jokelo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:01:24 PM |
|
Hey thanks! Yeah I thought so. I thought I missed some new software tech.. Ok, so I'm getting best results on -i 4. GPU1 123H/s, GPU2 116H/s. Doesn't a bigger intesity, reflect as a bigger ''burden'' on GPU and therefor bigger watt consumption?
|
|
|
|
igotek
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:01:39 PM |
|
175-182 Hs/s on stock R9 390X
6x R9 390X = 1085 Hs/s
|
I cannot live, I cannot die, trapped in myself. Hold my breath as I wish for death. Oh please god, help me !
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1745
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:02:14 PM |
|
It seems that with this release
ETH POWER CONSUMPTION = ZEC Claymore V6 POWER CONSUMPTION
Hopefully I can undervolt most cards to like 900Mhz Engine Core and keep only the Memory clock high.
|
RAZED | | | 100% | WELCOME BONUS | │ | █████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ████████████▀░░░░▀███████ ██████████▀░░▄▀▀▄░░▀█████ ██████████▄▄██▄▄██▄░▀████ █████▀░░░░░░░▀██░░█░░████ ████░░████▀▀█░░██▀░░▄████ ████░░████▄▄█░░█░░▄██████ ████░░█▀▀████░░██████████ ████░░█▄▄███▀░░██████████ █████▄░░░░░░░▄███████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████ | █████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ██████████▀▀░░░░░▀▀██████ ████████▀░░▄▄█░░▀▄░░█████ ██████▀░░▄█████▄░░▀░░████ █████░░▄████▄▀░░█▄▄░░████ ████░░▄███▄▀░░▄▀██▀░░████ ████░░▀▀██░░▄▀███▀░░█████ ████░░▄░░▀█████▀░░▄██████ █████░░▀▄░░█▀▀░░▄████████ ██████▄▄░░░░░▄▄██████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████ | | |
NO KYC | | | RAZE THE LIMITS ► PLAY NOW |
|
|
|
Bananana
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:03:14 PM |
|
Use "-i 4" when possible.
For some reason, my -i 3 gives me higher sol as compare to -i 4. Anybody have the same problem?
|
|
|
|
Gaglam
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:03:59 PM |
|
Use "-i 4" when possible.
Is it also possible on r9 280x?
|
|
|
|
bronsky
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:07:04 PM |
|
It seems that with this release
ETH POWER CONSUMPTION = ZEC Claymore V6 POWER CONSUMPTION
Hopefully I can undervolt most cards to like 900Mhz Engine Core and keep only the Memory clock high.
yap, watt up 10-15 watt per card
|
|
|
|
Tmdz
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:08:54 PM |
|
Ok so a round up
Optiminer:
Expected speed (stock card):
R9 Nano: 185S/s R9 290: 140S/s RX 470: 130S/s
Claymore 6.0
R9 290: 137-149 s/s RX 470: 130-135 s/s
So after the dev fee on claymore we have a tie, claymore has more features and more stable.
So I give the win to claymore
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3276
Merit: 1072
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:09:47 PM |
|
Clymore when you are going to do a boost to nvidia also? is it in plan at least?
|
|
|
|
buckrogers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2801
Merit: 1195
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:10:56 PM |
|
~ 115 per card on R9 290x ~ 114 per card on R9 280x ~ 113 per card on 7970 ~ 154 per card RX 480 All stock settings  Thanks!
|
Well I'm dr. spock I'm here to rock y'all
|
|
|
olcaytu2005
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1024
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:12:08 PM |
|
It seems that with this release
ETH POWER CONSUMPTION = ZEC Claymore V6 POWER CONSUMPTION
Hopefully I can undervolt most cards to like 900Mhz Engine Core and keep only the Memory clock high.
You will than lose a lot of hashrate since with the release of Optiminer core clocks do matter even more than memory clocks. I guess Claymore took that road too.
|
|
|
|
suggsy89
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:13:53 PM |
|
Use "-i 4" when possible.
You did it again... Performance is through the roof!  I have noticed a 5% boost between -i 2 and -i 4 option. Thank you! We all appreciate your work.
|
|
|
|
hoatuthan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 78
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:15:36 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:16:55 PM |
|
can someone share their 290x and 290 h/s on this v6 with or withour bios mods please? trying to work out if it's worth modding my card bios's
170 Sol/s with STILT BIOS for R9 290 at 1100/1450 Elpida mem. which stilt are you running? Probably based on one of these http://www.overclock.net/t/1561904/mlu-bios-builds-for-290x
|
|
|
|
olcaytu2005
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1024
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:18:55 PM |
|
I have the weirdest problem. I start hashing quite stable and well. After I leave the rig (stop using the mouse etc), hashrate starts to drop a lot. When I move the mouse again the hashrate is back up. Same problem was with v5 too. Anyone else having this weird issue?
|
|
|
|
Meech
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:23:09 PM |
|
~ 115 per card on R9 290x ~ 114 per card on R9 280x ~ 113 per card on 7970 ~ 154 per card RX 480 All stock settings  Thanks! Your 290x should be getting at least 130 or more.
|
|
|
|
doktor83
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:24:21 PM |
|
Difference in -i 2 and -i 4 in POWER CONSUMPTION ?
|
|
|
|
smorc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:24:41 PM |
|
It seems that with this release
ETH POWER CONSUMPTION = ZEC Claymore V6 POWER CONSUMPTION
Hopefully I can undervolt most cards to like 900Mhz Engine Core and keep only the Memory clock high.
yap, watt up 10-15 watt per card no it doesn't. I get 720 at the wall compared to 900 on ETH with downvolt.
|
|
|
|
CoinPro69
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:24:51 PM |
|
4x the speed with Claymores V6 Miners with my rx470 since the beginning!
Amazing Stuff! 
|
|
|
|
faygokris
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:28:14 PM |
|
Can someone point me in the direction to mod the bios on the following for low power consumption or at least better than stock bios mining:
I have rigs with the following :
Powercolor red devil 1330mhx RX 480 8GB Sapphire nitro rx 470 4gb sapphire nitro rx 480 4 gb sapphire nitro rx 480 8 gb
All will use powered risers 1x - 16x if that matters.
These are all about to get installed into rigs for minining and I want to set it right up at the start.
|
|
|
|
h311m4n
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 06:34:11 PM |
|
Very small difference in hashrate with -i 4, I get maybe 5-10 hashes more per rig. Almostno change in wattage though.
|
|
|
|
|