bigjme
|
|
March 15, 2014, 03:46:20 PM |
|
ok let stop the debate now, Christian doesn't know how he is going to distribute it yet. he hasn't said he will charge at all, he hasn't even said he will 100% release it to us everything is speculation. when i said a price, i stated what price I would gladly pay. i did not say "Christian charge this amount". If its too much noone will use it, if its free too many people will use it. there is no winning at all.
an AMD one is being released when the cudaminer one is. this has not been said if it will be charged for or not. the AMD crowd is a LOT bigger then us, they always tend to flood the coin and make it flop and the value drop.
one way or another there is no guarantee the coin will be worth ANYTHING once both miners are out
End of debate now, arguing if anything will just piss Christian off
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
jack80
|
|
March 15, 2014, 03:48:57 PM |
|
I'd be more than okay with running a binary blob that hardwires a portion of the mined coins to christian's wallet directly. If there needs to be an incentive over hashing by himself rather than distributing it, then he can easily do the math as a lot of us command well over a dozen cards worth of hashpower. Distribute it in binary form to even a few folks and you'll be making 0.25btc a day look like a joke. I know I'd volunteer Yeah! this is the best! .
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
March 15, 2014, 03:50:59 PM |
|
I have nothing against giving a contribution but I think you need to realise that pretty hate machine (big fan of nine inch nail myself...) has the amd version of the HVC more or less ready to be released and it will release when Christian releases it... so there won't be any head-start before the coin crashes or the difficulty increases to the roof. So it is certainly better Christian continues the way he has planned at least it will be profitable for him.
And don't forget there are new coins every days in cryptoland
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
sambiohazard
|
|
March 15, 2014, 03:51:30 PM |
|
Oh boy!! this got a little out of hand I thought people were mature enough to discuss How to show our gratitude towards Christian.
|
|
|
|
sambiohazard
|
|
March 15, 2014, 03:53:24 PM |
|
To make this clear my suggestion was for the long term support for cudaminer for every release.
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
March 15, 2014, 04:43:02 PM |
|
That project is separate from cudaminer as Christian mentioned.
...so far. I am not excluding the possibility to merge it right in. It depends on how we will decide to release it. Christian
|
|
|
|
ManIkWeet
|
|
March 15, 2014, 04:50:32 PM |
|
That project is separate from cudaminer as Christian mentioned.
...so far. I am not excluding the possibility to merge it right in. It depends on how we will decide to release it. Christian I like how you pretty much seems to have ignored the whole conversation of last page (That's a good thing, make up your own mind, don't let others tell you what to do!)
|
BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
|
|
|
bigjme
|
|
March 15, 2014, 05:07:05 PM |
|
Lmao, either way I'm going to chill out and wait. Hope everything is going well christian
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
fruitsdemers
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
March 15, 2014, 05:24:38 PM |
|
That project is separate from cudaminer as Christian mentioned.
...so far. I am not excluding the possibility to merge it right in. It depends on how we will decide to release it. Christian I like how you pretty much seems to have ignored the whole conversation of last page (That's a good thing, make up your own mind, don't let others tell you what to do!) He undoubtedly has thought of all of that and probably has been mulling over it earlier than any of us even thought of it. I know it'd be a pretty complex decision to me if I were in his shoes. As far as I'm concerned, I don't have much of a horse in this race anymore. I've fully paid off 5 750tis and one 780ti that I would never have been able to afford if it weren't for cudaminer and whatever I can make from now on is strictly profits. If the man makes the calculated decision to continue solo, that's his decision to make. If he would like to borrow his following's hashpower, I'll be the first to sign up.
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 15, 2014, 05:56:31 PM |
|
cbuchner1,
Do you have a good link on how to compile from linux to windows that would be like "how to compile for dummies".
Never tried it but thought I might get my feet wet.
