[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]

[tbearhere]

off topic but does anyone know how to save this thread as a file? Some threads have an "all" at the end, but this one doesn't. thz

Save 885 pages and do a merge? lol jk I don't know.   

k thz   

[1715119949]

1715119949

[1715119949]

1715119949

[1715119949]

1715119949

[1715119949]

1715119949

[1715119949]

1715119949

[bigjme]

i told the topic to print and the website just returns a blank page xD too much in this topic

yeh that's what i am going to do for the filter, its going to be easier

Looking forward to seeing how the "mess" turns out. 

your not the only one

[tbearhere]

nvidiaInspector  ? 

nvidia_gpu_temperature  ?

[cayars]

nvidiaInspector  ? 

nvidia_gpu_temperature  ?

These along with a couple of other OC utils would be good for a UTILITIES page.

[tbearhere]

nvidiaInspector  ?  

nvidia_gpu_temperature  ?

These along with a couple of other OC utils would be good for a UTILITIES page.

how can we keep both here together, that is a good question, and one that we should do. imo

EDIT: in fact all cuda related programs and issues.  been working good so far, since page 1

[Amph]

some news about nvidia and amd



like i said x3 the speed of a 750ti, and probably 150w-180w consumption, but we have a big monster called titan 2, which is 3.5 x faster

[tc61]

AMPH,  Nice...thanks for posting ...very interesting, I queses ill wait before buying anymore 750ti's

[djm34]

AMPH,  Nice...thanks for posting ...very interesting, I queses ill wait before buying anymore 750ti's

actually they don't tell when they will be released...
read to fast Q4/2014 isn't some of specifications of the card 
Titan II Q2/2015 long time to wait...
880      Q4/2014 ...

[bigjme]

cudamining.cc is getting another quick facelift on the releases page. Website will be in editing mode for a second

[jack80]

OK i love cudamining.cc .

[bigjme]

ok here is an edit to make things a little nicer, what do you all think to this
http://cudamining.cc/url/releases/member/5

it still needs to editing, because if you click a download link then it minimizes the section but for now, you get the idea - FIXED

if wanted i could do the same thing however on the page before so you click the user, and it slides down with their versions, what do we think?

[djm34]

ok here is an edit to make things a little nicer, what do you all think to this
http://cudamining.cc/url/releases/member/5

it still needs to editing, because if you click a download link then it minimizes the section but for now, you get the idea - FIXED

if wanted i could do the same thing however on the page before so you click the user, and it slides down with their versions, what do we think?

may-be a bit too linear (whatever it means...). Actually it would be better if it was on several column... (my comment works best on Christian page though...  )

[bigjme]

Yeh thats what i thought, problem is that there's only christians with anything more then ccminer.
i would put a dev bio on the right hand side?

Edit:
I've added in a release description aswell so the dev can state what the version is or what has been added. Let me know what you think

Question:
So an idea for removing the fact its very list like would be to add a navigation section on the left with all the devs names so you can select a dev on any release page, it would cut the page down a bit so it wasnt so full of list style elements. Let me know what you think

sample-


if you would like that, would you keep the solid lines or change them to dotted?

[S_tring]

I'm coding an auto profit switching facility into ccManager. Obviously, it has to switch algos which means it has to switch to the correct miner.

So, am I right in saying that for optimum results...

nist5 = Christian's miner
x11 = Christian's miner
x13 = Christian's miner
x15 = Djm34's miner
Cryptonight = Tsiv's miner

[bathrobehero]

I'm coding an auto profit switching facility into ccManager. Obviously, it has to switch algos which means it has to switch to the correct miner.

So, am I right in saying that for optimum results...

nist5 = Christian's miner
x11 = Christian's miner
x13 = Christian's miner
x15 = Djm34's miner
Cryptonight = Tsiv's miner

Or you could use the unified version. As far as I know it didn't break anything.

[Equitum]

bigjme, while cudamining.cc is getting updated, could you take a look at the configurations page? In the short form, a few of the stats (hashrate, voltage/OC) get messed up and don't display the correct numbers (the long form works fine).

[S_tring]

I'm coding an auto profit switching facility into ccManager. Obviously, it has to switch algos which means it has to switch to the correct miner.

So, am I right in saying that for optimum results...

nist5 = Christian's miner
x11 = Christian's miner
x13 = Christian's miner
x15 = Djm34's miner
Cryptonight = Tsiv's miner

Or you could use the unified version. As far as I know it didn't break anything.

No unfortunately I can't, ccManager is written for Linux only.

[QuadraQ]

Is there any chance that someday just the interface and failover parts of cgminer/sgminer could be pulled over for ccminer? The results of the nvidia developers is fantastic, but the interface is still inherited from CPU mining, and just doesn't provide enough info.

[bigjme]

bigjme, while cudamining.cc is getting updated, could you take a look at the configurations page? In the short form, a few of the stats (hashrate, voltage/OC) get messed up and don't display the correct numbers (the long form works fine).

the short form get the average numbers from everything posted, so if any of the user submits are wrong the average is thrown off a lot. So it does show the correct numbers, just not compared to the original users post

[Equitum]

bigjme, while cudamining.cc is getting updated, could you take a look at the configurations page? In the short form, a few of the stats (hashrate, voltage/OC) get messed up and don't display the correct numbers (the long form works fine).

the short form get the average numbers from everything posted, so if any of the user submits are wrong the average is thrown off a lot. So it does show the correct numbers, just not compared to the original users post

Ah, I see. I think the pre-Killer-Groestl-update submissions for relevant algos are probably not accurate anymore; maybe some culling of old submissions is all that's needed.