aaronsace
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 04:30:59 PM |
|
Anyone got problem with 280x doing 0 h/s in 5.0? Works just fine with 4.0. I have updated drivers from 15.7.1 to latest crimson 16.11.3 - same thing. This is a mixed with nvidia rig with 280x being the only AMD card present: ZEC: Stratum - Connected (equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357) ZEC: Authorized Pool sets new share target: 0x01e1e1e1 (diff: 136H) ZEC: Share accepted!
GPU #0: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units ZEC - Total Speed: 0.000 H/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 ZEC: GPU0 0.000 H/s Pool switches: ZEC - 0 Current ZEC pool share target: 0x01e1e1e1 (diff: 136H) GPU0 t=47C fan=49% Reward is at 5.14 now, will get up to 10.0 - expect twice the price drop. Please read previous posts. Run two separate windows. Use -di and -mport. Thats why I have written `This is a mixed with nvidia rig with 280x being the only AMD card present:` There are no other AMD cards there, this is the only claymore ZEC miner running. Anyway I have tried it to run with " -di 0 -mport 0", but still nothing Update to the latest drivers from AMD and remove any overclock/mods.
|
|
|
|
Wandika
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 508
Merit: 250
In CryptoEnergy we trust
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 04:32:44 PM |
|
my fury has the biggest gain hittiing 180 H/s..maybe its the HBM memory, imagine when HBM2 is released with the rx 490, that gpu will probably outclass the rx 480 and HBM cards by a huge margin.
What is your Fury setting? What is the Catalyst version and the GPU frequency? My R9 Nano with driver 16.9.1, 1000/500 can only reach about 155H/s. 15.2 is ever slower.
|
|
|
|
qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 04:35:30 PM |
|
I've got some strange behavior of the miner while tested v5.0. Miner detected all my cards but used only first one. Here is some piece of log. 17:30:47:046 283c parse packet: 296 17:30:47:051 283c new buf size: 0 17:30:47:056 283c ZEC: 11/14/16-17:30:47 - New job from zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666 17:30:47:061 283c target: 0x00147ae1 (diff: 3200H) 17:30:47:066 283c ZEC - Total Speed: 114.094 H/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01 17:30:47:071 283c ZEC: GPU0 114.094 H/s, GPU1 0.000 H/s, GPU2 0.000 H/s, GPU3 0.000 H/s, GPU4 0.000 H/s 17:30:48:934 1378 ZEC: put share nonce 21d 17:30:48:939 1378 ZEC round found 1 shares 17:30:48:945 283c ZEC: 11/14/16-17:30:48 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
Does anybody have same problem? On v3.1 all works fine with the same setup.
Please read previous posts. Run two separate windows. It's not working! I got same issue. When two miners working in the same time All GPU show Incorrect Data like this and half hashrate GPU #1 returned incorrect data! 293f5d2 GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 123ada6 if i close one, the second back to normal mining. First window put "-mport 0 -di 0" Second window put "-mport 0 -di 1234" Thanks man -mport 0 in each miner instance solve the issue. I guessed it was needed at least in 1 of 2 miner.
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 1723
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 04:35:59 PM |
|
Should bounce from here. Very low risk/High Reward trade. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi64.tinypic.com%2F8xig5v.png&t=665&c=wdYHlsos3zEV8w) Thank you, bro. I've lost 20% today ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) IT was a valid bull flag, however supply exceeded demand, and when support broke at the daily low everybody bailed. I lost money too but only like a few %. Very hard to trade this coin since you can only go long and can't short.
|
|
|
|
hawkfish007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 04:39:28 PM |
|
Anyone seeing random hash rate drop specially for RX 470s? After running overnight I found 2 out of 7 470 were hashing at 33 sols but the rest are at 110. This happened in 2 rigs both with 7 470s.
|
|
|
|
Bojcha
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 04:43:22 PM |
|
What do you rejoice? It is advantageous when your speed is higher than the other. And when the rate rises in all, you are in relation to other, standing pat are.
It just kills the coin.
Exactly - the only one actually making money is Claymore xD If you check history, my miner is not x3 faster than others, I just see how fast others miners and release a bit faster version. This time I have to release faster version due to new miner. If people stop this speed racing I'll stop it too, but you know it won't work ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Also do note my miner is not for NVidia, not for CPU and not for Linux, so if I release miner with x2 speed, network difficult is not going to raise x2 too. Claymore, possible to add CPU affinity for miner in some next version? it Seems that on one core miner is more 'stable'.
|
|
|
|
xeridea
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 04:57:30 PM |
|
What do you rejoice? It is advantageous when your speed is higher than the other. And when the rate rises in all, you are in relation to other, standing pat are.
It just kills the coin.
Exactly - the only one actually making money is Claymore xD If you check history, my miner is not x3 faster than others, I just see how fast others miners and release a bit faster version. This time I have to release faster version due to new miner. If people stop this speed racing I'll stop it too, but you know it won't work ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Also do note my miner is not for NVidia, not for CPU and not for Linux, so if I release miner with x2 speed, network difficult is not going to raise x2 too. Claymore, possible to add CPU affinity for miner in some next version? it Seems that on one core miner is more 'stable'. https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/santhoshonline/2011/11/24/how-to-launch-a-process-with-cpu-affinity-set/It would be cool to have in miner though, since /start opens another window. Many use /start in restart loops anyway (not really necessary with Claymore miners most the time....)
