[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]

[axzerrouni]

What coin is best for 750ti ??

Now , I can make 0.001 per card per day.

no matter what this coin is, if it makes its way to this thread, it won't be anymore the best coin for the 750ti  

^ So don't tell anyone about flappycoin!

Wow Flappycoin. But  I can't open website Flappycoin Pool.

[djm34]

What coin is best for 750ti ??

Now , I can make 0.001 per card per day.

no matter what this coin is, if it makes its way to this thread, it won't be anymore the best coin for the 750ti 

^ So don't tell anyone about flappycoin!

no problem, I don't even know it (scrypt ?) 

[Amph]

my old rig with asrock h81 pro btc was doing 2600-2700 x 6 at 380-390w total(including cpu/mobo/ram)

so 16mh/s at 390w, 41kh/s per w, but this with the whole system, it's more like 45 kh/s per w

also your math is missing one zero, 20mega are 20k kh/s, therefore 20k/545, 37kh/s per w

[Amph]

are you sure all those amd gpu were doing only 545? seems too low to me

[Amph]

are you sure all those amd gpu were doing only 545? seems too low to me

You forget - I'm running my own OpenCL.

Here's my numbers with the new 290X:

Hashrates (X11 in MH/s): 270X: 3.58, 280X: 5.71, 290X: 7.79, 7950: 4.99 - total: 22.13
Power @ wall: 610W
Screenshot (NSFW): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/x11localrigwolf-lowpower-10232014.png

So, 22,130kh/s / 610W = 36.27kh/s per W. Hm... I need to turn it down a little.

I should check hash/watt at max performance - just for shits and giggles.

this mean that an "own optimization" for nvidia can make things even better for 970 and 980

i mean amd can't reach new nvidia card ever, no matter the optimization, if it does, then nvidia isn't optimized

[Odeyin]

there is a way to divide the load on ccminer for the same gpu? if i open two instances of ccminer the thing simply crash, i remember in sgminer, that in this case the loaded is divided

it depends... if the memory usage of the 2 instances is larger than what is available on the card, then it will crash.
Otherwise it should be ok (I guess... I assume 2 instances running on the same algo... never tried mixing stuff)

it use 1gb of memory for every instance, approximately, maybe it's not a good idea with petit card like 750ti lol, but with a 970-980 should work

someone tested it on scrypt, how many khs for the 970 and 980? cryptoblog reports 600khs for the 980, which seems too low

by the way, anybody tried neoscrypt ? (with amd obviously  )

Is Feather Coin the only one using the Neoscrypt algo?

t
I think there are a couple of other coins using it

Guncoin is now using it.

[antonio8]

there is a way to divide the load on ccminer for the same gpu? if i open two instances of ccminer the thing simply crash, i remember in sgminer, that in this case the loaded is divided

it depends... if the memory usage of the 2 instances is larger than what is available on the card, then it will crash.
Otherwise it should be ok (I guess... I assume 2 instances running on the same algo... never tried mixing stuff)

it use 1gb of memory for every instance, approximately, maybe it's not a good idea with petit card like 750ti lol, but with a 970-980 should work

someone tested it on scrypt, how many khs for the 970 and 980? cryptoblog reports 600khs for the 980, which seems too low

by the way, anybody tried neoscrypt ? (with amd obviously  )

Is Feather Coin the only one using the Neoscrypt algo?

t
I think there are a couple of other coins using it

Guncoin is now using it.

I seen that. It looks like there are a couple thousand more blocks before it kicks in.

I  am just curious to see what the 970 will do with that algo. I'll try FTC since it looks like they will hit their target block first.

[djm34]

there is a way to divide the load on ccminer for the same gpu? if i open two instances of ccminer the thing simply crash, i remember in sgminer, that in this case the loaded is divided

it depends... if the memory usage of the 2 instances is larger than what is available on the card, then it will crash.
Otherwise it should be ok (I guess... I assume 2 instances running on the same algo... never tried mixing stuff)

it use 1gb of memory for every instance, approximately, maybe it's not a good idea with petit card like 750ti lol, but with a 970-980 should work

someone tested it on scrypt, how many khs for the 970 and 980? cryptoblog reports 600khs for the 980, which seems too low

by the way, anybody tried neoscrypt ? (with amd obviously  )

Is Feather Coin the only one using the Neoscrypt algo?

t
I think there are a couple of other coins using it

Guncoin is now using it.

I seen that. It looks like there are a couple thousand more blocks before it kicks in.

I  am just curious to see what the 970 will do with that algo. I'll try FTC since it looks like they will hit their target block first.

what is the speed on an amd ? (haven't tried).

