Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 03:56:47 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 [168] 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 ... 760 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839121 times)
aaronsace
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 04:30:59 PM
 #3341

Anyone got problem with 280x doing 0 h/s in 5.0? Works just fine with 4.0.
I have updated drivers from 15.7.1 to latest crimson 16.11.3 - same thing.

This is a mixed with nvidia rig with 280x being the only AMD card present:
Code:
ZEC: Stratum - Connected (equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357)
ZEC: Authorized
Pool sets new share target: 0x01e1e1e1 (diff: 136H)
ZEC: Share accepted!

GPU #0: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 0.000 H/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ZEC: GPU0 0.000 H/s
Pool switches: ZEC - 0
Current ZEC pool share target: 0x01e1e1e1 (diff: 136H)
GPU0 t=47C fan=49%

Reward is at 5.14 now, will get up to 10.0 - expect twice the price drop.

Please read previous posts. Run two separate windows. Use -di and -mport.

Thats why I have written `This is a mixed with nvidia rig with 280x being the only AMD card present:`
There are no other AMD cards there, this is the only claymore ZEC miner running.
Anyway I have tried it to run with " -di 0 -mport 0", but still nothing

Update to the latest drivers from AMD and remove any overclock/mods.

Hello? Are you able to read this? Guess what... the best miner ever created has arrived! https://github.com/aaronsace/MultiPoolMiner/releases
Wandika
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 508
Merit: 250


In CryptoEnergy we trust


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 04:32:44 PM
 #3342

my fury has the biggest gain hittiing 180 H/s..maybe its the HBM memory, imagine when HBM2 is released with the rx 490, that gpu will probably outclass the rx 480 and HBM cards by a huge margin.

What is your Fury setting? What is the Catalyst version and the GPU frequency?

My R9 Nano with driver 16.9.1, 1000/500 can only reach about 155H/s. 15.2 is ever slower.

qqqq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 04:35:30 PM
 #3343

I've got some strange behavior of the miner while tested v5.0.
Miner detected all my cards but used only first one.
Here is some piece of log.
17:30:47:046   283c   parse packet: 296
17:30:47:051   283c   new buf size: 0
17:30:47:056   283c   ZEC: 11/14/16-17:30:47 - New job from zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666
17:30:47:061   283c   target: 0x00147ae1 (diff: 3200H)
17:30:47:066   283c   ZEC - Total Speed: 114.094 H/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
17:30:47:071   283c   ZEC: GPU0 114.094 H/s, GPU1 0.000 H/s, GPU2 0.000 H/s, GPU3 0.000 H/s, GPU4 0.000 H/s
17:30:48:934   1378   ZEC: put share nonce 21d
17:30:48:939   1378   ZEC round found 1 shares
17:30:48:945   283c   ZEC: 11/14/16-17:30:48 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)

Does anybody have same problem?
On v3.1 all works fine with the same setup.

Please read previous posts. Run two separate windows.

It's not working! I got same issue. When two miners working in the same time All GPU show Incorrect Data like this and half hashrate

GPU #1 returned incorrect data! 293f5d2
GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 123ada6

if i close one, the second back to normal mining.

First window put "-mport 0 -di 0"
Second window put "-mport 0 -di 1234"

Thanks man -mport 0 in each miner instance solve the issue. I guessed it was needed at least in 1 of 2 miner.
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 1723


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 04:35:59 PM
 #3344

Should bounce from here. Very low risk/High Reward trade.


Thank you, bro. I've lost 20% today Smiley


IT was a valid bull flag, however supply exceeded demand, and when support broke at the daily low everybody bailed. I lost money too but only like a few %.

Very hard to trade this coin since you can only go long and can't short.
hawkfish007
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 895
Merit: 504


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 04:39:28 PM
 #3345

Anyone seeing random hash rate drop specially for RX 470s? After running overnight I found 2 out of 7 470 were hashing at 33 sols but the rest are at 110. This happened in 2 rigs both with 7 470s.

