S_tring
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 102
OPEN Platform - Powering Blockchain Acceptance
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:07:59 PM |
|
Could one of you coding gurus help out?
I'm trying to ping a stratum server from Linux command line to decide if connection is available. It's probably simple, yet eluding me.
|
|
|
|
QuadraQ
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:15:57 PM |
|
Could one of you coding gurus help out?
I'm trying to ping a stratum server from Linux command line to decide if connection is available. It's probably simple, yet eluding me.
Are you sure that the stratum server will respond to a ping? Some don't.
|
|
|
|
S_tring
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 102
OPEN Platform - Powering Blockchain Acceptance
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:22:08 PM |
|
Could one of you coding gurus help out?
I'm trying to ping a stratum server from Linux command line to decide if connection is available. It's probably simple, yet eluding me.
Are you sure that the stratum server will respond to a ping? Some don't. Yea, that's the problem I guess. No way to tell if the server is available for sure.
|
|
|
|
ivcelmik
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:31:21 PM |
|
Took the easy gains first, around 18% boost on 750 Ti. Still trying to wrap my head around the hard part.
[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 286.07 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 286.72 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 285.23 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.80 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.69 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.42 H/s [2014-06-30 00:12:04] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 274.37 H/s [2014-06-30 00:12:04] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 1701.50 H/s (yay!!!) ...more performance gain than I thought. really nice. thanks! missing your donation address as signature or on github What's the power usage per GPU with the new build? It seems GPU's are getting close to Xeons in efficiency. Can u help me with toyr conf file i only get 260H/s thx in advance Sorry 230H/s
|
|
|
|
Neo.op
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:32:30 PM |
|
My problem is wallet for monero not exist one wallet with GUI ? Only in DOS ? I like wallet similar bitcoin for windows .
not sure why everybody want MNR (beside the fact it looks new... ), their stuff has clearly no future (... sure it is profitable but beside that... it is completely buggy... I have able to send 1000ducknote to bittrex, then every other transfer attempt failed...) u mean XMR ? Mjollnircoin = MNR In cryto , most of the time we don't have to know why whales want to buy certain coin. We just have to know it can make $$. That's all that matters. Don't really care about innovation or what not. Every other coin is the same for me. No matter which algo or what function. They all turn into BTC eventually. That is all that matters. Well for the most part its just a low volume levitation. A trick easily pulled off when trading penny stocks and the one which is much easier to pull off in crypto space. Once your circle have a good amount of coins (because you are the dev ie read early adopter) its easy to put a floor at a given price. Its certainly not the whales.
|
LYR | ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓███ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█████ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓███ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓▓████ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▄█████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█████▄ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▄▄▓████▓▓▓▓████ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓███▄▓▓████▓███ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████▄▓▓█████ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█████████▄▓███ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████▀▓███▄▓█ ▓▓▓▓▓▓██████▓▓▓█████ ▓▓▓▓▓██████▓▓▓▓█████ ▓▓▓▓██████▄▄▄▄▄██████ ▓▓▓██████████████████ ▓▓███████████████████ ▓██████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█████ ██████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█████ ██████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█████ | LYRA Loyalty Rewards on Blockchain
══════════════════════[ Main Features ]══════════════════════ ✓Customizable tokens ███✓NFT███ ✓DeFi███ ✓DEX███ ✓Revenue share | | | |
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:43:07 PM |
|
My problem is wallet for monero not exist one wallet with GUI ? Only in DOS ? I like wallet similar bitcoin for windows .
