|
adamvp
|
 |
July 05, 2016, 06:40:35 PM |
|
On 280x I get over 25% more hashrate for Exp than for ETH,
on 370 likewise,
but on 380 and 380x (4gb) hashrate for Exp is equal with Eth hashrate..
whether the cause is cards architecture or something else?
|
I am looking for signature campaign  pm me |
|
|
|
|
|
In order to get the maximum amount of activity points possible, you just need to post once per day on average. Skipping days is OK as long as you maintain the average.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rastanan
|
|
July 05, 2016, 07:34:37 PM |
|
On 280x I get over 25% more hashrate for Exp than for ETH,
on 370 likewise,
but on 380 and 380x (4gb) hashrate for Exp is equal with Eth hashrate..
whether the cause is cards architecture or something else?
I think it's due to how it accesses memory. 280x and 380 are different generations of GCN. |
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1898
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 05, 2016, 09:56:33 PM |
|
Anyone know oldest supported driver for AMD tahiti 79xx cards?
14.7 are low hash, I presume only 15.12+
any hack to add some dll from 15.12 to genoil miner to fix hash speed?
|
|
|
|
|
Grim
|
|
July 05, 2016, 10:04:10 PM |
|
Anybody tested these gpus if or when the TLB starts to trash and bottleneck the gpu?? eg. all 9xx nvidia gpus start to tlb trash at 2GB despite having 4 GB+. Are the 10xx gpus limited in the same way? Can anyone run Genoils testprogram to verfiy that? (would also be neat to run it on a RX 480)  |
|
|
|
|
carlo_0000
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 05, 2016, 11:00:34 PM |
|
what driver you use on r9 series ? i update to last one and i lost speed 17 got 19 before on 380 and i got my first r9 390 at cheap price i just tested but it still to expensive for the worst speed  i only get 25mh and it s also slow on skein algo it does only 225 when a 380 does 205 with less power and lot cheaper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
carlo_0000
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 06, 2016, 01:02:51 AM
Last edit: July 06, 2016, 01:21:11 AM by carlo_0000 |
|
ok thanks it s working i got more speed |
|
|
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
July 06, 2016, 08:31:46 AM |
|
F$%K dwarfpool so much trouble with connection and rejected shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
_javi_
|
|
July 06, 2016, 10:59:38 AM |
|
i cant connect Genoils to stratum at dwarfpool (port 8018) for exp.
what do you use, merc84?
|
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1793
Merit: 1028
|
|
July 06, 2016, 01:39:33 PM |
|
F$%K dwarfpool so much trouble with connection and rejected shares.
I SWITCHED TO NANOPOOL-- After mining many ETH at DwarfPool, I switched to NanoPool. The statistical graphics are clean, informative, and readable, payouts are easier to manage, and the hashrate is strong enough for steady mining. --scryptr |
|
|
|
Smokyish
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
July 06, 2016, 01:52:42 PM |
|
The new Nvidia 368.69 drivers have been released, can someone test a 1070/1080 on Windows7/8/10 with these?
|
|
|
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
July 06, 2016, 02:15:31 PM |
|
i cant connect Genoils to stratum at dwarfpool (port 8018) for exp.
what do you use, merc84?
ethminer -U -S exp-us.dwarfpool.com:8018 -SP 1 -O 0x1497684e0740d41cd05f5a0d2f2f51953b940510.gtx970 I switched away from dwarfpool because of frequent loss of connection and rejects. Sometimes for some unknown reason dwarf starts rejecting almost all shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
vaulter
|
|
July 06, 2016, 03:03:28 PM |
|
Anybody tested these gpus if or when the TLB starts to trash and bottleneck the gpu?? eg. all 9xx nvidia gpus start to tlb trash at 2GB despite having 4 GB+. Are the 10xx gpus limited in the same way? Can anyone run Genoils testprogram to verfiy that? (would also be neat to run it on a RX 480) All pascal gpus (10xx) are good to go over 2gb And today there is 368.69 driver availible which enables to mine eth at full speed for 10xx series in win 10 insider preview - just install this driver and go |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
July 06, 2016, 06:40:14 PM |
|
The new Nvidia 368.69 drivers have been released, can someone test a 1070/1080 on Windows7/8/10 with these?
