[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]

[nomad1109]

not bad. The private mining code we have is only marginally faster now

GPU hashrate: 1561.1578

that's for 3 780 Ti cards.

Congratulations to tsiv for his work so far! I noticed several of his changes closely match what we have done to optimize.

Christian

Well done TSIV... you are about 18% behind and still making progress. Which indeed deserves a big attaboy.

I also wanted to note that I appreciate that Christian still continues to participate, comment and encourage even thought he has nothing to gain from this being done by others. I think the encouragement helps a ton for those who are coding, and his commenting finally on an actual speed is also encouraging.

Just my thoughts!!

[nomad1109]

someone needs to come up with an autotune. Just sayin'...

NOTE: separate autotuning would be required for the 3 kernels of the algorithm.

I think this is his attempt to nudge development in the right direction.... add on that he just donated .5 BTC, and I have to say I am impressed.

[nomad1109]

Can anyone who has tried out Monero with some 750ti's post their power draw while mining?

I haven't touched it yet, but wanted to update the power numbers in the profit calc so it reports fairly accurately.

Thanks

[yellowduck2]

claymore crytonight open source

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671784.0

Maybe their code can boost Nvidia ?

[cayars]

claymore crytonight open source

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671784.0

Maybe their code can boost Nvidia ?

That's is wolf's early draft/release that's only partially ported to GPU.  Not claymore's.

[Equitum]

Anyone played around with the launch config stuff for the TSIV version? I'm finding that 4x80 is far from optimal on certain systems. 6x60 gave me about a 25% boost on a GTX 770 and GTX 780, which on a GTX 860M 4x40 basically tripled my performance (from 50 H/s to 170 H/s). It would be great to hear what others are seeing with the -l parameter.

-l 4x120 gives me 420-450 h/s on my 780 Ti on today's release from tsiv. Lots of posters from the earlier release found good results with -l 8x60 on 750 Tis, but my GPU lost performance or crashed for the same threads x blocks with any number of threads that isn't 4 (i.e. my GPU didn't like -l 8x60 or -l 6x80, and got worse results, or crashed, on these launch configs).

[matrix961]

Anyone played around with the launch config stuff for the TSIV version? I'm finding that 4x80 is far from optimal on certain systems. 6x60 gave me about a 25% boost on a GTX 770 and GTX 780, which on a GTX 860M 4x40 basically tripled my performance (from 50 H/s to 170 H/s). It would be great to hear what others are seeing with the -l parameter.

-l 4x120 gives me 420-450 h/s on my 780 Ti on today's release from tsiv. Lots of posters from the earlier release found good results with -l 8x60 on 750 Tis, but my GPU lost performance or crashed for the same threads x blocks with any number of threads that isn't 4 (i.e. my GPU didn't like -l 8x60 or -l 6x80, and got worse results, or crashed, on these launch configs).

I'm assuming you are on windows. Sounds just like what I experienced when I was running it on windows, I'm running the same card. In order to fix the crashing you can apply the tdr delay reg workaround at the link below. After I did that I was able to run at 6x120 which I found to be the best for the 780 ti. That should give you an additional gain. Let me know if you try it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=656841.msg7529269#msg7529269

[tc61]

I'm assuming you are on windows. Sounds just like what I experienced when I was running it on windows, I'm running the same card. In order to fix the crashing you can apply the tdr delay reg workaround at the link below. After I did that I was able to run at 6x120 which I found to be the best for the 780 ti. That should give you an additional gain. Let me know if you try it.

https://bitcointa.lk/threads/bounty-for-open-sourced-monero-gpu-miners-bounty-thread.330655/page-4#post-7209253

HAve you guys done any work with the 750ti? just wondering what launch you found to be best...
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #7KeDs1WkWke59Hxr

[Equitum]

Anyone played around with the launch config stuff for the TSIV version? I'm finding that 4x80 is far from optimal on certain systems. 6x60 gave me about a 25% boost on a GTX 770 and GTX 780, which on a GTX 860M 4x40 basically tripled my performance (from 50 H/s to 170 H/s). It would be great to hear what others are seeing with the -l parameter.

-l 4x120 gives me 420-450 h/s on my 780 Ti on today's release from tsiv. Lots of posters from the earlier release found good results with -l 8x60 on 750 Tis, but my GPU lost performance or crashed for the same threads x blocks with any number of threads that isn't 4 (i.e. my GPU didn't like -l 8x60 or -l 6x80, and got worse results, or crashed, on these launch configs).

