Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[AzzAz]

People is this still Claymore's tread? No it's mining kindergarten tread!

[1714705040]

1714705040

[way2vinoth]

Hi

RED DEVIL RX470 - 4GB @ - 155 sols displaying on Mining Software

But Pool shows 10 % different

Windows 7 64Bit - 6 GB Ram,

Claymore 7

Here is my pool link

http://zcash.flypool.org/miners/t1RLqYJYnTytTuvTudhLfa7NvkT7hcvS2Fb

and anyone have bios for increasing sols... i am new to the field .

[omnik]

Whats the problem with mining on nicehash?
With -allpools 1
Without it will not start...

What's the problem? It still mines for you. It will try to find good pool for devfee, it may take some time since ZEC pools are unstable.

it doesn't effect my mining at all?

The only problem is it cannot connect for an hour or two, miner will stop mining after that. But within this period miner will check several pools many times and must find good pool.

Its solved with V7. Tnx!

[prichina]

I think it is time for dual, something like ZEC+ZCL or something

[prichina]

Hi

RED DEVIL RX470 - 4GB @ - 155 sols displaying on Mining Software

But Pool shows 10 % different

Windows 7 64Bit - 6 GB Ram,

Claymore 7

Here is my pool link

http://zcash.flypool.org/miners/t1RLqYJYnTytTuvTudhLfa7NvkT7hcvS2Fb

and anyone have bios for increasing sols... i am new to the field .

The average is smaller, that is because every hour the devfee kick's in for a minute and then you recconect on the pool....and start all over again to calculate your average hash rate. Dont worry, the average in the miner isn't false

[wll1rah]

Hi

RED DEVIL RX470 - 4GB @ - 155 sols displaying on Mining Software

But Pool shows 10 % different

Windows 7 64Bit - 6 GB Ram,

Claymore 7

Here is my pool link

http://zcash.flypool.org/miners/t1RLqYJYnTytTuvTudhLfa7NvkT7hcvS2Fb

and anyone have bios for increasing sols... i am new to the field .

zec.suprnova.cc lets you use fixed diff, flypool's diff is fixed as well but it doesn't take into account your hashrate. this is why you see a difference.  I think there diff is 1000 sol's, so divide that by 155/1000 and that is how long it will take to get a share.

[way2vinoth]

Hi

RED DEVIL RX470 - 4GB @ - 155 sols displaying on Mining Software

But Pool shows 10 % different

Windows 7 64Bit - 6 GB Ram,

Claymore 7

Here is my pool link

http://zcash.flypool.org/miners/t1RLqYJYnTytTuvTudhLfa7NvkT7hcvS2Fb

and anyone have bios for increasing sols... i am new to the field .

zec.suprnova.cc lets you use fixed diff, flypool's diff is fixed as well but it doesn't take into account your hashrate. this is why you see a difference.  I think there diff is 1000 sol's, so divide that by 155/1000 and that is how long it will take to get a share.

so which is best for one card

[Alehandros]

i want back to time when claymore didnt release optimized old card, this is ruined zec mining, all those new card stuck like hell
except the nano's hash rate is pretty amazing with low power cunsumption 205 h/s / 80 watt
RX series 90 watt at 0.9v core doing 160hs

Nano's FTW!

Edit: I've seen mention of assessing your GPUs ASIC quality, how do you tell? GPUz? or just the hash rate?

[Thin86cz]

Hi,
may I have some question about using -mport..? I was suspicious why the coinmine.pl showing values which are not coresponding with my hashrate properly, often too much under average (not just in devfee period) and average was lower than should be.

So I set -mport 0 to all of my rigs, in version 6 it was good, pool was showing "better" values, I cant say if it was just luck, but V7 came and after a few seconds of mining is software is falling down.

When I set -mport -3333 or nothing everything is ok. Thanks for response.

[thiagobangu]

For those, who need comparison data.
version 7 speeds:
7870 - 95 sol/s
7950 - 145 sol/s
7970 - 165 sol/s
270x - 100 sol/s
280x - 165 sol/s
285 - 110 sol/s
470 4Gb - 155 sol/s

Couldn't be more accurate. You can add
290 - 200 sol/s to complete the list

295x2 shapire  -  452 sol/s to complete the list

[YIz]

Over 260H/s on Fury X using 7.0.

