r0ach
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
 |
April 27, 2016, 01:37:02 PM |
|
This is my only logical reasoning I can put together for why China did not want to follow the west in the original BTC rise: If you put the pieces of the puzzle together, China did not want to follow or support the Bitcoin rise initiated by the west and just tried to stop it with a shakeout. When China has more miners than the US by far, there's not many logical reasons they would do this. I'm thinking China may actually have bought a bunch of Eth and wants to find someone to dump it on before the BTC halving so they attempted to slow the BTC bull run on purpose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gillette
|
|
April 27, 2016, 01:53:48 PM |
|
MatThePussy, you are a mignon penny trader! Hoard BTC, sit on them for 2-3 years and sell them for more than 500% profit!
|
|
|
|
|
|
MatTheCat (OP)
|
|
April 27, 2016, 02:04:06 PM |
|
This is my only logical reasoning I can put together for why China did not want to follow the west in the original BTC rise: If you put the pieces of the puzzle together, China did not want to follow or support the Bitcoin rise initiated by the west and just tried to stop it with a shakeout. When China has more miners than the US by far, there's not many logical reasons they would do this. I'm thinking China may actually have bought a bunch of Eth and wants to find someone to dump it on before the BTC halving so they attempted to slow the BTC bull run on purpose.
Sure, whatever. Whenever Bitcoin goes up, it is due to natural organic demand and whenever it goes down it is due to manipulation? How about, there is no reason for Bitcoin to go up (including halving pump), or down without significant market engineering being conducted by large capital who are seeking to extract wealth from this market? What time is it in Beijing anyways? 9pm when the dump happened? Is that a 'normal' time for Insitutional money to do business? It just so happens however, that the dump happened at 9am New York time, do the fucking maths ya bellend. |
|
|
|
Hunyadi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000
☑ ♟ ☐ ♚
|
|
April 27, 2016, 02:15:21 PM |
|
Roll up, roll up!
Getcha cheap Bitcoins.
Only $455, reduced from $472 (and counting)!
lol.
 |
▂▃▅▇█▓▒░B**-Cultist░▒▓█▇▅▃▂
|
|
|
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3528
Merit: 9547
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
April 27, 2016, 02:17:00 PM |
|
MatThePussy, you are a mignon penny trader! Hoard BTC, sit on them for 2-3 years and sell them for more than 500% profit!
This is my non technical, non pro trader tip. Fingers crossed but I can't see this method failing. |
|
|
|
|
MatTheCat (OP)
|
|
April 27, 2016, 11:46:21 PM |
|
Roll up, roll up!
Getcha cheap Bitcoins.
Only $455$433, reduced from $472 (and counting)!
Fixed that. |
|
|
|
|
MatTheCat (OP)
|
|
April 27, 2016, 11:49:41 PM |
|
Very interesting point here. If this long standing resistance line (since March 2014), doesn't hold and prove itself as support, then down to the next level below, currently around $420-$430 Bitcoin will surely go. Should bounce a bit here though.  |
|
|
|
r0ach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 28, 2016, 12:12:39 AM |
|
$443 is the bottom. The sell sides on places like stamp are real weak now.
|
|
|
|
|
MatTheCat (OP)
|
|
April 28, 2016, 12:31:06 AM |
|
$443 is the bottom. The sell sides on places like stamp are real weak now.
Fucking hell! You are sounding desperate... I had better get my buy-ins even further down the Bid Wall! Edit: too late....in at $435. |
|
|
|
|
|
chesthing
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 28, 2016, 02:01:49 AM |
|
What did I say, COCKroach? I may buy back in hard at low $410s, let's see. Sure glad I didn't listen to your shit and panic buy at $470.
|
|
|
|
|
r0ach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 28, 2016, 02:12:57 AM |
|
Fucking hell!
You are sounding desperate...