I'm assuming you are on windows. Sounds just like what I experienced when I was running it on windows, I'm running the same card. In order to fix the crashing you can apply the tdr delay reg workaround at the link below. After I did that I was able to run at 6x120 which I found to be the best for the 780 ti. That should give you an additional gain. Let me know if you try it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=656841.msg7529269#msg7529269

Thanks for the suggestion - up to 450-475 h/s range!

[nomad1109]

Even though I only have the 1 fan version of the ASUS 750 Ti's, here's a bit of a comparison of what I learned about the different brands so far:

	JPC hashrate	temps		notes
Gigabyte	~5.5 MH/s	~56C		2 fans, 6-pin power connector
ASUS	~5.2 MH/s	~66C		1 fan version
MSI	~5.3 MH/s	~59C		1 fan, has no fan RPM sensor (reports 4294967295RPM in ccminer - max integer) though it does have fan control

I had the same confirmed issue with the fan speed on the MSI 750ti OC card, but the TF model with twin fans shows correctly reporting fan RPM, and also has the lower temps reported by your other twin fan models.

Overall, I am a big fan of the TF model from MSI, but I think all the twin fan models show much better cooling with larger heat sinks as well.

I think it is very much worth the extra $20 for better performance and lower temps...

[squadbox]

I think this is his attempt to nudge development in the right direction.... add on that he just donated .5 BTC, and I have to say I am impressed.

I think that someone needs to start a GitHub organization like sgminer did, and let tsiv, djm, bombadil and maybe cbuchner all work together instead of maintaining 4 separate versions.

[I_M]

It should be trivial to merge forks.

[seljak]

Anyone played around with the launch config stuff for the TSIV version? I'm finding that 4x80 is far from optimal on certain systems. 6x60 gave me about a 25% boost on a GTX 770 and GTX 780, which on a GTX 860M 4x40 basically tripled my performance (from 50 H/s to 170 H/s). It would be great to hear what others are seeing with the -l parameter.

what h/s do you get on gtx770 with 6x60?

[Strannik-74]

Took the easy gains first, around 18% boost on 750 Ti. Still trying to wrap my head around the hard part.

[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 286.07 H/s
[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 286.72 H/s
[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 285.23 H/s
[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.80 H/s
[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.69 H/s
[2014-06-30 00:11:59] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 284.42 H/s
[2014-06-30 00:12:04] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 274.37 H/s
[2014-06-30 00:12:04] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 1701.50 H/s (yay!!!)

...more performance gain than I thought. really nice. thanks!
missing your donation address as signature or on github

MSI GTX 750 Ti 2Gb, ASUS GTX 750 1Gb
[2014-07-01 12:06:53] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 273.76 H/s
[2014-07-01 12:06:53] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750, 257.37 H/s
[2014-07-01 12:06:59] accepted: 57/57 (100.00%), 508.83 H/s (yay!!!)

[go6ooo1212]

Guys and Girls, I didnt get one thing, do you all mining Monero with this new cryptonight compilation of ccminer , or there is some new different coin with more profit? 

[cbuchner1]

It should be trivial to merge forks.

I'll be waiting with a merge until the stability issues on particular Windows versions are under control.

Christian

[th00ber]

Monero seems not so bad to mine, can you give a good pool with nice payout ?

[bigjme]

Im still hoping and wishing on jpc hitting it big lol

[djm34]

Im still hoping and wishing on jpc hitting it big lol

would be the first time a coin listed on mintpal increases in value... (don't even understand why some dude paid several btc to get it listed...)
I should have get rid of it when it was at 80sat... (and I should have get rid of my BBL when it was at 10k... would have made 8btc  ... )

[trogdorjw73]

Anyone played around with the launch config stuff for the TSIV version? I'm finding that 4x80 is far from optimal on certain systems. 6x60 gave me about a 25% boost on a GTX 770 and GTX 780, which on a GTX 860M 4x40 basically tripled my performance (from 50 H/s to 170 H/s). It would be great to hear what others are seeing with the -l parameter.

what h/s do you get on gtx770 with 6x60?

I had to do more investigating; here's the full rundown of what I've come up with so far -- some cards have "weird" settings, others are pretty straightforward.