For quality risers, splitters or 133 CFM fans, please visit my eBay listings,
http://www.ebay.com/sch/hawkfish007/m.html?_ipg=50&_sop=12&_rdc=1
Bojcha
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 848
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 14, 2016, 04:43:22 PM
 #3346

What do you rejoice? It is advantageous when your speed is higher than the other. And when the rate rises in all, you are in relation to other, standing pat are.

It just kills the coin.

Exactly - the only one actually making money is Claymore xD

If you check history, my miner is not x3 faster than others, I just see how fast others miners and release a bit faster version. This time I have to release faster version due to new miner. If people stop this speed racing I'll stop it too, but you know it won't work Smiley
Also do note my miner is not for NVidia, not for CPU and not for Linux, so if I release miner with x2 speed, network difficult is not going to raise x2 too.
Claymore, possible to add CPU affinity for miner in some next version? it Seems that on one core miner is more 'stable'.
xeridea
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 449
Merit: 251


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2016, 04:57:30 PM
 #3347

What do you rejoice? It is advantageous when your speed is higher than the other. And when the rate rises in all, you are in relation to other, standing pat are.

It just kills the coin.

Exactly - the only one actually making money is Claymore xD

If you check history, my miner is not x3 faster than others, I just see how fast others miners and release a bit faster version. This time I have to release faster version due to new miner. If people stop this speed racing I'll stop it too, but you know it won't work Smiley
Also do note my miner is not for NVidia, not for CPU and not for Linux, so if I release miner with x2 speed, network difficult is not going to raise x2 too.
Claymore, possible to add CPU affinity for miner in some next version? it Seems that on one core miner is more 'stable'.
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/santhoshonline/2011/11/24/how-to-launch-a-process-with-cpu-affinity-set/
It would be cool to have in miner though, since /start opens another window. Many use /start in restart loops anyway (not really necessary with Claymore miners most the time....)

Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/charts

BTC:  bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC:  LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth:  0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
amirheavy666
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 228
Merit: 101


NEM (XEM) Top Coin


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 05:03:31 PM
 #3348

I have one R9 390x and one RX 480 but with claymore ver 5.0 just Rx480 work !!

i give this error : (port is busy, use different -mport value)

 
and with claymore 4.0 both of R 390x and R480x works !!!

what i must do HuhHuhHuhHuh

Nem.io
Swimmer63
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004



View Profile
November 14, 2016, 05:13:11 PM
 #3349

Claymore -

I have a miner with one R9 290x and one RX480.  With v5.0 my RX480 is screaming fast, but now the 290 does not mine.  My PC alternates between recognizing the 290 and not mining it to recognizing it but with an error in the device manager.  Have tried both 15.12 and the current driver.  Does not seem to help.  Not sure if this is related to what you are referencing here or not.
Cobra98
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 05:14:00 PM
 #3350

I have one R9 390x and one RX 480 but with claymore ver 5.0 just Rx480 work !!

i give this error : (port is busy, use different -mport value)

 
and with claymore 4.0 both of R 390x and R480x works !!!

what i must do HuhHuhHuhHuh

Go back 1 page, u have to run 2 instances of v5.0 if u have mixed cards with rx400 series
olcaytu2005
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1024



View Profile
November 14, 2016, 05:14:46 PM
 #3351

Anyone seeing random hash rate drop specially for RX 470s? After running overnight I found 2 out of 7 470 were hashing at 33 sols but the rest are at 110. This happened in 2 rigs both with 7 470s.

Yup, had to go back to optiminer for now. Ran 2 hours with full speed, rest 8 hours was dropping dropping until it dropped like %25 (total hash speed), I had enough. Cards are getting overheated. And they are not even oc'ed.
fredeq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2016, 05:15:17 PM
 #3352

Anyone got problem with 280x doing 0 h/s in 5.0? Works just fine with 4.0.
I have updated drivers from 15.7.1 to latest crimson 16.11.3 - same thing.

This is a mixed with nvidia rig with 280x being the only AMD card present:
Code:
ZEC: Stratum - Connected (equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357)
ZEC: Authorized
Pool sets new share target: 0x01e1e1e1 (diff: 136H)
ZEC: Share accepted!

