|
LeChuckDE
|
 |
July 20, 2016, 10:05:24 AM |
|
No I didn't, only a accidental hit in a learning process *LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed
timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It
takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but
hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
anatolikostis
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
|
|
July 20, 2016, 11:49:29 AM |
|
23,4mh/s only?   stock miner/the same ugly elpida |
|
|
|
|
anatolikostis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
|
|
July 20, 2016, 12:52:25 PM |
|
Not bad - wait till I get a card with better mem... should blow that out of the water. But nice, regardless. As an aside - she will hit 24MH/s, but for stability, I dropped it a bit.
i can pump your gpu bios too  i`m just interested in "tight vram timings" sensitivity of your miner |
|
|
|
|
carlo_0000
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 20, 2016, 11:15:49 PM |
|
the stock memory speed of 380 4 giga version is 1500 ?
i only have 2giga version it s 1375 or 1400 runs at 20mh
|
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 22, 2016, 04:09:10 AM |
|
no 1.1.8 for windows?|!
It's a fork by LeChuckDe. There will be no 1.1.8 from me. 1.2 maybe late August with fast loading binaries and +1% on GCN1.0 cards. No dual miner in that feature roadmap? :O |
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
|
LeChuckDE
|
|
July 22, 2016, 07:27:03 AM |
|
no 1.1.8 for windows?|!
It's a fork by LeChuckDe. There will be no 1.1.8 from me. 1.2 maybe late August with fast loading binaries and +1% on GCN1.0 cards. No dual miner in that feature roadmap? :O for what ? at time sia and eth/exp are hyped, next decred and eth/exp ... You are able to dualmine at any time. use ethminer for Daggerhashimoto based coins and second session sgminer with sia or decred ... working like a charm and don't have to pay dev fee for a closed source where nobody knows what all is possible ... (botnet, keylogger etc.) |
|
|
|
|
|
LeChuckDE
|
|
July 22, 2016, 08:56:48 PM |
|
no 1.1.8 for windows?|!
It's a fork by LeChuckDe. There will be no 1.1.8 from me. 1.2 maybe late August with fast loading binaries and +1% on GCN1.0 cards. No dual miner in that feature roadmap? :O for what ? at time sia and eth/exp are hyped, next decred and eth/exp ... You are able to dualmine at any time. use ethminer for Daggerhashimoto based coins and second session sgminer with sia or decred ... working like a charm and don't have to pay dev fee for a closed source where nobody knows what all is possible ... (botnet, keylogger etc.) It doesn't work NEARLY as well, causing both hashrates to suffer a lot more than they should. Since you're mining on AMD at all, you're using closed source software (fglrx) - so that's not an issue for 99.999999% of people. wolf you know what i mean, the fglrx are maintained due AMD so it is prop. safe. but in closed source miners the risk for botnetclient is damnd high... not that i have a proof that it is happend but the risk is mutch higher that basic drivers closed source due vendors. |
|
|
|
|
|
LeChuckDE
|
|
July 23, 2016, 12:55:44 AM |
|
no 1.1.8 for windows?|!