Someone on the RieCoin forum posted for Linux but left it to be done for Windows.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
Bombadil
|
|
March 15, 2014, 05:58:19 PM |
|
I'm trying to get CUDAminer compiled, and since I don't have much programming experience, did some C# & Java a few years ago, I'm failing miserably. I got the source trough TortoiseSVN, installed CUDA toolkit (is their GPU driver mandatory? cause there are much newer drivers available) and opened the .sln in Visual Studio. I copied the content of the Visual Studio prerequisites zip file to the /trunk folder. But whenever I want to compile it, it's complaining about pththreads.h not being available. When I hardcode the <include> to the right path, it gives an error on the next header file of those prerequisites. Any way to make this easier so I don't have to copypaste every path?
|
|
|
|
sambiohazard
|
|
March 15, 2014, 06:02:16 PM |
|
I'm trying to get CUDAminer compiled, and since I don't have much programming experience, did some C# & Java a few years ago, I'm failing miserably. I got the source trough TortoiseSVN, installed CUDA toolkit (is their GPU driver mandatory? cause there are much newer drivers available) and opened the .sln in Visual Studio. I copied the content of the Visual Studio prerequisites zip file to the /trunk folder. But whenever I want to compile it, it's complaining about pththreads.h not being available. When I hardcode the <include> to the right path, it gives an error on the next header file of those prerequisites. Any way to make this easier so I don't have to copypaste every path? I am not a programmer but can you try putting the prerequisite at same directory level as project folder and NOT inside the project folder. EDIT: I read this tip somewhere in this thread so give it a try.
|
|
|
|
bigjme
|
|
March 15, 2014, 06:10:18 PM |
|
EDIT: I read this tip somewhere in this thread so give it a try.
thats what the folder structure likes for my compiling environment and here is a list of programs you need installed; CUDA 5.5 Visual Studio 2010 Visual Studio Service Pack 1 Update
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
March 15, 2014, 06:11:43 PM |
|
I'm trying to get CUDAminer compiled, and since I don't have much programming experience, did some C# & Java a few years ago, I'm failing miserably. I got the source trough TortoiseSVN, installed CUDA toolkit (is their GPU driver mandatory? cause there are much newer drivers available) and opened the .sln in Visual Studio. I copied the content of the Visual Studio prerequisites zip file to the /trunk folder. But whenever I want to compile it, it's complaining about pththreads.h not being available. When I hardcode the <include> to the right path, it gives an error on the next header file of those prerequisites. Any way to make this easier so I don't have to copypaste every path? I think, you need to rename some of the package so that you won't have to modify the cudaminer code: I have in the directory where I download the cudaminer source, these following library: curl-7.29.0 ==> this is not really 7.29.0 version, I just rename the one I use to be compatible with the one in cudaminer curl-7.29.0_x64 OpenSSL-Win64 OpenSSL-Win32 pthreads ==> same here I think a symbolic link could also work however, I am not sure how it work in windows
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
Bombadil
|
|
March 15, 2014, 06:14:03 PM |
|
WHoah, thanks for the tips guys I managed to get a step further by placing it in the directory above as sambiohazard and bigjme proposed But I get an error at linking: 1>LINK : fatal error LNK1123: failure during conversion to COFF: file invalid or corrupt So I'm almost there, would be fun to be on top of the source Any thoughts on that last error?
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
March 15, 2014, 06:16:26 PM |
|
WHoah, thanks for the tips guys I managed to get a step further by placing it in the directory above as sambiohazard and bigjme proposed But I get an error at linking: 1>LINK : fatal error LNK1123: failure during conversion to COFF: file invalid or corrupt So I'm almost there, would be fun to be on top of the source Any thoughts on that last error? what the compiler says in the lines before this one ?
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
PVmining
|
|
March 15, 2014, 06:18:37 PM |
|
Is there a good recommendation for a motherboard where 5x750ti (or more) working without problems... intel 1150 preferred. I like to use this setup for another cuda applikation too, so i try to avoid too many x1 risers to get much bandwidth as possible. Some 3x PCIe x16 boards like the MSI Z87-G55, GIGABYTE GA-Z87X-UD3H or the ASRock Fatal1ty Z87 Killer would be a good idea. But i read about some painful tricks (wires) to get all cards working...
I would be happy if you guys share your experience
|
|
|
|
bigjme
|
|
March 15, 2014, 06:19:13 PM |
|
But I get an error at linking: 1>LINK : fatal error LNK1123: failure during conversion to COFF: file invalid or corrupt
ok so you have gone into the cudaminer source folder run cudaminer.slnyou will see part of the program that looks like this; change the part in the red area to what i have, click the green play button and wait, let me know how it goes
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
bigjme
|
|
March 15, 2014, 06:21:43 PM |
|
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
Bombadil
|
|
March 15, 2014, 06:25:18 PM |
|
what the compiler says in the lines before this one ?
Not that much interesting, I guess but still: http://pastebin.com/Gt4DTeiS@Bigjme: I was already testing it at Release, but with x64. Win32 gives me the same result.
|
|
|
|
|