Lol, yea right. These little Chinaman games don't make me flinch at all. I'm not a big fan of the Chinese in this market though because everything is just a pump and dump to them. They're just chasing flashing arrows around trying to earn more Yuans. They don't seem to understand debt based, fractional reserve fiat is a scam and actually enjoy being slaves of the bankers/govt (just like Mat does). I don't know what the "golden age" of China was like since it was probably hundreds of years ago, but it's more like the sick man of Asia nowadays. In the west you have people like Antonopolous, Patrick Byrne, Max Keiser, Roger Ver, etc, all talking in the media saying the reason they use BTC is because the banks and financial system are a scam. Where are these people in China? They don't exist. They're all cowards. One billion people and they can't even produce another tank man. Japan could probably produce a million "tank man".  |
|
|
|
chesthing
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 28, 2016, 02:20:17 AM |
|
Good job nailing the bottom of this dip, Matt.  |
|
|
|
|
r0ach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 28, 2016, 02:22:18 AM |
|
Good job nailing the bottom of this dip, Matt. It's more like the equivalent of him buying at $500 since he shorted twice on the way up and lost. He's now a law of averages trader where he does so many trades, that eventually one is bound not to fail, which might be some kind of workable strategy if exchange fees did not exist. |
|
|
|
chesthing
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 28, 2016, 02:25:34 AM |
|
Good job nailing the bottom of this dip, Matt. It's more like the equivalent of him buying at $500 since he shorted twice on the way up and lost. He's now a law of averages trader where he does so many trades, that eventually one is bound not to fail, which would be somewhat of an OK strategy if exchange fees did not exist. Admit I was right when I said $470 was the top and it was going to go down. While you are at it, apologize for suggesting I was a banker shill who bought a legendary account - because we both know that's bullshit. |
|
|
|
|
r0ach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 28, 2016, 02:32:34 AM |
|
Good job nailing the bottom of this dip, Matt. It's more like the equivalent of him buying at $500 since he shorted twice on the way up and lost. He's now a law of averages trader where he does so many trades, that eventually one is bound not to fail, which would be somewhat of an OK strategy if exchange fees did not exist. Admit I was right when I said $470 was the top and it was going to go down. While you are at it, apologize for suggesting I was a banker shill who bought a legendary account - because we both know that's bullshit. Yea right, you have all same 2 sentence posts like "the price is going to crash to 0 any second" that both the user Kwuckduck and Talks_Cheep do. It's so easy to spot the accounts that were sold to spam the forum with because all their posts are identical. Someone even solicited me wanting to pay $1000 for my account on IRC. |
|
|
|
chesthing
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 28, 2016, 02:39:41 AM |
|
Good job nailing the bottom of this dip, Matt. It's more like the equivalent of him buying at $500 since he shorted twice on the way up and lost. He's now a law of averages trader where he does so many trades, that eventually one is bound not to fail, which would be somewhat of an OK strategy if exchange fees did not exist. Admit I was right when I said $470 was the top and it was going to go down. While you are at it, apologize for suggesting I was a banker shill who bought a legendary account - because we both know that's bullshit. Yea right, you have all same 2 sentence posts like "the price is going to crash to 0 any second" that both the user Kwuckduck and Talks_Cheep do. It's so easy to spot the accounts that were sold to spam the forum with because all their posts are identical. Someone even solicited me wanting to pay $1000 for my account on IRC. Matt, we've been pm'ing for the last 2+ years. Tell this asshat I'm the original account holder, if nothing else but to prove how off course he is. Nobody should listen to this cunt. |
|
|
|
|
r0ach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 28, 2016, 02:50:16 AM
Last edit: April 28, 2016, 03:22:35 AM by r0ach |
|
Yea right, you have all same 2 sentence posts like "the price is going to crash to 0 any second" that both the user Kwuckduck and Talks_Cheep do. It's so easy to spot the accounts that were sold to spam the forum with because all their posts are identical. Someone even solicited me wanting to pay $1000 for my account on IRC.
Matt, we've been pm'ing for the last 2+ years. Tell this asshat I'm the original account holder, if nothing else but to prove how off course he is. Nobody should listen to this cunt. Don't really care what the hell Mat says after he just posted a long essay a few posts ago of why he worships central banking...hilarious. All it takes is someone clicking your post history then comparing it to people like Kwuckduck and Talks_Cheep. They all look identical. Just 2 sentence spam posts for 20 pages in a row all with the same garbage claiming the price will crash to 0 any second. Whether you claim the account was sold or not makes no difference. It's clearly a spam account. |
|
|
|
chesthing
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 28, 2016, 03:08:25 AM |
|
You are a shill with an agenda. I'm done with your sorry ass, put on ignore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
beastmodeBiscuitGravy
|
|
April 28, 2016, 03:23:07 AM |
|
Sometimes, when in public, you're occasionally confronted with the socially disabled. Perhaps a person with assburgers, or just of poor socialization generally ... Calling them out loudly on their asshattery usually elicits the opposite of the intended reaction.
It's possible that the "JIDF zionist bankster shill!" accusation is just a nervous tick, tourette's or something. Throwing "shill!" back tends to exacerbate things. Best to just smile, nod, and slowly increase distance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