GPU #0: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 0.000 H/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ZEC: GPU0 0.000 H/s
Pool switches: ZEC - 0
Current ZEC pool share target: 0x01e1e1e1 (diff: 136H)
GPU0 t=47C fan=49%

Reward is at 5.14 now, will get up to 10.0 - expect twice the price drop.

Ok managed to fix it by copying `data.bin` and `data2.bin` from other working miner.
Either I downloaded an early broken version or somehow this fucked when unzipping.

https://whattomine.com - Check what to mine Smiley
Vaculin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 613


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 05:15:42 PM
 #3353

I have one R9 390x and one RX 480 but with claymore ver 5.0 just Rx480 work !!

i give this error : (port is busy, use different -mport value)

 
and with claymore 4.0 both of R 390x and R480x works !!!

what i must do HuhHuhHuhHuh

You just use a different port. For example -mport  2345
GH
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 117
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 05:17:35 PM
 #3354


https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/santhoshonline/2011/11/24/how-to-launch-a-process-with-cpu-affinity-set/
It would be cool to have in miner though, since /start opens another window. Many use /start in restart loops anyway (not really necessary with Claymore miners most the time....)

Use
Code:
start /B
(HELP START)
xeridea
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 449
Merit: 251


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2016, 05:20:44 PM
 #3355

I have one R9 390x and one RX 480 but with claymore ver 5.0 just Rx480 work !!

i give this error : (port is busy, use different -mport value)

 
and with claymore 4.0 both of R 390x and R480x works !!!

what i must do HuhHuhHuhHuh

You just use a different port. For example -mport  2345
The error is saying the remote monitoring port (for the sweeeeet ethman) is already used.  On second instance, disable with -mport 0, or change port it uses (default is 3333), if using ethman, update port for 2nd instance.

It is explained by Claymore also.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=306958;sa=showPosts

Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/charts

BTC:  bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC:  LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth:  0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
xeridea
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 449
Merit: 251


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2016, 05:23:38 PM
 #3356

To the dozens who keep spamming help for issue with mixed cards.  Read the forum... and Claymore's posts

A workaround for rigs with mixed cards (Polaris and old cards): start two miners with "-di" option, one for Polaris cards and second for other cards. Use "-mport 0" option to disable port for remote management and avoid red message in second miner.
I will fix it soon.

It can also happen with Fury and non Fury cards.

Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/charts

BTC:  bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC:  LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth:  0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 1723


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 05:27:29 PM
 #3357

If you are using the 1500 Straps with your 470 4GB, dont run higher than 1800Mhz, its not like ETH and it will FREEZE your system.

Go stock or use 1800Mhz instead. It will run fast at first and then slow down due to massive memory errors.
king_pin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 416
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
November 14, 2016, 05:31:20 PM
 #3358

A workaround for rigs with mixed cards (Polaris and old cards): start two miners with "-di" option, one for Polaris cards and second for other cards. Use "-mport 0" option to disable port for remote management and avoid red message in second miner.
I will fix it soon.
You should also fix the issue I mentioned a few weeks back.
-di does not work properly:
when I write -di 1,2,3 instead of 3 devices I get 0,1,2,3 or 4 cards running!!!

Help to save a persons life with BITCOIN - http://www.bitcoinsaves.org/en/
Tuner77
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 14, 2016, 05:32:45 PM
 #3359

V5 rocks. 2x480 8gb, 4x 470 4gb, just upgraded miner and getting nice rates at the pool. Will report 24/hr rate tomorrow.

olcaytu2005
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1024



View Profile
November 14, 2016, 05:38:24 PM
 #3360

If you are using the 1500 Straps with your 470 4GB, dont run higher than 1800Mhz, its not like ETH and it will FREEZE your system.

Go stock or use 1800Mhz instead. It will run fast at first and then slow down due to massive memory errors.

Im using 1500 straps and 1750 mem. Still getting huge memory errors or invalid shares on log. Same settings, optiminer runs perfect with slightly lower but more accurate hash and sharerate.
Pages: « 1 ... 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 [168] 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 ... 760 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!