not sure why everybody want MNR (beside the fact it looks new... ), their stuff has clearly no future (... sure it is profitable but beside that... it is completely buggy... I have able to send 1000ducknote to bittrex, then every other transfer attempt failed...) u mean XMR ? Mjollnircoin = MNR In cryto , most of the time we don't have to know why whales want to buy certain coin. We just have to know it can make $$. That's all that matters. Don't really care about innovation or what not. Every other coin is the same for me. No matter which algo or what function. They all turn into BTC eventually. That is all that matters. Well for the most part its just a low volume levitation. A trick easily pulled off when trading penny stocks and the one which is much easier to pull off in crypto space. Once your circle have a good amount of coins (because you are the dev ie read early adopter) its easy to put a floor at a given price. Its certainly not the whales. obviously I meant XMR (for Xomero... ) getting lost with symbol which doesn't match anything... I would prefer if MNR was doing better too... however all not crypto turned to btc, I have a few counter examples in some wallets...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
PVmining
|
|
June 30, 2014, 06:06:40 PM |
|
[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 286.07 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 286.72 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 285.23 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.80 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.69 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.42 H/s [2014-06-30 00:12:04] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 274.37 H/s [2014-06-30 00:12:04] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 1701.50 H/s (yay!!!)
Can u help me with toyr conf file i only get 260H/s thx in advance Sorry 230H/s are you sure you use the newest version? with the previous one I also had 230h/s per card. in linux my conf looks like: ./ccminer -a cryptonight -l 8x60 -o stratum+tcp://pool -u ser -p assword the -l switch push it a little further. but it depends on the cards and the OC. In my case evga 750ti FTW with +400Mem. On a testrig I have some zotac with default clocks... they make less.
|
|
|
|
Bombadil
|
|
June 30, 2014, 06:08:53 PM |
|
[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 286.07 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 286.72 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 285.23 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.80 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.69 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.42 H/s [2014-06-30 00:12:04] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 274.37 H/s [2014-06-30 00:12:04] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 1701.50 H/s (yay!!!)
Can u help me with toyr conf file i only get 260H/s thx in advance Sorry 230H/s are you sure you use the newest version? with the previous one I also had 230h/s per card. in linux my conf looks like: ./ccminer -a cryptonight -l 8x60 -o stratum+tcp://pool -u ser -p assword the -l switch push it a little further. but it depends on the cards and the OC. In my case evga 750ti FTW with +400Mem. On a testrig I have some zotac with default clocks... they make less. It's windows Getting much better results on Linux too, but I like my Windows just as it is, buggy and shitty ^^" So yeah, I also get around 230-250h/s.
|
|
|
|
PVmining
|
|
June 30, 2014, 06:10:19 PM |
|
Just released my updated profit calc PS: If anyone could give me the FULL hashrates.text (or at least the wattages) for a complete 6x 750ti rig, that would be great I'll add it as the default list. Really cool my dear! Love it. will check the wattages in the next few days... my previous list is not up-to-date since the last ccminer update.
|
|
|
|
PVmining
|
|
June 30, 2014, 06:16:53 PM |
|
Took the easy gains first, around 18% boost on 750 Ti. Still trying to wrap my head around the hard part.
Not gonna lie, working on this algo is making a huge dent on the whiskey fund. Cheers mate ...these two posts make total sense together will donate you some coins, to get your whiskey fund stable *cheers*
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2014, 06:54:33 PM |
|
Not gonna lie, working on this algo is making a huge dent on the whiskey fund. Cheers mate Here's 0.5 BTC in hope the excessive Whiskey supply will keep you short of our own performance benchmark Transaction-ID 7fdaf9602034832a8045887c7b592b62d53b74377ddbf3d958129b9ad8d4ed55-000 seriously, great work on your ccminer forks. Keep it up! Christian
|
|
|
|
ivcelmik
|
|
June 30, 2014, 07:00:33 PM |
|
[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 286.07 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 286.72 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 285.23 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.80 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.69 H/s [2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.42 H/s [2014-06-30 00:12:04] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 274.37 H/s [2014-06-30 00:12:04] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 1701.50 H/s (yay!!!)
