ethminer-0.9.41-genoil-1.1

[DMDCreeper]

1.1.3

i m a bit confuse  what s the last version?  is it not the 0.9.41?

0.9.41 was the version of ethminer when I forked it. 1.1.3 is the release number of the fork.

Is the stratum code working in the OpenCL build of 1.1.4?
It builds fine, and runs great using network - but, I'm getting a missing symbol when using a -S (stratum) config with Ubuntu 15.10.

Does it need a link to boost? or is that built-in?

Anyone else running stratum with 1.1.4?
If so, would you please share your config line.

thanks!

Does donkeypool support stratum now?

[1715466287]

1715466287

[1715466287]

1715466287

[Smokyish]

The gtx 960 can go from 11 to 14MHASH with small modifications to the code. I run with --farm-recheck 150

Is that 960-only? Interesting, nice rate for a 128-bit bus. Haven't got one, so can't even start guessing.

First of all thanks to Genoil for all your hard work.

I've been getting a nice increase in performance by using this miner with my Geforce 670 GTX (Gigabyte 2GB OC model), here are some results:

Windows 8 64bit, 368.39 driver:

ethminer / getwork: 12.4MH/s
genoil 1.1.0 / 1.1.3 / cuda + getwork: 14.4MH/s
genoil 1.1.0 / 1.1.3 / cuda + stratum: 14.6MH/s

Linux Mint 17.3 64bit, 367.xx driver:

ethminer / getwork: 12.4MH/s
genoil 1.0.8 / 1.1.4 / getwork: 9.9MH/s
genoil 1.0.8 / 1.1.4 / cuda + stratum: 14.6MH/s

https://i.imgur.com/QOjbPuQ.jpg

Ordered 2 1070's that i'm still waiting for to add to the mix

[Genoil]

for 970 nvidia
still better to use win7 , 347.52 driver     with   ethminer 1,1,4   -G option ?

For Nvidia use -U, not -G. When using win7, you can also use latest drivers.

347.52 (or 350.12, better) is only for gtx960,970,980 (950 too with some additonal tweaks) on Win10. This also requires a CUDA 6.5 build, which you'll need to do on your own.

Feature request: When the GPU mines a share not meeting the target, could that increment the Failed counter?

?

A share meets the target by definition.

If the CPU verification (using lightweight method since 1.1) fails, F is already incremented. I hardly see that happen though.

[Rimtu]

The gtx 960 can go from 11 to 14MHASH with small modifications to the code. I run with --farm-recheck 150

Is that 960-only? Interesting, nice rate for a 128-bit bus. Haven't got one, so can't even start guessing.

First of all thanks to Genoil for all your hard work.

I've been getting a nice increase in performance by using this miner with my Geforce 670 GTX (Gigabyte 2GB OC model), here are some results:

Windows 8 64bit, 368.39 driver:

ethminer / getwork: 12.4MH/s
genoil 1.1.0 / 1.1.3 / cuda + getwork: 14.4MH/s
genoil 1.1.0 / 1.1.3 / cuda + stratum: 14.6MH/s

Linux Mint 17.3 64bit, 367.xx driver:

ethminer / getwork: 12.4MH/s
genoil 1.0.8 / 1.1.4 / getwork: 9.9MH/s
genoil 1.0.8 / 1.1.4 / cuda + stratum: 14.6MH/s

https://i.imgur.com/QOjbPuQ.jpg

Ordered 2 1070's that i'm still waiting for to add to the mix

What setting do you use...

I'm on W7, genoil 1.1.4, 368.39 drivers... and can't get much over 13MHs

My bat file looks like this:
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0

GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100

GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1

GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ethminer.exe -S eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -O "wallet address" -U --cuda-grid-size 8192 --cuda-block-size 128 --cuda-schedule auto --farm-recheck 400

[BitMinerN8]

Hi I picked up my first 980ti to add into the farm. It sounded like a good idea at the time but does not seem to be performing as well as expected. (Compared to my others - 950/960/970) I'm only getting around 18MH/s and it sounds like I should be getting more. It's running on Mint 17.3 with ethminer 1.1.4, does anyone have any suggestions for the optimal command line options? If I can't get better then that I might as well return and get a 970. Thanks for any help.

[Smokyish]

The gtx 960 can go from 11 to 14MHASH with small modifications to the code. I run with --farm-recheck 150

Is that 960-only? Interesting, nice rate for a 128-bit bus. Haven't got one, so can't even start guessing.

First of all thanks to Genoil for all your hard work.

I've been getting a nice increase in performance by using this miner with my Geforce 670 GTX (Gigabyte 2GB OC model), here are some results:

Windows 8 64bit, 368.39 driver:

ethminer / getwork: 12.4MH/s
genoil 1.1.0 / 1.1.3 / cuda + getwork: 14.4MH/s
genoil 1.1.0 / 1.1.3 / cuda + stratum: 14.6MH/s

Linux Mint 17.3 64bit, 367.xx driver:

ethminer / getwork: 12.4MH/s
genoil 1.0.8 / 1.1.4 / getwork: 9.9MH/s
genoil 1.0.8 / 1.1.4 / cuda + stratum: 14.6MH/s

https://i.imgur.com/QOjbPuQ.jpg

Ordered 2 1070's that i'm still waiting for to add to the mix

What setting do you use...

