|
Th3P
|
 |
November 25, 2017, 01:52:14 PM |
|
Ive been offered a B5 Plus in stock for $1550 is this worthwhile?
Does anybody know if the RX 460 in the B5 Plus are 4GB or 8GB?
|
|
|
|
|
|
deadsix
|
|
November 25, 2017, 03:22:38 PM |
|
Ive been offered a B5 Plus in stock for $1550 is this worthwhile?
Does anybody know if the RX 460 in the B5 Plus are 4GB or 8GB?
1550 is not a bad price, but consider the warranty issues that people have been having as well. Also there are no 8gb 460's, only 4gb. |
|
|
|
wolf_miner
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1018
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 26, 2017, 08:59:16 AM |
|
Hi, pandaminer B5+ on Pandaminer website are in stock redy to ship or is a Pre-order?
Thanks W_M
|
|
|
|
|
bittawm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1894
Merit: 1087
|
|
November 26, 2017, 09:18:46 AM |
|
I have 10 x B5 + for sale for 1300usd inc world wide shipping, let me know if anyone wants
|
@bittawm is my real telegram
@bittawm is my real twitter
beware of impersonators
|
|
|
|
Th3P
|
|
November 26, 2017, 10:52:12 AM |
|
Ive been offered a B5 Plus in stock for $1550 is this worthwhile?
Does anybody know if the RX 460 in the B5 Plus are 4GB or 8GB?
1550 is not a bad price, but consider the warranty issues that people have been having as well. Also there are no 8gb 460's, only 4gb. Yes it "could" be very good, Ive seen mentions of the PSU catching fire. Im tempted to just invest the money in a rig and then I have the resale options of the GPU, Mobo etc whereas the Pandaminer might not be as easy to sell on |
|
|
|
|
|
elokk
|
|
November 26, 2017, 01:26:46 PM |
|
Ive been offered a B5 Plus in stock for $1550 is this worthwhile?
Does anybody know if the RX 460 in the B5 Plus are 4GB or 8GB?
1550 is not a bad price, but consider the warranty issues that people have been having as well. Also there are no 8gb 460's, only 4gb. Yes it "could" be very good, Ive seen mentions of the PSU catching fire. Im tempted to just invest the money in a rig and then I have the resale options of the GPU, Mobo etc whereas the Pandaminer might not be as easy to sell on You don't have to use the pandaminer brand psi, most people use something else |
t.me/bitcoinasic
|
|
|
ZedZedNova
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 475
Merit: 265
Ooh La La, C'est Zoom!
|
|
November 27, 2017, 03:23:34 AM |
|
Ive been offered a B5 Plus in stock for $1550 is this worthwhile?
Does anybody know if the RX 460 in the B5 Plus are 4GB or 8GB?
1550 is not a bad price, but consider the warranty issues that people have been having as well. Also there are no 8gb 460's, only 4gb. Yes it "could" be very good, Ive seen mentions of the PSU catching fire. Im tempted to just invest the money in a rig and then I have the resale options of the GPU, Mobo etc whereas the Pandaminer might not be as easy to sell on If memory serves me (i'm getting old, so who knows!) the PSUs were not what was burning, but rather it was crappy connectors/connections on the wires. Forcing a lot of current through a bad connection is a recipe for fire due to the heat generated. |
No mining at the moment.
|
|
|
|
wishxy
|
|
December 05, 2017, 04:03:37 PM |
|
Is there any thread about Panda GmsHash project?
|
|
|
|
|
iRumba
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 12, 2017, 03:16:11 AM |
|
Sorry for my English. The message has been translated by Google.
I have 4 devices Pandaminer B3 Plus. When the ether is mined, they give out a different hashreit. The lowest is 163, the highest is 178. Tell me why this is happening. Prior to this, about half a year other people used the apparatus. I do not know what they did with them and whether they issued the claimed hashed, but now I want to fix it.
I tried to install new drivers (by the way, after that, Claymore finally began to show the temperature on video cards). I tried to play with the parameters (frequency, voltage) of the start of the miner. Nothing helped.
