that it is colorless, odorless, even tasteless but no living thing can exist without it. On Earth, there is a constant system of purification that recycles and reuses water, sustaining every living thing on our planet. How could God not play a role in this complex but amazing process?

[BADecker]

Indeed. +1 for evolution.

Whatever evolution is, it has been programmed to exist the way it does, by cause and effect.

Prove it!

Don't have to. Newton showed the proof of it a long time ago.   

I thought you'd try to weasel your way out of it.

Did you go look up Newton's 3rd Law, yet, to see that I didn't?   

[mrflibblehat]

Indeed. +1 for evolution.

Whatever evolution is, it has been programmed to exist the way it does, by cause and effect.

Prove it!

Don't have to. Newton showed the proof of it a long time ago.   

I thought you'd try to weasel your way out of it.

Did you go look up Newton's 3rd Law, yet, to see that I didn't?   

Yes, I did. And after doing that I conclude that you annoying and boring. Go away!

[valta4065]

Indeed. +1 for evolution.

Whatever evolution is, it has been programmed to exist the way it does, by cause and effect.

Prove it!

Don't have to. Newton showed the proof of it a long time ago.   

I thought you'd try to weasel your way out of it.

Did you go look up Newton's 3rd Law, yet, to see that I didn't?   

Newton's 3rd law is good. But Quantum Physics destroyed it.

Randomness exists. Randomness is everywhere.

[valta4065]

Indeed. +1 for evolution.

Whatever evolution is, it has been programmed to exist the way it does, by cause and effect.

Prove it!

Don't have to. Newton showed the proof of it a long time ago.   

I thought you'd try to weasel your way out of it.

Did you go look up Newton's 3rd Law, yet, to see that I didn't?   

Yes, I did. And after doing that I conclude that you annoying and boring. Go away!

The fact that he's annoying and boring isn't really a problem. The problem is that he's wrong. That's the real problem.

[mainpmf]

Quantum physics proved the existence of randomness whatever you're saying:

https://www.quora.com/Philosophy/How-do-we-know-that-randomness-actually-exists

There is a rather easy experiment that can be done with a laser that proves randomness exists. That it's part of the universe.

Sorry Badecker.

[BADecker]

Quantum physics proved the existence of randomness whatever you're saying:

https://www.quora.com/Philosophy/How-do-we-know-that-randomness-actually-exists

There is a rather easy experiment that can be done with a laser that proves randomness exists. That it's part of the universe.

Sorry Badecker.

That's what I like about you jokers. First, you set out to prove something. Then you do the math. Then you set up computers and a laser. Then you say that the whole thing proves that randomness exists. All the while you conveniently forget that all your proving was a whole bunch of cause and effect actions and reactions that used a whole bunch of other cause and effect actions and reactions to prove what? To prove that cause and effect can be bypassed? Don't make me laugh.

[BADecker]

Indeed. +1 for evolution.

Whatever evolution is, it has been programmed to exist the way it does, by cause and effect.

Prove it!

Don't have to. Newton showed the proof of it a long time ago.   

I thought you'd try to weasel your way out of it.

Did you go look up Newton's 3rd Law, yet, to see that I didn't?   

Yes, I did. And after doing that I conclude that you annoying and boring. Go away!

The fact that he's annoying and boring isn't really a problem. The problem is that he's wrong. That's the real problem.

The problem is that when you look science law in the face, and see that you don't like it, you go about ignoring it and trying to make it not exist, somehow. How silly of you. Why not simply accept the truth? It's there whether you accept it or not. Accepting it will simply make life more fun, and protect from eternal death if you go to God in truth and sincerity.

[mrflibblehat]

Indeed. +1 for evolution.

Whatever evolution is, it has been programmed to exist the way it does, by cause and effect.

Prove it!

Don't have to. Newton showed the proof of it a long time ago.   

I thought you'd try to weasel your way out of it.

Did you go look up Newton's 3rd Law, yet, to see that I didn't?   

Yes, I did. And after doing that I conclude that you annoying and boring. Go away!

The fact that he's annoying and boring isn't really a problem. The problem is that he's wrong. That's the real problem.

The problem is that when you look science law in the face, and see that you don't like it, you go about ignoring it and trying to make it not exist, somehow. How silly of you. Why not simply accept the truth? It's there whether you accept it or not. Accepting it will simply make life more fun, and protect from eternal death if you go to God in truth and sincerity.