Can u help me with toyr conf file i only get 260H/s thx in advance Sorry 230H/s are you sure you use the newest version? with the previous one I also had 230h/s per card. in linux my conf looks like: ./ccminer -a cryptonight -l 8x60 -o stratum+tcp://pool -u ser -p assword the -l switch push it a little further. but it depends on the cards and the OC. In my case evga 750ti FTW with +400Mem. On a testrig I have some zotac with default clocks... they make less. It's windows Getting much better results on Linux too, but I like my Windows just as it is, buggy and shitty ^^" So yeah, I also get around 230-250h/s. Ty 240H/s
|
|
|
|
ManIkWeet
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:38:54 PM |
|
Not gonna lie, working on this algo is making a huge dent on the whiskey fund. Cheers mate Here's 0.5 BTC in hope the excessive Whiskey supply will keep you short of our own performance benchmark Transaction-ID 7fdaf9602034832a8045887c7b592b62d53b74377ddbf3d958129b9ad8d4ed55-000 seriously, great work on your ccminer forks. Keep it up! Christian *Has a feeling Christian used the code to improve his own code by 200%* No but seriously, Mr.Christian you really are a good person
|
BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:40:01 PM |
|
Not gonna lie, working on this algo is making a huge dent on the whiskey fund. Cheers mate Here's 0.5 BTC in hope the excessive Whiskey supply will keep you short of our own performance benchmark Transaction-ID 7fdaf9602034832a8045887c7b592b62d53b74377ddbf3d958129b9ad8d4ed55-000 seriously, great work on your ccminer forks. Keep it up! Christian ^^^ This guy rocks.
|
|
|
|
trogdorjw73
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:54:19 PM |
|
Anyone played around with the launch config stuff for the TSIV version? I'm finding that 4x80 is far from optimal on certain systems. 6x60 gave me about a 25% boost on a GTX 770 and GTX 780, which on a GTX 860M 4x40 basically tripled my performance (from 50 H/s to 170 H/s). It would be great to hear what others are seeing with the -l parameter.
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:59:08 PM Last edit: June 30, 2014, 10:55:13 PM by cbuchner1 |
|
Anyone played around with the launch config stuff for the TSIV version? I'm finding that 4x80 is far from optimal on certain systems. 6x60 gave me about a 25% boost on a GTX 770 and GTX 780, which on a GTX 860M 4x40 basically tripled my performance (from 50 H/s to 170 H/s). It would be great to hear what others are seeing with the -l parameter.
someone needs to come up with an autotune. Just sayin'... NOTE: separate autotuning would be required for the 3 kernels of the algorithm.
|
|
|
|
RbelMonstr
Member
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
|
June 30, 2014, 09:03:14 PM |
|
Anyone played around with the launch config stuff for the TSIV version? I'm finding that 4x80 is far from optimal on certain systems. 6x60 gave me about a 25% boost on a GTX 770 and GTX 780, which on a GTX 860M 4x40 basically tripled my performance (from 50 H/s to 170 H/s). It would be great to hear what others are seeing with the -l parameter.
someone needs to come up with an autotune. Just sayin'... Well, you've done it with CudaMiner so what ya waiting for?
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2014, 09:08:00 PM |
|
Well, you've done it with CudaMiner so what ya waiting for? I am kinda busy counting coins here...
|
|
|
|
GoldBit89
|
|
June 30, 2014, 09:44:44 PM |
|
Well, you've done it with CudaMiner so what ya waiting for? I am kinda busy counting coins here... keep counting those coins you have earned it and thanks for all the great work you have done so far. After counting coins, keep up the great work.
|
FTC 6nvzqqaCEizThvgMeC86MGzhAxGzKEtNH8 |WDC WckDxipCes2eBmxrUYEhrUfNNRZexKuYjR |BQC bSDm3XvauqWWnqrxfimw5wdHVDQDp2U8XU BOT EjcroqeMpZT4hphY4xYDzTQakwutpnufQR |BTG geLUGuJkhnvuft77ND6VrMvc8vxySKZBUz |LTC LhXbJMzCqLEzGBKgB2n73oce448BxX1dc4 BTC 1JPzHugtBtPwXgwMqt9rtdwRxxWyaZvk61 |ETH 0xA6cCD2Fb3AC2450646F8D8ebeb14f084F392ACFf
|
|
|
tc61
|
|
June 30, 2014, 10:03:57 PM |
|
Is it just me or do the launch kernels conflict with the underlying Maxwell architecture? They are so far from the usual launch configs we are used to.. Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #Xwz9r5wNw8ElGF4n
|
|
|
|
|