djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 03, 2014, 04:53:01 PM |
|
nvidia gt 620 why I can not run cudaminer? my laptop hangs when runing you should be happy it doesn't burn
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
cayars
|
|
July 03, 2014, 04:59:05 PM |
|
nvidia gt 620 why I can not run cudaminer? my laptop hangs when runing Try ccminer instead of cudaminer. You want to run something that is going to generate less heat for your laptop. (assuming ccminer works).
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 03, 2014, 05:07:48 PM |
|
Just wondering what everyone is using for the -l parameter for ccminer?
You don't need it on ccminer. cryptonight algo uses a -l
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
RavenXBR
|
|
July 03, 2014, 06:21:43 PM |
|
Just wondering what everyone is using for the -l parameter for ccminer?
You don't need it on ccminer. cryptonight algo uses a -l Ah... ok, thx. I didn't mine that algo yet.
|
|
|
|
sparks2013
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
July 03, 2014, 06:40:51 PM |
|
Ok, just installed my two Gigabyte 750 Ti cards. Getting decent hash rates @ 230H/s with -l 8x60.
The only strange things is, and this may be a silly question.. but I installed Gigabyte OC Guru 2 and its showing my GPU clock at 1359Mhz while my Base / Boost is 1215 / 1294.
Is this normal?
|
|
|
|
RavenXBR
|
|
July 03, 2014, 06:53:24 PM |
|
Ok, just installed my two Gigabyte 750 Ti cards. Getting decent hash rates @ 230H/s with -l 8x60.
The only strange things is, and this may be a silly question.. but I installed Gigabyte OC Guru 2 and its showing my GPU clock at 1359Mhz while my Base / Boost is 1215 / 1294.
Is this normal?
Try MSI Afterburner or EVGA Precision X instead of OC Guru 2, they give a better hashrate (I use the second). I've also tried Guru when I bought my first Gigabyte 750 and could not achieve the rates people were achieving.
|
|
|
|
italeffect
|
|
July 03, 2014, 06:59:13 PM |
|
So I have finally got my first mining rig built using 4 X 750ti from Gigabyte. I am testing with Jackpot Coin to see what is what. Can some of you give me what you get for hashrates. I am currently getting 20.6 - 21.7 mh/s total or 5.15-5.43 mh/s per card.
Must say for a noob this is pretty sweet. Time for a beer!
A few posts before I mentioned my rates for a rig same as yours. I'm getting 5.1~5.3 per card. What's the wattage use look like for this? Is is comparable to x11/13/15?
|
Dash: Xdopotr3eAHpsSCMkUyU2YWP3WQWb5X3t8
|
|
|
sparks2013
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:00:53 PM |
|
Ok, just installed my two Gigabyte 750 Ti cards. Getting decent hash rates @ 230H/s with -l 8x60.
The only strange things is, and this may be a silly question.. but I installed Gigabyte OC Guru 2 and its showing my GPU clock at 1359Mhz while my Base / Boost is 1215 / 1294.
Is this normal?
Try MSI Afterburner or EVGA Precision X instead of OC Guru 2, they give a better hashrate (I use the second). I've also tried Guru when I bought my first Gigabyte 750 and could not achieve the rates people were achieving. Thanks for the info, but I haven't even started overclocking or anything. I'm just using the app for monitoring as of right now.. As a side note, i've actually installed MSI afterburner and this is also reporting 1359mhz for the GPU clock, when the cards spec's read 1294. Which is the exact same that OC Guru is showing also.. I'm not complaining, i'm just wondering why this is.. lol
|
|
|
|
RavenXBR
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:50:32 PM |
|
So I have finally got my first mining rig built using 4 X 750ti from Gigabyte. I am testing with Jackpot Coin to see what is what. Can some of you give me what you get for hashrates. I am currently getting 20.6 - 21.7 mh/s total or 5.15-5.43 mh/s per card.
Must say for a noob this is pretty sweet. Time for a beer!
A few posts before I mentioned my rates for a rig same as yours. I'm getting 5.1~5.3 per card. What's the wattage use look like for this? Is is comparable to x11/13/15? JPC draws around 10% more than X's algos. My 4 750 rig draws ~250W at wall for x15 and ~275W for JPC (monitor off in both cases).
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 03, 2014, 08:22:07 PM |
|
So I have finally got my first mining rig built using 4 X 750ti from Gigabyte. I am testing with Jackpot Coin to see what is what. Can some of you give me what you get for hashrates. I am currently getting 20.6 - 21.7 mh/s total or 5.15-5.43 mh/s per card.
Must say for a noob this is pretty sweet. Time for a beer!
A few posts before I mentioned my rates for a rig same as yours. I'm getting 5.1~5.3 per card. What's the wattage use look like for this? Is is comparable to x11/13/15? JPC draws around 10% more than X's algos. My 4 750 rig draws ~250W at wall for x15 and ~275W for JPC (monitor off in both cases). don't forget to turn off the light while mining jpc....