[thiagobangu]

Friends, follows new option for zcash mining.

https://www.f2pool.com/help

line: 

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec.f2pool.com:3357 -zwal xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.worker -zpsw x


Claymore'z v7.0 

[Antalla]

Does anyone have a stable BIOS for RX 480 Nitro+ 4Gb Elpida?
This one isn't working for me: https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/10570/bios-for-sapphire-nitro-rx480-4gb-elpida
And what clocks and voltage are you using?
Didn't find anything on this thread :/

I have a link for the 4gb and the 8gb versions, http://www.cryptominingtalk.com/flashing-bios/
edit: dont know if its the same though.

Thx but they are the same :/
Does anyone have at least proper clocks and voltages for best h/W ?
Have 1300MHz/1060mV and 1800Mhz/960mV for Mem right now

[Amph]

any chance you will begin to work on nvidia and cuda? amd is reaching is limit already i don't think it's possible to do high improvement anymore

on the other hand a 1070 is stuggling to have 125 sol and it should be 160 at the very least, and i think it might be higher, up to 180...

[Claymore]

any chance you will begin to work on nvidia and cuda? amd is reaching is limit already i don't think it's possible to do high improvement anymore
on the other hand a 1070 is stuggling to have 125 sol and it should be 160 at the very least, and i think it might be higher, up to 180...

I still can improve speed, though it requires more and more efforts and time. It seems about 300H/s on stock 390X is possible. So it's not over for AMD yet and therefore I don't have time for NVidia.

[svetliopi44]

Sorry for the spam. Some of mod Bios for XFX 470 4GB Hynix?
 

[giagge]

any chance you will begin to work on nvidia and cuda? amd is reaching is limit already i don't think it's possible to do high improvement anymore
on the other hand a 1070 is stuggling to have 125 sol and it should be 160 at the very least, and i think it might be higher, up to 180...

I still can improve speed, though it requires more and more efforts and time. It seems about 300H/s on stock 390X is possible. So it's not over for AMD yet and therefore I don't have time for NVidia.

You hate Nvidia ? .

[dagarair]

any chance you will begin to work on nvidia and cuda? amd is reaching is limit already i don't think it's possible to do high improvement anymore
on the other hand a 1070 is stuggling to have 125 sol and it should be 160 at the very least, and i think it might be higher, up to 180...

I still can improve speed, though it requires more and more efforts and time. It seems about 300H/s on stock 390X is possible. So it's not over for AMD yet and therefore I don't have time for NVidia.

You hate Nvidia ? .

YES 

[Mr047]

For those, who need comparison data.
version 7 speeds:
7870 - 95 sol/s
7950 - 145 sol/s
7970 - 165 sol/s
270x - 100 sol/s
280x - 165 sol/s
285 - 110 sol/s
470 4Gb - 155 sol/s

Couldn't be more accurate. You can add
290 - 200 sol/s to complete the list

295x2 shapire  -  452 sol/s to complete the list

I listed only results on GPUs that i have, it won't be apropriate to add something because results may be different depending on settings (all stock, but bios mod timings), rig hardware (i have most rigs on 775 socket, even some with DDR1 memory,after V3.0 they show same speed as the new ones on 1150 socket).
If anyone interested i came to conclusion that only thing that matters for old CPU on multiGPU rig is HyperThreading or other VirtualCore technology, without it there is a big hashrate drop.

[aaronsace]

any chance you will begin to work on nvidia and cuda? amd is reaching is limit already i don't think it's possible to do high improvement anymore
on the other hand a 1070 is stuggling to have 125 sol and it should be 160 at the very least, and i think it might be higher, up to 180...

I still can improve speed, though it requires more and more efforts and time. It seems about 300H/s on stock 390X is possible. So it's not over for AMD yet and therefore I don't have time for NVidia.

You hate Nvidia ? .

He's one man, there are other miners you know.