Dude, you've said a lot of things over the time. But you definitely have not proved God to exist. THAT is a fact.

[BADecker]

The problem is that when you look science law in the face, and see that you don't like it, you go about ignoring it and trying to make it not exist, somehow. How silly of you. Why not simply accept the truth? It's there whether you accept it or not. Accepting it will simply make life more fun, and protect from eternal death if you go to God in truth and sincerity.

Dude, you've said a lot of things over the time. But you definitely have not proved God to exist. THAT is a fact.

I agree with you. In fact, I'll go one step further.

Presently, I am not in the mode of proving the existence of God. I have other things to do. That's part of the reason I do the simple thing. I point people to the three scientific laws that prove God exists when combined. These laws are (as I have stated many times) cause and effect (as upheld by Newton's 3rd Law), complex universe, and universal entropy.

Do you need to dismantle your car engine just so that you know enough about your car to drive it? Of course not. You can still drive your car around even if you think the engine is a steam engine (which it is, btw). But if you want to get into a discussion about your car engine, and if you want to be truthful about it, you need to examine things about car engines a bit.

I have examined car engines. I know that your gasoline car engine is really a steam engine, even though people don't generally call it that. It is an internal combustion engine. But more to the point, it is an internal combustion gasoline steam engine.

Same with the scientific proof for the existence of God. Like the internal combustion gasoline steam engine, the fact that people don't generally say the laws that prove the existence of God, in a fashion that shows that they prove God exists, doesn't negate the fact that these laws show that God exists.

In other words, an internal combustion gasoline engine is a steam engine, even though people don't say it this way very often. Also, the laws of cause and effect, complex universe, and universal entropy, when combined, prove that God exists, even though people don't say it this way very often.

Have I proven that God exists? Absolutely not. And I have stated such many times. But you keep on coming back with the idea that I haven't proven God exists. Great! We are in agreement on this point. Why do you keep bringing it up?

If you want to see the proof that God exists, stop looking at the things that I say, and go look at the laws and their combination. Of course, if you don't want to see the proof that God exists, don't look at the laws. You can drive your car if the only things you know about the engine are that it takes gas, and you gotta turn the key to get it started.

But if you start to talk about how your car engine works when you haven't even examined the proof for how it works, you are missing it mentally in some way.

[mrflibblehat]

The problem is that when you look science law in the face, and see that you don't like it, you go about ignoring it and trying to make it not exist, somehow. How silly of you. Why not simply accept the truth? It's there whether you accept it or not. Accepting it will simply make life more fun, and protect from eternal death if you go to God in truth and sincerity.

Dude, you've said a lot of things over the time. But you definitely have not proved God to exist. THAT is a fact.

I agree with you. In fact, I'll go one step further.

Presently, I am not in the mode of proving the existence of God. I have other things to do. That's part of the reason I do the simple thing. I point people to the three scientific laws that prove God exists when combined. These laws are (as I have stated many times) cause and effect (as upheld by Newton's 3rd Law), complex universe, and universal entropy.

Do you need to dismantle your car engine just so that you know enough about your car to drive it? Of course not. You can still drive your car around even if you think the engine is a steam engine (which it is, btw). But if you want to get into a discussion about your car engine, and if you want to be truthful about it, you need to examine things about car engines a bit.

I have examined car engines. I know that your gasoline car engine is really a steam engine, even though people don't generally call it that. It is an internal combustion engine. But more to the point, it is an internal combustion gasoline steam engine.

Same with the scientific proof for the existence of God. Like the internal combustion gasoline steam engine, the fact that people don't generally say the laws that prove the existence of God, in a fashion that shows that they prove God exists, doesn't negate the fact that these laws show that God exists.

In other words, an internal combustion gasoline engine is a steam engine, even though people don't say it this way very often. Also, the laws of cause and effect, complex universe, and universal entropy, when combined, prove that God exists, even though people don't say it this way very often.

Have I proven that God exists? Absolutely not. And I have stated such many times. But you keep on coming back with the idea that I haven't proven God exists. Great! We are in agreement on this point. Why do you keep bringing it up?

If you want to see the proof that God exists, stop looking at the things that I say, and go look at the laws and their combination. Of course, if you don't want to see the proof that God exists, don't look at the laws. You can drive your car if the only things you know about the engine are that it takes gas, and you gotta turn the key to get it started.