Help diagnose faults and correct them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
elokk
|
|
December 12, 2017, 03:26:08 AM |
|
Sorry for my English. The message has been translated by Google.
I have 4 devices Pandaminer B3 Plus. When the ether is mined, they give out a different hashreit. The lowest is 163, the highest is 178. Tell me why this is happening. Prior to this, about half a year other people used the apparatus. I do not know what they did with them and whether they issued the claimed hashed, but now I want to fix it.
I tried to install new drivers (by the way, after that, Claymore finally began to show the temperature on video cards). I tried to play with the parameters (frequency, voltage) of the start of the miner. Nothing helped.
Help diagnose faults and correct them.
The hash rate sounds normal |
t.me/bitcoinasic
|
|
|
iRumba
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2017, 03:28:42 AM |
|
Sorry for my English. The message has been translated by Google.
I have 4 devices Pandaminer B3 Plus. When the ether is mined, they give out a different hashreit. The lowest is 163, the highest is 178. Tell me why this is happening. Prior to this, about half a year other people used the apparatus. I do not know what they did with them and whether they issued the claimed hashed, but now I want to fix it.
I tried to install new drivers (by the way, after that, Claymore finally began to show the temperature on video cards). I tried to play with the parameters (frequency, voltage) of the start of the miner. Nothing helped.
Help diagnose faults and correct them.
The hash rate sounds normal The declared hash rate is 220. I get it lower by 20% + |
|
|
|
|
|
elokk
|
|
December 12, 2017, 03:31:33 AM |
|
Sorry for my English. The message has been translated by Google.
I have 4 devices Pandaminer B3 Plus. When the ether is mined, they give out a different hashreit. The lowest is 163, the highest is 178. Tell me why this is happening. Prior to this, about half a year other people used the apparatus. I do not know what they did with them and whether they issued the claimed hashed, but now I want to fix it.
I tried to install new drivers (by the way, after that, Claymore finally began to show the temperature on video cards). I tried to play with the parameters (frequency, voltage) of the start of the miner. Nothing helped.
Help diagnose faults and correct them.
The hash rate sounds normal The declared hash rate is 220. I get it lower by 20% + New will run at 220 AMD cards slowly die off over time |
t.me/bitcoinasic
|
|
|
iRumba
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2017, 03:37:27 AM |
|
Sorry for my English. The message has been translated by Google.
I have 4 devices Pandaminer B3 Plus. When the ether is mined, they give out a different hashreit. The lowest is 163, the highest is 178. Tell me why this is happening. Prior to this, about half a year other people used the apparatus. I do not know what they did with them and whether they issued the claimed hashed, but now I want to fix it.
I tried to install new drivers (by the way, after that, Claymore finally began to show the temperature on video cards). I tried to play with the parameters (frequency, voltage) of the start of the miner. Nothing helped.
Help diagnose faults and correct them.
The hash rate sounds normal The declared hash rate is 220. I get it lower by 20% + New will run at 220 AMD cards slowly die off over time Do you think that 20-25% for half a year is slow? |
|
|
|
|
|
elokk
|
|
December 12, 2017, 03:38:25 AM |
|
Sorry for my English. The message has been translated by Google.
I have 4 devices Pandaminer B3 Plus. When the ether is mined, they give out a different hashreit. The lowest is 163, the highest is 178. Tell me why this is happening. Prior to this, about half a year other people used the apparatus. I do not know what they did with them and whether they issued the claimed hashed, but now I want to fix it.
I tried to install new drivers (by the way, after that, Claymore finally began to show the temperature on video cards). I tried to play with the parameters (frequency, voltage) of the start of the miner. Nothing helped.
Help diagnose faults and correct them.
The hash rate sounds normal The declared hash rate is 220. I get it lower by 20% + New will run at 220 AMD cards slowly die off over time Do you think that 20-25% for half a year is slow? I have 3 of these exact miners and they run at that hash rate as well on ETH/Claymore |
t.me/bitcoinasic
|
|
|
iRumba
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2017, 04:29:44 AM |
|
Sorry for my English. The message has been translated by Google.
