ethminer-0.9.41-genoil-1.1

[ComaWombat]

cmake -DBUNDLE=cudaminer -DCOMPUTE=30 -DCUDA_HOST_COMPILER=/usr/bin/gcc-4.9 ..
worked on my testbench on 15.10 the server is still down need to try it there to.

i did a try on 16.04 but got som errors. used the same cmake a on 15.10
[ 11%] Built target ethash
[ 51%] Built target devcore
[ 57%] Built target ethstratum
[ 59%] Building NVCC (Device) object libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir/ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o
[ 66%] Built target ethash-cl
nvcc fatal   : redefinition of argument 'std'
CMake Error at ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o.cmake:207 (message):
  Error generating
  /home/mattias/cpp-ethereum/build2/libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir//./ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o


libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir/build.make:63: recipe for target 'libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir/ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o' failed
make[2]: *** [libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir/ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o] Error 1
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:350: recipe for target 'libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir/all' failed
make[1]: *** [libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir/all] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
[ 66%] Built target BuildInfo.h
Makefile:116: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2

I got the NVCC fatal STD error too when building with cmake 3.5.1 but I finally got it compiled on my Ubuntu 16.04 laptop using the following steps:

- removed cmake 3.5.1
- downloaded cmake 3.2.2, built it from source and installed it
- added the following line as the first line of CMakeLists.txt:

set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -D_FORCE_INLINES")

And that was that. I didn't use any special flags and arguments to build it, just the  "sudo cmake -DBUNDLE=cudaminer"

I still haven't tried this on my mining rig though, it was just a test compile on my laptop.

[1715237301]

1715237301

[1715237301]

1715237301

[1715237301]

1715237301

[1715237301]

1715237301

[restless]

Can someone point me to latest Win10 driver for 750Ti  better speed?

Genoil, do you think that generating DAG in-memory or chunks can help NV cards?

[_javi_]

which is the best AMD drivers version to use with 1.0.7 miner?
i have a pair of undervolted gigabyte 280xs that dont like newer drivers. i´m still using 14.4 as i can control gpu and memclock with it.
i cant underclock gpu with 15.7 and cards get sick at default speeds.

Hashrate is kinda low with 14.4 drivers... 18mh/s at best.

[fenomenhaa]

which is the best AMD drivers version to use with 1.0.7 miner?
i have a pair of undervolted gigabyte 280xs that dont like newer drivers. i´m still using 14.4 as i can control gpu and memclock with it.
i cant underclock gpu with 15.7 and cards get sick at default speeds.

Hashrate is kinda low with 14.4 drivers... 18mh/s at best.

Copy the 15.12 dll files to miner folder. İt'll work. Anybdy knows the latest drivers(for 390) can possible  downclock the core-mem clocks.15.12 and 15.71.1 don't let the downclok.pls share.it's driver bug . don't wanna try the all srivers.

[_javi_]

which are the required dlls?

amdocl.dll  for sure
what else?

[crazyearner]

Will ethminer be made to not use DAG files as the latest update in separate dual miner has no DAG file creation and uses it on GPU using Claymore's Dual Miner. Was wondering if you guys on ethminer will follow suite and become DAG free on system?

[Amph]

Will ethminer be made to not use DAG files as the latest update in separate dual miner has no DAG file creation and uses it on GPU using Claymore's Dual Miner. Was wondering if you guys on ethminer will follow suite and become DAG free on system?

it will be released without the need to create dag, by SP, check his thread, he still need to test some things

[sp_]

Porting the dagger creation code to the gpu is low pri. But I think I make the existing code 200 times faster by using memory mapped files.

[Amph]

Porting the dagger creation code to rhe gpu is low pri. But I think I make the existing code 200 times faster by using memory mapped files.

200 times, which translate in what kind of boost in the hashrate? nvidia was always not optimized well, that's why amd could match it with the same power consumption...

[sp_]

Porting the dagger creation code to rhe gpu is low pri. But I think I make the existing code 200 times faster by using memory mapped files.

200 times, which translate in what kind of boost in the hashrate? nvidia was always not optimized well, that's why amd could match it with the same power consumption...

You save some seconds when you generate and load the dagger. Perhaps it can be generated realtime. But still in the cpu, and your rig need 6-8gb of ram.

[Amph]

Porting the dagger creation code to rhe gpu is low pri. But I think I make the existing code 200 times faster by using memory mapped files.

200 times, which translate in what kind of boost in the hashrate? nvidia was always not optimized well, that's why amd could match it with the same power consumption...