[antonio8]

there is a way to divide the load on ccminer for the same gpu? if i open two instances of ccminer the thing simply crash, i remember in sgminer, that in this case the loaded is divided

it depends... if the memory usage of the 2 instances is larger than what is available on the card, then it will crash.
Otherwise it should be ok (I guess... I assume 2 instances running on the same algo... never tried mixing stuff)

it use 1gb of memory for every instance, approximately, maybe it's not a good idea with petit card like 750ti lol, but with a 970-980 should work

someone tested it on scrypt, how many khs for the 970 and 980? cryptoblog reports 600khs for the 980, which seems too low

by the way, anybody tried neoscrypt ? (with amd obviously  )

Is Feather Coin the only one using the Neoscrypt algo?

t
I think there are a couple of other coins using it

Guncoin is now using it.

I seen that. It looks like there are a couple thousand more blocks before it kicks in.

I  am just curious to see what the 970 will do with that algo. I'll try FTC since it looks like they will hit their target block first.

what is the speed on an amd ? (haven't tried).

I'll run it on my 280x and 270x also. Should be sometime on the 26th when it is ready.

[Amph]

950W for this (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/x11localrigwolf-10232014.png

So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.

that's more correct lol

[economist2000]

Ok, if you insist ...
www.sonstiges.org/stuff/ccminer-m7v7-Schleicher.zip

Thank you very much! There is a gain in speed, and also on other algorithms, such as m7 (before used nvminer D8).

[djm34]

950W for this (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/x11localrigwolf-10232014.png

So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.

that's more correct lol

That's high performance numbers - also, check out that 290X

what's impressive is that you run your 290x at 65°C... which drivers are you using ?
ended up yesterday doing 0kh at 94°C on sk1024 (bitslapper... should bit slapped for his kernels  )

[Amph]

950W for this (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/x11localrigwolf-10232014.png

So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.

that's more correct lol

That's high performance numbers - also, check out that 290X

what's impressive is that you run your 290x at 65°C... which drivers are you using ?
ended up yesterday doing 0kh at 94°C on sk1024 (bitslapper... should bit slapped for his kernels  )

14.9 - that ASUS DCII cooler is something - would you believe it's overvolted a little?

what about ambient temp? we are not in summer anymore

[djm34]

950W for this (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/x11localrigwolf-10232014.png

So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.

that's more correct lol

That's high performance numbers - also, check out that 290X

what's impressive is that you run your 290x at 65°C... which drivers are you using ?
ended up yesterday doing 0kh at 94°C on sk1024 (bitslapper... should bit slapped for his kernels  )

14.9 - that ASUS DCII cooler is something - would you believe it's overvolted a little?

it is an msi twinfroz... since 14.3 or 4, temps go wild very easily... (at least for all heavy calc algo... pentablake was the last thing I tried long time ago... beating the hell out of the 280x though) and the card was on riser outside the case...  I have to powertune to -20% to get acceptable temp.

actually when it reaches 94°c it downclock alone... I saw yesterday core clocks around 700mhz (nominal core clock is 1030MHz)

[antonio8]

Why is it that I find blocks on pools but as soon as I start to solo mine .........nothing.

[Amph]

950W for this (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/x11localrigwolf-10232014.png

So, 26,030kh/s / 950W = 27.4kh/s per W. Bad, but not nearly as bad as I thought it'd be.

that's more correct lol

That's high performance numbers - also, check out that 290X

what's impressive is that you run your 290x at 65°C... which drivers are you using ?
ended up yesterday doing 0kh at 94°C on sk1024 (bitslapper... should bit slapped for his kernels  )

14.9 - that ASUS DCII cooler is something - would you believe it's overvolted a little?

what about ambient temp? we are not in summer anymore

Maybe 60F.

that's cold already, could explain those low temps

[Travis9x]

Why is it that I find blocks on pools but as soon as I start to solo mine .........nothing.

Because when you're mining as part of a pool, the entire pool's hashrate is working toward finding/solving blocks.  When you're going solo, only your hashrate is working toward blocks.  The tradeoff is that when part of a pool, the reward for a solved block is divided among everyone who helped solve that block (according to shares, which depend on individual difficulty & hashrate), whereas if you're mining solo, all the reward of a solved block is yours…if you ever actually manage to find a block on your own…

[djm34]

Why is it that I find blocks on pools but as soon as I start to solo mine .........nothing.

Because when you're mining as part of a pool, the entire pool's hashrate is working toward finding/solving blocks.  When you're going solo, only your hashrate is working toward blocks.  The tradeoff is that when part of a pool, the reward for a solved block is divided among everyone who helped solve that block (according to shares, which depend on individual difficulty & hashrate), whereas if you're mining solo, all the reward of a solved block is yours…if you ever actually manage to find a block on your own…

I don't think it is what he meant... Actually on pool you may block for the pool at a higher rate than you find block in solo (while it should be identical)
I also noticed that, however over a long enough period this seems to even out (and if the number of block is large enough I usually move back to solo...)

[jekkka]

I have a GT 550 ti as to reduce the load from 100% to 80%??

settings

cudaminer.exe -i 0 -l 28x4 -C 1 -o stratum+tcp://66.55.92.73:8000 -O 17a59f320fg1745021:123456

[djm34]

just curious, who knew that MRC was swapping to a new MRC (x13) ? (just discovered that...)