It's a fork by LeChuckDe. There will be no 1.1.8 from me. 1.2 maybe late August with fast loading binaries and +1% on GCN1.0 cards. No dual miner in that feature roadmap? :O for what ? at time sia and eth/exp are hyped, next decred and eth/exp ... You are able to dualmine at any time. use ethminer for Daggerhashimoto based coins and second session sgminer with sia or decred ... working like a charm and don't have to pay dev fee for a closed source where nobody knows what all is possible ... (botnet, keylogger etc.) It doesn't work NEARLY as well, causing both hashrates to suffer a lot more than they should. Since you're mining on AMD at all, you're using closed source software (fglrx) - so that's not an issue for 99.999999% of people. wolf you know what i mean, the fglrx are maintained due AMD so it is prop. safe. but in closed source miners the risk for botnetclient is damnd high... not that i have a proof that it is happend but the risk is mutch higher that basic drivers closed source due vendors. No, I don't know what you mean. Unless you're calling out Claymore as untrustworthy, then no, I don't. As I've done closed source miners - it's not about risk if the dev is known, and you capture packets for a while. If you're saying it's okay for a company to do it, but not a single person making money, that's messed up. nope i don't say that is in it, i only say that i would not use it because it is closed source and possible everything could be in it. If someone would like make profit with it, okay everyone has the choise to do so, but my opinion is nope, there are many good communitybased opensource solutions for it, where i could do check what the software will do. Remeber the genius Telekom-Software Hack from 2 Kids back in the end of 90th (1998/99) the have wrote a little software that give some informations about connection. Put a backdoor in it and spread over nearly whole germany ... (there are only 3 - 4 providers at this time) nobody could say it was not possible to have it in it... seen some closed-source wallets, they have tried to load code over the internet and execute it after serval days running ... so it is for me a big nope for closed source in crypto. everyone could profit from a spread bot net, if it was use to mine for own, like dev-fees in claymore, but it was also possible to get them commandos to do DDOS attacks ... instead of mining for dev ... Edit: this is not a offend against any dev that have choosed to publish as closed source, could understand it. would also not share my code with my customers. But it must be understood from everyone that there are people that didn't let run everything on there systems without the control to see what this will do... Edit2: This is also not a message about that any of the dev's that has closed source miners is untrustable... |
|
|
|
|
kilo17
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
aka "whocares"
|
|
July 23, 2016, 02:04:30 AM |
|
I think this thread has turned into something different than Genoils Miner Thread. I am currently using Claymore's because I am using AwesomeMiner to monitor and control the rigs. I am not a fan of Claymore's Miner but it works.
I am wondering if someone (like Genoil or Wolf0) would be interested in making a dual miner for me. It doesn't need to be perfect but I need the API with it to have it properly function with AwesomeMiner.
I am not sure I can afford a lot of money because if it costs more than I would benefit then it would not be worth it, on the flip side I know it may not be worth the time and effort of the Dev either. I suspect I am paying Claymore at least $250-$300/month so I would be willing to pay a couple of BTC knowing Eth mining is not going to be profitable for much longer.
|
Bitcoin Will Only Succeed If The Community That Supports It Gets Support - Support Home Miners & Mining
|
|
|
|
tolazy
|
|
July 23, 2016, 04:06:31 PM |
|
how long will you make money on ETH ?
anyone have a gueesmate on that
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subw
|
|
July 23, 2016, 06:50:29 PM |
|
Hello genoil, could you help please? ubuntu 16.04.01, git checkout 110 [ 32%] Built target ethash-cl
[ 34%] Building NVCC (Device) object libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir/ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o
nvcc fatal : redefinition of argument 'std'
CMake Error at ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o.cmake:207 (message):
Error generating
/home/user/Files/Git/cpp-ethereum/build/libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir//./ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subw
|
|
July 23, 2016, 07:51:43 PM |
|
OK fixed it myself m 22:49:31|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
m 22:49:31|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
Using device: GeForce GTX 1070 (Compute 6.1)
Generating DAG for GPU #0
m 22:49:32|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 0%
CUDA#0: 4%
m 22:49:32|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 8%
m 22:49:33|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 12%
CUDA#0: 17%
m 22:49:33|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 21%
CUDA#0: 25%
m 22:49:34|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 29%
CUDA#0: 33%
m 22:49:34|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 38%
m 22:49:35|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 42%
CUDA#0: 46%
m 22:49:35|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 50%
CUDA#0: 54%
m 22:49:36|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 58%
m 22:49:36|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 62%
CUDA#0: 67%
m 22:49:37|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 71%
CUDA#0: 75%
m 22:49:37|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 79%
m 22:49:38|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 83%