|
Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/chartsBTC: bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC: LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth: 0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
|
|
|
amirheavy666
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 228
Merit: 101
NEM (XEM) Top Coin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 05:03:31 PM |
|
I have one R9 390x and one RX 480 but with claymore ver 5.0 just Rx480 work !! i give this error : (port is busy, use different -mport value) and with claymore 4.0 both of R 390x and R480x works !!! what i must do ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
Nem.io
|
|
|
Swimmer63
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 05:13:11 PM |
|
Claymore -
I have a miner with one R9 290x and one RX480. With v5.0 my RX480 is screaming fast, but now the 290 does not mine. My PC alternates between recognizing the 290 and not mining it to recognizing it but with an error in the device manager. Have tried both 15.12 and the current driver. Does not seem to help. Not sure if this is related to what you are referencing here or not.
|
|
|
|
Cobra98
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 05:14:00 PM |
|
I have one R9 390x and one RX 480 but with claymore ver 5.0 just Rx480 work !! i give this error : (port is busy, use different -mport value) and with claymore 4.0 both of R 390x and R480x works !!! what i must do ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Go back 1 page, u have to run 2 instances of v5.0 if u have mixed cards with rx400 series
|
|
|
|
olcaytu2005
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1024
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 05:14:46 PM |
|
Anyone seeing random hash rate drop specially for RX 470s? After running overnight I found 2 out of 7 470 were hashing at 33 sols but the rest are at 110. This happened in 2 rigs both with 7 470s.
Yup, had to go back to optiminer for now. Ran 2 hours with full speed, rest 8 hours was dropping dropping until it dropped like %25 (total hash speed), I had enough. Cards are getting overheated. And they are not even oc'ed.
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 05:15:17 PM |
|
Anyone got problem with 280x doing 0 h/s in 5.0? Works just fine with 4.0. I have updated drivers from 15.7.1 to latest crimson 16.11.3 - same thing. This is a mixed with nvidia rig with 280x being the only AMD card present: ZEC: Stratum - Connected (equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357) ZEC: Authorized Pool sets new share target: 0x01e1e1e1 (diff: 136H) ZEC: Share accepted!
GPU #0: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units ZEC - Total Speed: 0.000 H/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00 ZEC: GPU0 0.000 H/s Pool switches: ZEC - 0 Current ZEC pool share target: 0x01e1e1e1 (diff: 136H) GPU0 t=47C fan=49% Reward is at 5.14 now, will get up to 10.0 - expect twice the price drop. Ok managed to fix it by copying `data.bin` and `data2.bin` from other working miner. Either I downloaded an early broken version or somehow this fucked when unzipping.
|
|
|
|
Vaculin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 05:15:42 PM |
|
I have one R9 390x and one RX 480 but with claymore ver 5.0 just Rx480 work !! i give this error : (port is busy, use different -mport value) and with claymore 4.0 both of R 390x and R480x works !!! what i must do ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) You just use a different port. For example -mport 2345
|
|
|
|
GH
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 05:17:35 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
xeridea
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 05:20:44 PM |
|
I have one R9 390x and one RX 480 but with claymore ver 5.0 just Rx480 work !! i give this error : (port is busy, use different -mport value) and with claymore 4.0 both of R 390x and R480x works !!! what i must do ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) You just use a different port. For example -mport 2345 The error is saying the remote monitoring port (for the sweeeeet ethman) is already used. On second instance, disable with -mport 0, or change port it uses (default is 3333), if using ethman, update port for 2nd instance. It is explained by Claymore also. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=306958;sa=showPosts
|
Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/chartsBTC: bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC: LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth: 0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
|
|
|
xeridea
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 05:23:38 PM |
|
To the dozens who keep spamming help for issue with mixed cards. Read the forum... and Claymore's posts A workaround for rigs with mixed cards (Polaris and old cards): start two miners with "-di" option, one for Polaris cards and second for other cards. Use "-mport 0" option to disable port for remote management and avoid red message in second miner. I will fix it soon.
It can also happen with Fury and non Fury cards.
|
Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/chartsBTC: bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC: LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth: 0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 1723
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 05:27:29 PM |
|
If you are using the 1500 Straps with your 470 4GB, dont run higher than 1800Mhz, its not like ETH and it will FREEZE your system.
Go stock or use 1800Mhz instead. It will run fast at first and then slow down due to massive memory errors.
|
|
|
|
king_pin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 05:31:20 PM |
|
A workaround for rigs with mixed cards (Polaris and old cards): start two miners with "-di" option, one for Polaris cards and second for other cards. Use "-mport 0" option to disable port for remote management and avoid red message in second miner. I will fix it soon.
You should also fix the issue I mentioned a few weeks back. -di does not work properly: when I write -di 1,2,3 instead of 3 devices I get 0,1,2,3 or 4 cards running!!!
|
|
|
|
Tuner77
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 05:32:45 PM |
|
V5 rocks. 2x480 8gb, 4x 470 4gb, just upgraded miner and getting nice rates at the pool. Will report 24/hr rate tomorrow. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimgur.com%2FhQmejWk&t=665&c=83KZIRe8yZGdWg)
|
|
|
|
olcaytu2005
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1024
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2016, 05:38:24 PM |
|
If you are using the 1500 Straps with your 470 4GB, dont run higher than 1800Mhz, its not like ETH and it will FREEZE your system.
Go stock or use 1800Mhz instead. It will run fast at first and then slow down due to massive memory errors.
Im using 1500 straps and 1750 mem. Still getting huge memory errors or invalid shares on log. Same settings, optiminer runs perfect with slightly lower but more accurate hash and sharerate.
|
|
|
|
|