I have 4 devices Pandaminer B3 Plus. When the ether is mined, they give out a different hashreit. The lowest is 163, the highest is 178. Tell me why this is happening. Prior to this, about half a year other people used the apparatus. I do not know what they did with them and whether they issued the claimed hashed, but now I want to fix it.
I tried to install new drivers (by the way, after that, Claymore finally began to show the temperature on video cards). I tried to play with the parameters (frequency, voltage) of the start of the miner. Nothing helped.
Help diagnose faults and correct them.
The hash rate sounds normal The declared hash rate is 220. I get it lower by 20% + New will run at 220 AMD cards slowly die off over time Do you think that 20-25% for half a year is slow? I have 3 of these exact miners and they run at that hash rate as well on ETH/Claymore And do they have the same scatter of hash rate (162-178 Mh/s)? |
|
|
|
|
|
elokk
|
|
December 12, 2017, 04:52:10 AM |
|
I can only speak in regards to the 3 I have and pretty much yes, slow creep down from 220
|
t.me/bitcoinasic
|
|
|
iRumba
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2017, 05:52:20 AM |
|
I can only speak in regards to the 3 I have and pretty much yes, slow creep down from 220
You did not understand me. I read the information on the Internet. The problem of hash rate in AMD is not due to the deterioration of equipment, but to the increase in the generation of DAG. Therefore, a decrease in the hash rate should be uniform across all similar devices. And I have a hash rate 178 on one liner, on another 162. It's very strange and it seems to me that it's possible. |
|
|
|
|
Sparkly
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
January 03, 2018, 09:15:08 PM |
|
I can only speak in regards to the 3 I have and pretty much yes, slow creep down from 220
You did not understand me. I read the information on the Internet. The problem of hash rate in AMD is not due to the deterioration of equipment, but to the increase in the generation of DAG. Therefore, a decrease in the hash rate should be uniform across all similar devices. And I have a hash rate 178 on one liner, on another 162. It's very strange and it seems to me that it's possible. If you haven't installed the DAG fix drivers from AMD your Panda will slowly drop over time on ETH. http://search.amd.com/en-us/Pages/results-all.aspx#k=blockchainThe B3 should run stable 229MH/s on 220V with the latest software installed. |
|
|
|
|
|
elokk
|
|
January 03, 2018, 10:53:20 PM |
|
I can only speak in regards to the 3 I have and pretty much yes, slow creep down from 220
You did not understand me. I read the information on the Internet. The problem of hash rate in AMD is not due to the deterioration of equipment, but to the increase in the generation of DAG. Therefore, a decrease in the hash rate should be uniform across all similar devices. And I have a hash rate 178 on one liner, on another 162. It's very strange and it seems to me that it's possible. If you haven't installed the DAG fix drivers from AMD your Panda will slowly drop over time on ETH. http://search.amd.com/en-us/Pages/results-all.aspx#k=blockchainThe B3 should run stable 229MH/s on 220V with the latest software installed. Ahhh very useful to know. This is only a problem observed with mining ETH? |
t.me/bitcoinasic
|
|
|
Sparkly
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
January 04, 2018, 10:17:43 AM |
|
I can only speak in regards to the 3 I have and pretty much yes, slow creep down from 220
You did not understand me. I read the information on the Internet. The problem of hash rate in AMD is not due to the deterioration of equipment, but to the increase in the generation of DAG. Therefore, a decrease in the hash rate should be uniform across all similar devices. And I have a hash rate 178 on one liner, on another 162. It's very strange and it seems to me that it's possible. If you haven't installed the DAG fix drivers from AMD your Panda will slowly drop over time on ETH. http://search.amd.com/en-us/Pages/results-all.aspx#k=blockchainThe B3 should run stable 229MH/s on 220V with the latest software installed. Ahhh very useful to know. This is only a problem observed with mining ETH? Primarily an ETH issue on AMD at the time, with the older drivers, but with the beta Blockchain drivers, or possibly even the manual configuration in Radeon Settings to adjust GPU Workload options to Compute instead of Graphics on the newer updates, this issue is basically gone. |
|
|
|
|
|