CUDA#0: 88%
m 22:49:38|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 92%
CUDA#0: 96%
m 22:49:39|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 4.18MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
m 22:49:39|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 27.15MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
m 22:49:40|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 25.07MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
m 22:49:40|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 27.15MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
m 22:49:41|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 25.07MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
m 22:49:41|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 27.15MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
|
|
|
|
|
|
LeChuckDE
|
|
July 23, 2016, 08:05:32 PM |
|
OK fixed it myself m 22:49:31|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
m 22:49:31|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
Using device: GeForce GTX 1070 (Compute 6.1)
Generating DAG for GPU #0
m 22:49:32|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 0%
CUDA#0: 4%
m 22:49:32|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 8%
m 22:49:33|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 12%
CUDA#0: 17%
m 22:49:33|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 21%
CUDA#0: 25%
m 22:49:34|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 29%
CUDA#0: 33%
m 22:49:34|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 38%
m 22:49:35|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 42%
CUDA#0: 46%
m 22:49:35|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 50%
CUDA#0: 54%
m 22:49:36|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 58%
m 22:49:36|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 62%
CUDA#0: 67%
m 22:49:37|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 71%
CUDA#0: 75%
m 22:49:37|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 79%
m 22:49:38|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 83%
CUDA#0: 88%
m 22:49:38|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
CUDA#0: 92%
CUDA#0: 96%
m 22:49:39|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 4.18MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
m 22:49:39|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 27.15MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
m 22:49:40|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 25.07MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
m 22:49:40|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 27.15MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
m 22:49:41|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 25.07MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
m 22:49:41|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #3f8ae4c0 : 27.15MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
Let me guess, missed to set the propper NVIDIA Variables before startup ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Subw
|
|
July 23, 2016, 08:34:35 PM |
|
don't know what variable you are talking about but this is a cmake config error + some other incompatibilities in cuda headers
|
|
|
|
|
|
LeChuckDE
|
|
July 23, 2016, 08:53:53 PM |
|
Okay, same behavior when this settings are not made :
export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
should get some sleep .... mixed up screens ... from different posting ... wasn't problem at DAG creation ... was a problem on build
With earlier Version got some error. most of them are based on missing libs from nvidia, there was a version of driver where the so files are named different so a fix of source with the correct ones will work.
|
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 24, 2016, 09:27:05 PM |
|
Still high demand for a Ethereum dual miner, ESPECIALLY with the 1XXX series coming out and now even more overhead available with the 1xxx series due to the low performance in Ethereum. This is as I expected months ago and proven with the 480 and it's ability to mine other algos better while mining Ethereum at a fairly good pace with Claymore.
I actually kind of like what Epsylon is doing. With yiimp, the pool he runs, you can mine on it and basically donate to the creator without actually donating in the miner. Obviously a very round about way and almost no views it that way, but still a great way to reward developers.
2%, 1% for each algo is not far fetched and wholly encourage a developer to take my hashrate as long as they give something back. I would also pay a fixed rate for a miner as well, but I still think mining fee is the way to go.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
|
gijoes
|
|
July 25, 2016, 08:29:46 AM |
|
Hey, guys, what are the best settings for a GPU RIG with 6x NVIDIA GTX970, Intel CPU, 4 GB RAM, SSD?
|
| 🔒 SafeCrypt.io | | █████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████ | | | | █████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████ | | | | █████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████
█████ | | | |
|
|
|
Ultrabat
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
July 25, 2016, 10:37:20 AM |
|
Hey, guys, what are the best settings for a GPU RIG with 6x NVIDIA GTX970, Intel CPU, 4 GB RAM, SSD?
That is OK. You need a motherboard supporting 6 PCIE slots. The best for the mining is the Asrock MB. |
|
|
|
|
finder
|
|
July 26, 2016, 02:56:23 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1793
Merit: 1028
|
|
July 26, 2016, 04:14:36 AM |
|
GENOIL HAS SAID THE NEXT VERSION IS 1.2-- Although LeChuckDe has forked the project and produced his own version 1.1.8. I do not believe that LeChuckDe has made a public release, though. And, Genoill said that his next release will likely be in August. --scryptr |
|
|
|
|