But if you start to talk about how your car engine works when you haven't even examined the proof for how it works, you are missing it mentally in some way.

So - you haven't proven the existence of your deity, combining whatever you want or not.

And I do know about internal combustion engines, and they have nothing to do with steam.

Please stop embarrassing yourself.

[BADecker]

The problem is that when you look science law in the face, and see that you don't like it, you go about ignoring it and trying to make it not exist, somehow. How silly of you. Why not simply accept the truth? It's there whether you accept it or not. Accepting it will simply make life more fun, and protect from eternal death if you go to God in truth and sincerity.

Dude, you've said a lot of things over the time. But you definitely have not proved God to exist. THAT is a fact.

I agree with you. In fact, I'll go one step further.

Presently, I am not in the mode of proving the existence of God. I have other things to do. That's part of the reason I do the simple thing. I point people to the three scientific laws that prove God exists when combined. These laws are (as I have stated many times) cause and effect (as upheld by Newton's 3rd Law), complex universe, and universal entropy.

Do you need to dismantle your car engine just so that you know enough about your car to drive it? Of course not. You can still drive your car around even if you think the engine is a steam engine (which it is, btw). But if you want to get into a discussion about your car engine, and if you want to be truthful about it, you need to examine things about car engines a bit.

I have examined car engines. I know that your gasoline car engine is really a steam engine, even though people don't generally call it that. It is an internal combustion engine. But more to the point, it is an internal combustion gasoline steam engine.

Same with the scientific proof for the existence of God. Like the internal combustion gasoline steam engine, the fact that people don't generally say the laws that prove the existence of God, in a fashion that shows that they prove God exists, doesn't negate the fact that these laws show that God exists.

In other words, an internal combustion gasoline engine is a steam engine, even though people don't say it this way very often. Also, the laws of cause and effect, complex universe, and universal entropy, when combined, prove that God exists, even though people don't say it this way very often.

Have I proven that God exists? Absolutely not. And I have stated such many times. But you keep on coming back with the idea that I haven't proven God exists. Great! We are in agreement on this point. Why do you keep bringing it up?

If you want to see the proof that God exists, stop looking at the things that I say, and go look at the laws and their combination. Of course, if you don't want to see the proof that God exists, don't look at the laws. You can drive your car if the only things you know about the engine are that it takes gas, and you gotta turn the key to get it started.

But if you start to talk about how your car engine works when you haven't even examined the proof for how it works, you are missing it mentally in some way.

So - you haven't proven the existence of your deity,

What is my deity? I checked my pockets, under the bed, in the closet, etc., and I found that I can't find any deity that I own.

combining whatever you want or not.

And I do know about internal combustion engines, and they have nothing to do with steam.

Now YOU are completely mistaken. All gasoline and diesel engines, even gas turbines, are steam engines at the same time that they are gasoline or diesel engines. You are completely missing it. You better go back to school.

Please stop embarrassing yourself.

Thank you for the exhortation.

Since science has proved that the God Who created the universe exists. I don't have to attempt to prove such at all.

Continue to show your ignorance if you like.

[swogerino]

Thank you for the exhortation.

Since science has proved that the God Who created the universe exists. I don't have to attempt to prove such at all.

Continue to show your ignorance if you like.

And how has science proved that god created the universe? Can you explain what existed pre-god, in that case? Feel free to prevent my "ignorance" from affecting your beliefs.

[Buffer Overflow]

Now YOU are completely mistaken. All gasoline and diesel engines, even gas turbines, are steam engines at the same time that they are gasoline or diesel engines. You are completely missing it. You better go back to school.

Water is produced in an internal combustion engine during the ignition phase, and of course, instantly turns to steam due to the heat. But the percentage is small compared to other gases produced such as nitrogen.
The steam is actually unwanted because inside a cold exhaust pipe the steam condenses back into water and corrodes the steel. Which is why cars that do more short journeys, wear out their exhaust pipes quicker.

To call an internal combustion engine "a steam engine" is foolish, just another one of your childish word definition twisting games. Small amount of carbon monoxide are produced as well, shall we call them carbon monoxide engines?

Embarrassingly for yourself steam engines are actually external combustion engines. But I'm sure you'll find a way to lie your way around that.