You save some seconds when you generate and load the dagger. Perhaps it can be generated realtime. But still in the cpu, and your rig need 6-8gb of ram.

so no real boost on the hashrate? i guess it's because of the access to the memory, if i'm not mistaken, i've read they have a problem related to this compared to amd

[restless]

afaik its  algo-related

Still noone was able to implement the algo in faster way than referent design. At least not publicly available

[fenomenhaa]

which are the required dlls?

amdocl.dll  for sure
what else?

amd_opencl32.dll
amd_opencl64.dll
amdocl.dll
amdocl12cl64.dll
amdocl64.dll

[_javi_]

which are the required dlls?

amdocl.dll  for sure
what else?

amd_opencl32.dll
amd_opencl64.dll
amdocl.dll
amdocl12cl64.dll
amdocl64.dll

thanks for your answer

[Pustul]

Is there a way to monitor the miner without using Teamviewer or other graphic programs? Like it was possible with the API in cgminer or sgminer to send info to an adress IP and then set up a little webpage.

[Ayers]

Is there a way to monitor the miner without using Teamviewer or other graphic programs? Like it was possible with the API in cgminer or sgminer to send info to an adress IP and then set up a little webpage.

i think you need to programm a good webgui page with php to do what you want, then you can access to your miner via this web gui, but without proper skill it's better to use standard remote control

[Pustul]

Well building the webgui is not the problem, I need the miner to report data (an API) so that I can display it in the page. I was wondering if there was a possibility to do that with this miner. But I haven't find anything in the doc so probably not

[Longsnowsm]

I recently was able to cobble together a working genoil ethminer on 14.04 Linux which seemed to work fine on ethermine.org, but I didn't feel like I was getting the hash rates on the pool that I should have.  So I just hopped on miningpoolhub.com and fired up the genoil miner and I am getting what is says in an "unknown error".  I also see some invalid shares that are showing up on the pool.  However the pool appears to be reflecting a number that is closer to what the miner is stating is happening.  Anyone know what this unknown error might be?  I am running the latest 1.07 Genoil on Ubuntu 14.04 with a 6 gpu rig.  Thanks for any feedback or suggestions to sort out this unknown error issue. 

Longsnowsm

[kahir]

Nice that you joined the eth rush, Phil.
I am almost exclusively posting under the same nick (Biodom) on the Ethereum forum, so not to mix messages.
A couple of days ago decided to limit myself in eth and only have 3 rigs (12 cards), running 7950, msi R9 390 and Asus Strix R7 370, total about 220 mh, maybe will add 60 more (3 more GPUs).
I saw you saying that you ordered R7 370 from Amazon.
Newegg had a great deal on Strix, which is a smaller card that is easily overclocked to 16-17 mh.
I run six of then off H97 anniversary mobo with USB powered risers and all six of them plus CPU consume just below 800W (at default), 850-860W overclocked.
I like these more than 280x, which are noisier.
R9 are nice, but super "fat" and expensive
let me know your nick on ethereum forum if you are going to post there.

give me a link to the forum I will most likely join it.

thanks Philip, Amph for pointers -- yes, agreed - smaller chunks is better so that i am able to use the 1300 = eventually - simple management, card longevity/resale without OC, and cost effective may well be the ultimate goal here.

Just as example:

asrock H97 anniversary mobo with 5+1 pcie slots (need 5 risers) $70 newegg
Crucial 240gb ssd $55 at Microcenter after $10 instant rebate if you buy processor, i believe, but maybe if you buy mobo, then $65
Intel G3258 (enough for mining) $50
Asus Strix R7 370 4gb $165 ea, minus $15 rebate/ea of first two=$30 rebate, total cost of cards $960
Strix needs just one PCIe connector
risers from china (they cost less than half of Amazon price) or pay premium if you want fast:
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/PCIe-risers-card-PCI-e-X1-TO-X16-Adapter-with-80cm-USB3-0-or-4Pin-Power/1710122334.html
or
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/1-PCS-Pci-e-Express-1x-to-16x-Extender-Riser-Card-USB-3-0-Extender-Cable/1653140088.html
or get a lot of 10:
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/10-PCS-Pci-e-Pci-e-Express-1x-to-16x-Riser-Card-USB-3-0-Extender/1662171815.html
so, ~$45 for 6 risers
EVGA 1300-cost nothing for me since I had one, but $163-180 otherwise.
Total cost with PSU $1360, without $1180 for either 14 (default) or 16-17 (safely overclocked) mh/s/card=84-96 (or up to 102) mh/s for the rig.
84-96 mh/s is currently $410-468/mo or 42-48 eth/mo (as of right now)
Cost of electricity at $0.1/kwh=$58 for default or $62 for overclocked rig/mo.

as you can see, with rising difficulty and somewhat dropping price, it is not as clear cut as 1 mo ago, but hardware will be worth at least 50% in a few months and if you are nimble, you can do OK even when it is not a hobby.

[Frogman13]

Hey I am running a GTX 970

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_USE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
ethminer -G -F http:/exp.suprnova.cc:3000/username.worker/17 --cl-global-work 133500

I am pulling 20.5Mh/s = 17.1Mh/ .833s  can I get more out of it?

Also can I mine with my CPU at the same time with a different miner? I have an Intel I-5 6600K (Skylake) that isn't being used.