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
S_tring
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 102
OPEN Platform - Powering Blockchain Acceptance
|
|
July 03, 2014, 08:30:31 PM |
|
I'm trying to compile djm's X15 miner on Ubuntu, but seems to be hanging at this : ptxas warning : 'option -abi=no' might get deprecated in future ptxas warning : Too big maxrregcount value specified 80, will be ignored ptxas info : 0 bytes gmem, 80 bytes cmem[3] ptxas info : Compiling entry function '_Z28x13_whirlpool512_gpu_hash_64ijPmPj' for 'sm_30' ptxas info : Used 63 registers, 376 bytes cmem[0], 44 bytes lmem x13/cuda_whirlpool512.cu(59): warning: function "HIWORD" was declared but never referenced
x13/cuda_whirlpool512.cu(68): warning: function "REPLACE_HIWORD" was declared but never referenced
x13/cuda_whirlpool512.cu(73): warning: function "LOWORD" was declared but never referenced
x13/cuda_whirlpool512.cu(91): warning: function "REPLACE_LOWORD" was declared but never referenced
Do I wait it out? I'm sure I read that this version takes a while to compile, but it seems to have hung here for quite a while.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 03, 2014, 09:07:19 PM |
|
I'm trying to compile djm's X15 miner on Ubuntu, but seems to be hanging at this : ptxas warning : 'option -abi=no' might get deprecated in future ptxas warning : Too big maxrregcount value specified 80, will be ignored ptxas info : 0 bytes gmem, 80 bytes cmem[3] ptxas info : Compiling entry function '_Z28x13_whirlpool512_gpu_hash_64ijPmPj' for 'sm_30' ptxas info : Used 63 registers, 376 bytes cmem[0], 44 bytes lmem x13/cuda_whirlpool512.cu(59): warning: function "HIWORD" was declared but never referenced
x13/cuda_whirlpool512.cu(68): warning: function "REPLACE_HIWORD" was declared but never referenced
x13/cuda_whirlpool512.cu(73): warning: function "LOWORD" was declared but never referenced
x13/cuda_whirlpool512.cu(91): warning: function "REPLACE_LOWORD" was declared but never referenced
Do I wait it out? I'm sure I read that this version takes a while to compile, but it seems to have hung here for quite a while. it's normal (sort of)... if you watch mem usage of the process you will see it increase...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
July 03, 2014, 09:20:59 PM Last edit: July 03, 2014, 10:28:01 PM by cbuchner1 |
|
Tried to paid for a few beer and longdrinks in bitcoins tonight. Didn't work because the stupid Windows Phone wallet software confused decimal dot and comma in the German version of Windows phone. After 2 embarassing attempts that ended in a failure message, I shelled out 30 Euros in cash.
Oh well... the sad sad state of Windows Phone. Of course switching the entire phone over to US English localization would have worked.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 03, 2014, 09:31:44 PM |
|
Tried to paid for a few beer and longdrinks in bitcoins tonight. Didn't work because the stupid Windows Phone software confused decimal dot and comma in the German version of Windows phone. After 2 embarassing attempts that ended in a failure message, I shelled out 30 Euros in cash.
Oh well... the sad sad state of Windows Phone. Of course switching the whole phone over to US English localization would have worked.
How does it work ? (when it works) does the bar accept bitcoin ?
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
July 03, 2014, 09:41:13 PM |
|
How does it work ? (when it works) does the bar accept bitcoin ?
you walk to the cash register, the cashier types in the amount on some touch LCD screen, you scan the resulting QR code and confirm the payment on your mobile device. And when it doesn't work, you either shell out some hard cash or get to wash the dishes Christian
|
|
|
|
AizenSou
|
|
July 03, 2014, 09:53:35 PM |
|
How does it work ? (when it works) does the bar accept bitcoin ?
you walk to the cash register, the cashier types in the amount on some touch LCD screen, you scan the resulting QR code and confirm the payment on your mobile device. And when it doesn't work, you either shell out some hard cash or get to wash the dishes Christian You got a bar in Munich which accepts BTC? Cool. What's the name of this bar? I will try this too.
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
July 03, 2014, 09:59:22 PM |
|
You got a bar in Munich which accepts BTC? Cool. What's the name of this bar? I will try this too.
"Niederlassung", near U Bahn Station Fraunhoferstr.
|
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 03, 2014, 11:19:17 PM |
|
Any chance of seeing an algo-switching feature? sgminer currently supports this, for example using with NiceHash you can see the config here: https://www.nicehash.com/multialgo/nicehash guy rewrote everything... (so basically it's up to them) sgminer has never been simple in terms of parameter, they did very well at complicating even more sgminer...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 04, 2014, 12:23:27 AM Last edit: July 04, 2014, 01:05:51 AM by djm34 |
|
It seems there is a bug in shavite main routine c512... I spend a long time trying to find out why I wasn't able to get the hash_80 validated against the cpu... (while it was getting validated as hash_80).
I replaced the content of the routine with the standard sph routine (keeping the shared memory mechanism) and it seems to work... I don't know what it will lose in term of speed but it compiles a lot faster. I would say it is linked to the "counter" variable, however it isn't the shortest routine to check...
I don't remember what are the speed on X11, here what I get: 2.7MHash/s with the 750ti 5.9MHash/s with the 780ti
edit: with an older exe: I get 2.7MHash/s on the 750ti and 5.9MHash/s so that doesn't affect the hashrate
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
|