I'm on W7, genoil 1.1.4, 368.39 drivers... and can't get much over 13MHs

My bat file looks like this:
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0

GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100

GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1

GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ethminer.exe -S eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -O "wallet address" -U --cuda-grid-size 8192 --cuda-block-size 128 --cuda-schedule auto --farm-recheck 400

For me the default settings seem to work the best, tried messing with some settings but im running with no bat, command-line only, ethminer -U -O -S but the card is overclocked further than the factory OC settings.

In MSI Afterburner i can get a stable system/driver and a stable hashrate with the following settings and values that Afterburner is showing:
Core voltage: -50mV
Power Limit: 100%
Core Clock: 1280Mhz (+131Mhz) GPU-Z showing Default Clock, Boost: 1059, now 1190.
Mem Clock: 3105Mhz (+102Mhz) GPU-Z showing Default Clock: 1502, now 1553.
With fan at 80-85% temp is at 76-80C, 84% TDP (nvidia-smi doesn't support all the functions with the card so can't tell the wattage used.).

[Rimtu]

ok 10% OC explains 10% better hashrate 

tnx. for info

[Genoil]

Hi I picked up my first 980ti to add into the farm. It sounded like a good idea at the time but does not seem to be performing as well as expected. (Compared to my others - 950/960/970) I'm only getting around 18MH/s and it sounds like I should be getting more. It's running on Mint 17.3 with ethminer 1.1.4, does anyone have any suggestions for the optimal command line options? If I can't get better then that I might as well return and get a 970. Thanks for any help.

You should be able to get 20+ by forcing the card into P0 state: http://cryptomining-blog.com/7341-how-to-squeeze-some-extra-performance-mining-ethereum-on-nvidia/

But it won't be much faster than a 970, so that's a better use of your money.

[kantxcape]

My miner isnt creating the DAG files, i´ve checked APPDATA and theres nothing there, how can i fix this? The normal ethminer creates the DAG files.

[Genoil]

My miner isnt creating the DAG files, i´ve checked APPDATA and theres nothing there, how can i fix this? The normal ethminer creates the DAG files.

From version 1.1 and up there aren't any DAG files

[davembg]

1.1.3

i m a bit confuse  what s the last version?  is it not the 0.9.41?

0.9.41 was the version of ethminer when I forked it. 1.1.3 is the release number of the fork.

Is the stratum code working in the OpenCL build of 1.1.4?
It builds fine, and runs great using network - but, I'm getting a missing symbol when using a -S (stratum) config with Ubuntu 15.10.

Does it need a link to boost? or is that built-in?

Anyone else running stratum with 1.1.4?
If so, would you please share your config line.

thanks!

Does donkeypool support stratum now?

Late testing phase - DonkeyPool should be stratum-ready by Monday

[kantxcape]

My miner isnt creating the DAG files, i´ve checked APPDATA and theres nothing there, how can i fix this? The normal ethminer creates the DAG files.

From version 1.1 and up there aren't any DAG files

Thanks for the fast response!

Great work.

[BitMinerN8]

Hi I picked up my first 980ti to add into the farm. It sounded like a good idea at the time but does not seem to be performing as well as expected. (Compared to my others - 950/960/970) I'm only getting around 18MH/s and it sounds like I should be getting more. It's running on Mint 17.3 with ethminer 1.1.4, does anyone have any suggestions for the optimal command line options? If I can't get better then that I might as well return and get a 970. Thanks for any help.

You should be able to get 20+ by forcing the card into P0 state: http://cryptomining-blog.com/7341-how-to-squeeze-some-extra-performance-mining-ethereum-on-nvidia/

But it won't be much faster than a 970, so that's a better use of your money.

Thanks for the tip.

[Rimtu]

Genoil...

could you make screen saver miner?

I have a lot of computers in my office that are often unused, so if I could have a  screesaver that mines when computer is idle... that would be awsome

[COOLERbyPSP]

that would be awsome

lololol, only if computers have a REALLY GOOD videocards

[crazyearner]

Is their a read me for all the -- commands and what they do been looking everywhere and cant seem to find anywhere that has all the old commands and all new commands and what each one does.

[COOLERbyPSP]

Is their a read me for all the -- commands and what they do been looking everywhere and cant seem to find anywhere that has all the old commands and all new commands and what each one does.

try this

Code:

ethminer -h
pause

[Rimtu]

that would be awsome

lololol, only if computers have a REALLY GOOD videocards

Gtx 670.. they hash around 13.7MHs... and there are 8 of them...

[COOLERbyPSP]

> 13.7MHs
Not bad
better than 960
but what about power draw?

[parmatiya]

that would be awsome

lololol, only if computers have a REALLY GOOD videocards

Gtx 670.. they hash around 13.7MHs... and there are 8 of them...

That is very good performance. 670 is a very old card. Maybe their memory bandwidth is quite high to have such high speed.