win 7 need genoil work, because the drivers will not fix anything with pascal Anybody tested these gpus if or when the TLB starts to trash and bottleneck the gpu?? eg. all 9xx nvidia gpus start to tlb trash at 2GB despite having 4 GB+. Are the 10xx gpus limited in the same way? Can anyone run Genoils testprogram to verfiy that? (would also be neat to run it on a RX 480) All pascal gpus (10xx) are good to go over 2gb And today there is 368.69 driver availible which enables to mine eth at full speed for 10xx series in win 10 insider preview - just install this driver and go so this wil not work with standard windows 10 build? |
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 06, 2016, 10:27:26 PM |
|
The new Nvidia 368.69 drivers have been released, can someone test a 1070/1080 on Windows7/8/10 with these?
win 7 need genoil work, because the drivers will not fix anything with pascal Holy shit, what I said over a week ago and you told me to suck it up and go to W10 because everything was working peachy keen. That aside, in replies that followed Genoil and Vaulter said that there would be a driver update that updates WDDM in W7/8. Although I'm almost 100% certain this isn't true and Microsoft has no interest in bringing newer versions of WDDM back to W7/8. That's one of the defining features of W10. Microsoft is in control of WDDM, not Nvidia or AMD. So a driver update wont fix this. Once again we're back to the problem with bugs. And 'your friend' which is a clever way of saying yourself, I'm sure will be happy when this bug finally gets fixed. You would've figured this out all over a week ago if you actually had a conversation with me, instead of telling me that I'm wrong and reassuring me of your non-existant fixes, which you still have no idea WTF you were talking about. |
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
davembg
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 340
Merit: 251
Smell the glove.
|
|
July 06, 2016, 11:20:22 PM |
|
The new Nvidia 368.69 drivers have been released, can someone test a 1070/1080 on Windows7/8/10 with these?
win 7 need genoil work, because the drivers will not fix anything with pascal Holy shit, what I said over a week ago and you told me to suck it up and go to W10 because everything was working peachy keen. That aside, in replies that followed Genoil and Vaulter said that there would be a driver update that updates WDDM in W7/8. Although I'm almost 100% certain this isn't true and Microsoft has no interest in bringing newer versions of WDDM back to W7/8. That's one of the defining features of W10. Microsoft is in control of WDDM, not Nvidia or AMD. So a driver update wont fix this. Once again we're back to the problem with bugs. And 'your friend' which is a clever way of saying yourself, I'm sure will be happy when this bug finally gets fixed. You would've figured this out all over a week ago if you actually had a conversation with me, instead of telling me that I'm wrong and reassuring me of your non-existant fixes, which you still have no idea WTF you were talking about. I'll just leave this here - LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX and LINUX. |
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 07, 2016, 12:58:05 AM |
|
The new Nvidia 368.69 drivers have been released, can someone test a 1070/1080 on Windows7/8/10 with these?
win 7 need genoil work, because the drivers will not fix anything with pascal Holy shit, what I said over a week ago and you told me to suck it up and go to W10 because everything was working peachy keen. That aside, in replies that followed Genoil and Vaulter said that there would be a driver update that updates WDDM in W7/8. Although I'm almost 100% certain this isn't true and Microsoft has no interest in bringing newer versions of WDDM back to W7/8. That's one of the defining features of W10. Microsoft is in control of WDDM, not Nvidia or AMD. So a driver update wont fix this. Once again we're back to the problem with bugs. And 'your friend' which is a clever way of saying yourself, I'm sure will be happy when this bug finally gets fixed. You would've figured this out all over a week ago if you actually had a conversation with me, instead of telling me that I'm wrong and reassuring me of your non-existant fixes, which you still have no idea WTF you were talking about. I'll just leave this here - LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX and LINUX. I have better uses for my time then debugging kernels and recompiling for the sheer masochistic fun. |
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
|
vaulter
|
|
July 07, 2016, 04:09:35 AM |
|
There is no cliff drop as with maxwell - its gradual drop after 4.2gb for 1070/1080 As for eth and wddm - its wddm 2.1 change on win 10 rs1 (release on 2nd of august, availible today with insider preview to everyone) and just a driver change (no wddm) for 368.69 - but needs work from developers to enable linux/win10 performance for eth |
|
|
|
|
wpsd
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2016, 04:22:33 AM |
|
Hi could you provide json-rpc for checking miner status ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
